>>213357286
>AI art won't replace actual, good art.
How do you know? Will people value organic art on that basis alone? Will AI get to the point where its art is breathtaking and eventually people will assume the best of art is from AI because there's no way a human has the capacity to make it, not anymore?
Only time will tell who is right. But I am hedging on AI. Ten years ago no one would believe AI generated art could even exist yet. Now we're discussing if it will overtake human art. It's impossible to know what ten years from now will hold. You're betting against God to dismiss AI.