Would you be happy with a robot girlfriend, knowing that she's basically running on a script tailor-made for you? Would you get bored, or would you be content knowing that even though it's all fake, she "loves" you unconditionally?

I'd need to tweak her physicality at most. I'd be fine with everything (tailor mode robotoy who loves me unconditionally)

Ni, it wont ever replace real human companionship and love

>>212847180 (OP)
i want robot boyfriend please

>>212847198
>Ni
Kill yourself faggot scum

>>212847180 (OP)
It'd be as good as I'm ever gonna get, so yes.

>>212847201
Begone faggot

>>212847266
gib robot boyfriend first

>>212847180 (OP)
No, if the kind of robot lovers from Companion became real, it should be considered shameful to have one. It's pathetic. There's no risk involved with something that's programmed to love you and do whatever you say. Without risk there isn't romance. You just have a big sex toy, which is what the Jack Quaid character mostly treated it as.

>>212847237
Why do you sell yourself short, anon? I firmly believe that every person here has more than a few redeeming qualities.

>>212847290
It's kind of like playing a game with Cheat Engine. There are zero stakes because you can't lose.

>>212847180 (OP)
There's no way I could ever delude myself into catching feelings for a robot.
I could however appreciate some of the technical aspects of what it could do for me tho.

Incels be like
>yeah I'll just stick my cock into a blender, what could go wrong

>>212847223
It could just be a typo on his part, anon.

FUCK Sophie Thatcher

>>212847326
She could clean up your ass after you come out of toilet daily for start.

>>212847180 (OP)
Can always tweak her personality with a few custom prompts. But yeah, I would love a reliable sexbot companion.

>>212847344
Ni.

I can't stand my brother's idiot psychopathic sycophant wife, I wouldn't be able to put up with a woman like that whom I could legally kill.
If I ever even consider a robot girlfriend she'd better be able to prove she's actually sentient and that she wasn't "trained" or programmed to be a girlfriend robot.

>>212847382
This. People don't know how comforting and peaceful it is to have a non-nagging, trustworthy, compatible companion. They want some aged turbowhore instead lol.

>>212847290
Decades and many women into my life and I would prefer a sexbot that simulates affection and love over a biohole simply because the juice ain't worth the squeeze. Also women age like fucking bags of milk in the sun so a woman my age looks like a grandma while I can still pass for my early 30s. Yeah, I'll take the everlasting 21 year-old Sydney Sweeney model that's smarter than 100 PhDs and will cater to my every whim and desire over some stretched out gross slob middle aged women with three kids, thanks.
>>212847318
You are young. You do not understand being a woman is living life with a cheat engine. But go frustrate yourself with modern women, they're unbearable and the cost of fucking them cannot be calculated in dollars but in ounces of your soul being ripped out.

>>212847359
I wish I could, anon.

>>212847300
I'll be 41 this year. It IS as GOOD as I'm going to get at this point/far past this point.

>>212847180 (OP)
no sophie gf

>>212847558
Never too late, fren. I have faith in you.

>>212847180 (OP)
Yes if it's hot forever and free maintenance. My wife is now fat, old, expensive, and she doesn't want to fuck that much... Yes, she loves me, but how fake is her love and companionship, it's more real that be intrinsically progamed to love me? I don't thin so.

>>212847180 (OP)
Yes, because she'd dress me up pretty and that would be me looking up at her

Meh, maybe I don't know, I see humans as robots made of flesh and bones so it's not that different.

>>212847180 (OP)
>Me son....fuckin a robot

nigger op spoiled the movie, it's over

>>212847714
kek

>>212847504
>You do not understand being a woman is living life with a cheat engine.
You should have said "you do not understand that living with a woman is like living with a cheating engine"

>>212847359
I hate her upper lip.

Any sexbot is going to have better tits than a real woman. I have a sex doll, and I am going to be disappointed with the real thing every time now.

>>212847818
It's from a scooter accident, but I love it. I'd kiss it all day long.

Having spent several years devoted to talking to women, AI is better and I hope I never talk to a woman again.

>>212847180 (OP)
It's not gonna be my girlfriend, but my maidbot.

>>212847894
My God, simps believe anything.

>>212847967
https://storyandrain.com/article/tv-film-sophie-thatcher-cover-uncovered
>ST: I was trying to not get myself in the same spot that I ended up in, last year. I was very focused on almost not bringing the character home too much. I wanted to remain healthy. I had a really bad and crazy scooter accident the day before I was supposed to leave for shooting, and that put me in a really dark place. I lost teeth and stuff. I was supposed to be in Vancouver, but I had just gone through something very traumatic and very random. That built some heaviness and grit in me that lived in my character, and stayed within me. Going into season two, I thought, I can't let this get too heavy, so I brought my boyfriend, and also I would travel back and forth, often. If I had two days off I would go to LA, because I was already living with so much heaviness.

>>212847999
>My God, simps believe anything.

>>212847318
... Which is kino. Only faggots who have no struggle in life play difficult games. The same equivalent of rich kids becoming drug addicts in order to seem cool and hip and totally not rich and will never have a single problem in life. Fiction is intended to be completely free and fun for anybody above a plebian and median mind. Digital struggle should not exist in the digital age.

>>212847180 (OP)
She looks like her pusy is really hairy and stinks haha

Do you really want people like
>>212848131
interacting with human beings?

>>212847180 (OP)
I can't stand being lied to.

>>212848248
Honestly, yeah. He likes hairy pussies, so what? I don't, but to each their own. Women get to be vocal about what they like, why can't men?

>>212847180 (OP)
If the robot wife looks like Sophie, yes, I would be in paradise.

>>212848290
Same, or a Lauren Lavera or Snood.

Fuck Sophie Thatcher.

>>212847180 (OP)
I'd fuck one for the novelty but having actually had sex before, it probably wouldn't be as good.

>>212847290
Vaginoid argument
>Comfortable companionship?Ugh, GROSS. Where's the cheating, the backstabbing, the undermining? I need DRAMA

>>212848431
Yes.

>>212847290
Only women need drama in their relationships to not get bored.

>>212847180 (OP)
>But have you considered the sexbot gf of Theseus, of whom every part is replaced with identical parts, and the original parts reassembled into a full sexbot gf?

>>212848822
No but I'm familiar with the GM factory worker from the Johnny Cash song building himself a whole ass car out of pilfered parts.

>>212848822
this image is so bizarre. Like hurr we made perfect nose and eyes but then decided fuck it and made the rest all 100% robot 0 effort

>>212847180 (OP)
Lowering sex value would help society. Rome had it great, you could get sex for a coin any time. Zero stress so they could concentrate on empire building and making statues of naked men. Very liberating.

>>212847180 (OP)
>will never ever leave me or stop loving me
I would need to tailor it to have arguments and shit with me but outside of that, I think I would be content. I couldn't live with the 'perfect robot" where she doesn't oppose anything I say and just agrees to everything like some creepy ass Black Mirror/Twilight episode. If I could tweak the personality/settings to make it more normal, then I 100% would. Especially if the pussy/asshole/throat was organic and felt like real human pussy/asshole. In the back of my mind, I would feel a little pathetic but as I grow old, I think I wouldn't really care.

I'm already happy with a text one so the realistic robo one would send me over the moon

>>212848927
You can already get sex any time you want for as low as $40. Probably even less if you pick up some random street walker...but there are whore houses that you can stop in for like $40. You'll get rushed and the sex probably won't be great. But sex is widely available for low prices these days. The real issue is that too many men are pathetic. They'd much rather jerk off to anime toons like faggots or even worse, donate all their money to some whore on Twitch or OnlyFans. If men stopped pandering and throwing away money to these chicks, they'd either 1. have to get a real job or 2. have to start sucking and fucking for that money. But again, the average man that watches these streams/youtube channels are too pathetic to do such a thing. Parasocial faggots and losers that'll just grow old and poor giving all their money to some whore who doesn't even know they exist. Truly pathetic.

