← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 211995522

229 posts 54 images /tv/
Anonymous No.211995522 >>211996410 >>211996762 >>211998072 >>211998364 >>211998408 >>212000983 >>212001622 >>212001708 >>212002201 >>212002203 >>212003157 >>212005164 >>212006155 >>212006200 >>212007340 >>212007464 >>212007591 >>212007790 >>212007916 >>212008125 >>212008396 >>212008858 >>212011331 >>212011810 >>212014738 >>212014845 >>212016613 >>212017488 >>212021981 >>212022039 >>212023985 >>212024035 >>212024061 >>212024104 >>212024203 >>212025493 >>212029091 >>212029336 >>212032565 >>212033362 >>212036801 >>212037256 >>212041597 >>212046859 >>212047759
Denis Villeneuve to direct James Bond
Confirmed for directing the next 007 film. What do you think /tv/?
Anonymous No.211995715
first for superior thread
Anonymous No.211996410 >>211996559
>>211995522 (OP)
i like villie. he's like nolan but without being prone to gimmicks
Anonymous No.211996546 >>211999539 >>212018001 >>212029267
Don't let him do brutalism. The franchise needs sex, glamour, and lush music and locations
Anonymous No.211996559 >>211998453 >>212001336 >>212002237 >>212004872 >>212007659 >>212017635 >>212036839
>>211996410
He unfortunately sucks ass at science fiction movies. Like, he's done nothing but sharpen his skills within the genre for the last 10+ years and still the best he can produce is... Dunc. Which is a fine flick, but it's just not on the same level as the other epics like LOTR even though it tries really hard to be and people pretend it is. He ruined the story of Blade Runner even if his film looked amazing and Arrival is just plain shit really.

Ironically he excels at actions with stuff like Sicario and Prisoners being good. So maybe he can do Bond, but he also sucks at character drama (ahem Enemy) so if he tries to put any of that into the movie it'll all go south very quickly.
Anonymous No.211996596 >>212007370
sellout
Anonymous No.211996649 >>212000706
Is it just me or are his films more-so style over substance?
Anonymous No.211996762
>>211995522 (OP)
*sigh* somehow, james bond has returned
Anonymous No.211997725 >>211998147 >>212001044
Surely he has no say over casting though right? I don't think I could physically stomach a yank Bond
Anonymous No.211998072
>>211995522 (OP)
Sicario-era Yes. It had a plausible workplace tension, all the action choreo make sense, the conflict is thrilling enough.

Post-Dunc: HACK who plays the PR game better than he ever did. The work suffers tho
Anonymous No.211998147 >>211998276 >>212014867
>>211997725
Why would he be a yank? If anything he's gonna be Canadian
Anonymous No.211998276
>>211998147
(Yikes)
Well we can at least hope it'll be one of those east side leafs that sound Irish
Anonymous No.211998281 >>211998381 >>212001301 >>212012737
Bond's girl sure will be some ugly hag.
Anonymous No.211998327
film student tier hack
Anonymous No.211998360
Sweet. That means it’s going to be a shitty cast selected solely for their social media size.
Anonymous No.211998364 >>212001336 >>212003318 >>212007339
>>211995522 (OP)
Nolan on suicide watch
Anonymous No.211998381 >>211998413 >>212001806 >>212002252
>>211998281
>peak era Emily Blunt
>pre-wall Amy Adams
>Sarah Gadon
>Ana de Armas
Zendaya is kind of the only one of his leading ladies that doesn't fit the bill, and even that is off set by Ferguson really.
Having said that it would be an instant franchise destroyer if he casts Zendaya as a Bond girl, and there's a distinct chance he would do something like that.
Anonymous No.211998408
>>211995522 (OP)
Source? That’s what i thought. Lying fag.
Anonymous No.211998413 >>211998876
>>211998381
Zendaya is too popular to be a bond girl
Anonymous No.211998453 >>211998915 >>212001730 >>212007670 >>212008640 >>212017765 >>212036886 >>212042958 >>212047680
>>211996559
2049 and Dune are great, contrarian
Anonymous No.211998876 >>212012613
>>211998413
People said that about Ana de Armas in John Wick and now she has her own franchise
Anonymous No.211998915
>>211998453
They are fine. Like I said good flicks. But they by no means will stand the test of time. Maybe if visual effects plateau then there's a chance, but that's the best thing they have going for them. That's really not a contrarian opinion to hold anon... unless you're just a giant tastelet in which case we can compare our top films and leave it up to the court of public opinion you gigantic sillywilly?
