Thread 212008432

This was a good movie, thankfully they provided a hint at the start about working backwards so Early on brainlets like me could understand that the black and white was past to present and the colour one was present to past. Also made me basedface at the reveal that the story about jimmy was akshually him all along. What did /tv/ think of it?

The black and white part was set in the past? WHAT!

>>212008477
am i retarded? i thought that when they showed the scene where he told the motel guy to not accept any calls anymore was near the middle of the movie, but at the start in the colour section he already was talking about not accepting calls

>>212008432 (OP)
>Also made me basedface at the reveal that the story about jimmy was akshually him all along.
this part always felt unnecessary to me. the fact that he was just going around killing randos was enough of a twist imo, they didn't need to include the "he was actually sammy jenkis" part.

>>212008553
When the entire natalie part was going on I already beleived it was going to be a serial killer twist because none of the motivations of other characters lined up BUT I didn't expect that the wife was alive and then killed, also it probably wasn't a good idea to watch this with a piercing headache haha

>>212008644
it felt like a hat on a hat to me but i still like the film. it has a cozy vibe in spite of everything.