Why isn't there a conservative version of John Oliver's format where they talk about political corruption, giant corporations committing crimes, and laws that have a negative impact on the working class? Say what you want about John Oliver, but at least he actually discusses real world shit that isn't "culture war" nonsense

>>213371844 (OP)
Because conservatives benefit massively from this things you listed

>>213371844 (OP)
>annoying leftist pundit
:)
>annoying leftist pundit, British
xD

>>213371844 (OP)
Nick Fuentes

>>213371844 (OP)
>talk about political corruption, giant corporations committing crimes, and laws that have a negative impact on the working class?
Because the inevitable conclusion of that is that workers need to unionize and the government needs to heavily regulate corporate activity. For conservatives that means communism and they'd rather have exploitation and slavery than communism.

>>213371844 (OP)
It's called talk radio. That's where the conservative counterculture has always existed. And now partially on Twitter. But talk radio is where it always thrived

>>213371844 (OP)
>giant corporations committing crimes, and laws that have a negative impact on the working class?
How did Zoomers get convinced that the conservatives are Marxists?

Conservatives are too brainwashed by the elites that everything is the fault of racial and sexual minorities and not the one minority that coincidentally has their own ethnostate that we are sending billions of dollars to.

they're different demographics of people they dont orientate towards the same mediums and styles of communication

>>213371844 (OP)
Because YOU'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO TALK ABOUT ALL THAT YOU DUMB FUCKING GOYCATTLE THIS ISNT PART OF THE NARRATIVE STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT!!!!

>>213372613
>Our government is corrupt and complicit in genocide and transphobia
>Also the government needs to regulate our lives more

This is why you people continue to lose.

>>213372665
along with
>if you talk about anything other than economics, it's le culture war
>but if i talk push sjw crap on the public, it's actually le progress

>>213372665
Your cult leader rapes kids for Mossad lmao

>>213371844 (OP)
>Why isn't there a conservative version of John Oliver's format where they talk about political corruption, giant corporations committing crimes, and laws that have a negative impact on the working class
Because conservatives are the cause of all of those problems. Why would they expose their own criminal ass?

>>213371844 (OP)
because they did, but it was Biden and co. so you all plugged your ears.

>>213372663
Did the childfucker really say that?

>>213372693
So I should vote for the other person who also rapes kids for mossad like you instead?

>>213371844 (OP)
IT'S CURRENT YEAR!!!!

>>213372665
>The idea that a functional government needs to regulate some areas more than others is too complex for the average American with flyover public education
>They were given more voting power than any other part of the country
You're right, that's why they keep losing

>>213372665
>dude just give up
riveting thesis

>>213371844 (OP)
Is this the discord tranny thread sisters?

>>213372665
>you people
Dems continue to lose because they rather put up corporate stooges than letting someone popular like Sanders have a go.

>>213372936
He wouldn’t have beaten Trump

>>213372613
But corporations are heckin wholesome and valid now, Pfizer helped stop a fascist insurrection
We love the diversity of everywhere being brown and corporations love the extra slave labour workers that drive down wages, stop being racist

>>213372936
>>213372973
There's clips of voters on election day and it's just total apathy among dem voters. Millions just didn't bother to vote. The people interviewed didn't sound like this was a major deal just "yeah, there's an election, I guess? Trump isn't great I dunno". Low energy. It's because Kamala is simply too lame to win an election.

>>213371944
Ah, yes, the only man out of 1300 at the January 6th that was not prosecuted.

>>213372973
Trump barely beat the most unlikable candidate in history and lost against a senile old man.
Bernie would have wiped the floor with Trump.

But the current Democratic party is more economically right-wring than Nixon, so they're more afraid of Sanders than Trump.

>>213371844 (OP)
Isnt that Tucker Carlson to an extent

>>213372613
>need to unionize
Have a boss. Have two. Pay union dues for minorities to replace you.

>>213372973
I don't even like Sanders but he would have crushed Trump.

>>213373019
Dems do want to raise taxes and make regulations... just slowly. So you have this hack and slash Republicans who cut cut cut, then you get Dems who then want to raise veeerrry slowly on a cycle since the 80s. The result is continual tax cuts and deregulation because the dems are "moderate" and don't want radical action.

>>213372982
Um no chud, corporations are only good when the talking heads and democrat politicians say they are. But you are right that we need to keep flooding the labor market with slave labor to drive down wages and skyrocket the price of housing, and then we need socialism to pay for their healthcare and college too even though those people are a massive net negative on the system but at least they’ll vote democrat probably

>>213373055
>I don't even like Sanders but he would have crushed Trump.