Anonymous No.211999539
>>211996546
Agreed. Villeneuve can be pretty good at doing cold, emotionally detached epics. As a big Dune books fan, I don't like his Dune, but he at least didn't totally screw it up like some other filmmakers would have. I'm just not sure he has what it takes to do Bond. We've already had 20 years of self-serious Bond. Will Villeneuve allow the character to breathe a bit, to go back to being a bit more charming and wild in the old-school Bond way? I suppose maybe it has more to do with the actor and the writing than with the director, though.
Anonymous No.212000706 >>212000926 >>212001764 >>212002527
>>211996649
Which makes him perfect for Bond. Nobody watches a Bond film for depth, what people do watch it for is styleish and cool action sequences, often involving really cool settings.
Anonymous No.212000926 >>212001031
>>212000706
Sure, but Bond also has to have a certain sort of charm. Without that the cool settings and action sequences have much less appeal.
Anonymous No.212000983 >>212003340
>>211995522 (OP)
a guy who makes technically perfect but soulless movies is just right for Bond.
Anonymous No.212001031
>>212000926
Bond needs a double taking pigeon or a guy sweeping the air.
You can't go full Die Another Day, but a Bond movie with no bafflingly stupid choices is not a true Bond movie.
Anonymous No.212001044 >>212001094 >>212002272 >>212014433 >>212026399
>>211997725
Amazon themselves said the next Bond would be a caucasin from the "british commonwealth" or something. Rules out the latest Irish guy whose agent is trying to get publicity for. Very much rules in Andrew Garfield, Taron Eggerton, and Tom Holland.

A Canadian is a possibility but Jackman is too old and Ryan Reynolds is probably too busy.

An Australian is also technically possible but Taika Waititi wouldn't fit the role and as he is part aboriginal or something doesn't fit the Caucasian requirement.
Anonymous No.212001094 >>212001364
>>212001044
anon... have you ever seen James Bond?
Anonymous No.212001301 >>212001375 >>212038361
>>211998281
If the leaks about Awkwafina playing a gender and race swapped Felix are true, then she's cute and they won't need a "bond girl". Smart move as its the ultimate "something for the dads" right there, but as she flies under the radar of women who don't realise how hot she is, it means you won't get the usual shrill voices screaming sexism that accompany most Bond films being released.
Anonymous No.212001336 >>212001764 >>212003268 >>212007368 >>212017635 >>212042815
>>211996559
villeneuve and Nolan are the current biggest directors
>>211998364
Unironically, I'm positive Nolan could do a better job but Bond's owners don't want him to ruin the franchise doing the best bond films in history. They want something shiny and commercial so people can move on and ask for another one.
Anonymous No.212001364
>>212001094
Yes, I have seen them all.

Sorry but Taika Waititi doesn't fit the role.
Anonymous No.212001375
>>212001301
awkafina voice in any bond film would be a big plus unironically
Cast Anamaria Vartolomei as bond girl and I'm in
Anonymous No.212001429 >>212001598 >>212002287 >>212003000 >>212007192 >>212007829 >>212007888 >>212008521 >>212008652
Would you rather the next Bond film be;
>Set in the modern day
>A period piece set in the 60's/70's
Anonymous No.212001598
>>212001429
Depends what they do with it. If the "Rigging the Game" leaks are true and its set with James Bond going against a modern sea piracy based terrorism group, then that would be really cool with tankers and and super yachts set in the modern day.
Anonymous No.212001621
It's amazon so I will not watch
Anonymous No.212001622 >>212002173
>>211995522 (OP)
Based Benis has never made a bad movie. It will most likely be good or even great, but I still won't watch it, because I don't care about James Bond.
Anonymous No.212001674
It would be an irresponsibly bad decision not to bring back Sean Bean in some capacity. Seems like such a no brainer
Anonymous No.212001708
>>211995522 (OP)
>Villememe
no thanks. Anything he makes is insufferably sterile
Anonymous No.212001730 >>212001781
>>211998453
no, they are shit, contrarian
were you even alive when movie were good or your standard is set on capeshit?
Anonymous No.212001764 >>212002025
>>212001336
Villeneuve is awful director and storyteller
>>212000706
A Bond movie should also be manly, cool, stylish and sexy. And Villememe can't do that shit
Anonymous No.212001781 >>212002223
>>212001730
Objectively incorrect take.
Anonymous No.212001806 >>212006108
>>211998381
are we talking hollywood beauty standards?
