>this was somehow not faked

>and when we’re done we just flew back up to the spacecraft and flew home with a camera live recording us

This thread has AIDS

>>212683701 (OP)
>boomers thought this was real

>>212683742
Don’t forget Nixon’s landline “phone call to the moon” with zero latency.

>>212683701 (OP)
nice ass

>>212683701 (OP)
>>212683742
>>212683807
>>212683848
I cant believe we have regressed so far as a society that it is now becoming popular to deny basic science

>>212683701 (OP)
>[radio static]
>holy shit i can see my house from up here!
>[drum sting]

>>212684168
just get another booster bro, you ARE pro science right?

>>212683807
Nah they're just trolling, it's the people born afterwards who actually believe it

>>212683701 (OP)
>oh well we just never felt like going back
>uhh... yeah we never bothered recording the transmissions, like it just didn't seem like a big deal you know?

>>212685359
>yeah... uh, we just thought the tapes of man's greatest accomplishment in history weren't worth keeping. buying new tapes was expensive so naturally we just reused what we had, you know

>>212686562
>Anyway, want to watch all the master tapes of The Honeymooners with me?

>>212686562
In fairness it was a really good run of Jerry Springer

>>212684168
it's just computers/smartphones becoming more affordable, so even poor retards have opportunity to voice their valuable opinion

>>212686611
Only if we cuddle
>>212686646
Ahh, makes sense

>>212683701 (OP)
>moon landing is fake
Amost as retarded as the "flat Earther" cancer. Almost.

One day I'll care enough to buy a strong telescope to see for myself if there's anything up there. I think I read radiation turned the flag white or something though.

>VROOOOOOOOOM

>>212687207
>nothin beats practical effects!

100 years will pass before Humanity returns to the Moon, and it'll be the Chinese and Indians who make moon bases and be shitting on the Moon.

>>212687207
>there are bugmen in this thread who will get legitimately angry if you question this
I will never understand that.

>>212687207
only reason i believe this is real is because kubrick would have had higher standards

>>212685231
>JOHN MADDEN
>AEIOU

>>212684168
Nice proof

>>212683701 (OP)
I know. It's not like we went back several times and almost lost astronauts a few times or anything. It's not like we ever sent probes to Mars or beyond the edge of the solar system that remain operational decades after their mission expiration or anything... Oh, wait.

>>212684168
If going to the moon is basic science why don't you do it? Why doesn't India? They have more advanced ICBMs than they did in the 60's.

>>212687000
you would need like a 100 meter wide mirror to see enough detail to see the lander iirc. still worth getting a big ass telescope, it's beyond description looking at the moons of jupiter or the rings of saturn through your own eyes

>>212687943
curious how there's no footage taken from earth of the moon landing
you'd think astronomy nerds and nasa itself would have wanted to look at it in real time

Jews

>>212687855
If man has already landed on the moon then what's the propaganda value of it? It's a far greater bargain economically and scientifically to send robotic missions like every has ever since. If the impetus behind manned extraorbital space exploration never ended, we probably could've had 1 or 2 manned missions to Mars and back by 1990. Now we're stuck figuring all this out from scratch again as the last 45 years of manned space flight have been spent deploying satellites and doing science fair experiments.

>>212687855
>Why doesn't India?
lad they can't even handle trains

>>212688124
>yeah we just forgot how to shield people from the van allen radiation belt
>and uh, we also forgot how to make spacesuits not get shredded by lunar dust

>>212683701 (OP)
Impressive stuff innet, glad people are starting to push for going back again it's been too long.

>>212684168
You should be more concerned that we deny basic Christianity

>>212683701 (OP)
>neil armstrong discovered the moon, he's a great american explorer and in this house he's a hero! end of story!

>>212688124

Bro what's the propaganda value of going to the Moon for countries that want to emerge as the next superpower. What's the point? No point to it at all.

>It's a far greater bargain economically and scientifically to send robotic missions

In case you haven't noticed nobody even manage to do that. Somehow even placing a bucket of sensors on the Moon is beyond today's tech. It always keeps falling over or "something".

>>212687207
All of that debris exploding off would have destroyed everything.

>>212687851
Every man who walked on the moon was sent during the Nixon administration. I wonder why . . .

