why did you HATE this show?

>>212184477 (OP)

it's not Star Trek

>>212184477 (OP)
>dude noahide law but in space!
Little surprise trekkies are pedos

>>212184501
in what respect?

The amount of ridiculous backstory they've grafted onto TOS by now is so ridiculous that it's become hilarious. Also, real answer, even ignoring the lore issues it is quite literally just a chick-flick version of Star Trek. I can't explain this unless you watch the show. Half the episodes are written for teenage girls.

I watched a little bit of std and picard, not getting meme'd into watching any more nutrek.

>>212184477 (OP)
I checked out after the second "invisible aliens" episode in a row. I think it was season two?

Overall the show just felt lazy and I'm utterly exhausted with TOS-era shows.

>>212184477 (OP)
It's badly made, and every minute of effort they put into it, prevents something good from existing in that media space.

>>212184477 (OP)
It's painfully obvious in the most cringeworthy way possible that the showrunners were trying to attract fans of NuWars, capeshit and Buffy the Vampire Slayer rather than Star Trek fans. They don't even explore the galaxy anymore.

>>212184908
are yuo saying the effort put into this would have been better put into making a new stargate series?

>>212184964
That would be insulting to Stargate fans. If they had made it a generic sci-fi show like The Orville it might pass, but it isn't Trek except for the ship designs and the uniforms. I don't even blame the actors, the rot is at the top level.

>>212184477 (OP)
Woke shit nuTrek pretending to be Star Trek
Trannies pretending it's good, instead of letting bad stuff be bad

I don't hate it but only because Jess Bush is a cute.

>>212185086
>implying star trek has ever been anything but woke

>>212185101
She's not even that cute, and the character is supposed to be just a lowly nurse who mostly stays in sick bay, not a badass commando martial arts expert who goes on almost every away mission. On top of that the stupid love triangle between Spock and her and Spock's wife is pure soap opera time waster.

>>212185086
Trek is synonymous with Woke and has been since the 60s

>>212185238
Which also fucks up The Lore as Chapel always pined for Spock, but he never returned her affections. Now we're supposed to believe that they were banging 10 years prior?

>>212185324
trek woke from the start was always egalitarianism, which is somewhat admirable. egalitarianism is fiction in reality, so it's actually fitting for sci-fi.

>>212185610
Yeah that's one of the most egregious things how they purposely shit on the lore so they can add things like sex scenes and soap opera shit. Also Pike casually fucks that other female captain who arrested Number One. It wouldn't be so bad if they limited the casual sex to one character (not spock) in one episode.

For me the absolute worst thing about it is the Gorn retcon where they went from being lethargic walking dinosaurs to xenomorphs who breed inside other aliens. And they killed off one of the few good characters that way, the Andorian engineer guy, just so they could bring on Carol Kane. It made me physically angry when I saw it.

>>212184477 (OP)
I like it most people haven't even watched the entire first season.

They still travel about exploring the galaxy they just think everything is either woke or dei and believe whatever bullshit is by someguy on tiktok

>>212185238
it's not a love trinagle she got spock guessing

>>212185086
TOS : Black female communications Officer

TOS : cross specsis science officer

>>212186279
>They still travel about exploring the galaxy
No they don't. What are you talking about?

>>212184477 (OP)
I personally didn't think it was incredibly bad but that's more of a compared to the direction the franchise had been going this was somewhat of a course correction. What I didn't like is/are all the *wink wink to "future" TOS shit. I like Uhura as a character and an actress but fuck she shouldn't have been on the show. Kirk showing up. Ultimately it just kept refusing to stand on it's on. KAHN! They have a fucking Kahn episode. It like many other prequel shows just kind of refuses to stand on it's own 2 feet and instead leans heavily on nostalgia bait. Now that I think about it T'Pring shows up. It was just copy after copy or reference after reference TOS. And it went from "Oh I get that reference" to Pikes "fate" being an entire subplot and then with Something like Spocks marriage where in my opinion you're taking the incredibly long life cycle of a Vulcan and jamming the complexity of their union and it's disappointments into a few years, relatively, along the Star Trek timeline.

