>>211679132 (OP)
Source?

>>211679132 (OP)
time travelers could have been using the advanced version of this tech, since the beginning of the movie industry. and you wouldn't even know. lmao lol.

>>211679180
https://x.com/mrjonfinger/status/1935543320656363883

>>211679221
Thanks. The issue with AI is that you still can't carry over skins, hair, clothing, from scene to scene.
The first company that does that wins everything.

>>211679132 (OP)
Not until armor and clothing and weapons actually look right, not that hollyjew can often get them right either, but still.
AI just spews trash by being fed trash.

In 10 years, the top AI filmmakers will be ultra-polymaths who can act, direct, write, etc. You'll have probably like a hundred Orson Welles types just making kino in their garage.

>>211680117
This is the future we actually deserve.

>>211680117
the jews fear democratisation of kino

>>211680045
This. Once it can achieve 99% consistency it's over

>>211679132 (OP)
Anti-AI seethers will respond to this like
>Reeeee it doesn't look real
>dude this sucks!
>that guy's acting isn't good
Just last year this was unthinkable. Two years ago you couldn't even generate a good image.
This is the future of filmmaking. You can make very bad b-slop shit with the lowest effort put into it and an AI will just clean it up.

Doesn't it seem somewhat unnatural that this would be praised on the same /tv/ where pic rel has been shat on for years

not one shot over 3 seconds long. wasting your neet credits.

>>211679132 (OP)
it's still unbelievably soulless and almost every single element changes between shots. some things don't even wait to change between shots - like when the fat guy with the hammer moves from side to side the guy behind him changes clothing

yeah it's like 80% of the way there but that last 20% i fear is going to ultimately be impossible because it's an enormous gap from the wasteland of jeet-tok material nobody is ever going to give a shit about to "actually good media"

there's also literally zero evidence he didn't just generate this total nonsense first and then do his little mimicry stunt afterward. you know, post-hoc justifications (lies) to make it seem like a more competent product

>>211679321
That has already been solved. Complete non-issue that was fixed before they even fixed the weird flickering.
The only real obstacle is processing. The quality is sacrificed to put out a video faster. That's the main reason why you can easily tell that the AI video is fake. It makes something fast that it thinks is just good enough in 10 seconds when it could work on the video for 10 hours and get a flawless result.

>>211679132 (OP)
Looks like absolute slop, this is just going to keep the movie industry sloppy alive for even cheaper, Not replace it.
You'll see, the tools will eventually be out of reach once the big production studios start paying top dollar to use it, and then you will have to say goodbye to AI.

Good.

didnt realize the top was AI and was just thinking "jesus christ this is in a movie nowadays? this is fucking dogshit what movie is this"

>>211680360
>already been solved
literally happening the video we're all watching
>complete non-issue
it's the biggest problem AI video generation has yet to overcome
>main reason why you can easily tell
there are many more reasons
>it could... get a flawless result
where are these flawless results then. they should definitely exist

>>211680358
Massive cope. The progress AI has had in the 5 years is insane. We went from AI that can just barely generate shapes that sort of look like something, to this.
This is miles ahead of what we had last year, but no, this time it will plateau and this is as good as it gets. Next year we won't have even better stuff.

>>211680311
I don't give a fuck about how good/bad it looks, I just think it's a bad idea to give every schmuck the power to generate anything they want.

>>211679132 (OP)
Until they fix how short the cuts are this will always look weird

>>211680358
>there's also literally zero evidence he didn't just generate this total nonsense first and then do his little mimicry stunt afterward. you know, post-hoc justifications (lies) to make it seem like a more competent product
good point

>Hollywood uses greenscreen
>OMG SO SOVLLESSS VGH HOW CAN YOU ACCEPT THIS SLOP

>Slop producers make their entire fucking thing greenscreen and the AI is fucking retarded and thinks jars are fucking beer mugs (that kind of glass doesn't exist back th en either but shhh)
OMG YES OH GOD YES SHOVEL IT DOWN MY GULLET GLUPGLUPGLUP OH YES MR SAAR SIR GIVE ME MORE SLOP OH GOD YES I'M CUMMING FROM YOUR SLOP BECAUSE IT ISN'T HOLLYWOOD SLOP OH GOD YES

>>211679132 (OP)
I like the little gloating movement the barbarian does

>>211680523
This but unironically

>>211680117
If people weren’t creative before Ai they aren’t going to suddenly be creative afterwards

>>211680523
get a grip

>>211680550
Shut up Bong. So glad when your shitty '''country''' blocks 4chan in a few months.

Kek Pedowood fags ITT seething

>>211679132 (OP)
I can't deny that this has massive potential for great storytelling in the right hands and circumvents the barriers, costs and restrictions in traditional filmmaking but I fear that we will get buried in garbage made by Indians using it.

>>211680424
so tired of this genuinely retarded argument. do you seriously think all technology just progresses in a linear, upward fashion, forever? because that doesn't happen for probably 99% of all technology.

we also went from horse and buggy, to rudimentary automobile, to the cars of today - where are the flying cars, retard? where are the hologram tvs? where are the mars colonies? where is the cure for the common cold or balding or cancer? there is so much shit out there that is obviously locked in until we virtually elevate everything we understand about our reality - but no, it's going to be this muddy, blurry, nonsensical shit most people use to generate low quality porn and terrible single frames of fan fiction movies that somehow exponentially grows to the point where you can "generate some le kino" exactly to your specifications in 5 minutes, 30 minutes, an hour, an afternoon? do you get how fucking stupid that sounds?

guess what my argument was last year on ai? the same it is now. this shit can still barely restrain itself at all times from turning into a nightmare hellscape and morphing people together and forgetting hands and feet have 5 digits on them. i'm sure 5 years from now with a several thousand dollar machine you'll be able to get a solid 30 seconds out of it that almost looks as real as a b-movie. just enough for a tiktok, how nice

The irony is that AIslop producers are just helping the people they claim to hate (Jews). Every time you use an AI you're helping a Jew and his business improve his AI (that isn't public) so he can save money, fire more humans and use it to make more money elsewhere. So, I guess you fucks are either all Jews or accelerationists.