>>peak era Emily Blunt
cute +
>>pre-wall Amy Adams
cute
>>Sarah Gadon
cute +
>>Ana de Armas
meh
Anonymous No.212002025 >>212002196 >>212007394
>>212001764
sorry can't you name a director with better numbers (yes, numbers) than Nolan or Villeneuve in the last decade?
protip: you can't
Anonymous No.212002173
>>212001622
>Based Benis has never made a decent movie.
fixed
Anonymous No.212002196
>>212002025
>numbers
Then there aren't good directors in the last decade, it's that simple
Nolan is ok btw, but getting worse, probably due to industry around him getting worse. Will never watch his Odyssey
Anonymous No.212002201
>>211995522 (OP)
kino. As long as Bond is not African-British
Anonymous No.212002203 >>212003378 >>212030378
>>211995522 (OP)
>A fucking French faggot directing Bond
>Black Bond
Just throw it in the trash. They got an American for the last one and it stunk.
Anonymous No.212002223
>>212001781
>Objectively incorrect take.
Anonymous No.212002237 >>212002297 >>212017573 >>212032956
>>211996559
I thought Blade Runner was fantastic. His other Sci-Slop gives me pause though. The hyper-minimalism is going to seem weird in a Bond film, as would the realism of his other projects. He seems like a very strange fit.
I would have picked Baz Lurhman - the correct ethnicity, can do Yuge movies, all hyper kinetic and flashy and lizard brained.
Anonymous No.212002252 >>212002535
>>211998381
This is why Nolan can't do Bond. He'd probably cast Bella Ramsey as a Bond girl.
Anonymous No.212002272 >>212002438
>>212001044
Jackman is Australian. But too old. Taika Waititi doesn't identify with the Commonwealth. He's half Maori, half Jewish.
Anonymous No.212002287
>>212001429
I wish they had gone with Tarantino with his period accurate/book accurate Casino Royale. If they needed a Brit, they could have just got Ritchie to direct and Butler to star. It would have been decent.
Anonymous No.212002297
>>212002237
Baz Lurhman with Sweeneys tits and ass as the Bond girl.
Anonymous No.212002438 >>212002994
>>212002272
>Taika Waititi doesn't identify with the Commonwealth. He's half Maori, half Jewish.

Maoris are part of the Commonwealth, they're New Zealanders. They also love the British because we bought them rugby, civilisation and government.
Anonymous No.212002527
>>212000706
Great he can make skyfall 2.0 andfilm school dropouts can glaze it again
Anonymous No.212002535 >>212003009
>>212002252
You're an idiot. Nolan would probably give us Anne Hathaway which would be great but she would never "lower" herself to it.
Anonymous No.212002958
Still want Verhoeven's take on Bond.
Anonymous No.212002994
>>212002438
He absolutely hates the British and is one of the one's who sees New Zealand as "occupied".
Anonymous No.212003000
>>212001429
Modern day. Navy ship final fight and all that.
Anonymous No.212003009
>>212002535
But that's exactly what I said? He would give us an asexual uggo as a Bond girl.
Anonymous No.212003157
>>211995522 (OP)
The casting is unbearable in all of his movies so I'll skip
Anonymous No.212003268
>>212001336
nobody can't even pronounce this guy name, he's not popular outside of a few reddit normies.
nolan is on a completely different scale
Anonymous No.212003318
>>211998364
Yeah im sure he doesn't have any other option anon, he was totally available
Anonymous No.212003340 >>212003394
>>212000983
>Souless movies
Anonymous No.212003378 >>212007556
>>212002203
>French

Anon...
Anonymous No.212003394
>>212003340
>incendies

is that short for incel tendies?
Anonymous No.212004872
>>211996559
Enemy is a great movie
Anonymous No.212005164
>>211995522 (OP)
Considering his body of work it's going to be yet another shitty movie.
Anonymous No.212005609 >>212007185
How would you react if Idris Elba is the next James Bond, /tv/?
Anonymous No.212006108 >>212007159
>>212001806
You ranked Sarah Gadon over Ana de Armas ergo you are a gay faggot
Anonymous No.212006155
>>211995522 (OP)
Are yall joking he's a terrible choice it's gonna be more boring minimalist slop like Craig shit was. I hope they pick a black wheelchaired woman for bond because it's fucked either way
Anonymous No.212006200
>>211995522 (OP)
James Bond confirmed for no fun allowed pretentious horse shit. Fuck id take Michael Bay over DV
Anonymous No.212006758 >>212017644 >>212033288
They should cast pic rel as Bond. He's a bit buffer nowadays but I think that could actually work in his favour. He's not as ridiculously big as Cavill either.
