← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 212011531

20 posts 4 images /tv/
Anonymous No.212011531 >>212011778 >>212011999 >>212012286
12 Angry Men, Why is it so highly regarded among normal people and critics?

I watched it and it was good but was it somehow revolutionary at the time?
Anonymous No.212011710
its comfy.
Anonymous No.212011758
jewish bullshit
Anonymous No.212011778 >>212011880
>>212011531 (OP)
It's just another overrated old movie. In modern standardi it's 7.3 instead of 9.0 movie.
Anonymous No.212011880 >>212011943 >>212011944
>>212011778
Nah its dogshit. Rashomon for people with down syndrome
Anonymous No.212011943 >>212012050
>>212011880
its not like rashomon at all
Anonymous No.212011944 >>212012050
>>212011880
This nonsensical comparison makes it seem like you are the one with Down syndrome.
Anonymous No.212011999 >>212012286
>>212011531 (OP)
It was topical at the time because some Jew had gotten off from a solid conviction in real life.
Anonymous No.212012050 >>212012142
>>212011943
>>212011944
Go organize your crayons
Anonymous No.212012142 >>212012187
>>212012050
You already shoved all the crayons up your nose to come up with this moronic comparison, you retard.
Anonymous No.212012187 >>212012340
>>212012142
Its okay to be stupid anon, dont worry. This retarded jew movie was made for stupid people like you.
Anonymous No.212012263
1. Prince of the City
2. The Hill
3. 12 Angry Men
4. Fail Safe
5. The Verdict
6. Network
7. Before the Devil Knows You're Dead
8. Long Day's Journey into Night
9. The Offence
10. Murder on the Orient Express
Anonymous No.212012286 >>212012642
>>212011531 (OP)
It's just a good movie OP. In fact, of the best movies are just stage plays or feel like stage plays.
Anyway Henry Fonda's character was wrong and the kid absolutely did it.
>>212011999
This is untrue.
Anonymous No.212012340 >>212013725
>>212012187
>Its okay to be stupid
Of course a retard like you would say so. Considering your absurd comparison you are obviously proud of your own stupidity.
Anonymous No.212012642 >>212012846
>>212012286
>the kid absolutely did it
the evidence didn't imply he did.
Anonymous No.212012846 >>212013085
>>212012642
Literally all of the evidence pointed towards him and for him to be innocent literally all of it would have to be wrong. The jurors find supposed holes in the evidence, but we don't actually know if any of those are exonerating because none of them are cross examined by the prosecution, who obviously isn't present among the jurors. This is also why jurors aren't supposed to re-debate the case and evidence when deliberating.
Anonymous No.212013085 >>212013319
>>212012846
It's not jury's fault the defendant has a shitty lawyer.
Anonymous No.212013319
>>212013085
This assumes the defense didn't bring up these supposed holes because they weren't aware of them. It is equally likely they were aware of them, and, based on evidence the jury isn't privy to, knew they weren't exonerating or worth bringing up.
Anonymous No.212013446
Oh boy another obvious russian influence shill thread. Same shit over and over. No Ivan I don't want an fascist justice system where people are automatically guilty. Yes Ivan we know you made this thread to try and influence people's real world views and not discuss a movie.
Anonymous No.212013725
>>212012340
mad because dumb xD