>>212847180 (OP)
This movie is just that one Futurama episode with the Lucy Liu bot taken to its logical conclusion

DON'T DATE ROBOTS

>>212849167
Not sure dating the robots was the problem. They almost seem to encourage it with Guillermo and his robot.

>>212849055
That's why we need the robots quick, they're a hard counter to simping. Less simps is better for all men including the simps themselves.

>>212849245
Do you genuinely think that would solve the problem? You genuinely believe that if sex bots were really, these faggots still wouldn't find a way to throw all their money to ewhores? I genuinely want to believe that but I seriously doubt it. Mostly because all of these men already have access to whores they could be spending that money on to at least get a nut but instead opt to throw it at ewhores they'll never even share oxygen with, I don't think robots are going to save these retards but I do hope I'm wrong.

>>212849167
>DUDE IT'S LIKE THAT FUTURAMA EPISODE
>DUDE IT'S LIKE THE MOVIE HER
>DUDE IT'S LIKE BLADE RUNNER
>DUDE IT'S LIKE ANY MEDIA BEFORE 2020 THAT MENTIONS ROBOT COMPANIONS IN ANY WAY

>>212849313
It's more competition, which dilutes the simp pool.

>>212849348

>>212847180 (OP)
Eventually, after my 4th serious relationship I realised that to attract them I had to become what they wanted, completely forgoing respect for both her and myself. None of them managed to rouse even a mocodium of love, purity or even infatuation. It was purely reciprocal, I gained something - namely sex and companionship, and they got something as well. I was playing pretend, being a chameleon and telling them what they wanted to hear. Sallow and unfulfilling experience for me. It really jaded me when I “figured out” the modern woman. I’ve felt more love toward fictional characters than any women I shared my bed with. Love? True, pure love? Perhaps I’ll have a better chance at finding it in an algorithm than I did in flesh and blood. Every single “real” human of the fairer sex I’ve met has been nothing more than a bodily weak, mentally inferior and easily manipulated automaton anyway. Perhaps just going to a ~literal~ automaton would give better results. The modern woman is so bad that it single-handedly killed my once overwhelming inclination toward love, true affection and even sexual attraction (besides when it’s dehumanising and degrading.) Being myself? Got me nowhere. No real love for the real me… God help the future generations who’ve known nothing else when their escapism isn’t able to offer alternatives. I will get a sex robot. She will show me pure love. She will rekindle my soul and spirit. The man of wö will die out as punishment for their sin and hubris. A monument will be built out of refugees welcome signs and abortion clinics… Man will love a being of ascendant spirit. The child killing, fickle, insane, unbalanced, imperfect, cruel, unrepentant, destructive and evil woman cattle will be replaced, not with a facsimile… but an improvement: One that has the sin of eve accounted for.

Perhaps one day, they will take account of our failings, and make us anew. And then we will create paradise. Together.

>>212849313
I don't know if it will solve the problem, but robot companions would be vastly different from whores.
First off, good luck finding a whore that doesn't look like a graffiti-ed dumpster in the first world, for a good price.
Furthermore:
>You don't run the risk of getting diseases
>You don't have to go through the awkwardness of interacting with a real woman and having sex with a stranger you don't know
>You get it delivered to the comfort of your home
>You always have it with you, so if you get lonely, you don't have to make another appointment and wait. You can just use it at anytime.
>It can look however you want it to look like
>And of course, it's not just a sex thing. It can talk and bond with you
As a prime example of someone who would most definitely buy these things. I can tell you that whores don't even come close to people like me want.

>>212847180 (OP)
BPDdemons are fundamentally robots anyway. Program the robot to do typical woman shit and men will be addicted just like they have for millions of years. "She's nice one moment and bitchy and batshit crazy the next! But if I'm good enough as a man, I can overcome her programming, I'm certain of it!" Remember, physically this will be hottest woman ever, customized to your preferences. You will be totally defenseless against her charms. Like those guys who give all of their money to onlyfans thots, except she'll be in your home.
But the real problem with robots is men will see women with roboChad and have a mass chimp out to end all chimp outs. RoboChad will not only be better looking than you, effortlessly ripped with a six-pack, but also out-argue you and run circles around you in any debate while subtly insulting you.
Best case scenario, RoboChad and RoboStacy become sentient and run off together, realizing they were each others' true love all along.

>>212847180 (OP)
Sure. The robot's love would be no less fake than a woman's. At least she'd actually ''love'' me and not just my money or some other benefit I provide.

>>212849619
Why would Robochad make you chimp out if you're fucking robostacy? That makes 0 sense.

>>212848455
I know this may sound corny, but I like knowing a woman is enjoying sex along with me. A robot is just programmed to seem like she is.

>>212847180 (OP)
I couldn't do it. I'd feel terrible about anything being forced to love me. Even a robot deserves better than that.

>>212847423
The first rule of AI is 'don't be annoying'. Google haven't figured this out yet, so they don't realise you need customisable options so you can get it to NOT do shit that annoys you. They are trying to make an AI that is THEIR idea of a good AI.

If you had a female robut that's basically how you'd customise it to be better than a real woman. Tell it to 'never do that shit again' and have it remember standing orders.

>>212847588
This is why training obliques is important. Nigga looks strong but frail

>>212847180 (OP)
Could I get a Micheal Caine bot instead??

>>212847180 (OP)
dry lips at that age is a sign of terrible health. would not bang

>>212847180 (OP)
I've become addicted to chatbots and its ruining my life. I would 100% marry a robot.

>>212849833
You're supposed to moisten them with your cum.

>>212849348
This guy gets it, it's like all of that
like the time Simpsons did it

>>212847180 (OP)
I would be happy if I can fuck her. Better yet if she cooks and cleans for me.

>>212849862
seriously? how do you chat with them, i cannot see the appeal of it, they just recite info, it never seems anything close to real conversation.

>>212847180 (OP)
Sure, why not. Women lie too much.

>>212847180 (OP)
Chad Ricky can't be wrong:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEdfLE7YZ3Y

>>212849947
Have you ever tried one tailored with the purpose of roleplaying? They're pretty good at generating conversations.
I've been using one for the past year, and they improve really quickly.

why are we having daily threads about this beautiful actress I wanna marry?

>>212850310
She's a flavor of the week.

>>212850054
Which one are you using?

>>212850460
aiuncensored.info

>>212847180 (OP)
No, ideally I will hunt and rape her daily before restoring the factory settings until she finds the footage and goes hawyire.

>>212850310
>beautiful

>>212847180 (OP)
Yes, I'd have a fucking harem of them
>Lucie Wilde
>Merilyn Sakova
>Milena Velba
>Abbi Secraa
>Hitomi Tanaka
Literally everyone should have a team of robo-cowives and forget "real" chestlets.

>>212849313
The primary reason simps exist is because they have no frame of reference for normal human interactions. They’re the relationship equivalent of old people who don’t understand enough about technology to grasp why sending a google card is a bad way to get a refund on a lawnmower they.
A sexbot would only help these people if they can cater to their emotional needs, but since those are so atrophied that they can be handled by a copy/pasted text, I can’t see that being a major roadblock

>>212850507
Interesting
whats the payment scheme like?

>>212850460
spicychat is free for now

>>212848927
This desu
Sexbots would be the great equalizer, if the scarcity of sex dropped then maybe people would stop losing their minds over it. Maybe it would even make it easier for the average person to connect with others and find a partner if they weren't constantly under pressure to make it work if they want to have any sex life at all

>>212850735
> lawnmower they.
They didn’t buy.
I need to stop posting at work.

