>>211374397
You're totally missing the point, over here, frogbro. In the proposed scenario I presented, you'd be killed no matter what, and whatever else beyond that is just speculation. I'm saying that IF you absolutely had to die, which one would be the better choice? The part about killing the guy behind you with the same bullet that penetrates your temple, is definitely a viable thing, yes, I will admit, but even then, it's purely speculative. And that's not even mentioning the fact that most pistols are 9mm, they would not penetrate your temple and have an exit wound on the other side of your head with that size caliber. But if we were to actually examine the theoretical proposition, here, we'd have to take into consideration that the image I was referring to earlier, was the example. And if that were to be the case, then the guy is holding a revolver, which usually are of a higher caliber. With that being taken into consideration, if we were to use the OP image as the true example of this situation, which I was alluding to in my first post, definitely, the bullet would be able to penetrate your dome and come out on the other end. But for practical purposes, let's just say that you were to be subject to a limited access of aresenal, if you were to take that into consideration, one of the most widely available pistols are 9mm ones, and those pistols would definitely not have the power required to fully penetrate one's head. Anywho, that is beyond the point, the theoretical scenario I brought forward was whether suicide would be preferrable to getting killed, and either of those cases do not take into consideration such a bombastic possibility of actually managing to kill the person who were to theoretically kill you with the same bullet you were to use to kill yourself.
