Thread 213360853

>Bald
>No acting range
>Has "no lose in a fight" clause in his contract like a beta

>>213360853 (OP)
cause it suits him
who should be doing those roles, tom holland? lmao

>>213360883
He should just retire. He'll never be John Wick

>>213360853 (OP)
Because he is based. Like really has a fun career. Wish he did more comedy tho

>>213360853 (OP)
I love him and bai ling was amazing

crank 3?

>>213360853 (OP)
>No acting range
This is preposterously false. Statham in a comedy is GOLD.
If it wasn't for the fact that he can't do an American accent for shit, he should've been the one starring in the Naked Gun remake.

His movies aren't like John Wick at all, they are all very self aware and he is a clown in many of them.

>>213360853 (OP)
>Has "no lose in a fight" clause in his contract
does he for serious? kek what an absolute faggot

>>213361281
Most of them aren't, but Beekeeper and The Working Man are definitely John Wick knockoffs

>>213361368
Yeah, it's pretty well known. All the bald guys like The Rock and Vin Diesel have it in their respectively contract.

All three of them look like small dick energy cucks to me.

>>213361447
>no lose clauses
Didn't you faggots see Once Upon a Time in Hollywood?

>>213361540
Sorry, we only watch kino films

>>213360853 (OP)
He was kino when he had hair.
But he's just a brit when the day is done

>>213361540
None of those guys is in that?

>>213360853 (OP)
I thought this guy had dementia

>>213361625
that's not a good look, standard jason is superior

>>213360853 (OP)
>Jason Statham's net worth in 2025 is estimated to be $100 million
there you go

>>213360853 (OP)
Because people continue to watch his movies.

In the Name of the King is about the only movie of his i hated

>>213360907
He was doing John Wick movies before John Wick was a thing, zoom zoom

Because Guy Ritchie won't make 'Snatch 2'.

>>213360853 (OP)
Cause it's easy money. I usually hate this kinda thing but I can't knock the hustle. Those shitty action flicks seem more legitimate to me than MCU slop. He's in shape, stars in mediocre action flicks, and has a hot wife.

>>213361248
This
With how literally ever movie in the past getting sequels, Crank needs to come back as well

Dude is a boss. I would have a "no lose" clause in my contract, too. If not, you're just asking for some feminist or tranny or gay to literally turn your career into a humiliation ritual. If you can pull it off, I honestly don't know why you wouldn't. What are you, some big tough guy for letting the director kick your ass on film? Get real.

>>213360853 (OP)
>John Wick knockoff

Think whatever you want about his movies but they are not "knockoffs' of the John Wick formula. If anyone was stealing from anyone I'd say it was John Wick taking from things like Transporter.

>>213361250
This is not even reminding people of his amazing performance in Revolver. No hyperbole, that was an Oscar-worthy performance in the elevator scene. Statham can act and he can act his socks off but Revolver and London flopped and he just bet safe, like anyone would.
>>213365078
Statham invented the modern action movie. He's easily the most influential and important action star of the 21st century and yeah he doesn't have much competition aside from Neeson and Reeves but Reeves barely counts as action movies because of how fluffy and Reddit they are whereas real men only watch Neeson or Statham and not that crap for manchild Redditors who fetishize the action genre but would never watch deep-cut VOD action like any real lover of the genre.

Has he ever done a good movie where he actually acts? I can understand doing easy money films, it's a fine career path and I like some of his stuff, but you know how lots of actors do like the one or two "I'm actually an actor" films and then go back to making slop for the masses?

Has Statham done one of those or no?

I fucking loved the beekeeper and the working man.

>>213361625
>>213362581
He can pull of both, similar to Jude Law

So, what we really need is Crank 3.

>>213365434
Read the post above you, you mongoloid fuck.

>>213360853 (OP)
He has a far better filmography than Keanu

>>213366161
He does not, and it's not close.

>>213360853 (OP)
he's a shorter, british, and less successful version of dwayne johnson

I liked the one where he was an ex commando who doesn't play by the conventional rules.

>>213361064
yeah her performance in 2 was kino

>>213360853 (OP)
>Why does an action star keep making action movies

>>213361626
Al Pacino explains the no lose clause to Leo DiCaprio in the opening scene

>>213368324
I liked the one where he was a professional assassin but his past caught up with him

>>213360853 (OP)
He is better in every way. At least he talks. He's got some sort of personality. Keanu Reeves is just garbage.

>>213360853 (OP)
He is contractually obligated by a Chinese company to churn out 3 action kinos every year until death

>>213368792
The only Chinaman whose hand I would shake.

>>213361625
my fav movie

>>213366084
YES.

WATCH A FILM WITH JASON STATHAM IN IT HAVE A GOOD TIME HAVE A LAUGH

>>213360853 (OP)
He should do more music videos.

>>213369750
CHELIOOOOOOS

>>213360853 (OP)
Rosamund Pike as Lady Penelope. Jason Statham as Parker.

Somebody make it already

>>213364310
he also used to bang 18 year old Kelly Brook

sonofabitch

>>213363588
Just so you know, whenever you type "zoom zoom", at all because the commercials is FUCKING old and was never that funny, but especially as two separate words as if it weren't one term, you just reveal yourself as a geriatric retard with the intelligence of a nigger.
Imagine if your cringe retarded compliment said "boom boom" imagine how retarded and niggerish that would sound.

>>213365253
>London
I caught that on cable many years ago by chance one night, and man am I glad I stuck to watch it, it was great. It's an awesome little story with him and Chris Evans doing cocaine in a bathroom the whole time. One of those nice little stories with heart that are great but flops hard and no one watches.
Fuck this gay Earth.

>>213371883
Then you must watch Revolver because Statham gives a performance that should make Oscar "winners" eat their hearts out. It's also an incredibly esoteric film about Jewish kabbal mysticism and how clown world has emasculated the modern man and deprived him of purpose and how it feeds to an endless ego/ID loop of suffering. It's a fucking gem.

>>213372062
I just wanna watch a good movie, not get radicalized into the alt-right pipeline, anon.

>>213360853 (OP)
He has zero ambition as an actor. Despite the acclaim for his comedic role in Spy he went back to mostly formulaic stuff.

>>213371662
>zoom zoom is mad
topkek

>>213361250
God I wish he'd do more comedy.

>>213371662
Calm down mazda

>>213370010
this is well good

>>213371662
I agree with you 100%, but just call them a boomer in response, gets them all mad and questioning their life choices lol

>>213361248
>>213364650
It wouldn't be kino. Just tryhard boomer slop. Crank 1&2 were products of their time, it would be inauthentic to try to recapture it in this day and age.

i swear there was a recent movie where he gets knocked out and captured or something. does that still count as losing?

>>213360853 (OP)
>Has "no lose in a fight" clause in his contract
He should've played Lex Luthor