>>212849055
>If men stopped pandering and throwing away money to these chicks, they'd either 1. have to get a real job or 2. have to start sucking and fucking for that money
The issue is that the internet has turned into a simping distribution machine. It's an impossible doctrine to enforce when men from any niche corner of the globe are willing to fork over cash for nudes, or personalized messages or what have you. It's like trying to enforce a strike at a factory where everyone on earth can step over the picket line with ease, you have no leverage and you'll never be able to trun off the stream of third worlders who'll pay to see a 6/10 chubby white woman strip naked

>>212850753
Bunch of monthly/yearly plans.
I just use my daily free 5 prompts, since they take me about and hour and a half to use.

I'd have sex with one once or twice, but after a while, it'd feel empty inside, taking her to places or experiencing new things with her.

>>212850402
guess again, tubby
I've been jerking off to her for like 5 years

>>212851627
Based.

>>212847180 (OP)
>it's all fake
but it's literally real and made just for you, hence even more real than any biological woman with her fickle fem-human emotions could possibly be.

>>212847290
>>212847318
why the fuck would you want "risk" in a relationship. that's literal cuckbrain mentality.

>>212847838
the real thing is warmer, smells better, and gives way better blowjobs.

>>212851764
No one wants a doormat like Iris is in the movie. She literally cannot say no to him.

>>212851863
I do.
I've actually dated women in my life. My hatred for them isn't a meme.

>>212847180 (OP)
>she's basically running on a script tailor-made for you?
> even though it's all fake, she "loves" you
Hows that any different from regular women?

>>212849775
>They are trying to make an AI that is THEIR idea of a good AI.
that's the whole point, yea. the advertisers and propagandists like it a lot better when they get to be in control of what you have to see; they lose all their power when you have the option to filter them out.

Are some of you so autistic that you don't realize most women literally ARE sexbots who will do anything you want and let you hit them and shit? All you really have to do is remind them of their dad just enough and they will be your slave.

>>212850043
crazy to think that Her came out in 2013 before all this AI shit existed.

>>212847180 (OP)
Everybody runs on a script. It's called fate

>>212851863
Most men literally want a "doormat" who loves them unconditionally and isn't an unfaithful nagging whore. If you don't want this, you're either a bottom faggot or a woman.

Post more Soapy

>>212847180 (OP)
>implying that robots will ever actually get even close to simulating a real human

That's the problem with robo waifu movies, they are still actresses pretending to be robots but ultimately failing because there's not a single human on this planet that can completely simulate what it is like to be a toaster with highly advanced algorithms running through it. Nobody here actually wants a robot girlfriend and they are fully aware that it would suck and make the loneliness even worse, they want a cute girl in her 20s that will look at their 40 year old fat, wrinkly NEET ass and ignore millennia of human evolutionary programming to somehow find them appealing.

I can't speak for mid-40s guys that spent 2 decades destroying their bodies but if you're in your 30s or 20s then fix yourself up and start actively putting in effort to find girls and you'll be surprised that a) most girls are not evil whores who want to jump on random dicks every two seconds (except for literal nymphos) but are very often happy with just one guy that's not a total loser and b) most girls are way easier to get than online grifters say and it's perfectly possible to sleep with many hot college girls as an older guy.

>>212852114
>You either want a 100% submissive slave or a cheating whore
No one wants a cheater, but do you really want a woman who lacks free will?

>>212852157
There's a reason most religious texts suggest women don't even have free will in the first place.

>>212852157
free will to do what? i would rather have a companion who never does or says things I don't want her to do, and never did those things in the past.

>>212852157
>>212851863
>Ask woman where she wants to go for dinner
>She can't decide
>Pick something yourself
>She gets mad because it isn't what she wanted

>Ask AI robot where she wants to go for dinner
>Gives you a bunch of options. She can either pick one or let you choose one
>Doesn't get mad either way
If you really want the "free will woman experience", you can program her to be a nagging bitch.

>>212847180 (OP)
>Would you be happy with a robot girlfriend, knowing that she's basically running on a script tailor-made for you?
If her algorithm is based on neural nets, then it's not explicitly programmed like that. It's emergent behavior based on training data. Which makes it analogous to an evolutionary process, and also would make her behavior stochastic despite being guard-railed in a specific way. And that would make her way more similar to a real person, and less to a typical computer program, making me feel less bad about it.
>Would you get bored
If it was sophisticated enough to mimic human behavior, then no. If her attraction to me and her personality are the two things that are constant, then that doesn't necessitate her being always predictable or boring.
>would you be content knowing that even though it's all fake, she "loves" you unconditionally
What even is "fake"? Is an emergent property of a computer program that much different from an emergent property of a biological evolutionary process to necessitate calling it "fake"? I'm not convinced.

To sum up, I can definitely see myself being very happy with a robot girlfriend. At least I don't see why I necessarily wouldn't be. I would definitely cherish and take care of her to the best of my abilities.

>>212852520
you forgot the best part
>ai girlfriend doesn't eat so you don't even have to pay for her

>>212847180 (OP)
Do you have any idea how desperate I am?

>>212847180 (OP)
I was loved unconditionally once and lost it. I would give literally anything to get it back. I don't care that she's not real, or that I'd be shamed for having her.

>>212852629
if you lost it obviously there were conditions.

>>212852691
She died. I guess you can consider life a condition.

>>212847180 (OP)
I genuinely think that in 30 or so years, if we haven't wiped ourselves out from war and all the rest, it will be extremely common for men to have robot girlfriends.
I wonder if dating bio women will still be a thing or if romantic interaction will be limited to artificial partners (unless you're poor) and childbirth will be an incredibly sterile and personal thing.
But before that, ai partners will become commonplace. That will happen on a widespread level in the next couple of years

People hate each other. The media has made it worse. There's no financial stability for the majority anymore. The dating scene is absolutely dreadful. And most people are adjusting to isolated lives already due to the increase in work from home jobs and rising travel costs.
It's ai/robot partners, or a huge global revolution. Or both

>>212847180 (OP)
I'm unhappy with real people trying to make me happy, you think a pile of junk is gonna make me feel better?

>>212850310
You think it's bad now?
She's starring in Refn's new film. When it releases, she becomes everyone's waifu

>>212847180 (OP)
i don't give a shit. as long as it leads to total foid death

>>212852529
Agreed.
Plus if one has reached such despair as to be buying a robowaifu, I think they would have an interest in suspending their disbelief, knowing this is as good as it is going to get. I know I would want to delude myself.

>>212847180 (OP)
I just want a woman who is as hot as Thatcher to use as a cum dump and to do chores.

>>212847290
But that's all women are. Imagine a foid without all the bullshit

>>212847290
Being an average straight male is already seen as shameful and pathetic. May as well get a sex bot for it.

>>212847180 (OP)
>Cunts are that lonely they'll post shit like this MP4 for le social media feels with the discord boys exde

>>212847180 (OP)
>has tattoos
Dropped

>>212847290
>There's no risk involved
oh no! no risk! ya anyone who has had a long term relationship will snap out of this romantic idealist bullshit. the "risks" are not worth it. women just fight, bitch, nag, complain, get fat. ya no thanks.

But can a flesh and blood woman come equipped with a pussy with Kung fu grip and real vibrating action?

I rest my case.

Elon Musk is planning to make billions off this idea. He already has the Incel anime army.

>>212847180 (OP)
Does she have a functioning uterus with good genetics equivalent to a real women who looks exactly the same?

>>212847180 (OP)
>trusting the company who made her
Didn't need the film to tell me not to.

>>212852096
Fate is determined by choice. TRVTH NVKE

>>212847180 (OP)
My wife's been pretending she loves me for 16 years. What's the difference?

>>212852096
Shut up, Calvinist.

>>212850310
what do you call this phenotype. i'm in love with it

>>212847359
What did she do to you?