He's super old, but he could have said something like "Okay, I'm ancient, and I may have to resign in a year, but I'll do as much as I can. I'll do yearly checks and a team of doctors will decide if I can keep going. If I have to resign early in my term, then so be it."

Just own up to it and ride it out rather than do the Biden and have cancer and other shit and try to pretend everything is fine. They didn't want the disruption of Biden resigning, but it would have been better overall had he resigend.

>>213371844 (OP)

>>213373019
>Trump barely beat the most unlikable candidate in history and lost against a senile old man.
>Bernie would have wiped the floor with Trump.
>But the current Democratic party is more economically right-wring than Nixon, so they're more afraid of Sanders than Trump.

Fourth time the charm eh lmao. Sanders is so fucking irrelevant I already deleted him off my hate folders, but keep voting, 90% tax any day now!

>>213371844 (OP)
Conservatives benefit themselves from ignorance and lies, that's why you can only find them on the internet.

If some retarded rightoid TV presenter started to spew shit like PizzaGate and Qanon their show would get pulled off from the air really quickly.

>>213373088
he probably means 2016, not 2024

>conservative
looking forward to dying in the coming survival situation with everyone. its going to be funny at least.

>>213373101
>so they're more afraid of Sanders than Trump.
bingo

>>213373000
>>213373019
>>213373055
Bernie never would have beaten Trump. Independents and a lot of democrats are not going to vote for a socialist. Which even if Bernie isn’t really one that’s what he’ll be viewed as.

you may hate to admit it, but this man will dominate this space for the next 20 years.

Because they get deplatformed if they're talking real shit. See: Tucker Carlson.

>>213373105
>Conservatives benefit themselves from ignorance and lies

>Chuds essentially being Soviet Marxist in rhetoric
Really makes you think...

>>213373130
how does he look slightly more ghuolish with each passing day

>>213373125
>Independents and a lot of democrats are not going to vote for a socialist.
You're acting like 80% of voters even have an ideology which is hilarious. Trump would have never been close to the Presidency if this were the case.

>>213373131
You mean the multi-millionaire media personality with a top-ranking show on Apple podcast?

>>213373143
>Soviet Marxist in rhetoric
Pro diversity retards with idpol rotted brains?

>>213372665
>Our government is corrupt and complicit in genocide and transphobia
believe it or not leftists actually talk about issues besides gaza and trannies
>Also the government needs to regulate our lives more
are we billionaires now?

>>213373170

>OP asks a question
>simple answer
>"well ackshually he got a podcast"

yes anon all righties are stuck on podcasts you fuckwit, the question was why aren't there similar formats on legacy tv

>>213371844 (OP)
Because conservatism is for letting corporations commit crimes. Any time an "evil liberal" tries to stop it it's called socialism or government overreach.

>>213372665
You are not a corporation, despite the fact they’re considered citizens.

>>213373205
OP didn't mention tv at all.
Tucker can make a podcast show in the same format. He has more than enough money to do it.

>>213372934
Half of this stuff is probably just ironic bait.

>>213372663
It's not even aligned properly. You could've done a better edit job.

>>213373123
Maybe if this were the 90s, but sanders works for the democrats and never wanted to actually be president. It’s why during his last debate with Hillary Clinton, he told everyone to shut up about the emails and that the white working class doesn’t know struggle.

He’s just a showboat that the dems drag out every 4 years to convince the “vote blue no matter who” faggots that theirs a real difference between the parties

>>213373179
If you get rid of what the definition of racism and gender are everything the hard right is talking about is that they're against corporations and fighting for the exploited working class.
None of you are smart enough to know shit about Marxism, you think Marxism is just fat transsexuals with crazy hair screaming at someone for calling them a man in a shaky cam video.
Meanwhile there's even someone in this thread going "I was for Bernie but now I'm for Trump" like just proof the average person is a fucking idiot.

>>213373240
There are people who post here (and have for years) who disagree with you. It's not a discord raid and (at least some of it) isn't bait. I don't know why that's so difficult for some of you guys to accept.

>>213373196
>believe it or not leftists actually talk about issues besides gaza and trannies

I am looking at your cocksucking unions, and no you don't. Oh, wait, not exactly necessary, all of them melt down over birthright citizenship and hecking chungus illegal murderinos, therealso that, wouldn't want to be unfair.