Anonymous No.212007159
>>212006108
Ana de Armas is a babyface with no curves
Anonymous No.212007185 >>212009976
>>212005609
"This is not Bond, will never watch or acknowledge it existence"
Same thing I said for Craigshit
Anonymous No.212007192
>>212001429
Victorian-era Bond
Anonymous No.212007305 >>212007442 >>212007479
He's definitely the best of the shortlist.
But I won't be optimistic until we get a good casting for Bond and they release a trailer. Aaron Taylor-Johnson would be a horrendous choice and tank the entire film if they still go through with him. And I don't trust amazon to trust Villeneuve's artistic sensibilities.
Anonymous No.212007339
>>211998364
We already got Nolan's Bond. It was called Skyfall and it was absolute shite
Anonymous No.212007340 >>212007529
>>211995522 (OP)
I'll at least watch it now, but I feel like the casting will be shit
Anonymous No.212007368
>>212001336
>I'm positive Nolan could do a better job
I'm positive you're a fucking retard
Anonymous No.212007370
>>211996596
Yes, the man who has made massive blockbusters is a sellout now.
Anonymous No.212007394
>>212002025
>can't you name a director with better numbers (yes, numbers) than Nolan or Villeneuve in the last decade?
So you want the Russo brothers to direct it? Fucking stupid choice but hey if you want to be a fuckwit then go for it
Anonymous No.212007442 >>212007503
>>212007305
>He's definitely the best of the shortlist.
Edward Berger would've been a good choice. But he'd only work for a very cold and methodical film with more emphasis on talking and the cat&mouse chase instead of explosions and gadgets.
Villeneuve is the best choice for a standard blockbuster that will make the most amount of people happy
Anonymous No.212007464 >>212007490 >>212043243
>>211995522 (OP)
doesn't matter who directs or who stars. It's going to be Amazon-flavoured slop with all the depth and self-important bombast of a lesser Marvel movie.
Anonymous No.212007479
>>212007305
>Villeneuve's artistic sensibilities.
those are sterile shit
Anonymous No.212007490
>>212007464
>Villeneuve kino vs amazon soullessness
I hold out hope for Denis
Anonymous No.212007503 >>212007566
>>212007442
>Villeneuve is the best choice for a standard blockbuster that will make the most amount of people happy
Except people who like movies and weren't raised by capeshit
Anonymous No.212007529
>>212007340
this
but maybe after working with pattinson on messiah villeneuve somehow convinces them to hire him instead and we get real bond kino
Anonymous No.212007556 >>212007601 >>212025651
>>212003378
Anon...
>Villeneuve was born on October 3, 1967, in the village of Gentilly in BΓ©cancour, Quebec
Anonymous No.212007566 >>212008614
>>212007503
>n-no it's everyone else who's wrong
>people who actually like films (not the people who watch films and vote with their wallets, the other ones who you've never heard of) all agree that i'm right
>it doesn't matter that villeneuve's never directed capeshit the point is that it makes me feel like i have a personality by shitting on him for no reason
Anonymous No.212007591
>>211995522 (OP)
could we pretend Ryan Gosling is British so he can play as Bond?
Anonymous No.212007601
>>212007556
Ah yes, Quebec, that amazing European city in the heart of France. I hear they invented the cheese wheel
Anonymous No.212007659
>>211996559
agree. he cannot do franchise sci fi. so bond is a coin flip.
Anonymous No.212007670
>>211998453
lol pleb
Anonymous No.212007790
>>211995522 (OP)
who?
Anonymous No.212007829 >>212019082
>>212001429
Bond films need to be set in the present time to cash in on brand licensing and product placement deals. See pic related for the new 007 game.
Anonymous No.212007888
>>212001429
Anyone who thinks it should be a period piece is retarded and their opinion on the entire franchise can safely be ignored
Anonymous No.212007916 >>212008566
>>211995522 (OP)
It will be dull and soulless like his other flicks. Shan't be watching.
Anonymous No.212008012
Villeneuve is a certified kinosseur this might be good
Anonymous No.212008125 >>212008161
>>211995522 (OP)
trying to remember past Bond directors and only Sam Mendes comes to mind.
Villeneuve is an interesting choice, bold move from them I think
Anonymous No.212008161 >>212010223
>>212008125
>forgetting Martin Campbell
bruh
Anonymous No.212008396
>>211995522 (OP)
The most boring filmmaker out there and that's quite an achievement considering Nolan is still somehow allowed work.
Anonymous No.212008521 >>212008616
>>212001429
Prehistoric Bond
>Bad guy caveman wants to take over world using newly discovered fire
>Dinosaur-riding chase
>Volcano explosion finale
Anonymous No.212008566 >>212008779
>>212007916
He has a track record of making beige, humorless movies that happen to be pretty good. I just don't think that's what bond needs right now.
