>Social media influencer Natalie (Hathaway) lives a traditional lifestyle. Her charming farmhouse on a working ranch is rustic and artfully cluttered, her husband a handsome cowboy, her six children each more delightful than the last. So what if there are nannies and producers behind the scenes, her kitchen hiding industrial-grade fridges and ovens, her husband the Republican equivalent of a Kennedy, her oldest daughter beginning to ask questions about whether her mother is a “trad wife”? What Natalie’s followers — all 8 million of them — don’t know won’t hurt them. And The Angry Women? The privileged, Ivy League, coastal elite haters who call her an antifeminist iconoclast? They’re just jealous. Natalie isn’t simply living the good life, she’s living the ideal of what life should be — and just so happens to be building an empire from it.

>Then she wakes up in a life that isn’t hers. Her home, her husband, her children — they’re all familiar, but something’s off. Her kitchen is lit by a sputtering fire rather than electricity, her children are dirty and disheveled, her soft-handed husband is suddenly a competent farmer. Her “daughter” informs her it’s 1805 — where just yesterday Natalie was curating photos of homemade sourdough for her Instagram, she’s now expected to haul firewood and handwash clothes until her hands bleed. Has she become the unwitting star of a brutal reality show? Could it really be time travel? Is she being tested by God? By Satan? Already reckoning with forces beyond her control, when Natalie becomes pregnant with her new “husband’s” child, it quickly becomes apparent that it doesn’t matter how she got here — all that matters is how she gets out.

https://deadline.com/2025/06/yesteryear-movie-hannah-friedman-writing-amazon-mgm-studios-2-1236441760/

a dig at "pioneer woman"?

>>212252861 (OP)
Anybody got that sideboob pic of her?

I'm always up for a time travel mo-

>her husband the Republican equivalent of a Kennedy, her oldest daughter beginning to ask questions about whether her mother is a “trad wife”?

I think I'm gonna skip this one.

>>212252861 (OP)
>dark brown hair
>dark brown eyes
She is subhuman

>>212252861 (OP)
while i dont like the political shit in the description, i absolutely despise the social media influencer fake tradwife cunts so i hope they really lay into those fucking whores.
>what if theres a crew of nannies and a bunch of industrial grade equipment to cook their tradmeals
this is also true of those charletan cunts.

>tradwife is bad
fuck this proapaganda

>>212253174
the tradwife trend is the propaganda, you retard

Someone must really hate tradwife larpers to make a movie out of a book that hasn't even come out yet.

>>212252861 (OP)
Sounds like some gay lib venting in movie form. Not gonna watch it so idc.

>>212252861 (OP)
If you made it past Devil in a Prada Dress or whatever that faggot shit was called and still don't really want to nail Ann, you are unfortunately, homosexual.

>>212252861 (OP)
She ain't white

>>212253985
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV122X7ycvQ

>>212252951
kek. sounds like it

>fake tradwife social media cunt is forced to be a tradwife for real and learn how to actually do all she says she's doing
I'm saying based.

>horror movie for women is staying home and taking care of the kids before social media existed

>she’s now expected to haul firewood and handwash clothes until her hands bleed.
Is this true? wtf im a feminist now

>>212252861 (OP)
>Lizard brain detected potential mate in picture
>"Social media influencer"
Histradwifeandoptomismgone.gif

>>212252861 (OP)
This just sounds like a retarded and aimlessly bitter movie. Who is the writer, exactly?

>>212255863
Being a woman in 2025 is terrifying.

>>212252861 (OP)
Reminds me of Burn the House Down.

The thing is you know the movie will have some ridiculously retarded conclusion

>>212252861 (OP)
Would easily

>>212252861 (OP)
she's fucking trash

>>212256623
It was all her paranoia because she feels trapped in her influencer persona and wishes her husband was a rude farmer who can manhandle her?

>>212255778
But the whole movie is going to be saying "trad isn't so great after all, is it? just embrace being a cosmopolitan bug person consumer!"

>>212256846
I'm not even up to date on zoomer shit or what a trad wife even is, but surely it only serves to prove that basically being a slave is undeniably worse than being some half hearted LARPer?