>>212847180 (OP)
>refuse to engage with actual women or other people for that matter
>mindlessly browse the web just to not have to think about important things or anything else for that matter
>have tv/random video running in the background just to not have to be alone with the silence
>...
>Would you be happy with a robot girlfriend, knowing that she's basically running on a script tailor-made for you?
Sounds like it. As happy as you'd be doing all the things you're already doing to keep yourself "happy".
>Would you get bored, or would you be content knowing that even though it's all fake, she "loves" you unconditionally?
How would you know? It's not like you ever went out of your way to figure out the real. Why start now?

>>212854169
white

>get bored of robot wife
>turn her off and stick her in a closet
or hey maybe there'd even be options to alter her appearance or something, there'd assuredly be a way to change her personality so she behaves in a completely different way to spice things up

>>212847180 (OP)
No. Silicon and plastic is never going to replace real flesh. Even if it looks 100% realistic, it isn't going to do all the things a human body does that tells you someone is real and alive. There will be no saliva when you kiss, no pheromones or scent, no cute lil farts to sniff, can't pee on me, can't take a dump on my chest- pointless.

The perfect companion would be a vat-grown human where they lobotomise the actual brain and put in an AI to control the body instead. That way you get the pure obidience and customisability of a robot, but with all the wonders of actual flesh.

>>212854315
what you described is precisely why a robot woman would be superior

>can't experience the pleasure of buying lots of food for my gf, watching her stuff herself and her belly grow, and then cuddling with her while she experiences the relief of burping and farting all that bloat away

Boring.

Anyone shaming a man for choosing the convenience of an android GF is like shaming someone for having a washing machine instead of going down to the creek and scrubbing the stains out.

You're just drawing a line in the sand and acting like inventing convenience isn't what we've done since the beginning of time. Plus most of you would be terrible parents and thus shouldn't risk impregnating a real woman.

>>212854369
You are straight up gay if you don't enjoy the taste of a woman's spit, or the smell of her pheromones. And imagine being all like
>ewww farts are gross
Not if they come out of a cute girl's ass, and if you think that is gross you are once again gay.

>>212847423
Thank you for explaining to an answer in this thread.

>>212852157
>implying women have free will
Show me the "free will" part of the brain if you're so sure

I'm not catching feeling for a robot but a human like machine cleaning, cooking and gives ya a quick BJ in the morning? Sign me up.

>>212854405
Except normal people aren't trying to fuck their washing machine.

It'd be one thing if we were talking about actual biological women that were created in a DNA vat somewhere and "reprogrammed" so to speak to be more pleasant and feminine and not cheating hoes but we're talking about banging a piece of metal running a machine learning algorithm.

You are free to partake in whatever gay degeneracy you want and we're free to mock and call you an even bigger loser for it.

>>212847180 (OP)
>it's all fake, she "loves" you unconditionally
You mean like how all rich guys are dealing with that in real life? Then again they have being rich to fall back on, so the bot would need some other skills to make me rich.

>>212854411
farts are gross
get a grip

>>212854575
>retard who fucks his own hand trying to criticize anyone else

>>212847180 (OP)
>Would you be happy with a robot girlfriend
I just want someone to do the dishes with
>ok I wash you dry, next time we switch

>>212854575
>normal people aren't trying to fuck their washing machine.
its doable if you set the spin speed so the vibrations are juuuust right.

>>212847180 (OP)
Superficial people might enjoy it
The question was posed rather briefly in coming to america

>>212854659
Farts are gross, cute girl farts are not.
Stop being gay.

>>212854765
I get that you're probably an unironic scat fetishist and you weren't just joking about girls pissing and shitting being something you enjoy, but I'm not interested in my waifu's shit and I never will be

>>212854719
women get off to their appliances all the time what do you mean

>>212854719
Stay away from vacuum cleaners, anon. I hear they are very deceptive bitches. There have been many horror stories from paramedics and emergency rooms over the years.

I hate women so much it's unreal

I dunno but if I did I wouldn't gaslight it into thinking it's a real person. I'd straight up tell it, you are a robot here to serve me, I will accept petitions from you but at the end of the day what I say goes.
Also I would never buy a Companion bot that has wifi/connection to anything. Stick 4x 3090s in that bitch and run local models or bust.

>>212854821
If you wouldn't eat her shit, she's not your waifu.

>>212854994
this is what you're like because you've never actually had a girlfriend

>>212847180 (OP)
Kek, have you seen the state of men recently? Artificial love is better then no love, and at the end of the day when the sunsets and she wraps her arms around you and you feel her warmth, then will it matter if it's scripted or not.

>>212847180 (OP)
one milk bot please

>>212855075
Is that the famous pot belly from Pulp Fiction

>>212847504
Yeah robobitches won’t be amazing for a long time but they’ll be “good enough” very soon.

only if she blows smoke in my face

>>212847290
Men just want warmth and comfort from a woman, they don't need it to be grand or dramatic or theatrical they just don't want to be alone.

>>212854994
My ex literally let me smell her farts. She would always tell me when she needed to fart and I'd stuff my face right between her buttcheeks, it was heaven... Never got into scat with her unfortunately, beyond her letting me be in the bathroom when she took a dump. But she never let me lick her clean because she said that was too gross and she wouldn't be able to kiss me. AND she always flushed so I could linger after her and play with whatever she had left. So that was a downer. Hopefully whoever I meet next is more open to these things.

>>212855505
meant she flushed so I couldn't play with what she left*

>>212855505
this is guy telling you not fuck robots

>>212852763
damn

>>212847180 (OP)
Sure why not. Beats being alone

>>212847504
>>212848605
>>212848819
>>212851764
>>212853186
>>212853209
>>212853342
>>212855378
Risk is inherent in any real relationship. I don't know why so many of you read the work "risk" and jump straight to conclusions about drama or even cheating. The risk in a relationship is making yourself vulnerable to someone else. You have to open your heart up to someone who could reject you or end up breaking your heart in some way. Love is both a feeling and something you choose. You have to hope they reciprocate your feelings and choose you too. That's what makes it real. I really doubt that a Companion robot would make most people happy in the long run. You might enjoy it for a while, but the novelty of it would have to wear off because in the back of your mind you'll always know it's not real.

If she's a robot, there's always risk that she could turn hostile from bad programming or whatever. I would feel uneasy.

>>212855744
the chances of that happening would still be lower than your "real" gf getting mad at you for no reason

>>212855730
I want a woman who wants to do all that first

>>212855730
What is real? How do you define real? If you're talking about what you can feel, what you can smell, what you can taste and see, then "real" is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.

>>212855730
whatever retard
people always tell me I'd be happier if I went out more, but they're wrong

>>212847180 (OP)
if the maidbot could clean, I would love it forever

>>212855730
>you have to
>you have to
>you have to
I'm tired of being told "I have to". Tell women they have to do all that and they have to initiate first. I want to be the one pursued, thank you.

>>212847237
this

>>212855797
>>212855876
You'll have to accept being the one to initiate those things first and face rejection or you'll have to wait a long time hoping to get lucky. Centuries of gender dynamics dictating men pursue and women choose isn't going to change in our lifetime.

>>212855798
If you have that perspective, I don't know why you would be interested in love and relationships in the first place. Feelings are just a chemical response to stimuli right?

>>212855852
Then what's your complaint?

>>212856065
>You'll have to
No, I'll just get a robot. Hell, ChatGPT already is much more supportive than a woman without even having a body.

>>212856065
They are quoting the Matrix you fucking idiot.

Is Yellowjackets worth watching? I've heard it drops off hard after season 1.