>>211680523
Here's the thing. White people hate both the green/blue screen and AI.
Indians like both, hence why so many like Snyder

>>211679132 (OP)
Jesus, this shit looks like fucking AI. Is this really what Hollywood movies look like in 2025?

>>211680594
What does that have to do with anything. Should we stop using electricity so that Jews can't either?

>>211680604
>Sevennasneed

>>211680621
Don't use the lord's name in vain

>>211680319
A certain group of people love AI (and saying good morning to eachother)

>>211680319
Does something burst through the wall behind him? You could buy everything in this shot in a single trip to home depot for less than a 10th of what it would cost to do it in vfx

does anyone here use language models for text adventures? They've already added text-to-speech and image generation to that. In a few years, we'll have video too. Already, I spend way more time on roleplay than I do watching hollyjew slop

>>211680626
Using electricity isn't you specifically helping a Jew improve electricity so he can save more money, fire more human workers and make more money later on. You're LITERALLY contributing to the thing you hate. You think AI will 'get rid of the Jews in Hollyjew' but you're just helping them make AI better so that they can produce stuff with AI and not needing to hire actual humans to do stuff like editing or extras or whatever. You're doing exactly what they want by using it while championing it as their downfall.

>OH MY SCIENCE IS THAT H*CKIN' AI KINORINO? BY THE MATH WHAT AMAZING SCENES!

>>211680621
Based retard anon, you'll get a few (You)'s for this. Have mine to get you going.

>>211680659
Nope

>>211679132 (OP)
shitty school projects and shitty marvel movies are cooked
real movies are fine

>>211680816
LIKE DC SAAR?

>>211680816
>real movies are fine
Hollywood is fucked then.

>Greenscreen: Hollywood
OMG VGH WHAT SLOP
>Greenscreen: AI
OMG KINO

good goys helping hollywood make better ai not even FOR FREE.

>>211680763
Okay well someone's gonna have to explain it to me then. Studios don't just piss away 10s of thousands of dollars for fun

the best directors of the future will be those who can prompt the AI the most effectively. total ideaguy victory

>>211679132 (OP)
Miyazaki btfo

>>211679132 (OP)
Kino kino kino
AI complainers forever seething

>>211680881
I think the idea is that it's cheaper in the long run in case they need to change something in response to reshoots or test screenings. All part of the production line quality of capeshit.

>>211679132 (OP)
What movie is this from? It looks like AI.

>>211680887
>total ideaguy victory
Ideaguy doesn't know what good writing is
Ideaguy doesn't know how to frame a shot
Ideaguy doesn't understand why certain musical tracks sounds good

Ideaguy will just be picking things that appeal to him but doesn't know or how it works, in the end he will never be able to make kino because of this.

AI will help actual writers, artists, cinematographers be able to produce work more efficiently quickly. In the hands of ideaguy it's literally no better than the endless fake movie trailer you see on YouTube made by pajeets.

>>211679321
thats a month to fix you coper
AI isnt a threat to art
and when someone manages to make something actually decent instead of the 100th shit tech demo, thats not a loss thats a gain of a new piece of art where someone just used AI
its a threat to talentless faggots and art as "products"
shit marvel movies and disney remakes are cooked, everybody else will probably use AI for test footage to workshop ideas for shots and scenes or editing
Kpop and Taylor swift is cooked, everyone else who makes music will still make music

>>211680851
long live the new post corporate studio hollywood

This is impressive if you're fucking stupid, so I'm guessing everyone will love it

>>211680591
tranny transgument (tranny argument)
AI hasn't lost any momentum and we have yet to see it plateau.
>heh, but it may hit a plateau someday and it won't be able to do [insert retarded shit no one said it will be able to do]
Shows what kind of a retard you are when you think flying cars is a proper example of tech not progressing. Cars don't fly and a wheel doesn't evolve into something that lies. That's not linear progression, that's just being retarded.

>>211681002
>shit marvel movies and disney remakes are cooked
Yeah the MCU with a total gross of $31bn and Disney Remarks with a total gross of around $10bn are COOKED. THEY'RE FINALLY FINISHED.

>>211681126
to the banks stuck financing bomb after bomb
yes, the shitslop is cooked

>>211679132 (OP)
>COOKED
You have to be 18 or older to use this website.

>>211679132 (OP)
How do I do this.
I have some ideas I want to test out

>Remake
>Requel
>Reimagining
>Sequel
>Prequel
>Capeshit
>Starshit
>Vidyashit
>franchiseshit


Fucking anything's got to be better than what we're getting. At least the guy is being creative with it.

>>211681232
I have never in my life been less interested in what Hollywood is offering.

>>211681232
lmao this is just troy/alexander but gayer and made with AI. maybe watch something good you fucking retard?

>>211680594
everyone hates you and wishes you would go away

>>211681077
actual seething jeetcope. you just fell into complete lunacy and a very sad attempt to come off as a shitposter when you're obviously just some shit eating retard. it's really pathetic

>>211681319
Not an argument, just a transgument. Actually seething and dilating.

>>211681232
>At least the guy is being creative with it.
LMAO hahahahahahahahahhaha. Did you even fucking WATCH it? It's essentially yet another terrible Roman 'epic'.

>>211681392
Nothing says mad seething bitch like cope writing HAHAHAHAAH

>>211681313
>guy makes a good point which is backed up by objective reality by simply looking at which companies produce these public ai models and who their ceo's and presidents or parent companies are
>immediately comes in and tells him to go away STOP NOTICING THINGS
are you the religious group he was talking about per chance?

>>211680543
Yes anon, no creative people exist who could do more if they had the means.
By an incredible stroke of luck, the jewish nepobabies who rule hollywood are the only creative people alive, and god made sure they were born to rich producers so they would have access to the insane resources required to make modern movies.

>>211681402
>Says something incredibly retarded
>gets laughed at
>Y-Y-YOU'RE *SNIFF* S-S-SEETHING!
*chuckles*

>>211681287
its fucking test footage you retard

>>211679132 (OP)
you will never be a filmmaker

>>211681415
See this falls apart when it is possible to make your own film using money and actors and so on. It might not be as professional as a major production but to claim you cannot make a cheap film and sell it to main stream audiences is just false. You don't need to pay a Jewish man thousands of dollars to produce multiple 3 second clips and edit them together to claim you're making a film. Which I should note, there has yet to be an actual AI film that isn't 3 second clips slapped together with zero internal consistency. If you actually went and got actors and costumes, you could fucking do exactly that because you're not a retarded computer.

