>>212881043>>212881053>you don't exist as a people and have no rightful claim to anything, anywhere on this planetyeah, sure, if you twist yourself into pretzels, deconstructing the existence of whites and refuse to extend any human consideration to them, then you can make a case for why they should not be allowed to have countries.
The problem is that you only re-litigate the historical indiscretions of whites. You don't apply 21st century moral standards to other races and punish them for 'stealing land' or doing colonialism or slavery. You don't deconstruct the racial/ethnic identity of other people.
If you genuinely believed in your principles, you would apply them universally. Indians stole land from other Indians in the Americas. Indians did slavery. Therefore, various Indian tribes have no rightful claim to their lands and must relinquish all their rights as a people to advocate for their own interests. You believe this, don't you?
You see, if you actually believed in your anti-colonialist, racial retribution philosophy, it would set you on a path of mass ethnic cleansing across the planet because you could use it to justify attacking pretty much everybody - with the exception of a few isolated tribes which still exist. But you don't do that, because you're just concocting any excuse to attack whites exclusively, probably because of some inferiority complex that is motivating you.