>past a certain age, a woman without children can be a bad thing

What age?

three fiddy

Listen, I'm only 36 and 36 is still young.

>>211684696
for a woman? no

>>211684566 (OP)
not my problem. I don't owe society anything.

>>211684566 (OP)
the point about this scene is to hammer in how much of a hypocrit he is

>>211685148
what show?

>>211685577
true detective season 1

>>211684665
ironically 35 is about when it becomes "geriatric birth" lmao. so yes, bout tree fiddy

seriously though some medical texts go as far to say a woman 30 and above who hasn't previously given birth is already in geriatric birth territory. what does that mean exactly? it means your chances of a physically, mentally, and emotionally stunted retard baby popping out and maybe even killing your wife in the process goes WAY UP.

guess when men's sperm degrades to the point of non-functionality? like 60. 70. some 80 year olds are still shooting live rounds. our sexual dimorphism is completely fucked and pretty much designed around oligarchic/kraterocratic harems

>>211684696h
I think that's how old my momo was when she got the ceserean and I'm an acoustic junkie retard who's terrified of life

>>211685749
>>211685743
and my point is immediately made
cesareans are also possibly bad regarding childbirth too - as the baby misses out on a lot of gross but very important hormonal and bacterial transfers by not being passed through the vaginal canal.

the mother after 9 months of pregnancy is a supercharged biological machine capable of supplying the fetus with everything it needs, into the post-natal stages, where the saliva from a breastfeeding baby literally interacts with the areola to tell the mother's body what the composition of the milk should be nutritionally speaking.
so all that birthing fluid, blood, sweat, even the little flecks of shit it'll inevitably get smattered in - all of that is helpful to acclimate the baby to the environment it's being born into, as all those fluids are a direct production from the things in that environment the mother consumed - essentially like a natural vaccine

>>211685749
damn..

>>211686138
Nice broscience

>>211685148
>the point of this scene is to polemicize and strawman ordinary hard working people so my drug addicted loser freak can save the day

my wife is having her first and she'll turn 28 just before the babies born. frankly i'd been telling her shes getting old for her first for 2-3 years. my sister had her first at 19 but she practically lives the life of a 1950s housewife but with a cell phone

>>211684566 (OP)
40

>>211684566 (OP)
>he's talking about Rust
>meanwhile Rust is being based and stealing snuff films proving he was onto something and eventually wins

>>211688333
Marty destroyed his family for teen pussy

>>211688258
this is verifiable pediatric medicine and would be more like ho science than bro science if it were otherwise

>>211684696

>>211688376
28s not that bad, my mom had me at 29 and turned out great

>>211684566 (OP)
30 probably. Women should give birth at like 20-25 for healthy children

>>211688706
Anon, I..

>>211684566 (OP)
Every childless women over the age of 30 I have met has been completely insane, so I'll go with 30

>>211684566 (OP)
27-35
After that point she's just a spinster that a similar aged man has to be tricked into marrying.

Even then most men will think someting is wrong with her and will never fully emotionally invest and have a PI, DNA testing facility and Divorce papers ready at all times.

>>211688258
t.dumbcunt who had a cesarian because dr.kilgore wanted to make money off of making her kid weak and making her body permanently incapable of having natural children without a hospital stay.

>>211688583
Proven pediatric science, and women's health being common knowledge and seriously studied would be DISASTEROUS for both the medical/psychiatric/pharma industry and feminist movement.

>>211688376
27-28 isn't bad and having a child will extend the time she can have further consecutive healthy births but i probably wouldn't space things out too far. the kinds of stories you hear about babushka's and shit having strong, healthy babies at 40-45 is because that's like their 10th baby already. the womb is definitely a use it or lose deal. you should also be aware of the fact though that every subsequent child increases the risk of male homosexuality if only slightly

>>211689077
they've tried. for all the bitching women do about men not understanding all their "mechanics" fucking stupid cunt women barely even understand it themselves most of time

in fact it's not even technically called a "geriatric birth" any more after that very straight forward medical term pissed off a bunch of barren hags. it's called an "advanced maternal age pregnancy" now

imagine your doctor going, "well, now that you're 60 you should consider improving your diet and trying light exercise as the organs and circulatory system of the elderly are the first to experience the deleterious effects of aging"
and you go
"UHBUH WUHHHHHH????!!!! ELDERLYYY?????? FUCKYOUFUCKYOUFUCKYOU LALALALALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU I CAN'T HEAR YOU I'M ACTUALLY A POST ADOLESCENT!!! LALALALALALALALALAAA!!!!!!"

>>211689305
woops, forgot my picture. check this AI distilled cringe out. love that it takes on biases for certain search terms and phrases and right off the bat tells, you, "UHN UNH CHUDDY! THAT OUTDATED AND... OFFENSIVE!!"

>>211689361
aaand one more post because that picture is truly insidious. IT'S FUCKING LYING!

>used to describe... 35 years and older
>while fertility MAY start to decline around 35
>some risks increase with age
>many women have healthy pregnancies and deliveries at this age and beyond
>many women are healthy and capable... well into their late 30s and 40s

i mean seriously, actual diabolical shit. EVIL. LIES. any fucking pediatrician, pre-natal care doctor, even a fucking mommy blogger, will tell you this

>geriatric birth: 30-35, generally regarded as 35
>"may start to decline" yet that's also apparently the age geriatric birth starts. it WILL decline. it HAS been decline since roughly 26-27 - that is OVERALL FERTILITY. egg QUANITITY and egg QUALITY
>"some risks" - yeah, every fucking possible risk there is for the baby AND the mother
>many people also run the red light but do you really want to be that fucking retard? the stats on +35 into +40 births are abysmal in terms of miscarriages, deformity, and chronic physical or mental illness
>no. they. are. not. women are generally considered INFERTILE by 40-45.

in other words, never trust some kike search engine's shitty AI. this shit genuinely makes me mad. it also will give you wildly different measurements of the contents of breastmilk just from changing the volume measurement you're viewing it in - craziest shit i've ever seen. google is actually nonfunctional, even downright harmful

>>211689361
damn this is grim

>>211684696
This, I'm 41 and still waiting to meet the right woman. The current one is literally crazy, but I'm optimistic. She's really nice in bed.

FYI sperm quality degrades too. Not as early and not as rapidly but a 40 year old's sperm is absolutely not as good as a 25 year old's.