>>212688380
They were also all (((Eagle Scouts)))

>>212683701 (OP)
As a non-amerishart, this has always felt like the most retarded conspiracy theory to me. Its showing how utterly self-centered as people they are.
If they really didn't do it, do you think that the Soviest or the rest of the world wouldn't completely tore the whole thing apart from every single little detail and expose it? Especially in that fucking time of tense relations...?
Literally half of the retarded online conspiracy that amerimutts believe in would work only in a vacuum if they were the only country on earth

>>212688474
The Soviets were probably full of shit themselves. They claimed Laika had survived the launch and lived for days for example.

>>212688474
Conspiracy theorists think like they're in a movie.

>>212688567
they also had no way of confirming or disproving it as there were no orbital telescopes capable of directly looking at the event until the 1990's

>>212688474

You're under some crazy assumption that the soviets (and "the rest of the world"?!) had tech where they can magically detect what's inside the capsule and track it all the way to the Moon as it lands and comes back. At best the soviets can pick up radar shit that's inconclusive apart from basic metrics.

protip : they could've simply landed a probe and said the astronauts were there and then produced them as they "came back" for a huge propaganda victory. who the fuck is going to be challenging that in the most jingoist part of US history where it was every man on deck to fight the evil commies.

what are the soviets going to do? call them liars without proof that just comes off as childish bitching?
It's one thing to send a probe and have it land and send some telemetry. it's a completely different thing to send a couple of people, have them land and play around and then have them lift off and come back in one piece.
they would never risk such a project if there wasn't a 100% chance of success and there was no 100% chance of success unless it was faked.

not to mention this should be trivial today with all the new tech for countries such as China that definitely have extra money to burn on weird vanity projects, and yet ....

>>212688474
>do you think that the Soviest or the rest of the world wouldn't completely tore the whole thing apart from every single little detail and expose it?
with what evidence? just say it's fake like conspiracy guys? they don't have any more proof than anyone else. and it'd be in their interest to keep the lie going...funnel money to their 'space program' slush fund. grow up

>>212688474
frankly it's ridiculous that they wouldn't claim that even if it were true, but they're obviously not the ones who ended up writing the history books

>>212688380
I know. And we certainly don't have thousands of communication and relay satellites in orbit around Earth or share a space station or anything...

>>212688033
there is no filmed evidence of planes flying around our 'atmosphere' from space either. always found that queer.

>>212683701 (OP)
yeah, america is pretty cool.

>>212688474
Nixon and Brezhnev initiated nuclear de-escalation and had did a joint space mission

>>212688643
my 75 year old buddy argues 'but i saw it on live t.v.' and 'people were more trustworthy back then' so they didn't lie including the t.v.
but yet he says the collection of holocaust shoes isn't proof of victims because 'anyone could gather a bunch of shoes and put them in there'

>>212683701 (OP)
>>212683742
>>212683807
>>212683848
Why would Russia go along with the hoax?

>>212688356
Pretty much everything we've learned about our solar system in the last half century has been from unmanned probes. India or NASA being unable to land a multimillion dollar lander on the moon is just a sign of the generational competency crisis. No shit, zoomers find it hard to create and save a word file because it's not an iPhone app.

>>212688965
They're in the Epstein list

>>212688730
>they're obviously not the ones who ended up writing the history books
is that really so?

>>212688965
They went along with the COVID hoax just fine and relations are worse now.

>>212688643
>It's one thing to send a probe and have it land and send some telemetry. it's a completely different thing to send a couple of people, have them land and play around and then have them lift off and come back in one piece.
then how come no one else has done it since? china's spend 20 years with people in space yet hasn't faked a moon landing yet
>they would never risk such a project if there wasn't a 100% chance of success and there was no 100% chance of success unless it was faked.
considering the contemporary losses in the space program beforehand i'm sure they were fine with the risk of losing them. if anything it would've boosted nixon's pollings as a chance for slick speechwriting

Rent free

>>212688965
If they denied it, they’d just be labelled a bunch of seething Ivans.

>>212683701 (OP)
Previously I didnt really care much about the moon landing being fake/real.
I figured either it happened or it was necessary to fake it to beat the Russians.

It wasn't til Neil Degrasse Tyson started saying it would be harder to fake it that I really began to doubt it happened.

