>>213415213 (OP)
1: Produce 12 movies a year, cap budgets at 20 million, can't make a good movie with that, tough shit and give it to someone who will.
2: Explain to the filmmakers that if they go one fucking cent over budget they'll be removed from the project and the studio will finish it without their involvement, threaten everyone involved that if they fuck around they will be fired and have a breach of contract lawsuit thrown at them for causing unreasonable issues that affect production.
3: Mandate adaptations of novels, novellas, comics, anything that has a source material that can be adapted.
4: Let Directors make whatever crazy shit they want just as long as they remember Rule 2.
5: Make them for streaming which allows any type of movie to be made with no restrictions, including censorship, but also remembering Rule 2.
6: If you're a streaming service you want to retain and bring in new customers. By having a new movie every month, or every two weeks if you wanted to make 24 per year with the same Rules above, you can keep customers and maybe bring in new ones if the projects are solid and have good word of mouth.
This is what angers me that we should be in a new golden age of Horror cinema but not despite making movies to be easier than ever with digital cameras and equipment.
Of course it all comes down to money and no one willing to focus a streaming service specifically to the Horror genre and, while there have been attempts, no one has ever been able to have one break through into mainstream exposure.
This is why if I had the money I'd have a studio that does 24 movies a year under the conditions mentioned above while I'd buy the rights to Fangoria magazine which is what I'd call my channel FANGORIA, as that doesn't specify one type of movie like calling it The Horror Channel.
Create a website that covers not only the movies we produce but Horror culture in general around the world and print a quarterly magazine like they'd doing now!!!FACT!!!