Anonymous No.212008614 >>212022169
>>212007566
Anonymous No.212008616
>>212008521
>We've invented a new method of transportation. We'll calling it the "wheel". Try not to break it this time
Anonymous No.212008640
>>211998453
2049 is entertaining and visually impressive but there's nothing about the plot and writing that made it memorable like the original was. Dunc 1 was pretty good but Dunc 2 was a massive fumble.
Anonymous No.212008652 >>212008682 >>212008885
>>212001429
Modern. The beauty of the old Bond films are that you can pick an era and then immerse yourself in a miniature time capsule of what was popular for a couple hours. It would be a shame to take that from future generations.
Anonymous No.212008682
>>212008652
Shit, don't phrase it like that. Now all the boomer execs will be creaming themselves to set the next Bond film in the past
Anonymous No.212008779
>>212008566
>that happen to be pretty good
it doesn't happen
Anonymous No.212008795 >>212013858
>next bond will be a bloated drama piece that pretends to be high art rather than a fun action adventure movie
Oh well. Like I said, can't be worse than Craig run.

They made bond bi and killed him
Anonymous No.212008858
>>211995522 (OP)
Finally we will get Bond Boy
Anonymous No.212008885 >>212026731 >>212043025
>>212008652
In theory I would agree, but I don't think it would work as well as a cold war Bond.
Doing his spy stuff with current era surveillance stuff would feel extr implausible, and the very idea of high tech gadgets in current technological era wouldn't be impressive at all.
And obviously changing the character to accomodate the modern era is out of question, because it would made him another character entirely.
Maybe it's time to retire the character. New generations being forced to creat new shit wouldn't be bad at all
Anonymous No.212009976 >>212010180
>>212007185
Ah, the incel reaction
Anonymous No.212010180
>>212009976
Like any other leftist buzzword, "incel" just means "normal person who rejects my extreme leftist religion"
Get woke, go broke, anon. get woke, go broke
Anonymous No.212010223 >>212011653
>>212008161
yeah he's not the kind of name I'd remember although GoldenEye and Casino Royale are great bond movies
Anonymous No.212011331 >>212017274 >>212043379
>>211995522 (OP)
Anonymous No.212011653 >>212013649
>>212010223
>GoldenEye
yes
>Casino Royale
nope
Anonymous No.212011810 >>212022228
>>211995522 (OP)
That's good for the Broccolis, but bad for Villeneuve enjoyers. The franchise format will constrain him considerably, I'd much rather see some non-name hack do the next Bond and Villeneuve make another original movie like Enemy or Sicario.
Anonymous No.212012613
>>211998876
Ballerina flopped hard lmao
Anonymous No.212012737
>>211998281
It will be Zendaya
Anonymous No.212013649 >>212032609 >>212043316
>>212011653
Mads is kino villain
Anonymous No.212013858 >>212017364
>>212008795
>They made bond bi
no
Anonymous No.212014433
>>212001044
>rules in Andrew Garfield
he's a jew. and unfitting. all of them dont fit. bond needs to have a dad type older man vibe, not young fuckboy pretty face. even cavil is wrong, too boyish. a masculine face is needed with a normal, somewhat broad physique. someone you'd call a hunk or somewhat lanky, but not too thin. theres multiple better choices than these, but most of my picks are too old. ten years ago after spectre, they shouldve done it, not another, boring craig movie.
Anonymous No.212014691
It will be woke
Anonymous No.212014738
>>211995522 (OP)
brutalist man wins again
can't wait for more conversations in dark rooms
Anonymous No.212014845 >>212032656
>>211995522 (OP)
Good.
Bondfags will suffer like original Dune fans did.
No one should be spared. Everyone will suffer until the age of troondaptations is over.
Anonymous No.212014867 >>212015401
>>211998147
Based
Anonymous No.212015401 >>212016805 >>212016955
>>212014867
Bond can't be an established and adored mega star
Anonymous No.212016613 >>212016915
>>211995522 (OP)
and his second wife is the producer
guess she's no longer pretending to be a journalist
Anonymous No.212016805
>>212015401
yes he can. Cavill or bust
Anonymous No.212016915 >>212017090
>>212016613
she's pretending to be a producer now. his 1st wife who saw him through the difficult years is a strong woman.
Anonymous No.212016955
>>212015401
go to bed goose, you're neither of those things
Anonymous No.212016993
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAtA061vmRg
Anonymous No.212017023 >>212029798
we need bond girls with cartoonishly large breasts. big tits are back in style, time to go very big
Anonymous No.212017090
>>212016915
and gave him three kids, up and coming film directors
say bonjour to future oscar winner SalomΓ© Ville9
Anonymous No.212017274
>>212011331
She could play Nik Nak's regular height daughter out for revenge.