>>212685231
the height of the dust they're kicking up by jumping on it is impossible with earth gravity

>>212689336
>Letting a zesty nigger influence your decision making
You should come out to your parents if you haven't already.

>>212689418
You really are just a big fumb faggot ain't you?

>this was somehow not faked

>>212684168
bait

>explore further than anyone in human history
>immediately call Richard Nixon
the fuck were they smoking back then?

>>212689620
>RICHARD NIXON BAD!

>>212689257
So why didn't Russia lie and make the US look like seething retards?

>>212689647
>the nickname for richard is... dick! hahaha

>>212688802

Never underestimate what a bunch of German engineers with unlimited funds can achieve.

https://youtu.be/Rr8ljRgcJNM

if they called Trump i would believe it was fake.

>>212688326
why? That shit is for gay niggers.

>>212689472
>Projecting

>>212689620
>>immediately call Richard Nixon

he was US president and there was a time delay of the expected speed of light time to the moon.

https://youtu.be/VLyJ9FHDO-c

>>212683701 (OP)
There is an argument some people make that the Moon landings were not only fake but that the Soviet Union was in on it and that the entire Cold War itself was just a ruse and a distraction. Just for the record, I believe in fakery from NASA and other space agencies but I still kind of believe the Moon landings happened. It's probably just wishful thinking and cope on my part that I want the coolest achievement of all time of the white man (and one that makes non-whites seethe to this day) to be true. Right now I'm kind of leaning into the theory that we were already on the Moon before 1969 and that all of the subsequent Moon landings by NASA exist only to hide a secret space program far more advanced than any of NASA's shit that NASA shows to the public. I think there's all sorts of artificial things on the Moon (towers, domes, buildings, etc.) and probably none of those artificial things are ours and whoever those artificial things belong to isn't friendly. Don't let the jews misdirect you. Think bigger and think outside the box.

"We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity..... Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do." - Ben Rich, Lockheed Martin

>>212689690
If he did a press event tomorrow and said space aliens are real would there be a bigger shitstorm on the left?

>>212688643
>what are the soviets going to do? call them liars without proof that just comes off as childish bitching?
you mean what you're doing right now?

>>212689826
Well he'd obviously be trying to distract from the Epstein files

This was the best Hollywood depiction of the 1st moon landing, there were six but the first was the most stressful.

https://youtu.be/zfNhkYHrfj0

>>212683742
And survived the van allen radiation belt twice.

>>212689875
The only Nasa related film I ever liked was Apollo 13.

>>212689818
believable and logical.
my buddy absolutely believes that this AI shit we are getting right now is advancing in real time. like the idea we are purposely being slow dripped an arguably soul draining consciousness shifting all encompassing tech because it was already perfected so long ago and trial and errored on the masses already through music and tv and film and maybe even our heavens is a conspiracy and insane to even conceive.

>moon landing deniers trying to explain how to store slow-mo footage digitally in the 1960s
>moon landing deniers trying to explain how a slow-scan analog camera could possibly be overcranked with zero artifacts and consistent smoothness over the course of an unbroken 1h 30min broadcast without the Soviets ever finding a defect in the imagery
Only way it'd be fake is if everyone was in on it like what >>212689818 said

>>212690262

or people are simply vastly overestimating what the soviets could detect
bear in mind that even back then soviets were just wholesale stealing tech from the US and then making orktech out of it. their level of competence and know-how is severely in question and I'm sure the US side knew what they can and cannot fake and get away with

>>212690262
>>212690341
People forget how easily the CIA controlled the media in the US. Even if the Russians tried to run a its fake campaign they wouldn't be able to. Any TV or radio broadcast is out of the question, and every major paper and magazine as the CIA and their in house censors would block it from being broadcast.

>>212683742
And did it all in a tin foil "space" ship

>>212688257
>last of the nazi scientists die
>suddenly all technology just keeps getting worse and advancements slow down massively
Hmmmm

>>212686915
Background is obviously a backdrop its not even funny

And you can tell the shadows are cast by a local light source, AKA a stage light

>>212689796
I'm just saying, if I made it to the moon, I'd be rolling my eyes the whole time. Like ok dickhead, we're up hear on the moon bouncing around collecting rocks and looking at fucking space but we have to listen to some asshole from California give some chatgpt jerkoff speech

I just catched Apollo 13 in my country.