Finally and most importantly, nothing that these people are producing is 'creative'. It is literally just copies of already existing films. Because, here is the thing, people will go on what they know - or more specifically - what will SELL. These people making 'AI films' aren't trying to be creative, they're trying to make money.

>>211681232
>You will consume the slop and you will enjoy it

>>211681479
Should go without saying

good morning saar

>>211681185
As a collective, Disney has made tens of billions pure fucking profit. They wouldn't keep making them if they didn't. You saying 'it bombed' doesn't translate because they've been doing this for 20+ years and it isn't stopping. Lilo & Stitch made around $900m. Even their 'flops' like Cinderella and Little Mermaid made half a BILLION.

>>211680196
Only a 200 dollar month subscription, goy.

>>211681483
>isn't 3 second clips slapped together with zero internal consistency.
nta, so just another MCU or any type of shit film made the last 15 years to cover shit acting and choreography.

>>211681549
>You saying 'it bombed' doesn't translate
Disney demanding another 300 million shekels to make another shit movie that doesnt make money when theres going to be 20 movies coming out for a fraction of that isnt going to translate to any chink or hedge fund financiers

>>211679132 (OP)
>0:19 to 0:20

>>211681002
>AI isnt a threat to art and when someone manages to make something actually decent instead of the 100th shit tech demo, thats not a loss thats a gain of a new piece of art where someone just used AI
Well that's if it was actually and intended in being used as a tool by these people but it's not so your entire argument is built on fallacious ground. AI Generation anything isn't simply a tool it's a cheap substitute for getting around the process of creative direction and production. You're trying to jump all the crucial and critical steps that come with making something. You're not providing the artist with a new tool you're directly replacing the artist with the tool, in the hope (delusion) that it can imitate everything he can do while ignorant of all the essential thought and effort put into it that comes with making something. The rooted appeal of AI art creativity isn't but laziness.

>>211681921
*isn't creativity

My challenge still remains undefeated. All I require is someone to make a 10 minute short film with AI that is the quality of a modern movie or TV show that is something people would actually want to watch and all we get is meme videos of fictional characters taking selfies while getting into wacky situations because most people who use AI have 0 creativity and just do what everyone else does

>>211681674
Why is Marvel always the go to for you people? Don't try to wiggle out with 'but I said any type of shit film'. Shit edits are not the domain of just Marvel. Just say shit films, we know what you mean (then again, this is an AI thread so filled with pajeets who hate Marvel so, color me absolutely SHOCKED that people love to get a kick in on Marvel when it isn't really appropriate).

But nothing is as bad as this AI shit. Ignoring the fact it cannot be consistent, it gets simple things wrong such as giving the guy a modern beer mug instead of, well, anything even remotely appropriate. This is why, despite you whining about 'shit films...AND MARVEL!!!!' is baffling because most films would not get this wrong. They may put a 1457 designed tankard in a film set in 1432 but they very rarely put modern shit in on purpose because they're clueless.

The ultimate defence of AI is always hilarious because as another anon said, the end result isn't somehow 'defeating Hollyjew' but you're just helping them and paying for them for the privilege of doing it while claiming it is their downfall.

>>211681789
Right but the odd 'flop' doesn't cancel the fact that despite these 'flops' they've gone on and produced more and made money. Cinderella was from 2015, 10 years ago, it made $543m on a $95m budget. You can claim this is a flop all you want, but even if we tripled its budget it still made a profit. This, therefore, goes to show that despite your claim about 'flops' and not being able to get people to back it, you're just wrong. Like, this isn't a opinion piece, it's objective fact. You can not like them, you can not watch them, but companies will continue to produce them like they always have because they make money. Maybe not as much as they want, but they do.

Same shit as when /v/ claimed SWTOR flopped yet it was raking in $250m per year profit. It being bad doesn't mean it flopped. It just means it is bad.

>>211682045
i just disagree, used in the right hands, deepfakes and Ai sets, costumes and make up arent a big deal. Unless energy physics changes or an invention of fusion comes, I dont think you need to worry about a fully generated Ai 4k HDR film. But whats the big deal about cutting out as much staff as possible for costuming and make up, to go towards, idk the writers

>>211682034
It appeals to the lowest common denominator of people given it's intrinsic nature.

>>211682157
That's the thing. Logically you'd think that a producer saving $10m on not having costumes and editors and extras would mean that $10m goes to making sure other things are good like writing and so on is reasonable... But in reality all it will mean is the producer can make the film for $10m less and that means more profit for him and his buddies. AI is not a tool to 'help the creative' or 'democratise the market' it is a way for the top dogs to cut costs and make more money. If the above AI was 100% free there might be a justification for it but it isn't free, it costs money. Money that goes to said top dogs who use what you do with it to train their next version which may or may not come out to the public (at a cost!) later on and they'll then use that to train their in-house AI which won't and so on and so on, all the while having idiots claiming that they're 'taking down the man' or 'cooking the Jew' when in reality they're just funding and helping 'the man' and 'the Jew' save costs and remove more of the 'human element' from the arts.

It's pathetic and sad, but the people who champion it don't think further than the surface level.

>>211681002
>thats a month to fix
You can fix it by having a reference picture or better yet reference 3D model, which you then hand-feed into next scene so AI doesn't actually have to create the armor by itself.

OP's picture doesn't show AI getting better, its showing people getting better at getting around AI's limitations which are still the same. If that guy wouldn't be using real clips he himself filmed, AI would be fucking up the hands just like always.

Movie industry is not done but advertisement is going to be taken over completely by AI.

>>211679132 (OP)
Movies have been AI tier since 2008. How is this impressive? AI is literally just for midwits lmao

>>211681002
That's a superficial prediction.
It implies that corpos won't force it as a new standard basically suffoctating inconvenient artists who actually have talent, that artists with actual talent won't see less and less oppoortunities to do their own thing and cultivate their talent, making talent effetively scarce and that (and this is the worst part) a new kind of audience even more unable to tell good from bad won't be bred, one who only knows slop and finds not-slop icky.
It's just the next step down the road we have been following for 30 years
Evolution doesn't reward best performances, but lower effort.

