Thread 212781741

This looks like suprise buttsex

>>212781741 (OP)
Disney Pixar's Pedobear

>all characters are women, mostly brown
>avatar but with beavers
>tumblr director
>millennial humor
yeah, this is slop

>>212781741 (OP)
Pixar has just completely lost the ability to make an appealing artstyle, huh?

PIxar's hires need to spend time in nature, study more humans + animals outside of their own immediate group.

>>212781741 (OP)
Pixar's current slop would be fine if they cost 10% of what they do now. This looks like some kind of straight to tv slop.

>>212782090
Do you mean away from livestock?

>>212781741 (OP)
That pic is indistinguishable from a jeet fake movie trailer.

Even trying to avoid culture war shit this seems very middling. None of the jokes landed and the writing seems strained.

Anyone else notice they had to mash multiple lines together just to say “this revolutionary technology”? It almost sounded like AI the way the inflections didn’t flow

>>212782015
damn

>>212781741 (OP)
toddlerslop

>>212781741 (OP)
This feels AI generated
>>212782883
yabba dabba doo

Anyone notice that the animation is really really terrible?

>>212781741 (OP)
I hate fucking Hoppers
Wish someone would go with a gun and round up all these damn Hoppers

>>212781741 (OP)
>>212782961
>>212782997
comments love it

>>212781741 (OP)
>genuinely indistinguishable from any DreamWorks slop released circa 2007
How the mighty have fallen.

>>212782953
>This feels AI generated
Slop like this "feels" AI generated because AI is trained on Pixar's other slop. AI just regurgitates the slop that it's been trained on. This is why AI won't save us from the slop, because it's only been trained on slop to begin with.

>>212782997
if i brought a hopper home my dad woulda thrown me out

>>212783073
The idea is lazy, the animation is lazy and the humour is memey.

>>212781741 (OP)
I laughed at the beaver and bear interaction at the end. It does look pretty mediocre though, and it seems reminiscent of a dreamworks movie. Which isn’t a knock on it, I personally got tired of the tryhard sentimental nature of Pixar movies really early on, so this would be a nice change of style.

>>212783085
>Slop like this "feels" AI generated because AI is trained on Pixar's other slop. AI just regurgitates the slop that it's been trained on. This is why AI won't save us from the slop, because it's only been trained on slop to begin with.

On top of that, modern Pixar-Disney is this huge design by committee with endless committees and writer's rooms so you can't see any singular vision at all. It comes off as a big amorphous blob of a story. Lacking an identity means it just feels artificial and sterile. Everything gets played safe.

And you can't make shit too "cool" because that's masculine and we hate that. Can't have real danger either.

>>212783063
>nowadays marketing for movies is around the same as the budget and that's why they have to jump through hoops to just break even
>"n-noooo the previous movie bombed only because they didn't promote it enough!"
Tired cope.

I think it looks cute, although it's sad that cute tomboy MC is gonna be a beaver for most of the movie from the looks of it.
https://youtu.be/hJnAHzo4-KI

>Are we vibing?
>And they were in the same den

Forced Gen Z speak and referencing outdated TikTok memes. Pixar is never going to make a comeback, is it?

>>212783063
These comments are from childless adult cartoon fans. Not the kind of audience that actually makes a kids movie successful. They would have left these same comments under stuff like Elio or Turning Red.

>>212783245
You’re saying that Elio was well marketed? No one I know knew that movie was even out, and the stupid title they gave it was guaranteed flop. It was marketed really really bad.

>>212781741 (OP)
The music and pop-culture reference makes this look like a Dreamworks movie from the 2000s

>>212783454
Turning Red was cute and funny thoughbeit

>>212781741 (OP)
Do these people not understand that animals have a fight/flight response?

>>212783466
Elio didn't get a huge marketing campaign because Disney dedicated more to Lilo and Stitch and because Elio was always going to be a stinker. That movie was basically completely redone half way through production. Disney wasn't going to invest much into something they expected to fail even with better marketing.

>>212783288
Nope, only sequels have been able to draw money so get ready for Toy Story 6, Incredibles 4 and Inside Out 20

Come home, white man.

