YouTube movie critics deserve to be hung and shot

>>212962387 (OP)
That's completely incorrect. You mean hanged, not hung

>>212962387 (OP)
Awww, did I hurt your feelings by giving a bad review of your favorite movie?

Who's the worst one? YMS? Critical Drinker?

>>212962387 (OP)
There is no such thing as a movie critic, EVERY single one is paid per review. There are no reviewers and there never were.

I don't think so
clearly someone is watching them
I cannot imagine the degree of autism that's required to watch this kind of content
I'd say the people that watch youtube movie critics that need to be hung and shot, but I don't think they have IRL friends anyway so isolation has similar effect

yes but so do frogposters

>>212964499
either in actual money or via payola, such as getting to interview a cast member.

>>212963063
Movies by LowRes Wunderbred is probably the only worthwhile one still around

>>212962413
hung sounds less esl even though it is factually

>>212963063
Doug Walker

>>212963029
It's more likely that you gave a good review of a movie he decided to hate for some retarded reason, and never even watched it.

>>212962413
No, imagine if she had a huge cock haha

>>212964810
Correct, for video interview promos, yes. Payment is the time on camera with whoever. If it's a "famous" "reviewer" though, the interview may have been paid for by the interviewee.

>>212963063
Ralph is pretty bad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArMAC_YNwZg

>>212966715
WOW
Anymore videos like this of hot actresses?

NOSTALGIA CRITIC IS BASED THOUGH

Man imagine the way Mauler's shriveled up little pecker would twitch and cum as he hangs by his fat neck, face turning purple and tongue lolling from his mouth as he dies before a crowd of onlookers.

>>212962387 (OP)
I'm gonna give you such a 20 hour rebuttal for that.