>>212690434
>People forget how easily the CIA controlled the media in the US.

that all broke down in 1974 after Nixon resigned and congress started holding public hearings about all the CIA and FBI illegal programs. Id call them crimes but of course nobody in the government ever gets prosecuted for committing crimes on the governments behalf.

>>212690642

If you mean the ron howard movie , its underrated and his best movie.

>>212690706
The CIA was never stopped. They just did a limited hangout and damage control. See Iran Contra, Fast and Furious, etc. They have only gotten better at what they do.

>>212683742
The LRV had a camera on it which was remote controlled by mission control. The first two attempts at capturing takeoff (Apollo 15 and 16) mission control got the timing wrong for the camera tilt and couldn't fully capture it. You can't say this was post-hoc either because if you read the NASA mission plans and watch the educational television programs made before the J missions were even launched they mention this explicitly.
>>212683848
There was latency.
>landline
Have you even heard of radio? The radio signals between the lunar surface and the DSN were converted to landline. AT&T developed that tech in like the 30s or 40s I believe.
>>212685359
Eat your heart out man:
https://www.nasa.gov/history/alsj/alsj-video.html
https://tothemoon.im-ldi.com/gallery/Apollo
>>212687207
>>212688378
The debris is kapton and mylar, not dangerous at all. Also, to explain the lack of plume: the lunar ascent stage engine used the same hypergolic fuel as the Titan II rocket (check out images of it lifting off, the plumes are almost fully transparent). The engines low thrust combined with the fact that rocket plumes in vacuum spread out dramatically doesn't make the footage surprising. If you watch the full video when the camera gets a peek right under the engine bell you can see the bright glow of the combustion.

>>212683701 (OP)
My science teacher in 8th grade showed the class a "hey maybe the moon landing was bullshit" documentary. I went home that night and told my dad about it and he got super fucking mad because apparently my grandfather who was serving in some military branch at the time had a hand in the first moon launch. Enough to be recognized as "helping" I guess.

Whoops.

>>212688257
>van allen belt
There's a lot to this misconception also there are two belts, not one
The Van Allen belts are composed of high energy protons and electrons, not gamma radiation, so a large fraction of the particles are stopped by even a thin barrier of many materials. With only 5mm of aluminum shielding in the inner van allen belt you would have to spend 100 days there to get a lethal dose of radiation. The Apollo command module had 13mm of aluminum, not to mention the shielding.
The Apollo spacecraft skirted around the highest intensity regions of the inner and outer belts and even if they went straight through the worst regions they would only be there for two hours since they are still near periapsis and have a super high velocity. The dosimeters on the astronauts showed that the radiation was within completely acceptable ranges. The Soviets even sent turtles to fly around the moon and return, and they were all completely healthy (until they were killed for autopsy).
>>and uh, we also forgot how to make spacesuits not get shredded by lunar dust
Never heard this one before. The outer layer of the suits was more than enough to solve the abrasion problem, plus it was discarded when they repressurized in the lander. Moon dust is not some mystery magic material that can cut through anything. It's a long-term problem, not a short one.

Throw out anything else you got, I have literally nothing else to do right now.

>muh soviets
>muh hundreds of involved people
Moon landing denial deniers are the same people who will now claim there's never been an Epstein client list, no Lolita island and Ghislane Maxwell is in prison for trafficking non-existent children to no one.
>hundreds to possibly thousands of people involved in supplying, staffing and maintaining the island and operation, that many people couldn't possibly be silenced!
>political enemies of the US haven't spoken on it, so clearly it must all be fake
>none of the supposed trafficking victims was ever found

>>212683701 (OP)
>this was somehow faked

>>212684168
>retard tier hoax = basic science
Hahahaha

Rare screengrab from lost moon landing footage

>>212690784
I dont know why you bother with this shit
The older I get the more I see the issue being politics
A bunch of white guys who served in the military, all with wifes and multiple kids, are the only humans to have set foot on the moon, you know what they did when they got there? The peeled around the lunar surface in a go kart and played golf, among other things
The older I get the more I see the moon landing conspiracy theorizing as a thin veil for a bottomless pit of seethe
Cope harder
Please, tell us more about a country full of people who shit in the street is going to "dominate" us, or better yet, China, please tell me about a country with no girls in it because parents used to throw their newborn daughters out the window is going to "beat" the United States
I'm all ears

>>212687602
Artemis III is landing people on the moon in 2027
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program

>>212690814
>bla bla bla scripted nonsense
lol you faggots are obvious af
>I have literally nothing else to do right now.
lol you're literally paid to shill nasa lies

>>212690795
your grandfather was a freemason actor and your dad is a typical gullible pig or also a freemason actor. happens all the time really don't sweat it.

