>>212773972
No, CGI is absolutely required and unavoidable if you want to make a live-action One Piece. Avatar shows how it's done. But this show, produced and directed by nobody hacks, obviously doesn't have the budget. Prosthetics also can look better than the shit you just replied to at least
>Yeah, that was the bare minimum for this to ever be made.
>have to pay a price to get something awful no one in their right mind ever asked for
>Vivi and Shanks are nothing characters
Hope you are just the schizo samefagging and trying different angles
>schizo still defending the show he said he doesn't like hours ago
>>212774008
>I'm not defending things
Yes you are defending the show by downplaying its errors and attacking my character because I criticize it. Also obviously defending the casting right now with this post, retard
>Yeah, he's growing on you once Syrup is over, but his initial arc isn't all that
No he's pretty endearing right away (in the manga/anime)
>but ultimately it is the low point of East Blue
Cool opinion. Done distracting and shitting on the source material?
>Crazy succesful franchise for something that is "not for everybody".
True
>Dunno, what was your point bringing up an actor out of costume?
The fact that whatever they put on his face doesn't completely hide that he's young. And that he looks like a babyfaced, Grinch-nosed goober who spazzes out for some reason is the bigger issue than his age
>Good makeup has always been more about effort than about technology.
What do you know about makeup defending this shitty Netflix anime cash grab? Literally people running around with gaudy cosplayer wigs that completely clash with the half-assed brown environments and drawing monobrows with a sharpie
>>212766631. You should stay far, far away from any makeup/hair department
