← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 212915243

326 posts 188 images /tv/
Anonymous No.212915243 >>212915344 >>212915397 >>212915623 >>212915664 >>212915815 >>212917559 >>212922637 >>212949340
/film/
Arthouse & Classics & Filmic Ontology

Continuous female authorship edition

>QOTD
Do (You) support continuous female authorship as a concept of filmic ontology?
>Bonus
Will she ever die?

Previous: >>212876837
Anonymous No.212915247 >>212925676
Queen of /film/
Anonymous No.212915287
Queen of /film/
Anonymous No.212915344
>>212915243 (OP)
>QOTD
Probably.
>Bonus
Heroes never die!
Anonymous No.212915373 >>212915397 >>212917160
Blessed edition
Anonymous No.212915397 >>212917034 >>212925657 >>212950828
>>212915243 (OP)
>>212915373
SHE WILL NEVER DIE
Anonymous No.212915435 >>212915472
other thread was first, this is bullying
Anonymous No.212915472
>>212915435
We're all counterbaking Gadonpaki here.
Anonymous No.212915522 >>212915591 >>212917065
I don't know how to answer.
Anonymous No.212915591
>>212915522
In case of emergency, just say "ok troon".
Anonymous No.212915594
Come home friends
>>212915190
>>212915190
>>212915190
Anonymous No.212915623
>>212915243 (OP)
>QOTD
Not if the disgusting, busted, obnoxious whore Dominique Labourier (1943 - 2025) is involved.
>Bonus
See above.
Anonymous No.212915664 >>212915781
>>212915243 (OP)
Permission to board? Iโ€™m defecting from the other bake. This one off to a better start, and perhaps an aroma of holday spices?
Anonymous No.212915781 >>212916083
>>212915664
Pass that blunt, nig.
Anonymous No.212915815 >>212916532 >>212916578
>>212915243 (OP)
Birthdays of /film/ for July 20th:
Happy birthday Verna Felton b. 1890
Happy birthday Rajendra Kumar b. 1929
Happy birthday Sally Ann Howes b. 1930
Happy birthday Aliki Vougiouklaki b. 1934
Happy birthday Ken Ogata b. 1937
Happy birthday Natalie Wood b. 1938
Happy birthday Kurt Raab b. 1941
Happy birthday Keiko Matsuzaka b. 1952
Anonymous No.212915820 >>212915966 >>212916080 >>212916083
>>212915587
>>212915587
>>212915587
Benbros of /film/, your ship has come in.
Anonymous No.212915966
>>212915820
Bensed
Anonymous No.212916080
>>212915820
Why did you make a thread about my father!? I just came out of prison and I swear to God if you don't delete that thread off the web I'm gonna go back in record time.
Anonymous No.212916083 >>212916224
>>212915781
>johh-jeee has been smoking the whacky tabacky! And he says Iโ€™m the cuckoo one!
>>212915820
ty for the bump. Itโ€™s the beginning of a long journey. But I know we will succeed. There is not an actor more charming, more humble, than our beloved Benedetto.
Anonymous No.212916224
>>212916083
>ty for the bump
'Twas a pleasure.
Anonymous No.212916411
Itโ€™s late here so I have some Burns and Allen running in the background. The show is slop but Burnsโ€™ delivery is always great. He really has that canned rage like heโ€˜s on the verge of throttling Gracieโ€™s neck.
Playhouse 90 and I Love Lucy are definitely much better television, as an example. This show is much cozier, though.
https://youtu.be/0o_Mxo_uhH8?feature=shared
Anonymous No.212916525 >>212916688 >>212916745
You guys are weird tonight.
Anonymous No.212916532
>>212915815
It's Charlotte's birthday tomorrow, and I do declare that we WILL have a Charlotte-themed thread, by hook or by crook.
Anonymous No.212916578
>>212915815
Did we ever celebrate Huppert's birthday on /film/? It was back in March.
Anonymous No.212916597
Anonymous No.212916669
Sad eyes :(
Anonymous No.212916688
>>212916525
Just roll with it. Anything is better than capeshit.
Anonymous No.212916745 >>212916880 >>212917162
>>212916525
The opening post preconfigures the vibe of the thread.