>>212685231
Must be fucking terrifying that one scratch from a rocj could kill you instantly

>>212691032

the same artemis that should've launched this year? and now in 2027 with Trump gutting NASA?

yeah, 2 more weeks bro

>>212691005
China doesn't import millions of 3rdies a year to suppress wages

>>212691130
Nolan should remake this

>>212690814
>The dosimeters on the astronauts showed that the radiation was within completely acceptable ranges.
If they didn't go to the moon, this point is moot.

>>212691042
Are you gonna provide a counterargument or elaborate on something I misunderstood about your post or what? I could just go jack off if you don't want to.
>>212691193
True. Although with the radiation readings from before the Apollo program you can still extrapolate that the trajectory the astronauts took was harmless with the bare minimum of shielding.

>Oh My God
>i was wrong
>it was Earth!
>all along...

>>212691189
He doesn't have the balls.

>>212683701 (OP)
There is nothing fake about it. Neil Armstrong climbed out first, descended the ladder, stepped on the moon, and spoke his very famous phrase. He then took hold of a 70mm Hasselblad camera and photographed Buzz Aldrin descending the ladder, ie - the picture seen in OPs post.

>>212691254
Schizos will dismiss any evidence gathered from space because "we've never been there"

>>212683701 (OP)
>this was 100 years ago
>we still haven't gone back because we lost the technology
>instead of having bases on the moon we apparently think it's a better idea having floating station in space
?????

>>212691254
>stage fake as fuck landings in the 60s
>use your control over all media to gaslight normies
>pay masonic faggots like >>212691254 to spam scripted retarded explanations whenever anyone asks valid questions
>doesn't matter if the explanations are retarded as long as we have explanations
>masonic faggot even tells you he's a glownigger to assuage his guilt lmao
All lies eventually come to an end, you faggots are nothing special in the grand scheme of things

KINO MUST WATCH:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzBhydrf7po

>>212691606
RIP Trevor Moore

>>212683701 (OP)
So were the Soviet Lunokhod landings fake as well?

>>212691690
There's only room for one attentionwhoring namefag in this thread.
You best git.

Anyone can watch the documentary American Moon (2017), it's on rumble and know that they faked it

>>212691675
glownigger zach killed trevor dont you dare speak his name

>>212687207
>I don't know basic physics
>I don't know the physics of rocketry
>I don't know the physics of low gravity
>I don't know the physics of ballistics
>I don't know the physics of ballistics in low gravity
>I don't know what rocket propellant is
>I don't know what kinds of rocket propellants there are
>I don't know the physics of rocket propellant
>I don't know the physics of rocket propellant in an anoxic environment
>but I can tell this video is a fake
>because just trust me

>>212691899
which would you rather trust? glowies who have destroyed entire nations and seek to dominate the world, or your base instinct (given to you by god or developed by millions of years of evolution). really bottles the mind

>>212691952
>your base instinct

What is your base instinct based on? Garbage in, garbage out. Study physics first and then watch the video again and tell me what you see.

>>212691990
ancestral blood memory

>>212691990
don't you know? being an willful ignoramus is in vogue right now on 4chan
get with the program

>>212689165
no hablo ingles

>>212691990
i literally told you
>(given to you by god or developed by millions of years of evolution)
your innermost impulse is not a product of environment. touch a hot stove and find out for yourself

>>212684168
>basic science

>>212692310
he doesn't understand the poisoning and degrading of the collective consciousness, our God given memory, is the main goal of forcing race mixing.

>>212692310
how many rocket engines and low gravity vacuums did our ancestors have to deal with to develop an intuition about them? your intuition (in this case) is based on your prior conceptions about physics that you learned in highschool and media you've consumed

>>212692408
you don't need a pile of metal and nuts and bolts to reach the stars and never did.