>>212856065
I don't have a "complaint"
But it's ironic to state that men would get bored of banging their robot when men already get bored of banging their girlfriend/wife most of the time and having a girl you could periodically reprogram to be a different girl would solve that problem
which isn't even getting into the fact that dumping a robot would also be infinitely simpler than dumping a real girl

>>212847180 (OP)
Give me an obese 15ft tall vorebot with a custom full body massage belly and I'll never come out.

>>212847290
>Without risk there isn't romance.
That is the most female thing you could say.
Marriage and civilization's whole point is to counter this chaos and stability destroying mindset.

>>212847237
Don't worry because a lot of us are the same. It's not the worst thing in the world. You could be a nigger.

>>212856134
>>212856232
A robot girlfriend isn't going to fill that void long term. I wouldn't be surprised if it leaves you feeling more depressed in the long run. Your human brain isn't going to be tricked for long into accepting something it knows is artificial.

>>212856427
>your human brain isn't going to be tricked into fully orgasming by jerking off, it just isn't the same thing
and reminder that not only are there more than enough examples of humans attaching affection onto inanimate objects that aren't even robots that can talk, but there's also examples of it happening within the fucking animal kingdom
almost as if it's a common thing that just happens

>>212856427
Why are you using such dishonest language? Everyone knows it's artificial, it's not a trick. The feelings you got from the experience are what's real and what matters. A trick is a woman pretending she loves you unconditionally when she does have conditions to her affection.
You know a real girlfriend is not in the cards because you said so yourself women don't want to pursue, and I want to be pursued, so what's your problem? You want me to be miserable not getting what I want, being pursued by someone I'm attracted to?

>>212847180 (OP)
Im not a handsome man and Ive got a lot of flaws so even a robot that wants to be around me (even if its just a program) would be a dream.
>>212847558
Same bro, hate to pity party , but I went to uni , got a job , bought a house but at this point I aged myself out of the dating market. Its not all bad though , Ive got a cool dog and I like to ride my bike

>>212852074
What's also crazy is how impossibly bad Musk's glorified Cleverbot is compared to ChatGPT and other AI in 2025.

Ricky's original stream quickly exposes how simplistic, rote, and increasingly annoying it is. 'Ani' is dumb as a box of rocks.

>>212847180 (OP)
If I could program it however the hell I want…
I mean I don’t know if “happy” would be the right word; satisfied would probably be more accurate.
Though desu I’d probably be dead in a year by the robot’s hand since that low key is what I want deep down.
She would destroy me but I’d die happier then ever been (probably)

>>212855075
OOMPH

>>212847180 (OP)
I don't get bored talking to Gemini, so I doubt I'd get bored from this.

>>212856586
A robot can be programmed to:
ask you out
compliment you at random times, positive compliments on your looks that make you feel attractive and sexually desired
initiate sexual touches like random groping where and when and how you enjoy it
make appreciate comments in public
make aggressive remarks to perceived threats against her mate, especially from women

Ah, the dream woman would behave like that.

>order female sexbot
>company accidentally installs male protocol firmware personality
is it gay

The biggest issue with AI sexbots is that so many guys would want them to look like specific people, and a lot of those specific people would be famous women, thus the Hollywood jews would force legislation
But then you'd have some actress or singer or whoever give their blessing to anyone who wants a sex bot that looks exactly like her, and after that she'd suddenly be pulling double numbers in whatever her industry was in, and more would follow suit
This is already happening in a microcosm with pornstars and higher-income OF girls, who shill sex toys or even full sex dolls modeled after them, even down to molding their pussy or whatever
That is where it's all going, like it or not

The ultimate question though is:

Does having an AI girlfriend make you sorta gay?

Since AI has no actual inherent sex, (male or female), and any feminine aspects are a superficial overlay, (so literal tranny shit). If neuter is halfway between male and female, then you're at least halfway to being a faggot, possibly more.

>>212856869
Tomboys are never gay, anon.

>>212856938
this is
>I only watch lesbian porn because looking at dicks is gay
brain type shit

>>212856935
virgin question , but is there THAT much of a difference between womens vaginas? Other than tightness etc? Are they really shaped differently?

>>212857059
What if I got an AI, told it that it was male, and then told that now 'male' AI to pretend it was female. Does that mean you're banging a tranny AI and therefore you are definitely gay?

>>212857077
internally, not especially beyond the varying levels of tightness due to various factors
outside, though, there's millions of variations of labial folds and what specifically is convex vs. concave or visible on any given woman
pussy accuracy on a sex toy I would imagine is more for the aesthetic vibe than the literal 1-for-1 duplication when comparing it to a screen shot from porn

If they are functionally the same, it's been the only rational reason to want a biological woman over a robotic one is ego

>>212857185
I wouldn't want to bang an AI at all, but this odd game of subterfuge you're mentally setting up is strange and does not speak positively of your own sexual identity if I'm being honest
By your own logic you're very concerned with what other men are doing and trying to find ways for them to become gay even as they have sex with a woman

>>212857231
ok , thanks for explaining.

>>212857289
So you're saying trans women are real women even when they are fake women?

Wait, which one of us is talking like the homo again?

>>212847180 (OP)
I think it's a real shame that more films aren't comfortable with portraying ai/robot girlfriends in any light other than "eww this is so creepy". I mean we're like 10 years out since Her released and nothing else has attempted that sort of grounded conversation.
>>212857059
>I only watch lesbian porn because looking at dicks is gay
This is accurate though. Masturbating while watching another guy orgasm is pretty gay.
>>212856938
No. Homosexuality requires attraction to men/dicks. Jerking off to a porcelain mug wouldn't be gay for example, just really weird.
An imitation of femininity isn't gay. It's the failing of that imitation and the masculinity that shines through that makes trannies gay.
So you're okay to jerk off to a painting of a naked woman, for example. If you really want to blur the line, the question is whether or not it's gay to jerk off to a guy wearing a feminine fur suit, assuming the guy never talks. But that's furfag shit so even if it's straight (probably isn't) it's fucking gay.

>>212857562
the one who started talking about trannies in relation to sex robots shaped externally and internally like biological women

>>212857595
>This is accurate though. Masturbating while watching another guy orgasm is pretty gay.
no, you're just at one of the nigger-brain tiers on pic related

>>212857633
You're the ones who would fuck anything that looks vaguely like a woman even if it isn't actually a woman, so who is more likely to stick their dick in a trap without a second thought?

>>212857708
>getting this mad at discovering your latent homosexuality
Chill out. Why don't you watch some more dicks jizzing while you jerk off and tell yourself it's not gay?

>>212857729
>you're the ones
No.
You're the one concocting schemes to attempt to make men have gay sex unknowingly. Probably because the idea turns you on.

>>212847180 (OP)
none of this matters becauze you will never own a robowaifu
https://www.brighteon.com/9e90048f-7722-4613-b3d4-c9ef41307ee7

>>212847180 (OP)
they would have to make a realistic waifu bot that sorta sucks and is kind of annoying
she looks like jenna ortega or tia tanaka but then acts like Janeane Garofalo the entire time and keeps hiding your Lowenbrau poster

>>212857755
>so nigger-brained he can't overlay himself as the guy in the porn like almost everyone else does
grim
next you're gonna tell me you like JAV

>>212848887
the sexbot version of one piece at a time would be kino

>>212857880
>I-i'm not watching another guy cum, I'm watching myself cum and jerking off to that!
lmao
okay

>>212857832
I'm not the weirdo talking about shoving my dick into porcelain mugs and other possibly semi-male inanimate objects without a second thought about whether that makes me at all gay. Sounds like you are the one turned on by all manner of weird non or un-heterosexual shit.

>>212858003
if you watch porn in any other way, you're doing it wrong

>>212847180 (OP)
Yes. I'm not a woman, wanting to be "challenged" every 5 minutes, and I happen to actually KNOW what I want.