DomLab OP = clownish, circus vibes
Anonymous No.212916880
>>212916745
Are you upset your general didnโ€™t take off, even though you posted first?
It seems like some of you arenโ€™t even trying to discuss film. Hmph..
Anonymous No.212916972 >>212916984 >>212917002 >>212917330
This general doesnโ€™t need to waifufag to be successful. Post your GOATs
Anonymous No.212916979 >>212917077
>Hmph..
Anonymous No.212916984 >>212917513
>>212916972
Anonymous No.212917002 >>212917034
>>212916972
OP already posted the GOAT.
Anonymous No.212917034 >>212917160
>>212917002
I'm, shamefully, quite attracted to Dominique here >>212915397
Anonymous No.212917065 >>212917097 >>212917213 >>212917316 >>212917369 >>212917559 >>212918008
>>212915522
As the anon who originally wrote that phrase (but did not make the thread), I'll try to explain what I meant by that. Filmic ontology is the fictional space where films create their own reality and in many great films this reality is infused with commentary on cinema or reflection on spectatorship. One of the most popular ontological categories in film is the dreamspace, and some of the most sophisticated films introduce the third element of magic to obfuscate the second (commentary) and seamlessly integrate it in the first (narrative). Some obvious examples: Citizen Kane and Point Blank are dreams of dying men and commentaries on solitariness of the author, dying genre and dying epoch; Peeping Tom and Vertigo are dreams of incapacitated directors acting through mannequin proxies and reflections on film creation; in all four films central characters can be seen as ever present ghosts. Some films operate entirely in the category of cinema, quoting and simultaneously commenting on all previous cinematic output while creating its own; in such films the commentary is the most apparent and because of this apparency it can be self-consciosly manipulated, giving film a sort of parallel narrative, often nonserious and humorous because of its contrast; the classic examples of this method are Godard and Lynch, operating in modernist and postmodernist logic respectively. And Celine and Julie is very unique in this context. It's a moebius strip of permanent female invention, explicilty created with a magic spell, explicitly - and, important, actively - comparing itself to film-watching, ironizing on different modes of film presentation, challenging the question of film authorship, all in airy, accessible comedic fashion.
Anonymous No.212917077
>>212916979
My toenails are getting long but I canโ€™t find the clippers. Might try to peel wirh my fingers but the one on my big toe is too thick.
Anonymous No.212917097
>>212917065
Neat.
Anonymous No.212917160
>>212917034
DL discussion is 95% shitposting but I'll readily admit Ronnie was cute back in the day and not too bad even now >>212915373
Anonymous No.212917162
>>212916745
>DomLab
I hope this catches on.
Anonymous No.212917206
Dummy Dommy
Anonymous No.212917213
>>212917065
>airy, accessible comedic fashion
You had me until this part.
Anonymous No.212917231
>Bresson-Labourier sex tape unearthed
Anonymous No.212917316 >>212917630
>>212917065
I appreciate that this is the first time Iโ€™ve seen someone draw a legitimate parallel between Godard and Lynch, but I wouldnโ€™t consider myself a positivist of these sorts of Hegelian Dialectics. Artists are ultimately alone, and their work is both art and entertainment and a business. These things can sound very structured and rational when we analyze the history of it all, but the progress of art history seems to me an illusion, or at least it has to be repeatedly rediscovered. Which is reminding me of Godardโ€™s Forever Motzart.
I think a dialectic of film can only exist because of what preceded it. A fuckload of people poured their lives and spirit into making movies and that made the soace for people to examine it. I think what we have now is a bit of a drought of selfless dedication. So maybe before we have a female ontology of film, first we need a half dozen female Griffiths? And female Billy Wilders? I know there are great female directors: my point is that these large bodies of dramatic work are the fuel for the fire of ontology.
Anonymous No.212917330 >>212917399
>>212916972
Waifuposting is not a self-consciously instrumental means of propping up /film/l: it is an organic, autotelic process that just so happens to prop up /film/ by virtue of the fact that women make up 50% of what is needed for a film (the other 50% being too obvious to need mentioning)..
Anonymous No.212917369 >>212917657
>>212917065
Isn't the magic in C&J a part of the narrative?
Anonymous No.212917399 >>212917439
>>212917330
Whats the other half?! Tell me or Iโ€™ll shoot! With my gun! With my girl.. my gun.. my combination girl and gun!
Anonymous No.212917439
>>212917399
;)
Anonymous No.212917452 >>212917513 >>212917610 >>212917616 >>212918114
Best girl film?
Best gun film?
Best complete film (synthesis of the prior two)?
Anonymous No.212917513 >>212917562
>>212917452
See
>>212916984
Anonymous No.212917559
>>212917065
Ok, thanks.
>>212915243 (OP)
>QOD
No.
>Bonus
Yes.
Anonymous No.212917562 >>212917582
>>212917513
That's a hag though.
Anonymous No.212917582
>>212917562
Cuck detected. Opinion discarded.
Anonymous No.212917610
>>212917452
The girl with a gun
Anonymous No.212917616
>>212917452
Anonymous No.212917630 >>212917891
>>212917316
Can this be connected to the recent trend of revision of film history and reevalution of "neglected" female directors? It may seem artifical and unfair, but it has some internal consistent logic, as attempt to pool together and structure the fragmented output of female cinema in order to see it as whole with its own separate quality and meaning. It does make sense when you look at it this way.
Anonymous No.212917657 >>212919343
>>212917369
Yes, as an illustration of mechanics of cinema.
Anonymous No.212917891 >>212917998 >>212918186
>>212917630
I think there is value in searching the past to create an appreciation for overlooked directors, but what these people miss is engaging with our own present. The record will never โ€œbe set straightโ€. This part is sort of sad to me. That unfortunately the younger critics feel the need to tear down directors (male) they see as sacred cows, to prop up their belle du jour. This probably only makes it harder to make new quality movies. Even when it has nothing to do with women. Like some people are even scared to study Griffith. Feels like trying to walk with one leg. Cinema is a sort of immense thing, and it is not a moral thing although people constantly try to make it so.
But anyways, a female film ontology or whatever will only come about through a wave of new work that is not so deliberately self reflexive. Then maybe in 30 years we will have something like what you are talking about. In the meantime movies need to get their confidence back. Social media has rendered modern movies very self conscious..
Anonymous No.212917998 >>212918193
>>212917891
Audiences have their blame too.
Anonymous No.212918008
>>212917065
In English, doc
Anonymous No.212918114 >>212918120
>>212917452
Thriller: A Cruel Picture is on the Mt. Rushmore of girl with a gun. Immensely satisfying revenge joint.
Anonymous No.212918120
>>212918114
Too much slow motion.
Anonymous No.212918186 >>212918233 >>212918265 >>212918475
>>212917891
Rewriting past to be correct in the present is a serious problem today and it is not limited to cinema, it's an operating principle of the expanding hyperpostmodernist omniculture that can be psychologized as a unified solipsistic ego, but that is not the topic of discussion for this thread. As for a new wave of female film work, I suspect it already happened back in the 80s, but was conveniently omitted to fit the dominating narrative of the present that I mentioned above. Seriously, there is a surprisingly large amount of 80s female directors and even auteurs: Martha Coolidge, Susan Seidelman, Penelope Spheeris, Mary Lambert, Amy Heckerling, Kathryn Bigelow - and only the latter is remembered and known today, curiously solely because of her shady cooperation with three letter agencies.
Anonymous No.212918193
>>212917998
Iโ€™m not really concerned with the blame game. Itโ€™s like a marital dispute. Does being right matter more than making it work? Because right now I would say movies โ€œisnโ€™t workinโ€
Anonymous No.212918233
>>212918186
I forgot to mention Nina Menkes.
Anonymous No.212918265
>>212918186
Watch this

