Thread 213014098

Margot Robbie is set to star in a remake of the iconic feminist film, "Attack of the 50ft Woman". The film is famous for being a poster on the wall of every girl with hairy armpits, a septum piercing and ear gauges. But there is just one problem, the degenerate simps of the internet have developed a fetish for femdominate women of titanic proportions. So what is Hollyweird to do? Will they play to the unshaven, girlpower, misandrist audience or will they target the incel, loser, vorarephile demographic? Either way expect it to be leftist trash.

>>213014098 (OP)
>The film is famous for being a poster on the wall of every girl with hairy armpits, a septum piercing and ear gauges.
Shit that never happened.

>>213014138
I thought the very same thing. Revisionism.

>>213014098 (OP)
>Margot Robbie
Dropped,

>>213014138
To OP's credit, I've seen that once or twice. I don't think it's the cultural phenomenon he makes it out to be though

>>213014098 (OP)
>Mid Robbie
No thanks
Go back to hiring actual hot women, hollydead

>>213014098 (OP)
>feminist propaganda
Jesse what the fuck are you talking about

>>213014275
>I've seen that once or twice.
Fucking where? This is a semi-obscure cult B-movie from the '50s. Only a special breed of sci-fi nerds care about it. And that demography doesn't include women. And zoomers. And the younger half of millennials. Did your wine aunt got it from a divorce or something?

>>213014339
It's just OP trying to sell you his bullshit, pretending to be a different user.

>>213014098 (OP)
Giantess fetish faggots will be jizzing over this for the rest of their lives. They will ruin this board with endless threads about it. Screencap this.

>>213014339
This may come as a tremendous shock to you, but these women haven't actually seen the movie, they just bought the poster because it featured a women destroying some buildings and in their minds equated that to "smashing the patriarchy". It's surprising, I know, that women, the gender famed for their depth and introspection, might do something only for the most shallow surface level reasons. But sadly it does happen.

>>213014223
>>213014291

The selection of Margot Robbie makes me lean towards propaganda, she is almost 40, is a LGBTQIA+ and "Women's Rights" activist and she stared in that terrible misandrist trash film Barbie

>>213014502
Yes. And you just go into feminists' homes to look at their wall posters. And you do it so frequently, you even managed to find two posters of the same '50s B-movie. Just like that. You lying faggot.

>>213014098 (OP)
What is the appeal of this movie to people that don't have the fetish? I have it so obviously I know why I'm gonna see it, but to everyone else?

>>213014502
>This may come as a tremendous shock to you, but these women haven't actually seen the movie

It comes as no shock to me, feminist are mindless neopagan socialists, they cling to false idols and satanic symbols without any understanding of their deeper meaning. Naturally they cling to the poster as something "empowering" without recognizing it for what it really is: evil

As someone who's actually seen 50 ft. woman, it actually is a feminist movie.
And /tv/ would lose their shit if they made a faithful remake, because it's not just fetish fuel.

>>213014678
But is it fetish fuel

As someone who's actually seen Attack of the 50 Ft. Woman, it's actually is a dumb '50s monster movie, but with a woman instead. Bit of dumb fun, if you're into it. Otherwise kinda meh.

>>213014714
For a modern audience it is

>autistic faggot trying to build some feminist seethe narrative about attack of the 50ft woman
jesus christ

>>213014311
Pay attention

>>213014098 (OP)
Any actual 50 ft woman would have an extremely deep voice
Major red flag

>>213014866
A big booming voice?

That's part of the appeal

>>213014732
>monster movie
Is it? She's not a monster (as in mindless) and i don't think she goes on a rampage, though it's been a while.

>>213014098 (OP)
it's going to try to appeal to both crowds and satisfy none, as usual

>>213014799
See
>>213014754

>>213014098 (OP)
I want 50 foot pregnant Margot to swallow me

>>213014098 (OP)
My cock and balls are not ready for a bare margot robbie foot of a titanic size crushing a neighborhood.

Logfag levels of absurd fetish

>>213014754
This shit keeps happening over and over again.
>omg chuds will seethe so much, am I right? you, I mean, we are, like, so mad about this, fellow chuds. oh yeah, chuds totally and unquestionably btfo

>>213014098 (OP)
As long as there are good shots of her big, dirty bare feet, who cares?

