Thread 212100725

>Tarantino's highest-rated screenplay was directed by someone else

OOF

>>212100725 (OP)
Tarantino movies are for fourteen year old boys. Nothing but surface level action and childish storyline. No depth or deeper meaning, no nourishment just junk food for the brain.

Shallow meaningless garbage for vaxxed and boosted retards.

>>212100994
This. Give me a marvel kino any day.

>>212100994
You must be a woman or a faggot.

>>212100994
you could say they're pulp fiction

>>212100725 (OP)
I'd say Pulp Fiction's ratings are more impressive.

>>212101862
Half-written by Roger Avery.

>>212100994
This is true but generally speaking they are expertly made.

>>212100994
this except for his best work, Jackie Brown

>>212100725 (OP)
He makes a big deal about his screenplay being vastly different from Tony Scott's movie, but it's not at all, nor is it as much "out of sequence" as he suggests iirc.

>>212100994
and what movies do adults with adult lives and families watch? because in my experience they watch the sloppiest slop imaginable.

So that begs the question of what movies for adults actually is. It certainly isn't what single men in their 30s with no friends like as a substitute for a real personality and real responsibilities, lol
>Yeah I've never held somebody that looked me in the eyes and told me they loved me, I'll never know what true expression of actual sincere love is but let me tell you about honesty in film making
lol, lmao even.

>>212100725 (OP)
Tarantino’s highest rated film is Pulp Fiction. Outside of From Dusk Till Dawn, True Romance is his worst rated. What an embarrassing thread, OP.

>>212100994
Seriously. It's intense nonsense. One scene has no responsibility to the one before it in a character sense. You can never predict what the characters will do, which is good only to the point where they still have an actual personality.