What's so sexy about it? What, you've never seen a woman in fishnet and shorts before? Her hair is done in a way that most women should have their hair. Lots of bangs, mass, volume and length. But there's nothing down right "sexy' about this. She's just showing off more skin than usual. Makes me think she's probably cold.
>>212767684
Because I don't like masculinity in women. I want to be able to look down into my wife's eyes in the same way I want to be able to look down and see my young children looking up at me. I'm like 5'8" on a good day. I don't want to look UP at my wife unless we're being intimate. Everyone is same height when they're laying down lol.
>>212767941 >>212767874
Hoodies are also usually visible even from the front. I don't think I've ever seen a hoodie that wasn't visible until it was pulled up.
>>212767941 >hoodies don't usually have stiff 15 inch long fins
Except it isn't that stiff, its rubbery, you can see it bend as it extends.
>generally
OK, but there are tons of hoodies that either zip up all the way, have some kind of mask or both.
>>212767970 >Hoodies are also usually visible even from the front.
Because people don't usually tuck them in because they don't usually have some thick rubbery bit that flails around when you move.
>>212769361
I literally got a hard on during that scene. That hadn't happened since I was a kid. It blows my mind that these two very anglo looking people in a scene with zero nudity managed to produce one of the horniest scenes of the 2000s.
>>212769843
Yeah it's a fucking marvel of television. There are so many British shows from the same era that were horny as hell, like Misfits who had young fit people fucking and tits wobbling around on the screen every episode, and yet somehow none of them were anywhere near as boner-inducing as Isy Suttie in that scene.