Anonymous No.212017364 >>212022138
>>212013858
They hinted at it in skyfall
Anonymous No.212017488 >>212033709 >>212043461
>>211995522 (OP)
I don't like Villeneuve but this is the classiest possible choice and will be a step up from the Craig Bonds unless they cast a black or a j. He has a Hollywood sense of darkness that is rather perfect, yet totally wrong for Blade Runner and Dune.

This also means that Nolan will helm the next Bond be it the next sequel or the next actor to have the honor. There's never been a perfect Bond movie. And it's a shame QT never got his shot, having grown up lower class, QT has an eye for the gleam of wealth and status that the series much needs, specifically his was set in the 60s.
Anonymous No.212017573
>>212002237
A Baz Lurhman Bond film would be too good for this world
Anonymous No.212017635
>>211996559
>>212001336
Nolan would not compromise with Amazon. Amazon was offering him $400 million to direct two or three Bonds and he turned them down because he stipulated it had to be set in the same decade as the books. The problem is that this is not attractive for product placement which hinges on the newest product as much as the brand.
Anonymous No.212017644
>>212006758
I've always liked his look, has a Dalton-esque thing going iykwim
Anonymous No.212017765
>>211998453
2049 was like a car commercial nothing more. He is perfect for 007. And it keeps him away from directing Rendezvous with Rama.
Anonymous No.212018001
>>211996546
The villain's lair will definitely be brutalism
Anonymous No.212019082
>>212007829
>they didn't have cars and soda pop back in the day
Die shill
Anonymous No.212021856 >>212021941
Chalamet is Bond
Anonymous No.212021941
>>212021856
Even that retard is better than Aaron the jew
Anonymous No.212021981
>>211995522 (OP)
could be worse
Anonymous No.212022039 >>212033306
>>211995522 (OP)
Hopefully he rips off more shots from One From The Heart
Anonymous No.212022138
>>212017364
oh, it's you
as you've been told a thousand times, he says that to dismantle silva's attempts to make him uncomfortable
Anonymous No.212022169 >>212043968
>>212008614
He destroyed your argument so now you're changing it to a political attack on him
Anonymous No.212022228
>>212011810
>That's good for the Broccolis
Not their franchise anymore, they handed it off to Amazon
Anonymous No.212023985
>>211995522 (OP)
aaaaaaaaaand we are back
Anonymous No.212024035 >>212036005
>>211995522 (OP)
Nice, cast Cavil now
Anonymous No.212024061
>>211995522 (OP)
I'm surprised he hasn't already.
Anonymous No.212024104
>>211995522 (OP)
>his favorite Bond film is Casino Royale
Based or not based?
Anonymous No.212024203
>>211995522 (OP)
the more razorfist hates him, the more I like him
Anonymous No.212025493
>>211995522 (OP)
Denis is like if Fincher and Nolan had gay sex until they became one director who was gay.
Anonymous No.212025651
>>212007556
>QuΓ©bec, Canada, France
Anonymous No.212026399
>>212001044
Garfield is 41 and too known to be bond
I do not believe they are changing their casting requirements which is someone in their early 30s, from the UK and not a well known actor. Aron Taylor Johnson was given a free pass since he was related to the person set to direct the thing but as time goes on that window closes more and more.
Anonymous No.212026731
>>212008885
The new generation does make new shit then bond just apes it since the spy genera is dead as shit. If a new bond movie was being filmed right now than it would be closer to John wick and depending on how superman does, that or like any other MCU quippy movies.
Anonymous No.212026984 >>212027240 >>212043524
Anons acting like Bond wasn't the MCU slop of the 20th century
Anonymous No.212027240
>>212026984
The MCU Slop of the 20th century was Star Trek
Anonymous No.212029091
>>211995522 (OP)
Sarah Gadon Bond girl
Anonymous No.212029175
Danny Boyle 2.0
7 months of nothing and then he quits over creative differences and then they get Leitch
Anonymous No.212029267
>>211996546
>sex, glamour, and lush music and locations
So everything this faggot is incapable of doing
Anonymous No.212029336
>>211995522 (OP)
I think Bond has been dead for a long time
Anonymous No.212029798 >>212032695
>>212017023
your bond girl sir
Anonymous No.212030378 >>212032957
>>212002203
My first thought was it's going to be Daniel Kaluuya, who is "British" and worked with Villeneuve.
