Thread 213318235

How's that AI-generated movie coming along? Got any updates to report?

>>213318235 (OP)
>How's that AI-generated movie coming along?

How can I make an AI movie

two more weeks

Sirs

>>213318274
you can't.

>>213318235 (OP)
I need an RTX 6000 Pro.

>>213318362
you need a girlfriend is what you need

i've created seven episode of The Simpsons season 2.5 so far. they combine the animation style and bittersweet tone of The Simpsons season 2, with some of the more absurdist elements of season 3.

as soon as i make it to twenty-three or twenty-four episodes, i will release them to the public.

>>213318235 (OP)
It's only production ready for certain minor jobs. I use it for set extensions without having to 3d model crap for days.
For characters we only use deepfakes, not fully ai generated ones. It's not ready yet.

>Life After People S3 releases a decade after S2
>Decide to check it out see this as opening scene
History Channel is already pushing out AI slop

And by slop, I mean legit slop. They don't even keep that lil AI symbol in the bottom left for 30% of the AI scenes.

>>213318516
why is the big ship eating the little ship

>>213318484
>>213318516
why do they bother telling people? it's not like an advert or something.
>this Lost submarine was created using computer-generated imagery.
>we thought we'd inform you, since some people prefer real submarine footage.

>>213318585
RULES OF NATURE

>>213318274
you are so retarded you cant even know how you possibly could do it, you are doomed

>>213318274
Have a decent graphics card and gen 5 second clips to string together

>>213318235 (OP)
Tech is still lagging behind, what I'm going to do is just take any movie or TV show and on any random scene Rocco is going to walk in naked and start shoving his cock down some character's throat, while all the other characters kind of ignore it

>>213318597
My only guess it's some legal thing or to lessen the blow if some hollywood-esque union makes it a legal requirement.
I shared it to show they are using AI for production and airing it right now.

>>213318705
I thought anon had a funny idea where a female character's breasts would continue to enlarge throughout the entire episode while all the other characters were oblivious, but the ever-increasing bust size would cause more and more problems as it became more unwieldy, eventually knocking over everything in front of her.

AI isn't anymore soulless than CGI and if we could ban both of those from all movies forever going forward the art of cinema would only improve

>>213318863
>if we could ban
Why are they like this, bros?

>>213319292
you'll still have plenty of old slop to enjoy after it happens, but it will happen

>>213319329
How do you plan on banning anons from generating AI movies at home

>>213318776
>I shared it to show they are using AI for production and airing it right now.
yeah that's fair, just don't get why they'd bow to the anti-AI crowd if they're using AI anyway. what happened to "it's just a tool, it's how you use it"? what if they use pre-made fonts, or Photoshop brushes?

closest i can think of is "reconstruction" for a crime or similar, which might be a useful disclaimer if they're mixing it with real footage/interviews.

>>213319360
we'll figure something out

>>213319360
don't want to alarm you, but if you point your browser to Newgrounds.com, people are making animations in Macromedia Flash instead of using cels and lightboxes.

frankly, publishing ANY sort of media should be licensed. these "DIY" and "indie" creators deserve jail time.

>>213319360
Not him but there absolutely will be hardware restriction imposed on the private sector to prevent this from happening.
Like right now you can spend a huge amount of money for some fucked up nvida stuff but in a few years when tech improves and prices drop they'll relase specialised ai hardware that only the govt and their cronies can get while the shitmunchers will get the pussyversion.

>>213319503
>they
You mean the anons who build their own AIs?

>>213319373
>closest i can think of is "reconstruction" for a crime or similar, which might be a useful disclaimer if they're mixing it with real footage/interviews.
That's what they are basically doing with this History Channel show, Life After People. They got their talkers and some real scenes but for the post-apocalyptic scenes they use AI slop instead of CGI like they did for the series 10-15 years ago.

>>213318235 (OP)
kys

>>213320395
sounds like the best way of doing it. can't film in the real apocalypse, sadly.

>>213318377
Anon, I can't afford a girlfriend...

>>213318782
My other kino idea is to add 5 minutes at the end of every movie where Sam Jackson shows up driving a big ass jeep at 250 mph and he goes "found you, motherfucker", then he brutally runs over the main character, who gets torn to absolute shreds