Let's assume all of the manned lunar landings were faked. There are no footprints on the moon. There are no rover tracks on the moon. There are no retroreflectors installed on the surface of the moon. There are no scientific instruments left behind at the landing sites. No tools, no cameras, no flags, no rovers, no lunar module descent stages, no golf balls, no golf clubs, no placards, no photographs, no gloves, no boots, no bags of human waste. Nothing was left up there on the moon because the United States never sent men to the moon.

Okay? It's all fake. Fine.

Now, imagine the Soviet Union suspected it was all faked. Imagine China today had reason to believe it was all faked. What do you think they would do? They would put hi-res cameras in orbit around the moon and photograph every inch of the US landing sites, flooding the world with video and photographic proof that the US lied to the world about landing on the moon.

But guess what. When lunar satellites photograph the moon, there is ample proof of the US landings. And guess what else. Apollo 11 installed a retroreflector array on the surface of the moon which are used even to this day by Earth-based lunar laser range finders for a variety of things including to measure the distance of the earth to the moon.

But imagine the humiliation that the US would have suffered by the now of the manned lunar missions were fake and no evidence of American human presence could found on the surface of the moon.

>>212692408
t. historylet

The world history as you know it is completely false. We are not living on Earth, our ancestors already fled Earth when it was destroyed by hellfires. I'd say more but you wouldn't believe it

>>212692446
>But imagine the humiliation that the US would have suffered by the now of the manned lunar missions were fake

EDIT --- "...that the US would have suffered by now if the manned...

trvth nvke

>>212692497
>I'd say more but...

...but I reached the inventive limits of my imagination

>>212692446
we'd just say they photographed the wrong spot or lunar dust and radiation destroyed the spaceships. simple as. but you can't even orbit the moon because its flat so none of what you are saying matters at all. simple as

>>212690580
Nah, you're just a fucking retard.

>>212692446
the assumption the moon is even a sphere floating at a previously calculated distance in the first place is egregiously dishonest.
when i hear someone honestly say 'during the covid pandemic...' with a concerned face i want to kill them.
you too.

>>212692497
based. i think we came from ganymede
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RtGal_-KXU

>>212692446
>When lunar satellites photograph the moon, there is ample proof of the US landings
bullshit
>And guess what else. Apollo 11 installed a retroreflector array on the surface of the moon which are used even to this day by Earth-based lunar laser range finders for a variety of things including to measure the distance of the earth to the moon
bullshit. Lasers were bounced off the moon before any of the fake retroreflector or moon landings happened

>>212692545
The Earth as you know it is where our ancestor's fled to after g-d smited them for hellworship. The real Earth is Eden. Google it

>>212692557
>>212692634
trvkes

>>212692634
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photos
https://lroc.im-ldi.com/image_tags/Apollo
Chandrayaan 2 photos
https://www.backyardastronomyguy.com/apollo-isro

>>212692519
>you guys
>a mostly flat, 2200 mile wide surface covered in light gray regolith is the same as a 3 inch mirror
>just trust me, mmmkay?

The moon actually does a terrible job of reflecting the sun's light. The moon's surface material absorbs around 90% of the light that reaches it. We, on earth, see only about 10% of the sun light that reaches the moon. The reason the moon looks so bright is because of how close it is to us on earth.

>>212689347
It was filmed underwater

>>212692760
>mostly flat
but you said it was sphere? quit changing your story or the judge will get real tough with ya

>>212685231
There’s no way bro. If you aren’t laughing your ass off at this you are a legit npc. This shit is so fucking fake.

>>212692963
>mostly flat

surface, you dipshit

>the tech advanced 1000x fold since then
>actual rockets to deliver cargo to space increased in capacity
>"we just don't wanna do it again"
>except for the times where they try to land a probe and it tips over instantly and is rendered useless

So... can't even land a small probe there anymore without a fuckup?

>>212685231
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgI_Dtbgems
The original video is so fun
>"I feel like Bugs Bunny!"

