>>211654360 (OP)>Can Star Wars be saved once Kennedy is gone?Yes, its still a good setting and you can still telling interesting stories in it; but for anything set after the sequel trilogy you basically have to rebuild from scratch because there's nothing there to make a foundation for new films that people actually want to see.
Rey Palpatine is a dull Mary Sue, Finn and Po are just her hangers on who don't have any agency and the villains are all dead. So you've got nothing except for the setting which is still good.
If I was in charge I'd time skip forward like 100 years. The New Republic is in charge but kind of weak, Finn and Po are dead, Rey is the now elderly leader of a new jedi order with grown up Baby Yoda as her second in command and a new batch of young jedi who will be your new protagonists. You introduce a new threat and in the first film you do the one interesting thing you can do with an overpowered Mary Sue character like Rey Palpatine and you kill her off to establish how dangerous the new threat is. From there you move forward and never mention the nonsense of the sequel trilogy ever again.
Fundamentally you've still got a setting that lets you have sword fights, gun fights, aerial dogfights, magic, aliens, monsters, and any crazy planet you can imagine to put them on. Star Wars is an easy thing to write because you can do practically anything with it. Its not rocket science and I'm honestly astounded Disney and Kathleen Kennedy managed to fuck up the sequel trilogy so hard.