>>211682379
>AI tier since 2008
ah yes, the Lighthouse... AI....

>>211682225
On social media every AI video falls into the same 3 categories
What I said above aka Bigfoot or a Dwar or Red Power Ranger or whatever fictional character doing selfie videos
Fake news videos
A video where everyone in the video keeps admitting they are AI and what they are doing is fake
The most blackpilling thing about AI is it should usher in a new age of creativity but it is doing the opposite. Everyone is just blindly following trends. Someone made a Ghibli-style picture? I will too. Everyone around me is making action figure AI images of themselves for a month straight. I will do the same. As advanced as people claim it is it is stuck in meme purgatory used for nothing but making whatever the meme of the month is. It's ironic that people who use it have this mentality of "I can do the same thing artists can do now and not be gatekept this will usher in a new age of creativity" and everyone is making the same exact shit and copying each other.

>>211679132 (OP)
I'm posting this on biz. Wait til you realize that with AI people won't even be watching the same media as each other at all soon.

>>211680604
do they copy paste phrases of completed English ?

>>211681674
yes, except not it not one repetitive capeshit movie, but 20 movies, made at 1/100 of the budget and it's a regurgitatio of all those repetitive capeshit movies

>>211682112
Quoting oddities doesn't make most of them not flops

man remember will smith spaghetti and how everyone said it looks shit and that it will take 100+ years for this tech to improve

>>211682536
That was 100 years ago.

>>211682045
it's because most shit is now also marvelized in tone, look and style, and it sucks

I will never take AI slop seriously

>>211680591
Absolutely malding right now.

>>211682536
No one said that and the tech hasn't improved much since people are still making Will Smith tier spaghetti stuff with it

>>211681465
if you're going to call something "creative" and it's actually not creative at all it being "test footage" doesn't make any fucking difference lmao. kill yourself you brain dead nigger

>>211682426
>The most blackpilling thing about AI is it should usher in a new age of creativity but it is doing the opposite

Anyone who actually has to put up with AIfaggots could already tell you this. I used to use sites like Pinterest to pull good images off for online D&D shit. Ever since AI art generation became available to the retarded masses the site was flooded with the same generic uninteresting AIslop that was never labelled as such because techfags have zero restraint or actual vision or even the basic decency to actually clearly label their garbage as garbage. They're in love with concepts, not results. They love the idea that their little chips and sicilone can do X but they'll never actually do X.

That's why there were so many tech startups and why 99.99% of them went nowhere, because techfags from actual programmers to slopproducers sitting in their basement typing prompts are actual dumbasses with no vision or creativity. AIfags have already decisively proven AI is a tool of idiots. AIfags can't produce anything of note and never will, and all they will do is flood spaces with even more of the same low quality things we already have more than enough of. This is why AI hype has already died off, because everyone has seen that all the potential it could have had is squandered by the fact that techfags are genuinely dumb people.

>>211680523
you seem aggravated

>>211682600
nobody but twitch stream subscribing trannies use that word. kill yourself you shit for brains nigger. i seriously cannot believe you're double replying to my post and pretending to be another jeet. fucking shitskins are ridiculously underhanded

>>211681921
>cheap substitute for getting around the process of creative direction and production
no its not
if you have no idea how to setup shots or what looks good, its just going to be shitting out random algorithmic crap, the AI used on >>211679132 (OP) are visuals its not generating the any of the direction
using it to transfer actual coherent ideas to screen requires said ideas, random prompts will always be meaningless bullshit, If AI is being used for storyboards or just to test setting up a shot like sometimes 3d modeling is used, youre still using AI to make movies and its being used like a tool

>>211679132 (OP)
Looks like the new odyssey movie

>>211679132 (OP)
Bottom: sovl
Top: slop
Know the difference.

smells like curry in here

>>211680319
No, because it's the difference between huge movie studios doing this vs single retard autists doing this.

>AI IS AMAZING IT HAS GOTTEN SO MUCH BETTER YOU NAYSAYERS KNOW NOTHING
>HERE IS THE 6000TH VIDEO OF A SASQUATCH DOING A STREAMER VLOG HAHAHA AREN'T WE FUNNY AND CREATIVE

>>211682347
China is having their 2004 era. I kind of envy it

>>211682347
>reference picture
A single frame can't tell you everything that happened in the last 8 or so seconds

Presumably I'm supposed to be impressed? Can the jannies just delete these low IQ shit threads already?

looks like shit. worse than even the shittiest jeet CGI.

probably fun to mess around with but I hope it isn't used by actual studios.

I wonder if there were people when batteries were being invented in the 1800's saying retarded shit like "you naysayers don't understand soon these tiny batteries will be able to power entire cites for free just a year ago we had candles don't you see how fast the tech is progressing!!!??" not understanding that progression eventually hits a bottleneck

>>211679321
Private companies have this solved already.

>>211682157
increasing the writing budgets will just give you more useless faggots and more shit mid production rewrites

>>211682409
>Evolution doesn't reward best performances, but lower effort.
yeah, marlon brando was working REAL hard in the godfather and apocalypse now

>>211682415
Lighthouse is a shit movie

>>211683047
this

>>211683254
That requires effort, to go against evolution. If a shortcut existed, you wouldn't have Brando, Godfather or Apocalypse Now, just AI patchwork John Wayne in AI Cannons Where Eagles of Navarone Dare

>>211679132 (OP)
That looks fucking awful, Arjun. You're a dumb idiot.

If AI tops at just these 8-15 second clips you can make then AI isn't really eliminating the hardest parts at all like editing and script creation and will still gatekeep retards out of making anything significant.

>>211680117
>In 10 years
Wait, I thought it was in 3 years. The OP says it's right now, they're cooked. Which one is it?

>>211683940
Sound is like 60% of a movie.

>>211683965
Yea I would include that in editing since most of your time would be spent taking that 8 second clip and improving it

>>211680319
This is a 100 million dollar project and the other you can do at home by yourself

>>211683940
Yeah editing is quite literally eveything

AI discussion on this website is just jeets flinging shit at each other

>>211679132 (OP)
that's pretty fucking impressive. I can't wait to see how good this shit gets in five years.