>>212781741 (OP)
I honestly believe it. “Hoppers” is a play on the word “poppers”, a very popular drug in the gay community. I’m straight but I’ve tried poppers a few times when hooking up with men. I swear it turns you into a slutty fucking semen demon. It helps loosen up your mouth and throat so you can deepthroat cock like a champ and relaxes your ass so you can be a good little bottom bitch and let daddy use and abuse that boy pussy. The times I took poppers are hands down the best sex I’ve ever had

>>212783517
Read some we bare bears comics and you’ll have an idea what the movie is going for.

>>212781741 (OP)
What moron picked that music for the trailer?

>>212783563
Forgotten kino

>>212781741 (OP)
Who will Pixar blame when this one bombs too?

>>212781741 (OP)
>that scene where she looks at the audience and says “MY BEAVER MY CHOICE”

>pond rules say that if you get caught by a bear you consent to being eaten
>the other beaver and the bear get mad at her
Was it kink shaming?

>>212782207
exactly, without looking it up I guarantee this somehow has a budget of 150-200m

>>212783563
>>212783494
>>212782053
>>212783073

we are now back in the mid 2000s again... that means another housing crash is soon
and emo girls will be coming back in style

>>212781741 (OP)
Will this bomb more or less than Elio?

>>212783788
What a time to be alive!

>>212783919
It’d be embarrassing if it bombs again. That said they might just be banking on Toy Story 5 to pay for this and Elio’s failure.

>>212783788
Soul...

>>212783572
>I’m straight but
>[gayest shit you can think of]
Why is this website like this?

>>212783788
Don't forget that the plot is largely pic related

>>212783975
Migration did $300m and this looks a similar tier. It's probably going to get more favourable press so I'm predicting $400m

>>212783788
I still can’t believe Over the Hedge was a newspaper comic first

>>212783466
Here in Italy I caught the ads everyday for weeks on tv every time I turned it on, which I don't do often. And in the big city I work in I saw ads in the train station and on lots of bus.

>>212782862
Imagine being a skilled 3d modeller and this is what your calarts graduate 2d artist hands you as your reference. I'd shoot myself.

>>212783919
Less severe bomb. Children would rather watch talking animals movie number 4653677 than that faggy looking autist Elio.

>>212783063
>We Bare Bears
oh yeah that faggy show on Cartoon Network about 3 bears living in wacky woke San Francisco

>>212782862
Which director, writer, etc self-inserted as the main character in their own movie this time?

>>212783466
It certainly was
Parents just avoided it because they didn't want their kids catching the gay like the movie's director

>>212783919
Parents are less on their guard with talking animals, it'll do at least marginally better than their previous flops featuring humans

>>212781995
fpbp
for some reason the wokies really love their bear fucking

>>212781741 (OP)

> Doesn't link to the trailer

*sigh* zoomer skill void

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJnAHzo4-KI

>>212781741 (OP)
Old Pixar would've made the plot about an actual beaver who was raised in captivity and got out, and wouldn't bother with the human in a robot body gimmick.

>>212784266
Hard to say, the director made his name on this bullshit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpfix3i6Q0o&ab_channel=CartoonNetwork

>>212784301
Gay shit was cut and it was only after the movie flopped that it was revealed there was a gay related storyline in it originally

>>212784412
>giving pixar views and money

fuck off. theres a reason i didnt link it

>After a group of scientists invent a way for human brains to inhabit mechanical bodies, Mabel Tanaka uses their technology to embody a realistic robotic beaver and thwart a construction company's plot to destroy the local animal habitat.

Pass

>>212784452
Considering We Bare Bears was successful i think they should market the movie "from the creator of We Bare Bears" in the trailers

>>212784430
But this is like Avatar. You know what Avatar is.

>>212784486
I mean this >>212784371 just SCREAMS masculinity

>>212784540
I mean, yeah they build dams, but I don’t really think beavers count as waterbenders

>>212784430
This

>>212782015

>avatar but with beavers

>>212784512
Looks like Disney is trying out A.I. writers.

>>212783779
>exactly, without looking it up I guarantee this somehow has a budget of 150-200m

Everything's budgeted like it's 2019, and they're still in denial thinking all the recent flops are an abberation, and people will start going back to theaters. COVID literally killed movie theaters.

>>212784597
where are the men

Why does every single Pixar movie have to look the same.

>>212781741 (OP)
Ass sex is so painful I don't know why people are into it. It has to be a meme.