https://youtu.be/vUl0Zd1bLtg?si=jI8vyEH7DfxE5esc
Anonymous No.212918475 >>212918816
>>212918186
Think about this: Godard and these critics of your โ€œmale dialecticโ€ analog had their minds shaped no doubt by the cinema of their youth. Godard, Lynch, their work resembles in some way the movies they saw when they were kids, even if they turn it into something altogether new. Many of these filmmakers are just too egg brain. Westerns in the silent era were looked at as disposable trash for children. Thatโ€™s a big reason why so many are lost forever. Art needs to get under the skin and bleed into the unconscious to start any sort of โ€œmovementโ€. And people are more open when their young. Many movies are of value in my eyes but donโ€™t โ€œplayโ€ to an audience. Maybe artists who feel marginalized struggle to confidently entertain, and the big words and deep thoughts are on some level a cope. The only thing I know for sure is if your movie is up on that screen than at that moment no other movie is. Non contemplative art gets a bad wrap from intellectuals.
Assuming youโ€™re the same person from yesterday: like I said there really is no answer for these questions. Iโ€™m happy to wax about it but I really donโ€™t think thereโ€™s such thing as โ€œsetting the record straightโ€.
Anonymous No.212918638
I think cannibalism is great, specially when the other watches.
Anonymous No.212918816
>>212918475
You misunderstood me yesterday, probably because I had no time to properly explain my position. I'm not disagreeing with you that there is no single answer, but that does not mean we shouldn't speculate and try to penetrate. Truth is infinite, and if in philosophical terms seraching for truth (and meaning) is incorporating Object into Subject, then we'll learn the truth only when everything is subject. I know what you want to call this, and no I'm not religious. But connecting to my previous point, part of the reason for the modern hysteria and neurosis is that we're learning too much, there's too much subject, too much ego and we're not adapted to it.
However, this conversation again highlights our crucial difference in understanding reality-culture-art-cinema, that I already described several months ago. For me, art is not a thing in itself that needs to descend back into minds to have any sort of influence on reality. For me, art is a superstructure of material reality, an expression of culture, an ascencsion of the subconscious, of the mind and its transformation into concrete artistic object (a film). In short, you're thinking idealistically down, I'm thinking materialistically up. In this way of thinking, "bleeding into" is a necessary prerequisite, an underlying principle, and goes without saying.
Anonymous No.212918887
/Philm/ sucks, what a bunch of nonsense.
Anonymous No.212919343 >>212919463
>>212917657
So how is it a third element contrasted with narrative and commentary? A bit of a nitpick I suppose, given that I think I see your overall point, but a sincere one.
Anonymous No.212919463 >>212919849
>>212919343
Not a nitpick, you're right, in Celine and Julie this element is explicit and does not contrast, that's why I call the film unique. We'll never know whether Rivette "felt" it instinctively in process of construction, or thought of it at the stage of conception, but either way the insight AND the authentic way it is included in the film are brilliant.
Anonymous No.212919474
Nigga
Anonymous No.212919849 >>212919982 >>212920135
>>212919463
>in Celine and Julie this element is explicit and does not contrast, that's why I call the film unique
What are some examples of more typical films where magic is a third element distinct from the other two?
Anonymous No.212919982
>>212919849
nta but Purple Rose Of Cairo?
Anonymous No.212920135 >>212920333
>>212919849
Already given above. In Peeping Tom the main character is compelled to act the way he does by the sadistic spirit of his father, and the father is played by the director of the film, which neatly exposes the film's themes as a commentary on cinema. It's all ambiguous of course, and the character can be explained away as merely burdened by psychological trauma, but that subtlety only adds to the beauty in my opinion. It's even implied somewhere in dialogue that the house owned by the father and passed down to the main character is father's head and the studio in the upper room his mind, making the film his body and the main character his proxy, an animated mannequin.
Anonymous No.212920333 >>212920552
>>212920135
>In Peeping Tom the main character is compelled to act the way he does by the sadistic spirit of his father, and the father is played by the director of the film
Seems not too dissimilar to the C&J to me. Is the "magic" you're talking about a convenient shorthand for a certain kind of relation between the other two elements? I feel like it's just the word that's throwing me a bit.
Anonymous No.212920552 >>212921704
>>212920333
>Seems not too dissimilar to the C&J to me.
The magic of Celine and Julie is explicit, organically weaved into the narrative. We see characters reading magic books, uttering spells, receiving magic sweets, etc. In Peeping Tom it's implicit, hidden to the point of nonexistence in the literal, straightforward reading, extratextual.
>Is the "magic" you're talking about a convenient shorthand for a certain kind of relation between the other two elements?
That's what I said in the first post up above, "to obfuscate the second (commentary) and seamlessly integrate it in the first (narrative)".
>I feel like it's just the word that's throwing me a bit.
Maybe supernatural is a better word, or something else. If fictional space of film is elevation of reality, the supernatural is elevation of the fictional space, does that make sense?
Anonymous No.212920874
Aggin
Anonymous No.212921390 >>212921430
I'll be watching Abel Gance's Napoleon epic today.
What can I expect?
Anonymous No.212921430 >>212921454
>>212921390
Epicness, and pain in the cheeks.
Anonymous No.212921454
>>212921430
I see. I need to take precautions on the cheeks part.
Anonymous No.212921544 >>212921550 >>212921734 >>212932875
This fucker's acting is David Caruso tier
Anonymous No.212921550
>>212921544
i love takeshi kitano but also MXC
Anonymous No.212921704 >>212921806 >>212922611
>>212920552
>The magic of Celine and Julie is explicit
>In Peeping Tom it's implicit
This kind of gets to what I mean about it likely just being a verbal thing. I'd agree that all the "magical" stuff in PT is implicit in contrast to C&J's explicit foregrounding of it as something within the narrative that makes it destabilize itself (but only the fact about Powell is outright extratextual), but it still ultimately remains a narrative thing apart from the Powell thing (can you similarly to PT explain away the "magic" with seeing the sweets as drugs and the other magical stuff as a red herring? It's been a while since I've seen it).
>"to obfuscate the second (commentary) and seamlessly integrate it in the first (narrative)"
Again, it's likely a verbal thing, but in spite of you calling it unique, one understanding of this general characteristic seems to apply to C&J perfectly (though I'd add that that seamless integration is a somewhat paradoxical one by virtue of it destabilizing the narrative) and far less so to anything else mentioned.
