← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 213299700

23 posts 10 images /tv/
Anonymous No.213299700 >>213300649 >>213300712 >>213300717 >>213300738 >>213300764 >>213300806 >>213300860 >>213300900 >>213300936 >>213300946 >>213302039
Senbom Masturbation warriors... causing their enemies to drop and coom. Biopic, last damurai, when?
Anonymous No.213300401
the irony is that during that battle there were 2000 men fighting, and 40 woman
Anonymous No.213300649
>>213299700 (OP)
>implying the women weren't in that camp only as fleshlights and do the dishes
Anonymous No.213300712
>>213299700 (OP)
wasn't it shamefur dispray for an army to have women in their ranks
Anonymous No.213300717
>>213299700 (OP)
>low on troops
>dress camp followers in armor to make it look like you have more guys than you actually do hoping to dissuade them from attacking
>they attack anyway
Easy explained
Anonymous No.213300738 >>213300783 >>213300922 >>213301207
>>213299700 (OP)
I don't get it, how would they know they are women just from the bones?
Anonymous No.213300764 >>213300782
>>213299700 (OP)
I remember when they dug up a viking graveyard and like 50% were female.
Anonymous No.213300782
>>213300764
I also remember when that didn't actually happen.
Anonymous No.213300783
>>213300738
Maybe at least they can't tell whether they were black women or yellow women, surely you can't tell that just from the bones, right? Race is just a skin color haha
Anonymous No.213300806 >>213300936
>>213299700 (OP)
>For example, Stephen Turnbull states that DNA tests on 105 bodies excavated from the Battle of Senbon Matsubaru between Takeda Katsuyori and Hojo Ujinao in 1580 revealed that 35 of them were women.[27] However, the source Turnbull appears to cite for this does not use DNA analysis but instead uses less reliable methods based on the size and shape of the temporal bones of the skull.
They're really divining the gender of 500 year old corpses using the nazi method of phrenology now?
Anonymous No.213300810 >>213300936
>women were there
>they must've been soldiers!
It's literally more likely that all 35 were part of one guy's harem
Anonymous No.213300860
>>213299700 (OP)
how can they tell they were women just by their dna? did they even ask what their pronouns were?
Anonymous No.213300900
>>213299700 (OP)
>die in a heroic battle for your shogun
>some fag in glasses 500 years later finds your remains and calls you a woman because you had narrow shoulders.
DATTEBAYO
Anonymous No.213300922 >>213300969
>>213300738
female pelvises are larger than males', to accommodate child-bearing and birth.
Anonymous No.213300936 >>213300984
>>213300806
>>213299700 (OP)
>>213300810
Let me paint the picture. Suzuki wasn’t doing any DNA analysis. It was 1989, not 2020. DNA testing on archaeological bones wasn’t exactly common practice, especially not in a regional city museum setting with skulls from a Sengoku-period battlefield grave. Suzuki’s team examined 105 human skulls exhumed from what’s called the “head mound” in Numazu City—Sembon-hama, to be exact. The local legend said the heads were from a Sengoku battle. Could be. Might not be. Either way, Suzuki did what physical anthropologists did back then: he examined morphology—skull shape, jaw angle, temporal bone width—to estimate sex. Not confirm. Estimate.
He found that about one-third were likely female. And that’s it. That’s the whole groundbreaking evidence. Not that they were warriors. Not that they fought in battle. Just that they were present in a grave with signs of violent death—cut marks, trauma, broken cranial plates. Was it war? Probably. Were they combatants? Maybe. Or maybe they were camp followers, servants, or just civilians caught in the slaughter. Welcome to Sengoku Japan, where entire castle towns were burned and heads were taken in bulk.
Now fast forward to 2010. Turnbull—who’s a familiar name to anyone with a bookshelf full of Osprey books—writes Samurai Women 1184–1877, a nicely illustrated volume with very little footnoting and some very juicy lines. One of those lines is the following gem: “A third of the DNA-tested remains from the battle of Senbon Matsubara (1580) were women.” Sounds familiar?
Anonymous No.213300946
>>213299700 (OP)
Damn, same fate trannies will face when they uncover their bones.
>They lived as women, but DNA proved they were men. History just changed
Anonymous No.213300969
>>213300922
But men can do that stuff too
Anonymous No.213300984
>>213300936

That’s the birth cry of our fake Kyoto study. Turnbull gives no source. No excavation report. No team. No date. Nothing. Just a spicy sentence floating in an ocean of educated speculation.
And here’s the funny part. Turnbull most likely wasn’t lying—he was just careless. What he probably meant was the Suzuki study.
Only he called it a DNA study when it wasn’t. And he changed the location from Sembon-hama to Senbon Matsubara—a different place entirely. And then, because Osprey books don’t demand rigorous footnotes, it went to print unchallenged. And then someone read it. And repeated it. And embellished it. And suddenly Kyoto University—who had nothing to do with any of this—was now apparently running groundbreaking feminist battlefield genomics from a ghost war in 1580 that might not have even happened.
That’s how fake history gets made.

https://www.face book com/sumiko.nakano.art/posts/theres-a-special-kind-of-lie-that-doesnt-just-lingerit-multiplies-i-watch-it-cra/122247867116035590/

Holy shit why doesn't it let me post a facebook link.
Anonymous No.213301033
THE LAST SAMURAI
Anonymous No.213301036
How do they know they were samurais? Why couldn't they just be random women that were there for some other reason?
Anonymous No.213301207 >>213301766
>>213300738
no penis bone
Anonymous No.213301766
>>213301207
where do penbone go when not aroused? I have not penbone right now but other times I have
Anonymous No.213302039
>>213299700 (OP)
I believe it, there's basically no difference between asian men and women.