>>213432055It's you that needs to turn your brain on, because you are the one who cannot comprehend moral complexity, or what is being shown for you on screen.
Saying Vic is "pure evil" just reeks of one dimensional reddit-tier herd morality. I think you need to watch Harry Potter, where the delineations are simpler with bad "evil" wizards and "good" wizards, something that children like you can more easily understand.
The Shield actually beats you over the head with the opposite. The reason Ronnie and the rest of the team trust Vic, is because Vic has done nothing but to gain their trust throughout the seasons due to his actions.
Vic was ready to fall on his shield for Ronnie in season 2, not in a life or death situation, but just because he was ashamed in having to force Ronnie to recant his statement so that he could save his own ass. Vic also presses his lawyer Rebecca, with no one else around, that if she can find a way to swap him and Lem, when Lem was detained and being sent to prison by IAD, she should do it. Vic is incredibly generous with the money train spoils and when he needs money for his autistic son, he leaves it up for the rest of the team to decide whether or not he should be allowed to, instead of just taking money as he saw fit. Vic also did not sign the immunity deal when being told that it did not feature Ronnie. He did it ONLY after his wife was (as far as he was aware) going to be prosecuted and potentially left in jail, thus singing on for her immunity.
Did he betray Ronnie? Yes, he chose his wife, the mother of his kids, over him. You may dislike the decision and that's fine, but saying Vic has a hierarchy of interests and priorities with his family being #1, is different than saying "Vic is just muh evil guy".
If Vic was simply an evil guy, the show would have never been as interesting as it was. The moral ambiguity is what makes it so unique. Vic was not a saint, but he did care about his team and his family