>If fictional space of film is elevation of reality, the supernatural is elevation of the fictional space
Do you mean something like the fictional space is a reality we're meant to take for granted as viewers which the supernatural tries to destabilize and draw something else from?
Anonymous No.212921734
>>212921544
Nah. He's the GOAT.
Anonymous No.212921806 >>212922611
>>212921704
>I'd agree that all the "magical" stuff
Sorry, "magical" stuff" should read "conventionally magical".
Anonymous No.212922001 >>212922090
Ladies and gentlemen, we got him >>212915190
Anonymous No.212922090
>>212922001
And BGG is still going!
>>212915587
Anonymous No.212922475
Anonymous No.212922611 >>212924701
>>212921704
>>212921806
>all the "conventionally magical" stuff in PT ... still ultimately remains a narrative thing
I don't see how, can you elaborate? Maybe my memory of the film is rusty, but I don't remember any hints of magic/supernatural presence, the narrative has a purely psychological explanation, and the head-mind-body analogy is just an abstract metaphor. Unlike for example in Vertigo where the presence of Carlotta Valdes is hinted at several times in the film, most explicitly in the picrelated famous shot.
>can you similarly to PT explain away the "magic" [in C&J]
No, you can't, the protagonists start seeing the film-within-the-film with the sweets' help only after several visits to the magical house, and the "spilling" of its characters into Paris happens without them.
>one understanding of this general characteristic seems to apply to C&J perfectly (though I'd add that that seamless integration is a somewhat paradoxical one by virtue of it destabilizing the narrative)
Again, I don't see how. Maybe you forgot that the entire narrative is conjured by a magic spell uttered in the very beginning.
>Do you mean something like the fictional space is a reality we're meant to take for granted as viewers which the supernatural tries to destabilize and draw something else from?
Not always. It's hidden in Peeping Tom, hinted at in Vertigo. But Last Year at Marienbad - another excellent example - is wholly and exclusively the supernatual destabilization of a completely static, inanimate fictional space.
Anonymous No.212922637
>>212915243 (OP)
Based Celine & Julie appreciator
Anonymous No.212922787
Back in prison, I used to suck men's dicks in exchange for anal sex.
I'm hard as a motherfucker.
Anonymous No.212923058 >>212923285
Anonymous No.212923285 >>212923305
>>212923058
What is this mythical place?
Anonymous No.212923305
>>212923285
Anonymous No.212924078 >>212945268
Anonymous No.212924149 >>212924936 >>212925945
The magic in C&J isn't meant to be taken seriously at all, it's a device to explore this "film within a film" idea. It's kept as vague and flimsy as possible. The sweets, rituals and books are part of the aesthetic of being a 20-something arthoe in Paris. It's unironically something men won't fully understand.
Anonymous No.212924475 >>212924970 >>212926093
This joint has grown on me a lot. I've listened to the soundtrack a whole lot, I've been whispermumbling it in public places. I sent the title song to my friend who's currently in a psych ward.
Anonymous No.212924701 >>212925099
>>212922611
>I don't see how, can you elaborate?
I was just going along with your point about the potential ambiguity of the psychological part of the equation of the protagonist that gives form to the extra-textual fact about Powell playing his father. Likely an unimportant tangent.
>Again, I don't see how. Maybe you forgot that the entire narrative is conjured by a magic spell uttered in the very beginning.
Sorry if I was confusing here. What I meant was that what your description of "magic" in general ("to obfuscate the second (commentary) and seamlessly integrate it in the first (narrative)") seems to apply very well (on one understanding and from what I remember of it) to C&J. I think that I must just have the wrong end of the stick because a concept that would subsume both something so subtle as to be borderline nonexistent (and arguably inessential) like the extratextual stuff like Michael Powell playing the protagonist's dad in PT (and I don't really see any obfuscation in it) and something as central the "conventionally magical" elements and their use in C&J was not what I had in mind.
Anonymous No.212924809 >>212924829
Anonymous No.212924829
>>212924809
In my country we eat this with chile and lime.
Anonymous No.212924930 >>212925014
Cinema isn't dead. It just smells funny.
Anonymous No.212924936
>>212924149
On the ultimate, framing level, you're of course right. Labourier is a librarian, she reads a book and is deep in fantasies, reads the spell as a joke, notices a clumsy woman that is totally not a white rabbit, the film-within-the-film is a mannered literary story and something she could read out of boredom, etc. The conjuring of the story and maneuvering inside and around it is a facet of the film's discourse on authorship and a mirror of its improisational construction.
Anonymous No.212924970
>>212924475
i watched that for the first time within the past 6 months and forgot it completely. should give it another shot.
Anonymous No.212925014
>>212924930
>I think the cinema will only begin when the film industry is dead. Iโ€™m waiting for it to go all the time, but itโ€™s going to hang on for at least another twenty years. (1970)
Anonymous No.212925099
>>212924701
I think it ultimately comes down to what reading of the C&J you prefer. Although the film is happy and eager to expose its inner workings and pull the viewer inside them it also can be seen as a simpler, more straightforward reflection on the pleasures of film-watching, and in that case the "magic obfuscation" element does apply perfectly well to it.
Anonymous No.212925657
>>212915397
She never sleeps
She says that she will never die
Anonymous No.212925676 >>212925775 >>212926294
>>212915247
This film gonna become lost media lol
Anonymous No.212925775 >>212925894 >>212949160
>>212925676
enough coomers have archived it
the real question is, are the rumors true and part 2 hits next month?
Anonymous No.212925842 >>212925918 >>212926180 >>212926222
Connoisseurs of /film/, where would you go to find a pdf if it weren't on libgen, z-library, anna's archive, the internet archive, or soulseek?
Anonymous No.212925894
>>212925775
We need that. /film/ needs that
Anonymous No.212925918 >>212926272
>>212925842
Try ThePirateBay.
Anonymous No.212925945
>>212924149
Rivettranny, truly.
Anonymous No.212926093 >>212926285
>>212924475
You're gonna get me to rewatch this for the first time this year, Dallebro.
I was so deep at one point early on, back in Feb 2024 I recut the whole thing, dubbing it "Mark I" and syncing the film to the soundtrack in Sony Vegas (the songs are higher quality/less tinny-sounding on the OST) and even added the open matte trailer at the end. Purely made it for myself when I just wanted to "watch the soundtrack" in the best quality, but I always meant to share it with someone, anyoneโ€ฆ anyhow, anyhow. Because of this post, I think I'll finally upload it to Youtube later.
Anonymous No.212926180 >>212926272
>>212925842
idk, you can filetype:pdf in search engines tho
Anonymous No.212926222 >>212926272
>>212925842
odds are pretty low
what are you looking for?
Anonymous No.212926272 >>212927206
>>212925918
I don't want scurvy