Anonymous No.212032565
>>211995522 (OP)
I think that Villememe can't make movies and I won't watch it
Anonymous No.212032609 >>212032856
>>212013649
Yeah,bt the movie is still shit and bond for people who don't like bond
Anonymous No.212032656
>>212014845
lmao Lynch Dune is better than DUNC.
Villeneuve is awful director and storyteller and the cast is horrid
Anonymous No.212032695 >>212032819
>>212029798
butterface with tommy lee jones eyes
Anonymous No.212032819
>>212032695
anon wanted titties
Anonymous No.212032856
>>212032609
why
Anonymous No.212032956 >>212033002
>>212002237
> Elvis 2022
You gorilla nigger you stupid dumb gorilla nigger
Anonymous No.212032957 >>212033028 >>212035915
>>212030378
He's such a bad choice. Even James McEvoy would be better. The best Bonds have to be believable as Etonian faggots AND threatening. No one really jumps out at the moment. Gerard Butler back in the day. They'll probably get an unknown from Australia or something.
Anonymous No.212033002
>>212032956
What's wrong with Elvis 2022?
Anonymous No.212033028 >>212035915
>>212032957
I'll say Aaron Johnson.
Anonymous No.212033288
>>212006758
Aidan Turner would be the most slam dunk selection they could make. Which is exactly why they won't do it
Anonymous No.212033306
>>212022039
There’s a giant woman in the bond movies?
Anonymous No.212033339
It'll take until 2029 for this movie to come out. They're making sure Bond is an irrelevant relic.
Anonymous No.212033362
>>211995522 (OP)
Denis Villafaghot already made a James Bond movie. It’s called blade runner 2049.
Anonymous No.212033709 >>212035778
>>212017488
>And it's a shame QT never got his shot
I used to say this about Star Trek but ultimately I don't think Bond should be walking around philosophising like a high schooler whilst being ostensibly racist. Same way you just know that if he did ST then the whole Kirk gets killed everytime he particle beams would be like a major monologue and plot point somewhere in the film.

It's just a bad fit all round. QT should exclusively make original content since he made his own genre effectively.
Anonymous No.212034277 >>212035201
sucks. didnt martin campbell say he'd still be up to direct bond 26? or at least some years ago said he'd be up to direct more. what the fuck has he done to anger the hollywood jews so much. everyone knows this guy is a sure bet and he's not going to fuck it up. he's successfully rebooted 2 bond actors.
Anonymous No.212035201 >>212035511 >>212043624
>>212034277
Martin Campbell just directed the worst non-SW movie of Daisy Ridley's career which says a lot. And he gets too much good faith for Casino, it was a generational break but set the motions for an predictable and muted Bond aesthetic.
Anonymous No.212035428
We hate him this is going to be boring, dull and he will ruin Bond just like he ruined dune and bladerunner
Anonymous No.212035511
>>212035201
not the same thing whatsoever. also i fail to see how casino royale set any precedent. if the precedents set were followed then goldeneye and casino royale wouldn't have been the best bonds of the respective eras.
Anonymous No.212035549 >>212046769
BR 2049 is great. K’s journey is an intense emotional roller coaster about what it means to have free will.
Brits are in for something good after a decade of Daniel Craig punching his way through the plot
Anonymous No.212035778 >>212035967 >>212036171
>>212033709
You're wrong, QT has spoken on Bond over the years, he's a Fleming nut, he knows the books in and out unlike any past Bond helmer or recently proposed ones, possibly with the exception of Nolan. He wasn't going to make Bond irreverent or make him speak jive. The best proof of this is his faithful vision for an adapted trilogy of Len Deighton's Berlin Game spy books, which have a harder edge than Fleming's but more emphasis on intel gathering and spookcraft. The draw for him was to work outside the very expectations you've defined, the closest we'll ever get now is Hans Landa, too cartoonish for Bond's world but a solid example of a necessary memorable adversary of wits for a true Fleming outing.

I haven't read the script for his Star Trek, which, while apparently more in line with his brand, it being a gangster noir set on Earth, is still allegedly great, Shatner was all in, and considering the lens flare slop JJ dished out, permanently denting the IP, it would be a correction and injection rather than a "bad fit."

He was also dedicated to making a whiter Anglo Bond than any other modern director is able or willing to, OUaTiH is an example of this loophole, and that was an appeal for him. It's a shame Broccoli shunned him, ideally he would have directed a Mission Impossible for Cruise, an eight film franchise fueled by Broccoli's rejection of Cruise for Bond, that vengeful billion dollar smash might have killed her.
Anonymous No.212035915 >>212036313
>>212033028
>>212032957
Pattinson is the only sensible choice.