>>212784634
This is a different style from those several beanmouth projects

>>212784499

Oh, it was some sad meaningless gesture on your part to bring Disney to their knees?

How does that work?

>>212782862
>more CalArts slop
Pixar is self-parody at this point

>>212784512
>mechanical bodies
Only thing that might save this movie is if the mayor combats the animals by being put into a Terminator body and starts racking up a kill count.

>>212784669
You can talk about a movie without needing to watch the trailer idiot

>>212784301
>>212784371
>>212784486
They cut the overt gay shit, but Elio still comes off like a little fruit. The film has fag energy.

>>212784371
>>212784716
zesty ahh nigga

>>212784618
>Literal faggot cannot watch a movie if a man isn't in it.
Keep saving the white race by crying about the lack of men in a children's movie, mutt.

>>212784618
anon... it's a movie about BEAVERS

I want to fuck the deer.

>>212782862
It's that Overwatch character I forgot the name of

>>212784786
>he says as he avatarfags with le funny drunk white man
good morning, saar

i thought this wasn't allowed anymore?

>>212784699

> You can talk about a movie without needing to watch the trailer!

"Talk". By which you mean crazed /tv/pol screaming about women and minorities.

Creepy way to spend your day.

Pixar phoning it in.

>>212784933
Pixar presents...the CEO of Grubhub

>>212784969
Is that knitted jumper just a flat texture?

Also, who the fuck wears a knitted jumper under a lab coat indoors?

>>212784969
>went to the same casting studio as Grub hub

>>212783454
> childless adult cartoon fans
those are the only ones watching these things now, zoomers and gen alphas are too ADHD to watch an entire 90 minute movie

> Hoppers lead VA Piper Curda is on the asexual spectrum.

Pixar just can't help themselves.

>>212784652
The Asian chick has a beanmouth, thoughever.

>>212782862
Gives me self insert vives desu
Probably true since all modern Pixar movies are some faggot's self insert

>>212784786
sar, I wanta redeeem!

>>212782738
I imagine the full scene's joke will be her just going on and on describing it.

>>212783788
Madagascar is a really good movie

>>212782862
>More bean mouth
Lmao.

>>212781741 (OP)
Isn't this directed by the guy who created that innocuous We Bare Bears show?

>Pixar finally stopped making humanslop
Well I guess I'm obligated by principle to watch this one. Thumbnail looks like Illumination shit though

>>212782862
>humanslop
>>212787528
Ah nevermind, dropped.

Invader Zim saw it coming

>>212783517
Do you really not understand an animal's freeze response?

Pixar nowadays is really hit and miss. Hoppers looks soulless compared to earlier Pixar works like Wall-E or Up, or Luca which came out just a few years ago. Speaking of Luca, it's probably Pixar's most underrated film, visually stunning and obviously made with a lot of love for the characters and the setting. Give me Luca 2.

>Women and POC
>bean mouth
Hard PASS

>Toy Story
>A Bug's Life
>Monsters, Inc.
>Finding Nemo
>The Incredibles
>Cars
>Ratatouille
>WALL-E
>Up
>Brave
>Inside Out
>The Good Dinosaur
>Coco
>Onward
>Soul
>Luca
>Turning Red
>Elemental
>Elio
>Hoppers

All the movies that aren't sequels, prequels, or spin-offs

>>212781741 (OP)
everything is so round and sterile and boring

>>212784512
> After a group of scientists invent a way for human brains to inhabit mechanical bodies, Mabel Tanaka uses their technology to embody a realistic robotic beaver and thwart a construction company's plot to destroy the local animal habitat.
??? How did this manage to get funding?

Are we never getting kino like Antz and the original Shrek ever again?

>>212782862
this is the director

>>212781741 (OP)
Why is it called "Hoppers"?
Beavers don't hop.

>>212788049
>Pixar so desperate they're bringing back straight to video directors

Pixar died with Lasseter

Why are Asian-American directors so awful? First Peter Sohn, then Domee Shi, now this guy.

>>212788209
Probably something related to the bodyjacking. Gotta “hop in” to the robot body.

>>212788239
>soulless chinks
>americanized to be even more soulless
it's the worst of both worlds

>>212788209
Hopping your brain into the robot animal.

>>212787581
Based

>>212788267
>>212788381
so why not "Lumber JACK"