Thread 213345547

His thesis is yet to be refuted.

When the fuck did Batman say this?

>>213345547 (OP)
Not if the killer has already killed before. The other killer died, the killer was already a killer…

>>213345547 (OP)
*kills two killers*
???

>>213345547 (OP)
If you kill two killers though the world's still down by one

What if you kill 2 killers? Then what, Batman?

what if you kill Hitler who murdered millions of innocent Jews

>>213345582
this is /tv/, you know what they will say

>>213345547 (OP)
the number of victims goes down each exponentially time

>>213345547 (OP)
What if he kills 10 killers?

>>213345547 (OP)
It's only true after your first kill. From number 2 onward you're reducing the number of killers.

Looks like we've debunked this one, boys!

Suck it, batman you stupid faggot lol

>>213345547 (OP)
No, if you're already a killer and you kill a killer, the number of killers decreases by 1.

>>213345547 (OP)
Batman is rich and therefore morally correct

>>213345572
This. In that case, the number of killers actually decreases. Would've made for a better point

>>213345547 (OP)
Does anyone have the altered version of this where it's
>the killer of killers in the killer remains the killer
or something?

>>213345579
Yeah but two wrongs don't make a right. Sorry criminals, you cannot win.

>>213345580
Stan Lee (or some other comic executive fuckwad) wakes up from his latest cocaine coma, writes a shitty reboot that resurrects a dead villain to keep the status quo, then goes back to wanking his meat at the sense of power it made him feel when he got Luke Skywalker to voice a character in his stripper cartoon.
Excelsior!

>>213345547 (OP)
With that logic it makes sense to kill multiple killers.

>>213345547 (OP)
What if I kill 2 killers?

>>213345820
Based, criminals deserve to die

>>213345820
You need to kill them before they breed though.

>>213345547 (OP)
We lock up kidnappers. OP BTFO.

>>213345820
>mass murder is the solution to all our problems and those dastardly liberals keep stopping us

>>213345547 (OP)
>There are 5 killers in the entire planet.
>I (1 person) decide to kill all of them
>-5 killers in the entire planet
>+1 killer in the entire planet (me)
>The entire planet has now 1 killer, me.
>1=5
retard

>>213345579
It makes you a double killer which is worth twice as much as one killer

>>213345547 (OP)
He said this after Joker escaped Arkham Asylum for the 1000th time and commited genocide again

>>213346169
Wasn't this the plot of The One?

>>213346102
if i kill 2 people who each killed 2 people who each killed 2 people...
i call it multi level vigilantism

>>213346236
I'd like to invest, by murdering you.

>>213346252
best decision of your life getting in on the ground flACK

>>213346169
What if the people you killed were each double killers then the world gains 1 double killer but loses 2 double killers (== 1 quadruple killer)

"If you kill a multiple murderer who won't stop killing, the number of victims in the world would decrease as soon as he dies. Batdick. It's not about you and your precious feel-feels, it's about saving people."
-Red Hood

>>213346324
Wow, this Red Hood sounds like a badass

>>213345820
the practicality of this breaks down so fast if you aren't retarded

>how violent does a "violent criminal" have to be to get executed? is brandishing a gun to rob a place violent enough or do they actually need to hurt someone?
>are you still giving people trials in this scenario or are cops just doing summary executions? if the latter do you actually trust the cops to be thorough in their investigations and get the right people and not just corruptly kill people?
>if you're giving people trials, how do you expect juries to actually convict people for more "minor" crimes if they know the person is going to get killed for it? it's going to result in a ton of hung juries and mistrials for minor cases.
>what about false convictions and innocent people? it happens all the time right now.

>>213345820
So is the government 100% accurate in arresting, convicting, and sentencing these people? No? Then what percentage of innocent people is it okay to kill?

Kill a killer, Kill two

>>213345547 (OP)
>>213345820
>leftists

Lmao. Blumpf ain’t doing it either

>>213346387
I agree, we should abolish prisons

>>213346398
The best part is, you automatically know where to find a second killer after you kill the first.

>>213345547 (OP)
Kill more killers. Problem solved.

>>213345574
you'd have to kill them at the same time, though. highly improbable though with prep time...

>>213345820
Killing violent criminals only works until people realize they have nothing to lose and will immediately fight everybody to the death when accused. You can't run a civilization when every cop gets a gun immediately pulled on them.
And if you win and create such a mass of beta males that give up despite it being effectively death then then you end up with horrible civilization full of beta males.

>>213345580
i think that makes you gay or something idk

>>213346571
The ones killing the criminals would be the ultimate alpha males.

>>213345547 (OP)
no it doesn't what if the killer kills you at the same time as you kill them

batman is retarded

>Batman starts his career
>He kills people, shoot them with bullets, snaps their necks, etc.
>Joker begins
>Batman becomes a no kill freak who has a teenage kid help with fighting crime
Reality Warping Chaos Powers.
Joker isn't human, it's a concept/force of nature made flesh. The only way to prevent Batman from killing him was to completely neutered him by forcing a no killing at all cost compulsion on him. No other way would he ever let Joker live.

>kill two killers
>an identical clone of me splits from my body, therefore keeping the killer count the same
>cryofreeze my clone
>harvest his organs when mine fail
>kill more people to generate more clones and fresh
>sell organs if I have excess clones
>????
>profit

>>213345547 (OP)
But... if you kill a murderer, the number of murderers in world will decrease!