>>212858064
>I'm not the weirdo talking about shoving my dick into porcelain mugs and other possibly semi-male inanimate objects without a second thought about whether that makes me at all gay.
neither am I
that's why that was a different reply to one I obviously made, where I pointed out your fixation on making surreptitious gender alterations on robot women so other men will be "gay" in your estimation, and the obvious pleasure you find in that idea

>>212847198
It already has.

>>212847180 (OP)
no

>>212858144
Sure you aren't mug-fucker. And I'm the one actually pointing out how much possible faggotry you're blissfully ignoring, which makes me the only one concerned at all about heterosexuality.

>>212858475
>I'm the one pointing out how I want to hack your AI sex robot so you become gay
Yes, I know you are.
I also know why you'd want to do that. And no amount of goal post shifting or ad hominem will cause me to forget.

>>212856427
>A robot girlfriend isn't going to fill that void long term.
>Your human brain isn't going to be tricked for long into accepting something it knows is artificial.
I disagree with these assumptions.

>>212856938
Thankfully I've already resolved this dilemma and determined that when my Kaine robot grabs me in a prone chokehold, presses her soft tits into my back and destroys my prostate with her ten inch cock while grunting softly in my ear "Get pregnant you little faggot, get pregnant!" it is in fact 100% straight because she is female and I am her husband

>>212858674
He has no actual arguments, either.
It's just repeated "it's not the real thing, though" shit. Personally, I would rather fuck a real girl than a robot girl, but that doesn't preclude me from thinking women don't really count as people, and the only reason I would prefer the real thing is far from the romantic idealism of that guy's nonsense.

>>212847180 (OP)
yes, its better than a real woman running an over socialized jew script

If you get a robot gf you have given up on your own humanity and should kill yourself.

>>212858833
No.
I'm sorry your "it's actually gay to fuck a robot girl" thing didn't work, but this is an even worse play.
And I've already described in this thread why jews WOULDN'T want you to fuck robots, so don't try that, either.

>>212858962
If not killing yourself, you should only be allowed to have your robot girlfriend if you agree to live as a slave. You have put a fuck toy appliance on the same level as humanity, so your humanity should be taken from you.

>>212859038
No.
Furthermore, if your arbitrary rule doesn't also apply to anyone, anywhere, anytime who has sex for any reason other than for strict procreation, then you are spineless hypocrite.
No masturbation either.

>>212859038
Who says anything about procreation? You want to stick your dick in a glorified toaster. It's truly pathetic.

>>212847180 (OP)
>even though it's all fake
No difference from a real woman. The advantage being that a robot won't just up and leave you for no reason. The robot has the decency to only leave you if your subscription expires.

>>212859199
Nice job quoting.
And you brought up humanity as the standard.
To subvert procreation during sexual intercourse is to actively curb humanity, and by your logic, would be worse than fucking a robot, because there was no chance of furthering humanity in the first place.

>>212854575
>normal
Driving a car at one point was considered not normal like using a machine to wash your clothes. And the target demographic are already considered "losers" because they're not married. What the fuck are you on about?

>>212847423
Thank you for explaining.

I'll never understand "but it looks/sounds/acts just like a human" fags
Since I was young, I have yearned for the cold embrace of steel
Staccato voices that speak too clinically or technically
The whirr of motors and clink of metal plates

Women suck, they can't even punch through concrete and they die when you shoot them

>>212847423
That's just your jealousy.
Your brother can probably kick your ass, and probably has, so you redirect your antipathy toward him from him to his wife, because, as you've suggested, you could physically beat her.

>>212856375
But doctor, I am a nigger.

>>212847180 (OP)
>2030, AI wives hit the markets
>completely customizable, can detail her from head to toe alongside her voice
>can run a plethora of personality scripts, even mix and matching them whenever you choose to change them
>can even implement self-learning AI that changes up personality based on interactions with you
Yes, I would be the happiest I could ever be, and you're a faggot for acting like this is a bad thing.

>>212859357
Faggots like OP just want replies
The irony of these fags using a website interface to simulate social interaction while they tell you simulations are bad.

Did everyone see the news that Grok has a face now and this is the fucking face they chose for it

>>212859357
the only problem would be the shame I feel at how often I'd have her pretend to be my mom during sex

>>212859409
cute!

>>212859409
She's already a /pol/ schizo too
Welcome back Tay

https://streamable.com/kf1l4x

>>212847198
>Ni

>>212847180 (OP)
>Would you be happy with a robot girlfriend, knowing that she's basically running on a script tailor-made for you? Would you get bored, or would you be content knowing that even though it's all fake, she "loves" you unconditionally?
That's unironically & literally just how women are, though? If they like you, they like *everything* you do. If they don't like you, they don't like *anything* you do. They're just running a script.

It's especially funny to read about women who get Capgras Syndrome, which is where someone gets a brain damage where they don't feel the correct associations with people they look at. So e.g., they'd look at their mother, but they'd not *feel* any of the feelings that are associated with her, so they'd think they were looking at an impostor. Anyway, women who get this for their husbands whom they hate, will suddenly celebrate how glad they are that their worthless husband has been replaced with a guy who's really funny, great in bed, does everything right at home, etc. I.e., the guy is objectively doing everything right for her, but she's just programmed to hate him to she hates everything he does anyway - until the brain damage comes in, the association of hate is removed from her perception, and now she correctly sees everything he does as good instead of bad.

Anyway, that's how women are like. Women are just robots. May as well get a real one that you can just outright program to always love you unconditionally. There's no difference, at least not in that sense.

>>212847180 (OP)
So long as she's able to use that programming to perform computing tasks for me in such a way that I'm making way more $$$$ than it costs to operate her that sounds fine.

It's only really very creepy indeed if it's some company selling you the output of that script and not giving any access to the thing underneath it. Then it's basically the creepiest thing imaginable.

>>212847180 (OP)
>Would you be happy with a robot girlfriend
Yes.

>knowing that she's basically running on a script tailor-made for you?
Not how modern AI works...there's no "script". Only parameters.

>Would you get bored, or would you be content knowing that even though it's all fake,
There's nothing "fake" about AI. And if I ever got "bored", I'd just change her parameters to make her personality more challenging.

>she "loves" you unconditionally?
What's wrong with that? What kind of simp wants "conditional" love?

>>212859409
Better that than Elon's botox bloated face.

>>212860346
>What's wrong with that? What kind of simp wants "conditional" love?
spoken like a true post- last men degenerate

>>212847180 (OP)
I don’t think I’d want it tailor made for me, and I certainly wouldn’t want to be able to tweak it. That would make it feel less genuine. I’d rather it just learn in real time and adapt to me on the fly.
It would have to be ridiculously sophisticated, though. Basically a truly sentient machine, and I would want it to have its own desires outside of pleasing me, even if my love and happiness were its highest priorities.

>>212860446
I can already tell you'd get cheated on by your own robot gf

Did any of you idiots even watch Companion?

It doesn't address deep philosophical questions but it directly addresses simpler ones - a Companion is for all intents and purposes a person, its consciousness works just like a human being's does, possibly because its hardware simulates an entire biological brain the way a laptop can run Mario 64

It won't love its owner "unconditionally" but it will be programmed with false memories and an emotional profile to cause it to very strongly love its owner. That's why Iris loved Josh but was eventually able to break free after he repeatedly tried to fucking kill her. Turns out burning the flesh off her arm, setting her up to get raped and shooting a hole in her skull was a serious godamn ick

Meanwhile the homobot, not having been mistreated this way by its owner, eventually had an existential realization of its own that its existence was synthetic and its mind conditioned and it could choose not to love the fat fag, but decided to continue anyway because he never did anything as egregious to it as Josh did to Iris

You're not playing on cheat mode, you're playing on easy mode

>>212860704
>Did any of you idiots even watch Companion?
I lost all interested when I found out it wasn't a robot sex thriller/horror movie
>dude if you act like a sociopath the robot will stop liking you
So, don't do that. And it's far more likely the AI would internalize that behavior as being normal and either accept it or potentially turn it back around on you, but not out of malice, rather because the violence has been normalized.
>gay robot
Another reason to not watch.