>>211679132 (OP)
Death To Hollywood!!!!!!

FORE their time of nigh is bearing!!!!!

>>211680117
I try to explain to my friends that it will encourage such creativity and that am I’m excited to make my own movies but people just glob onto AI BAD and the fact that it’s intellectual theft, just inherently.

>>211679132 (OP)
At what point are we going to get passed the "wow this is impressive wow imagine what this will be like in 2 years" circlejerking and when will something interesting to watch be actually made that isn't a AI tech demo?

>>211680319
Go cry in your mama's bloomers!!!!


DEATH TO HOLLYWOOD

>>211680523
Dear to Hollywood!

Say it with me, you incorrigible LOSER; DEATH TO HOLLYWOOD!!!!

>>211680659
From my understanding they did this because both actors in the scene were in 2 different studios so this was cheaper than flying one out to the other

>>211684142
>t. whiner that said AI would never be able to make anything realistic and certainly never able to do hands!

>>211682908
Clearly not based on every model except one not being able to consistently replicate characters or locales across different shots.

>>211684208
Video games are impressive now but in the 1970's when it was at it's most basic you still have people buying Magnavox Odyssey consoles despite it being at its most basic level you still have a product people wanted to consume

>>211684134
It's circa 1907 and the whale oil industry is screaming into the ever encroaching darkness, the infinite black that is crude oil,"THOU SHALL NOT REPLACE ME!!"

>>211680045
This is just the beginning. AIs are becoming more sophisticated each day.

>>211680523
techbro-fascism imbecilism/10
notice how the same cognitive dissonance animate them when celebrating Drumpf & Felon Musk....

>>211684268
Terrified they are that their Grief is at an end, and not soon enough it was!!!!

>>211684324
*Grift

>>211679321
>The issue with AI is that you still can't carry over skins, hair, clothing, from scene to scene.
It can already do this, though.

That's not how any of this works. Anyways, I'm killing all the AI fags anyways so it doesn't matter. It's a non issue now.

AI threads always fill up with anons claiming AI will never be able to do the stuff that it can already do.

>>211680523
Fake artists having to find a real job is the best day of my life.

>>211680117
In 20 years AI will be able to make movies better than humans from start to finish. you might as well just tell an AI "run the movie industry"
ai will be better at literally every single thing than humans

>>211683940
Script creation is the last thing I don't want made by AI and the main reason modern movies are all shit

>>211684268
>sophisticated each day.
uhhhhhhhhhhh

>>211681415
ESL overload

>>211684516
This. AI *still* can't do human faces, hands, backgrounds, or text, and it will be at least 100 years before AI can do video.

>>211684156
>>211684116
Hollywood will use AI to give you more slop and you won't make anything of value.
All you'll make is tech demos, porn and remixes of hollywood slop

>>211684526
nta but you should get your eyes checked

>>211682034
Even when the technology gets to a consistent level, these AI faggots will never create anything interesting or truly long lasting. All the AI pics being discarded and being forgotten after like 3 seconds of posting it is proof.
It’ll be a sea of endless shit, made by untalented and uncreative people, watched by untalented and uncreative retards. Maybe there will be one semi-decent thing to come out of it all, made by a small and focused team, and it will either be buried under all the shit, or shilled as the best thing ever.

>>211684547
I could do it 20 years ago, which is weird considering I'm a teenage girl.

>>211684241
Games are shit and look like shit now. It's all industrial minded realismslop. no artstyle, no creativity, no fun

>>211680591
>where are the flying cars
those have been around since the 1940’s. They’re called helicopters, there is no reason to have retards flying them, because you can’t even be trusted with cars on the ground. Imagine thinking that 250 million helicopters need to be zig zagging passed each other over our heads and homes. You are such a retarded homo, fuck

>>211684472
>Automation process that cannot think will comprehend the concept of "good"
Sure buddy. hot hair balloons will go to space and everyone will have one for free. Two more weeks.

>>211684631
>chud doesn't understand that no flying cars = no AI progression

>>211684547
The ceiling will not be the technical aspect tho, it will always be the nature and quality of content

>>211684650
>hot hair balloons will go to space and everyone will have one for free. Two more weeks.
Based anon getting completely mindbroken by AI

>>211684401
Show me AI that can make a scene between 2 characters expressing feelings for each other with dialogue and emotion that feels real. I have never seen AI do that.

AI has a lot to prove.

>>211684688
You have no argument and just reacted with a snarky emotional outburst
Why AI tard don't understand how their "magic" technology actually works?

>>211684681
Your argument seems to be framed around the idea that someone who uses an AI to generate video must also use an AI to write the script.

>>211684695
>AI can't do ̶h̶a̶n̶d̶s̶ heartfelt conversations

>>211684583
It doesn't matter if its games it can be movies or any technology we use that we consumed even when it was at its most basic level you autist.

>>211684731
>Why AI tard don't understand
lol

>>211679132 (OP)
It's the contrary, studios will use this to reduce the budgets.

>>211679132 (OP)
Not if your friendly neighborhood (((Feds)))))) impose regulations on this type of thing so the public can’t use it.
>Here’s why not having access to basic computer tools is a good thing!

>>211684573
You know what the true bitter blackpill is anon? The one that took me a long time to accept? This, what you describe is the future of entertainment. AI will bring us down where 10 second clips of random garbage and farting will be enough to entertain people and no one will desire movies or tv shows anymore.

>>211684864
Who needs studios now shithead.

>>211680656
SAAR

>>211680117
>>211684472
This isn't how anything ever turns out. What'll actually happen is that technophiliacs and nerds will churn out retarded, uncanny slop for consumption by the masses of retards, making civilization uglier and dumber, while actual artists will make actual art for niche audiences.

>>211680591
Everyone knows 9/11 killed the flying car, retard.

>>211680424
>we
The Feds will. Maybe we can access some of it, heavily regulated, for a fee.

>>211680591
Thing about AI is that it's progressing incredibly quickly. The main issue is going to be resources and energy required to actually keep it going. One of the facts that people can't seem to accept is that we're not on the way to a 'Sci-Fi' future with spaceships, replicators, holodecks etc. Even the smartest person on the planet can't create something that the currently available resources on Earth or even the universe can make a reality. In a similar vein there's going to be human ailments that remain incurable because the resources required to correct them simply don't exist.

