>>213037619 (OP)
i don't get it.
Like, i seriously cannot get even a whiff of it, this isn't hyperbole or anything, i just cannot path my mind to the comedy intent.
even with most dumb shit ass comedy i can still see it, i still SEE what they are doing. but with this i just don't SEE anything?
they are angry? okay? it's a funny face? is it? why? it just... is? no, no that's not it. it's not. it's not a funny face, there is a strange sense though that it's somehow SUPOSED to be fun, right? its exaggerated so... that = funny right? but it's not? it's not funny? what am i supposed to empathise with that expression? frustration? am i supposed to laugh because haha frustration is a thing? angrily consuming? is that funny? the |-| mouth means what?
there is simply... nothing, there's nothing here, what the hell is it? an abyss for people to project some IDEA of someone else's idea of funny? right? "oh it's something that someone would find funny, so I guess I'll gaslight myself into laughing"?
kids? it's for kids? a kid thinks angry eating is funny? are they niggers? what does this face MEAN. I dare you to blow by blow break down this expression unfolding from it's root.
is this nothing more than the face of a lower primate in resource defence mode? is this what culture they are targeting? niggers? niggers find it funny/ relatable when a character displays lower primate behaviour like resource aggression? it's haha funny? like HAHAHA!! LOL!! funny?
"It's funny because i'm a retard nigger and so are they we the same n sheit"? is that it? is that what kind of audience they are targeting? sub human? sub human base instinct? it's funny because they are lower primates? so we clap at retards like it's the greatest thing?
it insists upon itself too, it's totally utterly directly self aware. it's the creators framing the shot so clearly, all three in a line, all the same exact face. look at them, the director says, "aren't they funny?"