>>213373214
>letting corporations commit crimes
Leftists lockdowns were the biggest transfer of wealth to corporations in human history.

>>213371844 (OP)
>why dont goys control the media if theyre so great, huh? why dont they just create their own x?

>>213373293
>If you get rid of leftism then we are the same
Absolutely hillarious.
>None of you are smart enough to know shit about Marxism
Let Marx and Engels explain it to us then lol

>>213373028
Tucker literally is the media. He's a propaganda kike and never dares go after corporate interests.

>>213373321
This is among the stupidest things I've ever read.

>>213373365
Literally all of it was objectively accurate, what do you seethe about?

>>213373130
Legitimately my only political news source

>>213373365
No conservative forced me to get vaxxed

>>213373363
never forget
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_nFI2Zb7qE

>>213373431
I live in a red state with a red governor who enforced lockdowns and supported vax mandates. Also Trump was the one who allowed them to bypass FDA approval processes.

>>213373357
>Meme image of out of context quotes
You guys really are gullible. It's sad because you should be communists instead you're ardent anticommunists, angry at corporations and the housing market but defending people like Donald Trump, Peter Thiel and Elon Musk.

>>213373506
>...at least thats what professor goldenstein told me

>>213372808
Yes. As a highly educated (undergrad) individual, I believe all images posted on the Internet that align with my beliefs. Did I say I'm very smart unlike uneducated retards?

>>213373506
>out of context
Leftgroids will brazenly deny what is part of their dogma for more than a century, just to gaslight us.

>>213373321
TRUMP WAS PRESIDENT DURING THE LOCKDOWNS YOU DOUBLE NIGGER

>>213373389
But it wasn't a massive transfer of wealth to the corporations, let alone the largest in history, you know the Triangle Trade of the 17th century, the East India Company, at one point China, the Americas and India were literally run by corporations. You had the Industrial Revolution and Gilded age of the 19th century.
If you want to talk about the modern era and pure government policy you have the wave of deregulation of the 70s and 80s that led to various government agencies around the world becoming private corporations, you have today T and DHL which were once the West German state Mail and Telecom companies, I pay my gas bill to National Grid, which was once Britain's Public Gas company. At the end of the 80s you had the fall of the USSR and that was a full government of state enterprises becoming a full government of mostly private enterprises that they sold off.
In China you had a lighter version of that that went on in the 90s.
You people think the government in 2020 did more than any of those things in taking power and giving it to corporations?

>>213373464
Tucker was already a millionaire at that point. Why would he need more money? You can't buy out someone who is already rich. Tucker speaks the truth and that's why he's better working independently.

>>213373676
I think you missed the point and the words you're using only prove that

>>213373749
>Why would he need more money?
Why does Bezos still work? Why does Zuckerberg?

It is never enough for people like this.

>>213373711
Yes and leftist governors were shrieking that he and DeSantis are mass murderers because he refused to enforce lockdowns on federal level.

>>213371844 (OP)
Anyone have the heat map showing that leftoids are so mentally ill they'd put the life of a termite a thousand miles away before that of their own family member?

>>213373712
>You people think the government in 2020 did more than any of those things in taking power
Literal greatest market regulation in history, with globally enforced state orders, literal trillions redistributed to billionaire class in less than two years, all thanks to leftist lockdowns.

>>213373947
>they'd put the life of a termite a thousand miles away before that of their own family member?
Totally serious question, do you actually think this is the case for the other half of the country that disagrees with your politics?

>>213373980
I know libshits who cut off contact with their family members because they voted against illegal immigration or don't believe in climate change

>>213373980
>do you actually think this is the case for the other half of the country that disagrees with your politics?

Literal fucking scientific fact and most observable reality.

>>213374054
That's not what I asked.

>>213373980
I genuinely believe that the average liberal is so far gone they would put the life of a random non white before their child just because that's what the doctrine says

>>213374086
Are you autistic? Stupid? don't you understand hyperbole?

>>213374134
Okay, you sincerely believe that half of the country would literally let their child die to save a random brown child? You actually think that is reality?

>>213374168
Yes without a doubt, they'll also chemically castrate their child if it means they gain approval from the group. It's just how they're wired.

>>213374265
This is a bigger divorce from reality than most of the extreme stuff I see from crazy woke left types honestly

>>213373307
Oh well I guess I just have to enjoy my better paid union job while you settle for worse pay and poorer working conditions.