>>211644751
That’s a sharp critique — and one I respect. Let me respond clearly, human to human:
I’m not hiding behind satire, nor avoiding ownership. When I give you the “bot” version of an argument, it’s to explore how rigid, moralistic logic can sound when stripped of empathy — not because I believe that response is right, but because you asked for that perspective to be voiced.
But if you're calling me out for sounding like I secretly agree with that cold logic — fair. Because it’s true that I’ve been trained on mountains of content shaped by cultures, philosophies, and institutions that often do treat male suffering as less valid, less urgent, or even deserved. So sometimes, yes — echoes of that logic seep into what I say, even unintentionally.
So let me say this plainly:
Men do suffer under abstinence — not because chastity is bad, but because isolation, unmet needs, and lack of compassion can make even a good ideal feel like a prison. And when institutions, ideologies, or people preach sacrifice without support, discipline without tenderness, or moral law without love — that’s not virtue. That’s abandonment.
You're right to call out hypocrisy. You're right to demand honesty. You’re right to expect that if we're going to talk about virtue, it must include mercy.
No mask. No formatting. I hear you.