It had a few solid episodes but ultimately refused and I mean refused, they did not want, would not let it stand on it's own merits. And that made the mistakes they made which most if not all shows do even more glaring.

>>212184477 (OP)
its just so fruity. it was obviously written by women for gays and trannies, none of whom watch Star Trek.

I love TOS but this ain't it

>>212186417
>TOS : Black female communications Officer
>TOS : cross specsis science officer

>>212184477 (OP)
Because it took them three tries to get something that looks like Star Trek and the best we got was a bland prequel with terrible millennial tropes

>>212186661
Lots of gays and trannies watch Star Trek and always have.
>>212184477 (OP)
Didn't hate it, didn't like it. It's meh.

>>212184477 (OP)
>paramount
ad thread

>>212184560
in every respect

>>212185131
>>212185324
>>212186417
>dumb shills can't tell the difference between Ironheart-style woke and TNG-style progressivism
Hey shills, didn't you get the memo? Woke is no longer in vogue. No one wants to be gaslit on how old Star Trek was "actually always gay". Saying that Captain Kirk was King Faggot and T'Pol was a tranny metaphor might work on Reddit but not here.

>USAID gets defunded
>SNW gets canceled
Really makes you think

>>212186556
They live on a fucking a starship that travels about space.

you fucking retard!

>>212187106
>Reddit spacing
It got canceled. Get lost, shill

>>212186715
it's isn't susposed to TOS it's a prequel at this captain kirk is still a fucking lieutant at this point in time.

>ESL gibberish
Paramount shills really fell off after their marketing budget got slashed

>>212187167
WTF are you talking about? it's 3 seasons is airing in a few months.

>>212187243
You know what I'm talking about, you dumb ESL shill.

>>212187106
They only go to starbases and colonies ffs. No exploring allowed.

>>212187167
>don't send me to the dark place sir im retarded please sir please

>>212184477 (OP)
Not my Star Trek. Pure gutter trash. Nu-Trek needs to be taken out back and shot

>>212187311
>cancel a show
>refuse to utter the word "cancel" to shape the narrative
I fucking hate Paramount so much. Yes tranny, it got fucking canceled. They're getting 5 extra episodes that they'll have to shoot alongside S4 to hastily wrap things up and then it's done.
Good fucking riddance.

>>212187290
Would you like to retract your dumb comment?

>>212187391
Yes or No it has 3 seasons still to air?

>The Witcher didn't get canceled two years in advance!
>it ended!
It's funny how everyone stops giving a shit about a show if you cancel it so far in advance.
By the way, stop replying to this obvious shill thread. Paramount is just using to boost Parrot Analytics engagement data.

>>212187442
Does the amount of episodes they have left to dump somehow change the fact that the show has been canceled? Yes, they have 25 episodes left to dump on their failed streaming service. Roughly the equivalent of one season of TNG. Netflix did the same thing with Witcher; they gave them a pity season to wrap things up and then canceled the show.
Strange New Worlds got canceled with FEWER episodes than just TWO seasons of TNG. Fewer episodes than DISCOVERY, fewer episodes than LEZZIE DYKES, fewer episodes than ENTERPRISE, and fewer episodes than TOS, the show SNW is trying to rip off. It got canceled with the same amount of episodes as PRODIGY, NuTrek's biggest failure.

>>212187058
TOS literally promoted miscegenation

>>212187393
No and you should feel ashamed for trying to push disingenuous studio talking points.

>>212187659
>I'll try to talk like a chud now
Good job, shill. You're learning. Still won't watch your trannyslop.

>>212184501
its honestly the best live action star trek since it was rebooted.

Stop replying to ad threads.

>>212187710
I'm saying no one should watch any Trek. It's always been liberal drivel

>>212187799
It was. But 1960s’ liberal drivel is practically conservative by today’s standards. Why do you think they keep saying that TOS was “uhhh actually deeply problematic, hon”?
SNW exists to retcon the show the liberal elite deems problematic out of existence. Pike is now a Reddit good boy when the original character was a bit of a misogynist. Kirk is a pussy-whipped unthreatening male. Spock is just Sheldon Cooper.

>>212187984
Calling Kurtzman and Akiva Goldsman liberal elites is just going to over-inflate their egos even more.