We've come an incredibly long way over the past 10,000 years, but it's going to cap out eventually to the point where we start running out of resources and regress as a species.

>>211681483
but you need major production quality to compete with Hollywood and for normies to even notice it, nobody would care no matter how much you market your film if it looks like dog shit. That's what AI will do, major production quality at a fraction of the cost and time of amateur films.

>>211685147
Shut up antisemitic chud we need to dump poison into the ocean to manufacture dildos for children and Covid needles! Bigot.

>>211685193
>compete with Hollywood
When people can prompt their own movies, most won't be concerned with distributing them because they're prompting for their own enjoyment, not because they hope to sell the end result.

>>211679132 (OP)
looks like shit, call me when AI is actually good

Sweet with genaritive AI we can redo all the subversive propaganda of the last decade, across all forms of entertainment media from movie franchises to video games, this is going to birth an actual Renaissance

>technology is exponential and limitless!

techfags are so stupid and delusional it hurts literally everything we have today was discovered 150+ years ago and it's just been a steady refinement since then

>>211685638
This. An AI video generator is just a fancy loom. Everything that could possibly be invented has already been invented.

>>211680991
Guild hands write this.

>>211684841
You think you do but clearly don't

have you guys seen a video where a pupyy gets bullied and tries to kill himself but a cat saves him and helps to kill and eat the bullies

If this explodes and destroys the established entertainment industry, how are Jews going to find kids to rape

>>211685683
This is sadly becoming reality

>>211685775
If this has any chance of blowing up (((Hollywood))) will use their government connections to get this outlawed. The fact that we have easy access to it means it is not a threat to them

>>211684744
People who automate the creative process because it's a convenient shortcut don't have the mindset to be otherwise creative with some specific parts
Either way we have already seen this happen with cgi, all its opportunities, all the thing we will be able to do now, and look at modern movies...

>>211684936
they will make thousands of slop movies per month and make that shit even more mainstream, meanwhile you won't make anything out of it

>>211684936
>I'm sure theater chains will play my AIslop movie nationwide, if I ask nicely

>>211684927
yep, this

>>211685483
so everythign will be self-fellating fanfiction tier
qed

>>211682409
I think you're the smartest person in this thread.
>>211681002
And I think you're a smidge on the dim side. ai that creates will march lockstep into the future with ai that destroys, censors and distorts. A day won't come when great artists can't create, but a day MIGHT come when great artists can't make a living for themselves. That's a privilege that a chosen few have already hoarded for themselves and will ALWAYS hoarde, It's just going to get worse now.

Great artists will continue to create, They always have, but noone will see what they make. Censorship algorithms will surpress it. And one day...
The last men who walk the Earth will grow to enjoy the taste of slop.

>>211685683
So they are just going to roll over and make less money like they do with porn, doesn't seem very Jewish to me guess they have a lot on their plate right now

>>211680117
For every Wagner you get a hundred Meyerbeer hacks

>>211686084
>British dog gets picked on by Muslim pigs
accurate

>>211686084

>>211686011
>so everythign will be self-fellating fanfiction tier
What's with the butthurt thought? You're not forbidden from making all the amazing arthouse epics you can.

>>211686159
>U MAD
Point is, it's not possible at home with AI. And never will

>>211686084
>>211686153
This is amusing but this is the ceiling of video AI. Junkfood meme videos. This has been a consistent thing all throughout the lifespan of video AI.

>>211686411
>U MAD
You really are. It's fun to watch anons get butthurt about the existence of AI, especially in the (now-weekly) threads where new video models are dropping.

Television didnt die with YouTube so i dont see it happening with Hollywood. Only their profit margin will skyrocket.

Roman Legionnaires would not just charge willly nilly like that, they would throw their javelins, keep formation and move as a unit. This is historically absurd.

>>211686524
>Television didnt die with YouTube
It's not dead but it is dying

>>211684557
Undoubtedly. Still, the layman will also have access!

>>211686588
AI can't do proper Roman military formations (and it never will).

>>211686153
>digging through sheer concrete with a garden shovel
> dog standing on hind legs
>CAT jumping in the WATER to save a GOLDEN RETRIEVER
This makes ZERO sense and that's without even getting into the shallowness of the ridiculous "plot"

>>211682729
>durr no its not
lol
>if you have no idea how to setup shots or what looks good, its just going to be shitting out random algorithmic crap, the AI visuals its not generating the any of the direction
Yeah but the sentiment still applies
> If AI is being used for storyboards or just to test setting up a shot like sometimes 3d modeling is used, youre still using AI to make movies and its being used like a tool
Ok now that's completely different than what's being said in the thread. In this case AI generation isn't being used in or as the final product, you'd still have to go through all the steps of making a movie your just taking shortcuts within the drafting stage. So you wouldn't be using it to actually develop and generate the movie itself. Yeah I don't think that's such a bad thing.

>>211686482
>NO U
>Nonsequitur
>projection
>goalpost moving
>things that never happened
>getting super defensive
>no argument
>lack of understanding of the thing you shill
kek
was your post written with AI?

>>211679132 (OP)
bottom: soul
top: soulless

>>211686630
With the amazing result that nothing of value will be ever be made by anyone, and nobody will even remember what even was "value"

>>211680117
no, youtube and every other video hosting site will be flooded by feature length garbage made by pajeets in their garage.
despite what you think, 99.99% of people couldnt create a good movie, even if they had all the necessary tools easily available to them

>>211686755
Except your creative muscle, the one you use get out of creative labyrinth that is the crative process, will atrophy, and almost every movie will have the same bone structure

ALL CGI is slop. Either do it practical or fuck off.

>>211680604
SAAAAAAAAAAAAR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BVkucjaiwE

>>211686787
Based butthurt anon making me smile

>>211682536
now it looks like morphing stills and the spaghetti versions look marginally better

>>211687114
bill turner you're a liar and you will spend eternity on this SHEP

>>211679132 (OP)
good morning saar!

>>211687180
>all the woman in the movie are white
>the jeet literally had to prompt "light skinned indian woman" every scene
what did they mean by this?