>>212926180
Tried that one too. No results.

>>212926222
Anonymous No.212926285 >>212930820
>>212926093
Do it please.
Anonymous No.212926294 >>212930507
>>212925676
>This film gonna become lost media lol
You're not confusing it with its sequel are you?
Anonymous No.212926357 >>212926396 >>212926413 >>212927221
Anonymous No.212926381 >>212932941
This was bad.
I watched all the way through to make sure.
It is okay not to watch this film and I recommend you skip it and remove it from your watchlist.
It wasn't bad in a very interesting way, just poor overall and in general.
Not by any means the worst film I've seen. Not offensive or completely incoherent or devoid of anything interesting, just, in general, bad.
Anonymous No.212926396
>>212926357
My little yella cinderella
Anonymous No.212926413 >>212926522 >>212926545
>>212926357
You watched this because I mentioned it the other day.
Anonymous No.212926511
Yeah yeah, but it's Rivette's film, he still made the final decisions and had final cut, he's the author ultimately, even if the ladies had creative input their control is only of their own performances in the end. There's plenty of films truly authored by women, this not being one of them.
Anonymous No.212926522 >>212927221 >>212927274
>>212926413
Yes, followed by this.
Anonymous No.212926545
>>212926413
Sternberg is one of our patron saints of /film/.
Anonymous No.212926626
FRed Lavigne belongs in the shkreets and his films belong in the trash.
Anonymous No.212926753
I may force myself to watch the sound of music today.
Anonymous No.212926800 >>212926914 >>212927748 >>212929754
It's interesting how I love C&G but detest Daisies by Vera Shitlova despite it being the spiritual predecessor. Worth a mention while we're on the topic.
Anonymous No.212926914 >>212927247 >>212927440
>>212926800
Well duh, Daisies was actually meant to be enjoyed by normal straight people.
Anonymous No.212927206
>>212926272
#bookz?
Anonymous No.212927221
>>212926357
>>212926522
I've got The Toll of the Sea here,ayve i'll watch it today.
Anonymous No.212927247
>>212926914
Got
His
Ass
Anonymous No.212927274 >>212927397
>>212926522
Zoo wee mama! Are her boobs nice in this one?
Anonymous No.212927397 >>212927532
>>212927274
False advertising, she doesn't actually get naked.
Anonymous No.212927440 >>212927638
>>212926914
Is that why both women in it are ugly as sin?
Anonymous No.212927532
>>212927397
Gay
Anonymous No.212927638 >>212927916 >>212929754
>>212927440
Nigga you gay
Anonymous No.212927748
>>212926800
the railroad sequence in Daisies blew my mind desu
Anonymous No.212927916 >>212928154
>>212927638
A fridge with butterfly magnets lol
Anonymous No.212928154 >>212928425
>>212927916
I'd fuck that face hard.
Anonymous No.212928326 >>212928486
No one watches the films I mention here.
Anonymous No.212928425
>>212928154
>wanting to fuck a fridge
Based and latent appliance fetishist pilled.
Anonymous No.212928486 >>212929140
>>212928326
Sad, send a chart of your top (enter number), so I can roast it later.
Anonymous No.212929140 >>212929399 >>212929754 >>212929925
>>212928486
All kino.
Anonymous No.212929399 >>212929521 >>212929642
>>212929140
These resemble films I will not watch.
Anonymous No.212929519 >>212929650
Ernest Hemingway would always be there for meโ€ฆ
Anonymous No.212929521 >>212929642
>>212929399
Sent that freak flying.
Anonymous No.212929642
>>212929399
Fuck you benchod
>>212929521
You too sir
Anonymous No.212929650 >>212930820
>>212929519
Ah, yes. Macho man hemingway.
Anonymous No.212929709 >>212929739 >>212929784 >>212929898
I want my favs to remain well kept secrets so when I casually mention them in passing people think i'm really cool and deep
Anonymous No.212929739
>>212929709
For me it's A Bug's Life
Anonymous No.212929754 >>212929805 >>212929863 >>212929950
>>212929140
I need to make a chart like this. God knows I've shilled at least a dozen different films on /filmhor/

>>212926800
>>212927638
Some guy I follow on Letterboxd with picrel as his avatar has nearly convinced me to watch Daisies. Even moreso now since Lipsky/Lemonade Joe convinced me I need to give Czechkino a chance.
Anonymous No.212929784
>>212929709
For me it's Honey I Fucked You in the Ass 2
Anonymous No.212929805 >>212930820
>>212929754
watch Closely Watched Trains if you haven't already
Anonymous No.212929863 >>212929948 >>212929963 >>212929991 >>212930721 >>212930820
>>212929754
Actresses chomping down on a piece of food has to be my favorite gender.
Anonymous No.212929898
>>212929709
>he doesn't intentionally promote his favorite films to force his contrarianism into finding new ones
Ngmi
Anonymous No.212929925 >>212929964
>>212929140
I have the Mayolos downloaded and i said i was adding Edipo to my watchlist you fucking whiner, but i get to stuff when i get to stuff.
Anonymous No.212929948 >>212930334
>>212929863
Impeccably Baused taste, anon.
Anonymous No.212929950 >>212930779 >>212930820
>>212929754
It's just careless subversion and mockery of western value systems and since it's made by women they don't even realise the depths of their depravity.
Anonymous No.212929963
>>212929863
It is a very hot thing indeed.
Anonymous No.212929964 >>212930006
>>212929925
calm down Joรฃo
Anonymous No.212929991
>>212929863
mfw
Anonymous No.212930006
>>212929964
I'm calm, i'm always calm, i don't know why you guys always think i'm angry just because i curse.
Anonymous No.212930030 >>212930066 >>212930191
What are you sissies buying from this months Criterion sale?
Anonymous No.212930066
>>212930030
I own exactly one Criterion DVD, Two-Lane Blacktop, which was my 15th birthday gift from my sweet loving mother.
Anonymous No.212930126 >>212930181 >>212930279
Anonymous No.212930181 >>212930296
>>212930126
Does he play her dad?
Anonymous No.212930191
>>212930030
A seedbox
Anonymous No.212930218
A sneedbox
Anonymous No.212930279
>>212930126
Genuinely repulsive
Anonymous No.212930296 >>212930640
>>212930181
Robert Carlyle plays Sarah Gadon's dad and Amanda Fix's grandfather!
Anonymous No.212930334 >>212930666
>>212929948
>anon
Anonymous No.212930507 >>212930573
>>212926294
Isn't that pic is from the sequel?
Anonymous No.212930573
>>212930507
Negative.
Anonymous No.212930640
>>212930296
Based!!!
Anonymous No.212930653 >>212930682 >>212931747
A really sad movie in all honesty. Concepts like time dilation feel tailor made for emotional moments in film.
Anonymous No.212930666
>>212930334
Forgive me. In my joyous haste at seeing my queen I forgot to read the file name.
Anonymous No.212930682
>>212930653
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=094iKZQRYA8
Anonymous No.212930721 >>212930766 >>212930943 >>212931775
>>212929863
Behold, a classic of the genre! Nas always eats like a bird, she's so dainty :)
Anonymous No.212930761
We're all orally fixed here.
Anonymous No.212930766 >>212930943
>>212930721
She gobbled on massive girthy BBCs when the cameras aren't rolling.