>>212687855
>If going to the moon is basic science why don't you do it?
Because it quite literally ISN'T "basic science". It quite literally required a budget higher than the GDP of entire countries to make it there, and given how much could have gone wrong, I'm actually surprised NASA even greenlit the missions. You know, the government agency that's known for cancelling $100 million launches because some bolt in the astronaut's diarrhea-proof zero G diaper system sent some slightly off telemetry for half a second 10 minutes before launch, or because one of the astronauts grew a pimple the evening before.
>Why doesn't India?
They do. But why sent people to the moon if you can just sent a robot? Far cheaper and if something goes wrong, there's no bad press due to the loss of life.
Apollo era NASA just didn't have the technology yet to send sufficiently advanced probes, so they had no alternative to sending people. That's not an issue anymore nowadays.

I've never had sex.

>>212693039
a sphere's surface is round retard. pick up a ball you nerd
>>212693163
loss of life doesnt matter to poos. they have crowd crushes monthly that kill thousands. not to mention all the other ways they tend to die over there

>>212693163
Why send a robot in the first place? The fuck is India going to learn from looking at moon rocks it's just a propaganda stunt

>>212693044
from 1958 to 1970 there were 80 or so lunar probes sent and 45 were failures
from 2010 to 2025 there have been 78 lunar probes and 30 or so were failures
not great but we haven't regressed

>>212692734
>muh dots and arrows
Lol

>>212683701 (OP)
the moon landing was real. The return was faked.

>>212690580
local light source
>what is the sun

>>212691005
> China, please tell me about a country with no girls in it is going to "beat" the United States
Looks like its working for them

>>212688474
You just witnessed global coordinated lockdowns and insanity over a cold. Im moon landing agnostic and dont really care, but the official story is always a lie, and then more retarded the lie is the harder it is to convince people otherwise it seems, like they cant come to terms with being fooled for so long. I would be more impressed if they did fake it and me so this up for so long

>>212693199
Here's an image of a sphere with no surface features being viewed at the same angle that the light it's illuminated by is coming from

>>212691574
do you believe in satellites?
Cause to make satellites is the hard part. From that to the moon is easy in comparison.

>>212693199
>loss of life doesnt matter to poos
Money does, though. A probe is like 500 kg tops, doesn't require a leak-proof capsule for holding oxygen, a toilet system, radiation protection, sleeping bags etc. pp.
Manned missions are as different from unmanned ones like a real boat for humans to sit in is to an RC toy boat that's driving around a pond in Central Park. I. e. $50 billion mission vs. $5 billion mission.

>Why send a robot in the first place? The fuck is India going to learn from looking at moon rocks it's just a propaganda stunt
Retard take. Why send people to Antarctica? We've already been there. The fuck are we going to learn from looking at snow that isn't just a propaganda stunt

>>212693298
>we improved by 18% goy, even though computing has improved over 10 trillion fold since 1958
>we totally sent those probes goy
Hahaha

>>212693383
>sexism
shant be reading your posts bigot

>>212693302
Did you look at the photos? They all match the navigation telemetry data from the 60s and 70s, they all match the paths that the astronauts took to set up the experiments and rovers, they all show the tire marks. If you cross reference the lunar terrain and paths with the archived footage and photos of the missions they match exactly.

>>212693413
>Why send people to Antarctica? We've already been there. The fuck are we going to learn from looking at snow that isn't just a propaganda stunt
watch penguins have kinky sex

>>212693414
It's not a matter of computing given that it's just essentially just advanced ballistics and timing for things that have already been computed on the ground.
It's mainly a matter of manufacturing and having competent (white) engineers.

>>212693464
Wow the digital images (note they are images, not photographs) match the propaganda.
Not very compelling evidence

>>212693384
Apart from the massive radiation barriers between here and the moon which would kill any human being right away.

There is a reason why they have sent dogs and monkeys into space to test out the safty and feasibility of that, yet never sent a dog or a mokey to the moon to test it first.

Any animal would die, or if they were doing a fake broadcast from Earth on a set, then bouncing it back off the moon so it appeared to come from there, an animal couldn't be trusted to convincingly act as if they were in low mavity using harnesses and wires.

If it were possible to send people to the moon using 1960s tech, then Bezos, Branson, and Musk would have done it by now.

