Will it flop?
Does anyone give a shit about this after Season 3 was so fucking terrible?

>>213402558 (OP)
>Will it flop?
Yes
>Does anyone give a shit about this after Season 3 was so fucking terrible?
No, but it's not because of season 3 being terrible, it's because of Disney fatigue.

>>213402558 (OP)
Even if it does flop the powers that be will simply lie about it's success and make up some impressive sounding numbers. Actual facts haven't mattered in Hollywood for many years now.

>>213402558 (OP)
Yes

>>213402558 (OP)
Why is Grogus name even in the title. The dude doesnt even talk, its not like its Starsky and Hutch.

>yo Grogurt... im empty I need a reload

>>213402902
Because this is just Lilo and Stitch for Star Wars.
Grogu merch for a while sold well enough to get bumped up to Stitch status for Disney

>>213402558 (OP)
I don't think it'll flop, but it will underperform without question. No one cares about Star Wars anymore.

I thought his name was baby yeed?

I have Grogu fatigue.

>>213402558 (OP)
probably will do OK but not as well as the execs are hoping. they took way too fucking long to make it, the Mandalorian's pop culture footprint has faded pretty hard.

its genuinely fucking insane how everything from creative products like tv shows and movies to physical objects like infrastructure and houses now take five times as long to make as it used to, cost ten times as much, and the end result is always a cheap phoned in piece of shit

>>213402983
What else can you expect when literally everyone is skimming off the top? Hollywood is insanely corrupt, the actual budget that remains after everyone took their cut is likely only a few percent of the reported number.

>>213402954
This could be Snow White bad for them, if they they keep doing what they do best

Consider me a litmus test for the audience receptivity.

I see that title and feel nothing. I vaguely know who the Mandalorian is, but what’s a Grogu and why should I care? My first instinct is that I will be expected to watch multiple seasons of a Disney+ show as “homework” in order to appreciate the significance of “Grogu.” I just won’t watch, that’s all.

>>213402954
The Star Wars season in Fortnite was a huge hit.

>>213403079
Star Wars lego is also really popular, but children's movies have never made huge bank.

>>213402558 (OP)
star wars is dead and disney killed it.

>>213402558 (OP)
Disney should have invited DAvid Lynch to direct their sequel trillogy while he was still alive.

>>213402970
It is their only new character that was proven to drive marketing. It is created by an for women because babies are adorable and they have absolutely no other ideas.

>>213402558 (OP)
imagining crushing that gay man Pedro's head

(It's OK I have anxiety)

>>213402932
Do normies even kno him by Grogu? Most ppl just call him Baby Yeed

>>213403105
Disney makes 1b with Star Wars merch every year.

>>213402967
>I thought his name was baby yeed?
Even the writers thought it was a dumb name.

>>213403011
there are entire classes of white collar professions like lawyers and consultants who weasel their way into anything that involves money to operate as middlemen, it is in their interest to slow everything down and bloat budgets so they can suck more money of it, they have zero incentive for the end product to ever come out - nevermind be good. its not just Hollywood either, its everywhere across the entire economy.

then on top of it in Hollywood the creative types are increasingly all nepo hires who feel entitled to praise and celebration and for them the act of actually making something is just some unfortunate hoop to jump through as half assed as possible to skip to the ego fellation phase

>>213402967

>>213403143
They slap the name Grogu on all the merch related to baby yeed now, so even your 50 year old white women picking up something from Target, toy shop, build-a-bear, what ever. Will least somewhat recognise the name

>>213402902
>Why is Grogus name even in the title.
Because baby yeed has been the only really successful thing about nuwars. Disney making that dumb movie and putting him in the title is pure desperation

>>213403241
>Well well, look at that coreworlder pulling up with his fancy Corellian speeder

>>213403165
>muhh merch
You're right, Disney is in the merch business, not making good movies business. They are and have been operating at a net loss despite that, since they decided to make star wars into a girl boss franchise with faggot men. Casual and core fans alike are checked out of this mess.

Merch sales != quality of storytelling/movies

>>213403068
It's one of the worst titles I've ever seen on a blockbuster. Tells you at a glance the whole movie was written by committee.
>theyre getting tired of marvel
>everyone hates star wars
>what the fuck are we going to do? maybe dig up johnny depp for another pirate movie?
>well actually they liked that baby yoda shit
>okay we'll make that into a movie: Baby Yoda
>his real name is grogu though, yoda's a different character
>okay but nobody knows that so we'll remind them what he's from
>it's decided then. the next featured entry in the most famous franchise in the history of film will be called... COVID TV Show And Plushie Doll
>don't forget to add 'A Star Wars Story' so it reminds them of something a man did
The 19th amendment was a mistake

>>213403373
funny you have to move the goalpost there

Why dont they retcon the retarded episodes?

>>213403520
Disney is way too prideful for that

>>213402558 (OP)
>>213403417
The movie name destroys the show's name

the show had a clever name.
The Mandalorian

at first you think, duh, they are talking about the dude. his name is literally "Mandalorian" obviously.

but Mandalorian is also the title of his people. it's a thing to strive for, like The Jedi. so maybe... eventually.... the title is about Baby Yoda becoming a Mandalorian! Whoa! cool! We all assumed, as a Yoda, that he would become a Jedi, not a Mandalorian. but it was right there in the title! neat.

or the last season, which was about uniting the planet, resurrecting the culture, The Mandalorian could have been referring to "the people" coming together. again.... neat.

but the movie title? nope. none of that clever stuff. it was the dude's name. DUH. what did you think we were clever with a cool name? no, it was the guy.

makes me feel like an idiot.

>>213403797

>>213402558 (OP)
It will do 400-500 million, probably on the lower end. The marketable Baby Yoda can not save this movie.

>>213403934
changing the movie title to
"Star Wars: Mando & Grogu"
would have solved it

it would have a cheeky buddy cop vibe. Starsky & Hutch, Tango & Cash, etc.

but the name-by-committee problem, people need to know it's from the show you should have watched.

ooops we now limited our move ticket sales to a pool of people who have only seen the show. on our paid platform. so now, not only do you need to watch 3 seasons of a show, but you need to PAY to do that. movie is a guaranteed fail, unless... enough people HAVE already watched the show? what a gamble. good luck to them

>>213402558 (OP)
Yes, no. Star Wars is dead.

>>213403934
Mando sounds close to Russian "manda" which means cunt.

It better flop for the sake of Star Wars. It should perform terribly, and it should be massively panned. Same should happen to R*y movies.

>>213402558 (OP)
No
>>213402590
>>213402897
>>213404376
retards

>>213404555
Apologise.

>>213404437
Russian sounds like "rushing," which means "hurrying."

>>213403241
>this is actually canon now