Disgusting
Anonymous No.212930779 >>212937434
>>212929950
Communism is hardly a western value at all, and the movie pissed off Godard too so that's another reason to like it
Anonymous No.212930820 >>212931747
>>212926285
I will. The only reason I never uploaded it back then was because there were a couple minor errors I needed to fix after the final render. Honest to god, I couldn't be bothered to go back in the original project file and fix them after working on it for two or three days straight. Also the encoding made the exported file look a little blurry, probably because I had to constantly resync the film with the soundtrack so frames blend in occasionally. I actually took picrel from Mark I because it looks nightmarish jej

>>212929650
It's a lyric but my point still stands.

>>212929863
Based and agreed.

>>212929805
>Closely Watched Trains
Never heard of it so naturally I just added it to my watchlist.

>>212929950
Noted.
Anonymous No.212930943
>>212930766
>>212930721
THATS FUCKING DISGUSTING
Anonymous No.212931379 >>212933480
Me on the left
Anonymous No.212931747
>>212930653
Time isn't real

>>212930820
Lyrics to what
Anonymous No.212931775
>>212930721
Why are you posting crash bandicoot in a movie thread?
Anonymous No.212932875
>>212921544
Anonymous No.212932941 >>212943978
>>212926381
Another pleb filtered by Micky Hannicky.
Anonymous No.212933071 >>212933130
Evening Gadonbros. Evening Fixbros
Anonymous No.212933130 >>212933480 >>212933906 >>212937457 >>212940771
>>212933071
what about us Madisonbros
Anonymous No.212933298 >>212933449 >>212933595
what's your take on cassavetes?
Anonymous No.212933449 >>212933484 >>212933880 >>212934346
>>212933298
How exactly is Le Tigre related to Cassavetes?
Anonymous No.212933480 >>212933519
>>212933130
ugly slimy fish

>>212931379
Real shit.
Anonymous No.212933484
>>212933449
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYq0WkMy8no
Anonymous No.212933519 >>212937488
>>212933480
>ugly slimy fish
pls saar
Anonymous No.212933595
>>212933298
Who are these three guys?
Anonymous No.212933843 >>212937484
i want to watch hunchback. do i go with lon chaney first or charles laughton? i like laughton a lot, but i dont mind chaney either.
Anonymous No.212933880 >>212934346
>>212933449
Through John Casablancas
Anonymous No.212933906 >>212933953 >>212937584
>>212933130
>Madisonbros
/tv/ normies and /film/ pseuds dont deserve a jewish princess. a nasty little jewish princess, with long phony nails and a hairdo that rinses.
Anonymous No.212933953
>>212933906
LALALA
Anonymous No.212934001
with a garlic aroma, that could level tacoma~
Anonymous No.212934293
hey it's a remake of >>212624765
>Yotsuya Kaidan has been adapted for the cinema at least thirty times
oh shi-
Anonymous No.212934346
>>212933449
that's clearly Ferrari not even close to Le Tigre
i would understand if you mixed it up with Blue Steel but Ferrari and Le Tigre are literally opposite of each other >>212933880
Anonymous No.212935010 >>212935060
Anonymous No.212935060 >>212935093
>>212935010
Anonymous No.212935093
>>212935060
Anonymous No.212935941 >>212937045
Is this the best American film of the last decade or so?
Anonymous No.212937032 >>212937076 >>212937529
page 9
Anonymous No.212937045 >>212937196
>>212935941
Comedy is the better Alverson movie
Anonymous No.212937076 >>212937098
>>212937032
Hey buddy, I think you got the wrong thread, the gookslop club is two scrolls down.
Anonymous No.212937079 >>212938228
John?
Anonymous No.212937093
ive been getting nosebleeds third day in a row now
im probably dying
Anonymous No.212937098 >>212937529
>>212937076
I think you mean 5 scrolls up, kdg is way more active than this general.
Anonymous No.212937196 >>212937233 >>212937270
>>212937045
Entertainment is practically an Antonioni film. Both nail alienation and existential dread. In Entertainment, the Comedian is a sad sack schlepping through Mojave dive bars, bombing with his cringe act and calling his kid who never picks up. Pure Antonioni vibesโ€”think Lโ€™Avventuraโ€™s Claudia and Sandro, lost in their empty lives after Anna vanishes. Both directors say fuck linear plots; Entertainmentโ€™s weird shit stillborn baby in a bathroomand Antonioniโ€™s open-ended stories Lโ€™Eclisseโ€™s ghosted ending keep you guessing, mirroring the charactersโ€™ own confusion. Visually, theyโ€™re twins. Antonioniโ€™s long takes and stark landscapes (those islands in Lโ€™Avventura, Red Desertโ€™s factories) scream loneliness. Alverson does the same with desert oil pumps and airplane gravesโ€”Comedianโ€™s greasy hair in perfectly framed shots is straight out of Antonioniโ€™s playbook. Both use bleak, washed-out colors to show a dead-inside world. Long, slow shots in both make you feel the charactersโ€™ painโ€”time drags like real life. Entertainment has some dark laughs, more Lynch than Antonioniโ€™s straight-faced gloom, and it rips on American showbiz while Antonioni digs at post-war Italyโ€™s soul. Still, both are about people stuck in a void, dwarfed by their world. Alversonโ€™s like Antonioni reborn in the desert
Anonymous No.212937233
>>212937196
not in the mood to read this many words today sorry, maybe later
Anonymous No.212937261
>sโ€”t
>sโ€”C
>nโ€”t
Anonymous No.212937270 >>212937378
>>212937196
Is this AI generated?
Anonymous No.212937378
>>212937270
If you have to ask it's already over for you.
Anonymous No.212937434 >>212937681
>>212930779
>the movie pissed off Godard
I will now watch this film.
Anonymous No.212937457 >>212937488
>>212933130
Disgusting blobfish.
Anonymous No.212937484 >>212940021
>>212933843
Double feature is the answer.
Anonymous No.212937488 >>212937550
>>212937457
see
>>212933519
Anonymous No.212937529 >>212937794
>>212937098
Go there then and leave us alone you undesirable cunt. Also,
>>212937032
That actress is not chopping that wood, dishonest cinema.
Anonymous No.212937550 >>212937584
>>212937488
Thinking an ugly woman is ugly makes me a pajeet?
Anonymous No.212937584 >>212937640
>>212937550
that, and also see
>>212933906
Anonymous No.212937640
>>212937584
She's only half anyway, give me a full heeb queen. This half a chinaman doesn't even have the new yawk accent.
Anonymous No.212937681 >>212939585 >>212939879 >>212940578
>>212937434
Yes, he said something to the effect that Chytilova shouldn't be making bourgeois films in a socialist society. Similar to the Czech officials who complained about all the food waste in the movie
Anonymous No.212937794 >>212940440
>>212937529
Anonymous No.212937862 >>212940419
Should I just straight up learn French because I can't stand most American films
Anonymous No.212938228 >>212938355
>>212937079
Yeah?
Anonymous No.212938355
>>212938228
Thanks.
Anonymous No.212939585
>>212937681
based. fuck Godard
Anonymous No.212939879
>>212937681
unbased. fuck Godard (sexually)
Anonymous No.212940021
>>212937484
i watched the lon chaney one and red a little of the book. i might continue with the book next week, the preface alone was very captive.
>A few years ago, while visiting or, rather, rummaging about Notre-Dame, the author of this book found, in an obscure nook of one of the towers, the following word, engraved by hand upon the wall:โ€”
แผˆฮรฮ“ฮšฮ—.
These Greek capitals, black with age, and quite deeply graven in the stone, with I know not what signs peculiar to Gothic caligraphy imprinted upon their forms and upon their attitudes, as though with the purpose of revealing that it had been a hand of the Middle Ages which had inscribed them there, and especially the fatal and melancholy meaning contained in them, struck the author deeply.
He questioned himself; he sought to divine who could have been that soul in torment which had not been willing to quit this world without leaving this stigma of crime or unhappiness upon the brow of the ancient church.
Afterwards, the wall was whitewashed or scraped down, I know not which, and the inscription disappeared. For it is thus that people have been in the habit of proceeding with the marvellous churches of the Middle Ages for the last two hundred years. Mutilations come to them from every quarter, from within as well as from without. The priest whitewashes them, the archdeacon scrapes them down; then the populace arrives and demolishes them.
Thus, with the exception of the fragile memory which the author of this book here consecrates to it, there remains to-day nothing whatever of the mysterious word engraved within the gloomy tower of Notre-Dame,โ€”nothing of the destiny which it so sadly summed up. The man who wrote that word upon the wall disappeared from the midst of the generations of man many centuries ago; the word, in its turn, has been effaced from the wall of the church; the church will, perhaps, itself soon disappear from the face of the earth.
It is upon this word that this book is founded.
March, 1831.
Anonymous No.212940210 >>212940440
Anonymous No.212940419
>>212937862
I'm doing it, but i'm so fucking lazy.
Anonymous No.212940440
>>212937794
>>212940210
Ugly lensing.
Anonymous No.212940578
>>212937681
Godard was such an insufferable cunt, never seen an interview with him that didn't make me want to punch him right in his rich swiss boy face.
Anonymous No.212940771 >>212941209 >>212942946
>>212933130
We prefer blue eyed white women here
Anonymous No.212941029
RIP Bruce Lee
RIP Yusaku Matsuda
Anonymous No.212941209
>>212940771
Beautiful picture, the sky reminiscent of J.M.W. Turner.
Anonymous No.212942278 >>212942294 >>212944344
James Gunn's Superman (2025) > any /film/ joint (unironically)
Anonymous No.212942294
>>212942278
many are saying this
Anonymous No.212942946
>>212940771
Based
Anonymous No.212943344 >>212943561 >>212943756 >>212949770
criterion has fallen
Anonymous No.212943473 >>212943609
How can the lazy modern movie director even compete?
Anonymous No.212943561 >>212943978
>>212943344
They gotta keep on falling, because GITS is peak media.
Anonymous No.212943609
>>212943473
what is the average runtime of these? impressive anyways
Anonymous No.212943733
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNw6Su_TeDA