>>212693632
trvke

>>212693414
If you're interested in this topic I found a really neat website that has a few pages explaining the Soviet engineering for their early moon and venus probes.
The electromechanical computing of the time is really fascinating. Did you know the radiation-resistant photographic film for the Luna 3 probe was taken from a downed US spy balloon? They didn't have the manufacturing capacity for that type of film so they just repurposed it.
http://mentallandscape.com/L_Luna3.htm
http://mentallandscape.com/V_OKB1.htm

>>212693632
they did send animals to the moon though

>>212690262
>Only way it'd be fake is if it were even more implausible
"more people were in on it" does not make it more likely

>>212691690
>implying these retards even know what that is

>>212693632
oh yeah, the radiation barriers. everyone knows about those.
this guy watched some bitchute video and thinks he's an expert on astrophysics and space travel now.

>>212693632
>this nigga's afraid of the van allen belts
lmao just take a polar trajectory when there isn't an active solar flare slamming into earth and wrap yourself in a couple layers of metal foil. That's literally all it takes to mitigate charged particle exposure basically to zero. What, do you live 1000ft under ground to hide from cosmic rays pussy?

>>212693730
How come I have not seen a video of an astronaut walking his dog on the moon, wearing a doggy space suit getting confused by the low gravity as it plays fetch?

NASA knows how absolute kino such a video would be, and that it would prove they were actually on a moon because they couldn't fake an animals reactions, yet they never made that film. They wasted time and tax money to play golf on the moon (or rather pretend to using SFX) yet no comfy cute doggo playtime.

>>212692519
Baaaased

>>212690857
Obviously AI fag

>>212694026
>How come I have not seen a video of an astronaut walking his dog on the moon
The world wasn't ready for it. The US government prevented the flight planners from incorporating this because they knew if they did the public would vote to fund NASA for another round of Saturn Vs so they could get more funny pet video compilations from the moon. Nixon couldn't afford that with how Vietnam was going.

>>212694041
rotate that sphere in your head so the hemisphere in light is fully facing you

>>212684168
chuds need a reason to ragebait and argue so others are as miserable as they are, and retards feel the need to know some le hidden truth to get one up over everyone who rightfully spits in their face

>>212688965
because they know less about space travel than a bunch of retards on the internet

>>212688326
Your semitic volcano demon is fluttering around in the Nablus-Hebron cave complex, go bow to him to your hearts content faggot

Every single technological achievement in the history of mankind has been repeated and improved upon and further progressed.

Except this. Apparently we went there and then decided not to anymore and then never did again and now can't.

Imagine discovering the Americas and then going "yeah idk we already went there, it kinda costs a lot to field a mission there so we're not gonna do it anymore"

Or to make a more apt point "yeah we visited antarctica so we're just not gonna do it anymore, don't feel like it plus it's cold idk there's nothing to do there".

or discovering a combustion engine "yeah I guess you can go fast with it, faster than a carriage so idk nobody really needs to get anywhere that fast we got this covered nbd"

etc...
somehow this ONE thing we just decided not to do anymore or bother with... for 50+ years.

>>212694126
Brightest spot is still concentrated to a small point. The moon isn't doing that however.

>>212694026
The Chinese should do this but with rabbits in tiny little rabbit space suits because they erroneously believe the moon looks like a rabbit.

>>212694216
They claim it's because "there's nothing there, there's no reason to."

...then why did they even go in the first place? Planting a little flag on a rock seems like a huge waste of money

>>212694221
the moon is matte

>>212694216
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_the_Moon

>>212690580
>local light source
It's called the sun, retard

>>212694262
Your point?

>>212694431
There were other missions to the moon besides the first one

>we landed on the moon
>hitler killed himself in that bunker
>oswald killed kennedy
>manson wasn't a govt. asset
>9/11 wasn't an inside job

>>212694216
>Or to make a more apt point "yeah we visited antarctica so we're just not gonna do it anymore, don't feel like it plus it's cold idk there's nothing to do there".
The last expedition to the south pole near the end of the heroic age of expedition was in 1913
The next time anyone set foot on the south pole was in 1956

>>212694488
Nigger there's been bases and shit on Antarctica for like 80 years. That's why they don't let people go there.

>>212694572
My point is that nobody bothered going to the south pole for 43 years because they determined that the cost of such an expedition would not be justified by just doing something they've already done. Antarctic exploration only became funded decades later when a permanent presence was feasible. Apply this to Apollo.