>>213014098 (OP)
No one has ever given a flying fuck about the movie. Just the poster and even then it’s a very niche poster. It might as well not even exist or be considered a remake considering how nobody has even seen the old movie. If they are making a new one it might as well be a new franchise.

>>213014678
>>213014714
Women in general are just fetish fuel.

>>213014584
Women are not a fetish, anon. A giant hot woman is still a hot woman, and everybody likes those.

>>213015506
I guess so. Maybe giantess fags aren't too far from normies as I previously thought.

>>213015534
I think the only things that really count as fetishes are things that are gross, like scat and blood. Otherwise, anything involving a hot woman is going to have a pretty big audience.

>>213014098 (OP)
No tits, no watch.

>>213014098 (OP)
you have serious mental problems.

>>213014098 (OP)
Imagine if she had a big, juicy cock in that movie. And balls too.

>>213014098 (OP)
>70 year old feminist propaganda
Don't you talk about Attack of the 50 Foot Woman that way.
>Either way expect it to be leftist trash.
Yeah probably.

Margot Robbie giant feet haha

>>213014098 (OP)
>margot robie

Dropped.

>>213015791
And that crowds of like 50 women were licking her balls all at once, haha
And another 50 licking her pisshole lmfao
Whatta laugh riot
They should make that, lol
>intense flop sweat

The 50's flick is the first movie I ever streamed

>>213014098 (OP)
The original is grindhouse kino, but the remake will be absolute garbage. The appeal of the original is the ridiculous premise, light sexploitation, and low budget unintentional camp. I have a hard time imagining a remake will capture any of that. It’s going to be a massively expensive turd.

>>213014502
“These women” don’t exist. The people that would own a poster of this are fans of b movies, horror, and sci fi. OP made up the feminist aspect.

>>213014098 (OP)
take your meds, nigga.

>>213014584
The original? It’s campy. The remake? I have no idea.

Giantess bros… we’re BACK

>>213015432
> nobody has even seen the old movie
I thought you fuckers actually watched films?

Wasn't the 1993 Daryl Hannah remake of Attack of the 50 Foot Woman boring enough for a few more decades?

>>213016518
It's not as much campy as just cheap looking crap.

>>213015791
And then she drains her hose and floods Los Angeles.

>>213015505
>OH N-

Scene where she makes a dude massage her feet

>>213014339
I wouldn’t say it’s obscure but it’s one of those movies that’s more like a decorative piece of Americana kitsch than anything anyone has actually watched. It’s a mid 6/10 50s flick.

It was a campy horror flic that became a feminist piece but at least had a hot chick. Now we'll have a feminist screed with no hot chick and I can find better giantess coombait on the internet.

>>213014098 (OP)
I've only seen the Attack of the 50 ft Cheerleader.

>>213014098 (OP)
>Margot Robbie
gay, could of had someone hot and thicc like Bryce
giant milfs dressing up in goth clothes ect..

>>213016604
No we don’t watch movies here… redit is that way

>>213016604
watching movies is for pussies, just read a short summary and make assumptions.

>>213014098 (OP)
margot robbie is ugly lol i'm doing a meme guys this is fun haha i'm trans btw

>>213014098 (OP)
Is that BigShe?

>>213014275
yeah giantessfags are a loud minority, and women dont watch movies
btw the original movie sucks ass. the best thing about it is the poster which is admittedly pretty sick.
shit is gonna flop so bad lol

Should have been Ella Purnell she’s has nice eyes and I think she’s pretty, also as I got older I’ve realised my giantess fantasy is just my primal need to be hurt by a beautiful woman preferably during sex, I need her to cause great amounts of pain, this idea is something I been humping my bed to since I was very young, I need to her to be extremely hurtful physically to me then also be nice after, imagine dying just as you cum inside a stunning beauty just dying at peak bliss for her

>>213017141
>high heels not barefoot
what a waste of digital information

>>213017141
BDH is a fat pig. Glad it'll be an actually attractive woman.

>>213019053
>I’ve realised my giantess fantasy is just my primal need to be hurt by a beautiful woman preferably during sex, I need her to cause great amounts of pain, this idea is something I been humping my bed to since I was very young
Are you me? I also hump my bed to masturbate and when I got older learned that virtually all my fetishes eventually circle back to being hurt in some way.