New Hal Hartley movie, I think maybe his style is never going to really hit like it did in the 90s.
Anonymous No.212943756 >>212944344
>>212943344
Sarah Gadon watches anime
Anonymous No.212943978 >>212944018
>>212932941
Filtered is what you all say when someone calls a movie bad and you can't think of a single reason why it isn't bad, so I accept your concession.
>>212943561
It's the definition of mid except for that one big fight.
Anonymous No.212944018 >>212944211
>>212943978
Tell us about exit level anime.
Anonymous No.212944211 >>212944696
>>212944018
I didn't write entry-level at any point, it just entered your wounded insecure psyche for some reason.
Exit level of the medium as a whole is when you realize every single mangaka was just a gay pedophile from the start.
Anonymous No.212944344
>>212942278
Cute post, here's your (You).

>>212943756
Based Sarah. The opening credits to Sailor Moon is kino.
Anonymous No.212944696
>>212944211
But where is the exit level anime, lil bro.
Anonymous No.212945268
>>212924078
CUTE
Anonymous No.212945531
me when I'm all set
Anonymous No.212945763 >>212949219
Late night /film/'s been real grim lately. Rec me exotica films (pacific south seas, orientalist stuff, even arabian stuff) from before the 60s.
Anonymous No.212946132 >>212946775
What if Bresson was a gay rasta
Bobby "Battyman" Bresson
Anonymous No.212946775
>>212946132
Batty Boysson.
Anonymous No.212946967
Anonymous No.212947590
> french "new" wave
> 60 years old
what did they mean by this
Anonymous No.212947736
>Paul "New"man
>came out in 1925
Anonymous No.212948047 >>212949025
Took a break from watching pretentious art slop for this absolute Kino.
Porky and Daffy's bond was so strong in this film. I wish I loved my brother as much as these two cartoon animals love each other.
That final moment on the asteroid made me more emotional than any film by European auteur could ever dream of.
Anonymous No.212948739
Is the adaption of Brother Karamazov is any good or should stick with the book? I heard William Shatner and the guy who played Rameses in Ten Commandments is in it.
Anonymous No.212948755 >>212948784 >>212949044 >>212951355
Haha oh no honey, your little black dress doesn't make you look fat... Ahaha...
Anonymous No.212948784
>>212948755
fine i'll give it a second chance just to listen to the musics
Anonymous No.212949025 >>212949092
>>212948047
Is that actually great or are you just memeing? Honest question, i really love those two characters and Looney Tunes in general.
Anonymous No.212949044 >>212949276
>>212948755
Truly disturbing individual.
Anonymous No.212949092 >>212949904
>>212949025
My post was 100% genuine but others may disagree.
I didn't go in expecting much but I was pleasantly surprised and wanted to share my experience with others.
Anonymous No.212949160
>>212925775
>the real question is, are the rumors true and part 2 hits next month?
Not rumours, it's official.
Anonymous No.212949219 >>212949477 >>212949738
>>212945763
https://letterboxd.com/filmcharts/list/film-s-trip-around-the-world-southeast-asia/by/release-earliest/
https://letterboxd.com/filmcharts/list/film-s-trip-around-the-world-middle-east/by/release-earliest/
https://letterboxd.com/filmcharts/list/film-s-trip-around-the-world-east-asia/by/release-earliest/
Anonymous No.212949276 >>212949376 >>212950060
>>212949044
He's trans :3
Anonymous No.212949331 >>212950310
We're all trains here.
Anonymous No.212949340 >>212949457
>>212915243 (OP)
Canadian actress Amanda Fix.