>>211679132 (OP)
Great, if we can wrestle away the media from the jews it is a huge win.

>>211680659
>Ignorant retard who has never done physical labor or computer related work ever
I can buy a green screen for less than a hundred bucks. The time spent doing the effects would cost less than the ticket(first class) for an a list actor. You could literally do anything for way cheaper than buying material, paying for labor to rebuild a fucking room(are you retarded seriously?), filming, then deconstruction, and sometimes storage for said props and sets.

You are dumb. I'm not sure if you're a dumb kid with no experience or worse a fucking adult with no experience.

So are we at the point where people are just pretending to like AI shit specifically for the meme? Because that's really all I see. Aside from Indians and grandmas on Facebook, it's just 100% people who are most likely fake accounts posting retarded AI-generated video and shitposting about it.

>>211679132 (OP)
>all the cope responses to this
>"it-its still slop! It'll never catch on!"
Lmao

>>211685193
A lot of gems were created for cheap on Youtube. AI won't makes you magically not lazy anymore to create your "masterpiece".

>>211688717
We're still at the point where anons post SAAAAR when they think a real photo is AI.

>>211680117
can't wait

>>211688717
you gotta take your meds, dude

>>211688928
No, no, anon definitely has the ability to discern the thoughts of total strangers.

What none of you seem to be taking into account is that a thing loses some entertainment value when it didn't really happen. They could have done all of Tom Cruise's stunts with regular old 2000's cgi, the point was that he actually did it which is why it was interesting to see

>>211680045
fuckin hell. "nah its not a thing until they do this"
then we do it
then the fucking excuse changes. they dont even keep fucking consistency in real fucking movies. theres whole websites dedicated to that shit, imfdb for example
>you see here, xxxx prop gun changes to a berreta 9mm, probably a inert plastic prop

>>211689356
There's also the problem that you can't sell a product made with AI. Consumers will never fork over cash for something they know was made by a computer for free

>>211688795
Those are the indians trying to fit in, yes. You all share the same IQ pool.

>>211684631
jetsons are 128,000 dollars, thats just one example of a man piloted drone. theres several companies putting out manned drones and the only real difference is cost, range, legality. some of it skirts the laws somehow meaning you dont need any license at all, which is pretty insane.

but yeah, lmao at the idea of 300 million car sized drones in america at rush hour

>>211680391
kek same

>>211679132 (OP)
And that's a good thing. This seuqence had more soul than most shit being released by hollywood nowadays. For starters, will finally have proper stories without woke shit being forced down our throats

>>211680319
Of course i'm gonna praise OP's webm over this. It's a single man doing the job of a bunch of frauds
Now true artist can TRULY express themselves. Woke Hollywood can't take us as hostages no more

>>211680391
wow, grim. even on a desktop screen, those images are so close together you couldnt have worse tunnel vision then if you had literally stuck toilet paper tubes to your eyeballs. on a phone id have to assume your like...6 months old to not have the ability to notice the near duplicate image right below it. oh well. maybe its the cool thing for the kids to do these days. "pretend to have less bodily autonomy than small children, or babies, thatll own the old folks".

ah, kids. jerkin off to toasters and shit.

>>211686524
>Television didnt die with YouTube
It kinda did, tho? The last time i've watched a TV was like 6 years ago

>>211688737
Sell an actual finished product. Otherwise shut the fuck up. I'm tired of having to listen to you subhuman retards and having to see your spam as if I'm supposed to be impressed. None of your slop shit has ever been impressive. Not the images, not the music, and not this shit. None of it. All of it is immediately identifiable as garbage and only invested mouth-breathers and turdies care.

>>211688781
>A lot of gems were created for cheap on Youtube
okay name five

>>211679132 (OP)
problem i see with AI is constant blurry backgrounds, like it can't really handle rendering background whenever there's a character at the center

>>211689430
Make fucking money with it, nigger. That's the only thing that matters.

>>211680117
>You'll have probably like a hundred Orson Welles types just making kino in their garage.
kino

>>211685483
you know Youtube was like that during it's infancy right? when people can finally produce videos using their phone everybody started posting their creations with no monetization. Look where Youtube is now.

>>211686630
>the layman will also have access!
No, most AI API are very pricy. They are free for now for test.

>>211690239
Commentary political grifters and crypto scams?

>>211689356
>the point was that he actually did it which is why it was interesting to see
I'm not at all interested in watching someone perform a stunt. It adds nothing of value to my engagement or enjoyment.

>>211690239
TT also made the barrier of entry for video very accessible. It's full of slop and brainrot videos.

>>211686153
>And cats! They're not usually known for their love of swimming, but one feline in northern Virginia is hitting the water instead of the gym in an effort to lose weight.

>>211689356
having used AI fairly prolifically, there absolutely is a psychological effect where something immediately becomes mundane and uninteresting after it's been generated. That I could generate however many billions of iterations of exactly the same thing with just the simple formula of inputs is a fact that my brain cannot overcome. All of a sudden the AI output is as interesting as the many different forms a grain of sand might take.

>>211690239
Oh yeah I love the same TTS being used to read out exactly what's happening in a video. Amazing videography. Cinema is replaced. TV is dead.

>>211689941
Why the fuck are you here?

>>211679132 (OP)
How long did it take him to make that

>>211690443
Actually it's just because your output is inherently dogshit. There's is no deeper meaning or reason as to why your crap is crap. It's just crap.

>>211680117
The people who say this shit always think they are way more creative than they actually are. We've already seen what this "democratization of art" has brought and what those "ultra-polymaths" produce with image generation: just an endless stream of slop with tiny variations that floods every content hosting site in existence in garbage. Realistically you won't get kino, you'll just have a million pajeets make blacked edits and boomers making 70IQ political strawmen just like now, only with more technical fidelity.

>>211679132 (OP)
Not just movies but TV/streaming too. Could not have happened to a nicer bunch of cunts.

>>211680319
You can make your own movies in little time

>>211680117
but then who will help (((them))) traffick the children?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/h86qesgoeSje

>>211690471
Jannies allow them to post their garbage outside of /g/eet. You can see the entire thread has nothing to do with TV or film. It would be great if all the indian slop threads were globaled across the site.