Anonymous No.212035967 >>212036054 >>212036062 >>212036171
>>212035778
You sound like a mouthfoaming fanboy m8
>Hans Landa
a direct example of why Tarantino should never have been anywhere near the franchise. This character works for Basterds but holy shit the opening scene of that movie would absolutely tank the Bond IP and you are pretty ignorant if you can't see why
Anonymous No.212036005
>>212024035
Cavill is occupied with a 200 million Highlander and then the Warhammer series.
Anonymous No.212036054 >>212036367
>>212035967
I dont think he is saying to literally put Hans Landa in a Bond film m8. Just that Tarantino can write a good villain
Anonymous No.212036062 >>212036367
>>212035967
>Hans Landa, too cartoonish for Bond's world
Read faggot.
Anonymous No.212036171 >>212036367
>>212035778
>>212035967
You also are ignorant of the fact that Christoph Waltz was cast as Blofeld due to his Oscar winning role as Hans Landa in Inglourious Basterds.
Anonymous No.212036313
>>212035915
Would literally need an entire set of new teeth
Anonymous No.212036347
i would have liked to see quentin tarantino or nolan's take on bond but only for one film. what bond needs isnt a superstar director who's quirky and experimental. what bond needs is a workmanlike director who's also a constant source of energy on the set. just like campbell. oh and a screenplay that isnt shit.
Anonymous No.212036367
>>212036054
>>212036062
>this character that Tarantino wrote whilst too wacky for Bond proves that he could write a good Bond villain that's not wacky
Uhhhh
>>212036171
Waltz is one of the worst parts about the Craig movies after Craig himself. Landa is the peak of his career ffs
Anonymous No.212036801
>>211995522 (OP)
why does this talentless retard get so much work?
>bladerunner sequel, dune movies
Just awful, uninspired garbage.
Anonymous No.212036839
>>211996559
>people pretend it is
Really? Anons here get off to the jew-nigger pairing, the butchered story and what he did to chani?
Anonymous No.212036886
>>211998453
>my comrades decide what's good
go back to re ddit, faggot.
Anonymous No.212037256 >>212037281 >>212037606
>>211995522 (OP)
What's going to happen to Dune?
Anonymous No.212037281
>>212037256
Hopefully cancelled and that hack never touch it again
Anonymous No.212037606 >>212046878
>>212037256
Dune Messiah starts next month. Bond starts in January
Anonymous No.212038361 >>212047427
>>212001301
grim
Anonymous No.212040721
bump, james bump
Anonymous No.212041597
>>211995522 (OP)
Meh. It's not like 007 films are fine art.
Anonymous No.212042815
>>212001336
>Bond's owners don't want him to ruin the franchise doing the best bond films in history. T
You're on crack if you think Nolan can direct a compelling Bond Movie. The guy is dry as fuck.
Anonymous No.212042958
>>211998453
Nah the guy is dull.
Anonymous No.212043025
>>212008885
Shut up you imbecile. Bond isn't going anywhere.
Anonymous No.212043177 >>212043518
Only British Directors should touch Bond. Campbell gets a pass.
Anonymous No.212043243
>>212007464
So perfect for Bond then.
Anonymous No.212043316
>>212013649
No. None of the Craig Villain's are good sadly. Brosnan at least had Alec and Elektra.
Anonymous No.212043379 >>212044584
>>212011331
>There is a possibility that Zendaya will be a Bond girl in my lifetime
Anonymous No.212043461
>>212017488
The Craig films were all shot well. The problem was never the directors.
Anonymous No.212043518
>>212043177
Canadians are red coats
Anonymous No.212043524
>>212026984
Thats another problem people taking Bond seriously.
Anonymous No.212043624
>>212035201
I wish you guys understood what a directors job is. They do not write the scripts. This is why people think Nolan is a great director when hes clearly a better writer.
Anonymous No.212043968
>>212022169
It does waft right stankily of Leftist, subhuman trash, yes.
Anonymous No.212044584
>>212043379
Anonymous No.212046769
>>212035549
>BR 2049 is great.
Lol no
Anonymous No.212046859
>>211995522 (OP)
So the villain parts will be cool and everything else will be shit
Anonymous No.212046878
>>212037606
>another waste
Too bad
Anonymous No.212047427
>>212038361
You seem to have mistyped "sex on a stick", Madam.
Anonymous No.212047680
>>211998453
>2049
>DUNC
>Great
Anonymous No.212047759
>>211995522 (OP)
I hope it doesn't get in the way of his real movies
Anonymous No.212050787
The name's Bump. James Bump.