>A-Are those... SCALES? On a MOVIE DINOSAUR from the 90s?
>AAAAIIIIIIEEEEE WHERE ARE THE FEATHERS HELP ME SCIENCE MAN I'M GOING INSANE

>>213059091 (OP)
those are artificial hybrids that do not represent the original lifeform

>>213059091 (OP)
dinosaurs had scales, they're very similar to aligators and reptiles nowadays, given how they have long tails and arms and skulls with teeth similar to reptiles. definitely not similar to any other creature like, say, birds, who have neither tails, arms, or teeth.

>>213059091 (OP)
Scarlet Johansson was crazy hot in Jurassic World: Rebirth. The amount of shots of her fat ass in those tight pants had me writhing in my seat just trying to contain my erection. I'll definitely be watching the sequel just for her. I don't remember much about the movie though.

>>213059091 (OP)
I hate this idea that we need to update all these dinosaur designs to look modern and accurate, and I just don't get it. They're fictional movie designs.
They're never gonna change the T. rex design and they're never gonna change the Velociraptor design, anyway. They've already proved this.
Any attempt to insert modernized designs fails because they clash significantly with the classic, iconic JP designs and don't look like they belong.

It's like if they found out all real life aliens like to wear feathered boa scarves, so now literally every alien depicted in a movie needs to wear one. Fuck the Xenomorph's design, fuck the Predator's design, fuck any of your favorite fictional movie alien design, they all gotta wear feather boas because science says so.
Doesn't that sound fucking retarded? So why do it to Jurassic Park?

>>213059091 (OP)
This made Millennials shit and piss their pants at the movies in fear

>>213060602
You got like a couple (You)s for this a month ago and really thought you had something going, huh

>>213059091 (OP)

Feather fags get out

>>213059091 (OP)
>THE BONES, I BROKE THE BONES AND THEY TOLD ME THEY WERE 30 FOOT TALL LIZARD BIRD MONSTERS FROM 60 MILLION YEARS AGO THE SCIENCE HAS BEEN SETTLED

>>213060728
>Still seething nobody likes the worst JP movie
Hahahaha

>>213061281
Who said anything about The Lost World?

>>213060584
"Leave the designs alone for brand consistency reasons" is a reasonable point, but Jurassic World somehow decided to make the Triceratops and Stegosaurus fatter and more tail-draggy instead of using the perfectly good JP/TLW designs.

>>213061489
Agreed, I hated JW's designs. They even fucked up the raptor's heads if you look closely enough.
But yeah, for the sake of brand consistency just let them look like movie monsters. All these featherfags cry and complain about how pop culture dinosaurs are ruled by scale designs because of Jurassic Park, but that's literally for a reason. They have plenty of dinosaur media that depicts more accurate designs that completely outnumbers Jurassic Park, and, guess what? It all SUCKS.
They want to fuck with Jurassic Park because it's the most popular and influential, despite never being strictly about scientific accuracy to begin with.

>>213060602
Nobody watched that trash movie anon

There is something primal about scaly raptors. It's like you gave komodo dragons higher metabolism, made them bipedal, and upsized the whole thing. It's nightmare fuel.