Thoughts /film/?
Anonymous No.212949376
>>212949276
that tracks. hopefully he'll join the 42% soon
Anonymous No.212949457
>>212949340
Far more disgusting, busted, obnoxious and whorish than /film/'s beloved DomLab.
Anonymous No.212949477
>>212949219
You did not understand my request.
Anonymous No.212949738
>>212949219
No seriously who the fuck would want to force themselves into watching Thai films since they talk so fast?
Anonymous No.212949770 >>212950209
>>212943344
Only GitS, Akira and couple of Ghibli films is Criterion worthy rest is slop
Anonymous No.212949781 >>212949911
Who the fuck would wanna force themselves into watchinga italian cinema they talka so fast
Anonymous No.212949904
>>212949092
Ok, i'll watch it.
Anonymous No.212949911
>>212949781
Sent those freaks flying.
Anonymous No.212950060 >>212950129
>>212949276
I will not yes and this bit.
Anonymous No.212950129
>>212950060
I beg your pardon, sir?
Anonymous No.212950209 >>212950237
>>212949770
Angel's Egg is more "Criterion-core" than any of the ones you mentioned
Anonymous No.212950237
>>212950209
i think you mean lum2 beautiful dreamer
Anonymous No.212950310
>>212949331
Stay strong trains is hard job
Anonymous No.212950341 >>212950783
Very soon I hope to be free from this pain, /film/ :)
Anonymous No.212950783
>>212950341
And /film/ hopes to be free from you
Anonymous No.212950828 >>212950856
>>212915397
>Rivette was a manlet
>Godard was a manlet
>Truffaut was a manlet
>Chabrol was a manlet
Rohmerbros we can't stop winning
Anonymous No.212950856 >>212950953
>>212950828
Trvth nvke.
Anonymous No.212950953 >>212951095
>>212950856
>Rohmer shoots fast, but he doesnโ€™t shoot all the time. Most directors arrive in the morning, line up a shot (if they didnโ€™t do it the day before), and film perhaps an hour later, shooting constantly up to the very last minute of the workday. Not Rohmer. He may arrive in the morning and do nothing concrete until noon. Though he may seem to be daydreaming, he acts with amazing speed when he decides what he wants. He may film up to ten screen minutes in a day (the average is three, which is more than acceptable), and then dismiss the crew before the scheduled time. His work rhythm is very irregular: sometimes with no warning he will just not turn up, or he may take time off to run (he was jogging long before it became a fad). I admit that I felt confused at first. But I began to get used to these odd tactics during the shooting of Claire's Knee. Sometimes we lost whole days, and the crew would become panicky, thinking the shooting was falling behind schedule. But Rohmer was probably only waiting for the perfect moment, either from the point of view of the light or of the actors, and would make up the lost time in a single dayโ€™s work.
Anonymous No.212951095 >>212951151
>>212950953
It's insane how based this guy was, the more i learn about him the more i care for him.
Anonymous No.212951125
We all shoot fast but not all the time here
Anonymous No.212951151 >>212951434
>>212951095
Shame about the guy he burned to death though
Anonymous No.212951355 >>212951718
>>212948755
What is this even a reference to?
Anonymous No.212951434
>>212951151
Nah that guy just fell into a lit match.
Anonymous No.212951718 >>212951856 >>212952100
>>212951355
Source: the riches of my Emersonian mind
Anonymous No.212951856 >>212951882
>>212951718
FYI yesterday was the first show of the Megalopolis Road Tour in NJ
full house, TICKETS PRICED $200 EACH
Anonymous No.212951882
>>212951856
>Sun Jul 20 - Red Bank, NJ - Count Basie Center for the Arts
>Wed Jul 23 - Port Chester, NY - The Capitol Theatre - Featuring Special Guest Grace VanderWaal
>Fri Jul 25 - Chicago, IL - The Chicago Theatre - Featuring Special Guest Grace VanderWaal
>Sun Jul 27 - Denver, CO - Paramount Theatre
>*Tues Jul 29 - Dallas, TX - The Texas Theatre (*Not a Live Nation Date, Tickets Available Here)
>Fri Aug 01 - San Francisco, CA - Palace of Fine Arts
Anonymous No.212951912 >>212951946 >>212952167
Can we just can it already so I can post the /film/ birthdays for today
Anonymous No.212951946 >>212951977
>>212951912
is it your birthday?
Anonymous No.212951977
>>212951946
Two more weeks It actually is on that week
Anonymous No.212952100
>>212951718
Look at dem chompers
Anonymous No.212952167 >>212952232
>>212951912
I got the next bake prepared already. Just waiting for the bump limit.
Anonymous No.212952219
Baked a cake
A birthday cake
For film icons
It's called cinema because it cinemakes me fall asleep
Anonymous No.212952232 >>212952242
>>212952167
>Queen of /film/
Could you give us a sneak peek?
Anonymous No.212952240
>he thinks I won't counterbake in 3, 2, 1...
Anonymous No.212952242 >>212952265 >>212952270
>>212952232
Partially inspired by the current /film/ic discourse, I'm baking a birthday cake.
Anonymous No.212952265 >>212952273
>>212952242
megacool
Anonymous No.212952270
>>212952242
Thanks for respecting the wishes of our residents
Anonymous No.212952273 >>212952308
>>212952265
Anonymous No.212952302
I'm all set.
Anonymous No.212952308 >>212952334
>>212952273
Anonymous No.212952310
New
>>212952287
>>212952287
>>212952287
Anonymous No.212952334
>>212952308
Anonymous No.212953193
>One hour and 12 minutes later
Anonymous No.212953300
bump
Anonymous No.212953375 >>212953418
I refuse to post in the other thread, so I'll just ride this one out until it dies
Anonymous No.212953418
>>212953375
Kyle?
Anonymous No.212953710
Not gonna be posting in the waifutranny thread
Anonymous No.212953720
bump
Anonymous No.212953948
ALT THREAD
>>212953934
ALT THREAD
>>212953934
ALT THREAD
>>212953934