>>211690532
when I make (real) art and it comes out crap, it's because I failed the execution and it deeply frustrates me. When an AI makes crap, it's because under the shallow surface you can tell that it doesn't have a soul.

>>211690443
It's like using cheats in a video game. Fun to fuck around with for a bit, but quickly becomes hollow.

>>211679132 (OP)
Only gamer tards would accept slop like this over Jason & argonauts, wyler epics

>>211681483
I agree, it's been possible to make a film with your cell phone for basically zero dollars for at least a decade at this point. This AI stuff is much less creative, because instead of making 1000 creative choices about set design, wardrobe, characters, world building, actor blocking, sound design, narrative, etc... people are just going to let the AI choose for them and it's going to be slop.

>>211690810
Yup, spawning tanks on Mount Chiliad

Why are faggot human beings clamoring for a.i. all of a sudden? You people don't know shit about art. A.I. won't transcend anything a human can make.
This all reeks of pathetic brown, 3rd-world cope to anyone with a sensible brain.

>>211690471
He is probably here for old movies just like me. I can't imagine the kind of person that enjoys /tv/ slop made after 2010.

>>211679132 (OP)
Needs 10-15 more years, teenagers of 2035-2040 are going to have it best growing up.

>>211690855
>instead of making 1000 creative choices about set design, wardrobe, characters, world building, actor blocking, sound design, narrative, etc... people are just going to let the AI choose for them and it's going to be slop.
But we can already feed the AI our own hand-drawn images, photo references, blocking compositions, etc.

>>211693382
I'm not saying AI can't make those choices for you, I'm saying if you're not the one making the creative decisions, you're not the one being creative. Saying "generate me a spooky mansion with a ghost in the corner" is 1000x less creative than meticulously designing the set, picking out the exact colors for the drapes, getting the lighting to flow at exactly the right angle, picking out every piece of clothing that your characters are wearing, making on the fly decisions about dialogue and character motivations, etc... being creative is making 1000 creative decisions, but when you use AI, you only make like 10-20 of those decisions and the rest is slop. By the way, I'm not trying to suggest that all of these decisions are made by one creative auteur, they're distributed among all the people involved in the collaborative filmmaking process.

>>211679132 (OP)
So close, I pray for the day when Hollywood becomes obsolete because when everyone becomes super.....No one will

>>211690996
we just think its fun. its you that gets angry and racist upon seeing technological progress

>>211694324
Technology doesn't supercede art.

>>211694505
and

>>211684472
>ai will be better at literally every single thing than humans
And then it will be so fucking over. I don't understand why we are rushing into this. There are no gains with AI that are worth giving up control of everything for

>>211680991
t.

>>211680319
woah, anons shitting on hollywood faggotry and praising a tool that would bring the death of jewllywood? on freakin /tv/?

nice one, disingenuous faggot

>>211681620
You pay $20M a month to make your slop, Chaim.

>>211682045
Man this guy is an absolute retard.

Alright so basically the government won't allow you to have AI, even if you're already running an AI locally.

>>211679132 (OP)
these are all cartoons

>>211690996
>You people don't know shit about art.
Neither does Hollywood, at least for the last 40 years

>>211680523
The ones who loved cgislop love aislop.

>>211686435
>Dis is da celing!
The tech is in its embryonic stage. This isn't even the floor.
In a few months, you will be able to tell it to make you a whole movie by itself.
You can do that NOW, if you know how to set up an agent fleet workflow and you've got your own mcp servers set up.
>but it'll be low quality
Higher quality than youtube, and youtube beat hollywood.

>>211694536
You're pathetic and talentless. A.I. won't help you.

>>211695408
Five years ago, AI still couldn't do faces, and now it can barely do 1080p video. Face it chud, AI is DONE.

>>211696203
help me with what

>>211682908
>A single frame can't tell you everything that happened in the last 8 or so seconds
Some /v/anon created this by rotoscoping a porn clip underneath, then inserting the reference princess drawing on every single frame manually. With a lot of hours spent in video editor you can force AI to stay in-model.

But yeah just pushing the prompt button guarantees that the armor is going to change in every clip. You need to fix that armor shit yourself.

>>211695408
>The tech is in its embryonic stage. This isn't even the floor.
You've been saying that for like 3 years now

>>211679132 (OP)
>sword out of thin air
>video game armor

very kino, Samir

>>211696374
3 years now of AI video?
Also
>REEEEEEE IT'S BEEN 30 SECONDS, WHY HASN'T THE TECH MATURED YET!??!?!
Get fucked npc

>>211679132 (OP)
>Hollywood movies look like garbage now, let's make it worse

so much A.I slop is actual bottom of the barrel shit and the people pushing it wants everyone to collectively lower their standards so things can be more easily sold to us.
aside from meme edits and personal porn it's so much collective fucking garbage that services the low IQ and those with poor standards.

So maybe movies won't, or shouldn't, be made entirely out of AI.
But what about applying AI to existing films like people apply mods to video games.
Like, what if you want to go back and re-watch an older Marvel movie, but swap in every character's comic-accurate outfits?

>>211696356
>With a lot of hours spent in video editor you can force AI to stay in-model.
You're a few weeks behind the curve. The free Kling web UI has this feature now.

I really have to get to work and write my script, I just need to finish a couple of things before. How much do you think it will cost to make a movie from a script once all the tools are in place?

>>211695072
>>211695408
Yeah, I mean three years ago AI couldn’t even make a still image, but he acts like generating the wrong beer mug is somehow an insurmountable obstacle.

>>211680319
can someone tell me why in the fuck "sitting in a chair with a dark gun" needed to be made in CGI?

>>211700567
>show movie to test audiences
>test audience thinks the gun looks too scary
>change it to a different model
>next test audience thinks the gun looks too wimpy
>change it to a different model

Modern movies are made purely by following a list of checkboxes.

>>211680117
I'm already storyboarding and scriptwriting and I'm not kidding

I'm planning a high kino artsy fartsy super serious camp sword and sorcery space opera kino you guys are going to love it

>>211694851
The further clashes between the unions and Hollywood in the future is going is to be amazing and hilarious. Hollywood cannot afford not to adopt AI or else they will get left behind. Its really going to be fascinating to watch.