This is James 'The Scum' Gunn, say something nasty about this evil pedophilic criminal judas >>213384181
Yes, yes, well done gunn scum. Well done gunn scum. HOWEVER >Beloved by the people. MoS audience score MOGS S25's future final score. MoS has 250k+ user reviews and S25 a pitiful 25k, so as the S25 user reviews increase the score will plummet to well below MoS's like how it does when for the critics score for nearly every movie as more critic reviews come in
>>213384307
Yep. A really good audience score on 250k reviews. Superman's current score will plummet the more user reviews it gets. It can pray for 60% AT MOST. Gunn LOST big time
>>213384417
Why are you fuckin lying?
The only non-Avengers films that were big were Iron Man's, Cap 1 and Thor 1 did average numbers and Incredible Hulk was a flop. When Man of Steel was out there were no GOTG, no Black Panther, no Spider-Man MCU.
>>213384417
Nah superman was not completely character assassinated and had tons of evil more popular copies of him on 2013 also did not come from 7 DC flops
>>213384694
Did the Rock's DCEU reboot even last the entire stretch of his movie's time in theaters? I don't think people spend enough time making fun of that retard.
EVERY FUCKING DAY YOU FAGGOTS A THREAD ABOUT THIS FUCKING MOVIE EVERYDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY
FUCK OFFF PLEEEEEEEEEEASE FUCK OFFF POST SOMETHING NEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWA
IM TIRED OF THIS SHIT ALWAYS POPPING UP WHEN I ENGETER THSISS GAY NSIIIIIIIIITE
>>213384138
The budget for this per variety was 225 production 100 marketing (which is unbelievablely low, I flat don't believe it) that's 325 million overall.
The standard rule of thumb is a film needs 2.5x production to turn a profit. That would mean you need 562.5 million. The film will hit that next week.
>>213385103
They probably supplemented the internal marketing budget with their tie ins. IE DQ blizzards and milkbones. Even with that 100 million sounds absurdly low to me too.