>>211768393How is it support for christian teachings.
If anything, it supports not venerating god as he wilfully causes you to suffer, in life.
Why venerate such a being.
Then while you 1+2 analogy rings true, the word "limitation" in this context is synonymous with a prison.
Not being able to be a frog, take reincarnation or more importantly "attain" non existence just again means imprisonment.
This whole debate started because anon stated "eternal life in heaven" which i replied this would be torture, and the logic still stands.
Heaven will innately become a hellish state BY its limitations. Hence the chocolate cake analogy.
Experience ITSELF is the experience of being imprisoned.
THAT is hell. And that is what your god created for you. A prison, of eternity.
>>211767945>Pleasure takes many formsPhysical sensation of pleasure, or internal sensation of pleasure, which is an internal form of the external pleasure sense, matters not.
They are mutually coexistent with their opposites.
Without the opposites, the experiences will become normality, so pleasure will no longer become pleasure, it will become essentially neutrality, and without unpleasantness one cannot differentiate what is pleasurable...
>>211767945>epicurean paradoxIt is logic to just give you, the reader understanding of logic needed to refute the veneration of god.
You can interchange evilness with anything. The logic is to show that god is not all powerful, or if he is, he is malicious and should not be venerated.
Like I mentioned above about imprisonment.
If you are imprisoned for a petty crime in this life, do you start venerating your jailors, the judge, jury or prison guards. No of course.
So why venerate god, who also imprisoned you.
Shit why venerate your parents too by that logic!
At least with your parents you can see they are fallible like you or I, but the christian god is supposedly an all powerful being who imprisoned you for the lulz, and for christians there is no escape...