>>212332059
>That's because 95% of everything is a bluescreen or greenscreen.
You can't even use that as an excuse though, look at David Fincher and the way he'll construct entire scenes from digital elements and you never notice except when attention is brought to it (the zoom through the coffee mug handle in panic room).
And you have movies like 300 and Sin City that used it to great stylistic effect to make it look like you were watching a comic book come to life on the screen in a visually interesting and coherent way that would be impossible with traditional techniques of sets, lighting, and color.
The problem isn't the technology, hell the barrier to entry for an independent film maker is lower than it has ever been, and plenty of fantastic movies with good effects have been made on a personal computer for a few thousand dollars, and there's a chance your cell phone has a digital camera that's capable of taking film quality recordings.
The problem is the studio system and the size of the "global" box office.
Up until the 2010's the global box office was dominated by the US/North American box office with Euorpe and Japan being afterthoughts. So you had a smaller demographic of people you needed to sell on the movie.
Once Payformers realized marketing in china was SUPER cheap and very effective the target audience shifted from mostly north american to needing to pander more and more to china.
Now your lowest common denominator starts to get so low, and your audience is so broad, and you're "spending" a half billion dollars on production, hundreds of millions more on marketing and distribution, and you have no choice but to make the most luke warm boring inoffensive easy to follow piece of dogshit because you have to have risk management when you're handling that much money.