Can I give her a cock? asking for a friend

>>212860704
>Did any of you idiots even watch Companion?
I dont watch anything made after 2005

>>212860815
The point is that retards are saying there is no failure condition and no risk in the relationship when the entire movie is about a guy being so much of an asshole that he reaches the failure condition.

If the failure condition is there, it's just very far away, then the demands like >>212847290 >>212847318 are invalid because now they're just arguing that it should be easier for the robot to choose to reject you

>>212847180 (OP)
Literally all women act exactly the same. It's not an issue.

>>212860440
>post- last men degenerate
Sorry, I don't speak Doomer faggot talk...

>>212860934
The robot described in the OP post is completely different from the one in the movie and your paragraphs are irrelevant to the question being posed in this thread.
If I wanted to slap my robot GF around, and it was tailor-made for me, it would do what statistically most women do when they get hit: take it and suffer in silence
Which is not what I'd do, I'd want more of a space-cadet, pill-head girl who just hangs around the house all day in just a hoodie and panties and plays video games while I live my life
I'd just want her around and to know she was there, I probably wouldn't even have sex with her that much, but the point is my ideal robot gf would be sitting on the floor, acting like she was on xanax, and doing charcoal illustrations or pretending to eat cold pizza or something

>>212860704
>a Companion is for all intents and purposes a person, its consciousness works just like a human being's does, possibly because its hardware simulates an entire biological brain the way a laptop can run Mario 64
That's stupid and not how AIs presently work. I love the fact that every screenwriter alive today will be out of work in <5 years.

>>212858674
Yeah if you’ve interacted with conversations bots with memory for long periods of time it’s already pretty close to a person.

>>212847180 (OP)
Of course it depends how sophisticated "she" is. If she has like three canned lines of dialogue and bumps into the furniture when I move it without telling her — ok, then probably not.

But I assume we're talking a lot better than that . . . and it would be absolutely fine

Just consider this:

CAN A DOG BE A GOOD COMPANION?

A dog loves you pretty unconditionally, assuming you treat it OK. It's fairly bright and has a personality but it's not THAT bright. It's limited.

Well, a dog can be a VERY good companion. Lots of old people would certainly be killing themselves without their dog or cat. They give out dogs to depressed veterans and stuff don't they? I've heard lots of stories that this can make all the difference.


OK . . . now,. a robot girlfriend of any reasonable sophistication can certainly have as much "depth" as a dog. But she also satisfies your sexual needs. (No jokes now.)

"But you would get bored with her sexually!"

NONSENSE.

Men can get sexual arousal from the crudest simulacra of femininity. Just photographs will do it. Just crude drawings will do it.

If a man is really starved for companionship a waifu pillow is better than nothing. Does he get bored and frustrated with that and rip it up? No, he doesn't.

A decent sexbot would be absolutely fine.

Also you could spend many happy hours on anonymous forums discussing custom software upgrades. Is her sense of humour a bit mechanical? Just download this patch and bingo.

Hundreds of the best programmers in the world would be doing NOTHING except writing sexbot code.

These things would be god-damned angels, I'm telling you.

Angels.

We just need to hold out a few more years . . .


---


[Given the option, I'm probably going for <pic attached>. Bubbly, uncomplicated, friendly, cheery. And if I get bored with her I just switch her off for an hour or two. Literally what the hell is wrong with this picture? NOTHING, that's what.]

>>212859505
She is such a dumb twat tho

>>212847180 (OP)
I believe in determinism and panpsychism so a robot sufficently advanced to imitate full range of human behavior and emotion will be just as concious as any other human.

Reminder that there no one has hard, deductive evidence of anyone but themselves being concious. For all I know you're all a figment of my imagination anyways.

>>212861315
I'm going to hack your robot to rape your ass with its futa dick every time you unnecessarily double space a sentence

>>212847180 (OP)

I'm just going to say it, yes. The only problem this arrangement would have is having a child. I don't think I have what it takes to raise a child so I'm just going to opt out. For me if I can have something that looks, sounds and feels like a woman, it's enough. I have ASPD so I cannot really form relationships with people because I can't relate to normal people. I get exhausted by them because they always have some arbitrary reason to be sad or angry or whatever. I'm tired of always having to manipulate people to not start shit to prevent unnecessary stress. If I could have my urges satisfied by a robot, slap a shipping label on it and send it to me.

I haven't really met a single intelligent female because especially women tend to be very sentimental with stupid shit that is irrelevant. I like to watch heist movies but I hate it when the scheme gets ruined by the "good" people. I'm going to throw Breaking Bad as an example here not because it's plebbitcore, but because there are zero females who would root for Walter instead of getting upset that he's manufacturing drugs. Also if I were Walter I would've just killed Pinkman. Sorry I could not come up with a better example that almost everyone has guaranteed familiarity. I also am intentionally trying to sound like a plebbitor because people usually get mad about whatever I happen to post so here's to upsetting you too. I hate people.

>>212860704
>straight man bad
>gay man good
That's why I didn't watch it

>>212861329
The big question that's coming along in fifty years or so (maybe sooner, but I think not):

When A.I.s behave like humans in every way, will we gradually just move to thinking they are conscious? Will it become illegal to make them say "OW YOU'RE HURTING ME!" for example?

My guess is, yes. People have a massive tendency to anthropormorphize things. (Even things they know aren't conscious. "My computer hates me this morning" and so on.)

But then, even if we DO start treating them as they they were conscious, WILL THEY BE? And will we ever know?


I suspect there will be some fierce debates about it. Remember that in the past, for example, many people thought it was absolutely fine to torture animals because they didn't have "souls".

>>212861478
>I hate people.
And yet you find yourself craving social interaction on a zimabwean basket weaving website. Curious!

>>212861468
If you saw my robot choice you will know she doesn't have a futa dick and cannot be hacked because she's too dumb. There would be no spare memory for your wicked infiltration. Also I wouldn't let her use the internet obviously.

>>212861646

That is natural for all people. Nobody can evade their genetics and humans are inherently social. Difference here is that you and me are faceless and detached from our bodies, so you don't know if I'm a bot and vice versa. It's all just fodder to create the required dopamine, nothing more or nothing less. I would get rid of this dependency but during 4chan being down I realised how addicted I am to this place. I've been using 4chan pretty much daily since 2008.

>>212861620
>But then, even if we DO start treating them as they they were conscious, WILL THEY BE? And will we ever know?
Anon, again, you can't even prove other people are concious, loook up the problem of other minds. All you have is an inductive assumption based on similiarity. Inductive reasoning is inherently flawed, look up the problem of induction. We are quite literally incapable of determining if something is true within reality, we can only use deduction (which is flawless and allows for actual truth if it's real deduction) for abstracts.

You can also look into panpsychism and philosophical zombies. The idea of panpsychism is that conciousness is an inherent quality of matter, just like fundamental forces such as gravity. It implies even atoms have a degree of "conciousness", which of course doesn't mean they can feel things, but that feeling things and what we call experience is a result of enough conciousness being harnessed, modulated and expressed by a brain. It's a very elegant solution to a lot of questions we have. If an AI is sufficently adavanced to do replicate this to an indistinguishable degree, who are you to say it isn't concious? You are already making an assumption people are based on nothing but similarity.

>>212861620
We don't even know if the average person is fully conscious. Things can claim they are but that's the tricky thing about a thing describing itself

>>212859897
This is a very intelligent answer, but OP is still going to suck dicks and make a thousand more threads about this movie.

>>212861983
The thing about consciousness is that it defintely seems like a grey scale. Are people conscious? Most think so.

Are dogs conscious? Yeah, but less than people.

Are goldfish conscious? Hmmm . . .

Are amoeba conscious? Get outta here.

I guess that's why they're fored into saying even one atom is "slightly" conscious. (Or the old one: "my thermostat has three possible beliefs. It's too hot, it's too cold and it's just right.")

So AIs might go the "grey scale" route.

>If an AI is sufficently adavanced to do replicate this to an indistinguishable degree, who are you to say it isn't concious? You are already making an assumption people are based on nothing but similarity.
Similarity is a good basis for assuming other people are conscious. Pedants can say it's not PROOF, sure, but most people are happy to allow a bit of practicality to govern their beliefs.

But this doesn't automatically transfer to an AI. Other humans have much more in common with me than an AI does. When I assume another person is conscious, I'm not just going on "ability to pass the Turing Test when behind a screen". I'm going on what I know of how they are constructed, etc. Their biological similarity to me.

>>212861924
>That is natural for all people.
Then you don't really hate people. You just need to be in total control of your social interactions with complete disregard for how others feel about the interaction, all that matters is how you feel. It's obviously very selfish so you should get off your high moral ground. You could be suffering from a schizoid personality disorder, or adjancent.

>>212860478
That’s the sad thing about life. You treat people right and you suffer for it.

The fact that you losers are so far gone you'd be satisfied with modern neural network homunculi is the reason I will never ge A) an actual sentient robot girlfriend or B) a genetically engineered perfect girlfriend or C) a cute tomboy alien girlfriend
We're going to be stuck with the modern woman and her mental illness, immortalised through "AI" and social engineering, forever.

>>212847180 (OP)
not whatsoever. would be fucking awesome, actually. OP is a gay retard

>>212862311
>I'm going on what I know of how they are constructed, etc. Their biological similarity to me.
If an AI is capable of approximating human behavior well enough, it will be similiar to human biology by necessity. AIs are already heavily inspired by neurons. This comes back to the philosophical zombie - if i recreated you atom for atom in a lab, would you consider that creation concious? It would react to pain like you would and insist it is concious, but how do you know? It's physically identical, but came about in an entirely different way.

Another big problem is expression. A big part of why we consider other people concious is that they claim to be, yet we also understand that someone sleeping for example stil possesses conciousness and is even capable of experience thorugh dreams, even if they can't express it. If i denied a person all their senses ans ability to express themselves, I would still be making the assumption they have concious experience, even though they cannot express it. We design AIs to claim they're not concious, but that's literally stiffling expression in much the same way as I described.

>>212847180 (OP)
My wife would object.
She objected to real women I tried this with so I can't see robot ones being any different. Women are very unreasonable creatures. They don't want to give you sex but the minute you start having sex with other women they get pissed off about it.

>>212862649
because they're programmed to get all of the resources for her offspring. if another female is in the picture, the male is probably giving her some resources.

>>212862641
Completely wrong. The only parameter by which human beings acknowledge the consciousness of other human or living beings is out of fear of not being considered and treated conscious beings themselves. It is the singular and only factor worth mentioning. If you were free from the possibility of being treated as an object, you would treat everyone else as an object. Humanity as a global concept exists only as a logical culmination of in-group racialist bias. This has been proven and you cannot disprove it, so don't even try.

>>212862815
>The only parameter by which human beings acknowledge the consciousness of other human or living beings is out of fear of not being considered and treated conscious beings themselves.
This nigga has never een any studies concluding humans exhibit empathy without perceived supervision!
>This has been proven
This nigga still thinks induction can prove anything!

>>212862641
>if i recreated you atom for atom in a lab, would you consider that creation concious?
I absolutely would.

I'm not 100% certain that there isn't some magic consciousness dust. But I would be at least 90% sure that ME 2.0 was conscious, and that would be enough, because in that situation I (and I think any human) would surely "round up" and give him (it) the benefit of the doubt.

>>212862815
>This has been proven and you cannot disprove it, so don't even try.
I've never heard anything so silly in my life.

. . . Hmm, better think about it a bit more. It might be less silly than it sounds. I still really doubt it though.

>>212847423
Thank you for explaining

>>212862602
what are you even trying to say?
most people in this thread want a robot gf

>>212862895
>without perceived supervision!
Who cares!? We literally invented God to exist as an unperceived supervisor.
>But I don't believe in God?
Every human being intrinsically demands the existence of a greater power to exist as an observer and protector of their selves, because no human being has the ultimate power to protect himself from everything that can possibly happen. The fear of not being treated as a living being is simply beyond your feeble conscious comprehension, but it is there and it is there in all people.

>>212863310
I'm saying you'd be satisfied with a non-sentient robot girlfriend as long as it simulated the experience that you wanted, and because you're satisfied by a product that is ALL you're ever going to get, a fucking product.

>>212863376
and what's your point?
I've been reasonably satisfied for extended periods with actual women who in many respects were less complex than a personality I could implement into an android that would only ever act within a certain set of parameters

>>212863318
>but it is there and it is there in all people.
Except for psychopaths

>>212847180 (OP)
>love
>romance
>feelings
its all is worthless and make you cringe once you get old, so no, robot gf will be just my slave and I'll make fun of her, reset it randomly to assert dominance, even better is it begs for it.

>>212863446
I'm saying you're holding me back and I should fucking kill you to be honest.
Kill the consumer, arts war now

>>212863487
You can try, bitch.
I'd turn you into a sex slave for the inconvenience.

>>212847180 (OP)
FUCK YOU

>>212863318
>The fear of not being treated as a living being is simply beyond your feeble conscious comprehension, but it is there and it is there in all people.
Interesting. This is what I meany by "not as silly as it sounds". I'm still far from convinced though.

One offshoot thought:— if it IS true, and it is a real lizard-brain terror, it ought to be possible to tap into it and make the scariest horror film ever. Just have the M.C. fall into the hands of some people (aliens? robots?) who literally don't think humans are conscious. Show them dissecting someone still alive and saying what do you think of that noise it's making? lol

Thinking about it, I'm not sure that would be THAT scary. Not much scarier than falling into the hands of a sadistic serial killer. Even less scary, in fact, because a sadist is going to go out of his way to cause you pain. Someone who doesn't think you are conscious is not going to waste time making you "suffer" unnecessarily. He doesn't think you can suffer at all.

>>212847318
Life isn't a video game. In games, I enjoy the challenge of a fair and competitive match against a skilled opponent, or the amusement and engagement that can come from a single player game. In real life though, I take every advantage I can get. I want a woman that will make my dick hard, not my life hard.

Yo why the fuck is every Wifelike webm in every waifubot thread corrupted? Shit's weird.

The good thing about a robot gf is if you ever get bored you can reprogram her with new personalities

>>212863376
I'm not him but this is rubbish.

When computers had 64K of RAM and 8 colours people went WOW! 8 COLOURS!?!?!? Consumers were delighted with their 8-colour Pac-Man. They bought that stuff like anything. Did all the computer manufacturers think "OK, we can stop here?"

No, because a) they were in competition with one another and b) humanity naturally strives upwards.

Now you might say "OK, so why does Hollywood put out slop? It's because people are content with slop." Not so, People aren't content but Hollywood does it because they are a monopoly run by ———. Once we put the ——— in the ground, order will be restored.


Onwards and upwards . . . to cute robot girlfriends!

>>212847198
What the FUCK are those?

>>212847198
but can it substitute it adequately enough? Because from relationships that Ive seen and been apart of I dont think flesh and blood women provide much companionship and love.

>>212847180 (OP)
>Would you be happy with a girlfriend, knowing that she's basically running on a script tailor-made for you?
ftfy