>the House of the Dragon star is on board to join Ryan Gosling in Lucasfilm’s Star Wars: Starfighter

>Mia Goth is also on board, with Shawn Levy directing the pic.

>The film is set 5 years after the events of Star Wars: Episode IX — The Rise of Skywalker,

https://deadline.com/2025/08/star-wars-star-fighter-matt-smith-villain-ryan-gosling-1236479292/

>>213430151 (OP)
Star Starfighter Wars?

>>213430151 (OP)
HAVE SEX
INCEL
HAVE SEX
I POOPED
I POOPED MY PANTS AGAIN
I POOPED MY PANTS AGAIN
HAVE SEX
INCEL
SUUUU FALA FALA FALA FALA

>>213430151 (OP)
He'll play another clone of Palpatine

HAVE SEX

>>213430151 (OP)
He’d make a cool evil fighter pilot.

>>213430151 (OP)
>The film is set 5 years after the events of Star Wars: Episode IX — The Rise of Skywalker,

the one where the bad guys lost again? So what will this movies main conflict be? Did Palpatine return again somehow?

>>213430151 (OP)
Dont care not gonna watch

>>213430151 (OP)
> Mia Goth in star wars
my prayers have been answered

Dead franchise.

>>213430151 (OP)
>Terminator
>Venomverse
>now Star Wars

Matt Smith is the undercover operator they bring in to kill a franchise. Star Wars fags BTFO

>>213430202
>>213430243
He is so ugly.

>>213430151 (OP)
This franchise has no future as long as the sequels remain canon.

>>213430151 (OP)
>This time it's totally about a masculine hero, trust me
>Oops, just let me add these TWO strong females to the main cast for absolutely no reason, tee-hee

>>213430315
>buy the most popular and well known movie franchise in the world for $4 billion
>it's a goddamn universe so the opportunities and possible stories are endless
>crash it into the ground in less than ten years
>dead franchise
Kathleen Kennedy narcissistic incompetence is almost impressive. It has to be malicious. Nobody can be that terrible.

>thuh sahluck et me oybrows

>>213430151 (OP)
Disney loves to lose money I guess. What a bunch of idiots. They have not made a movie in 6 years and they expect people to watch a movie in 2027? Fucking delusional retards.

>>213430496
Star Wars doesn't need any sequels. Anything after Return of the Jedi is by definition tacked on, pointless bullshit, that undermines the importance of the original trilogy and the finality of its "and they lived happily ever after" ending. All of it is retarded, pointless, cash grabbing crap. Star Wars ended here. Nothing of importance happened afterwards. There was no other threat that made the Empire look like babies, because a bunch of retarded fanfiction made after the fact needed inflated stakes to feel important. There was no Starkiller base that wiped out the entire New Republic in one stroke, there was no discount Warhammer 40k BDSM aliens that killed trillions. Nothing ever happened. The heroes won, and the ultimate evil that is the Empire was defeated. The End.

>>213430626
>They have not made a movie in 6 years and they expect people to watch a movie in 2027

They hadn’t made a movie in 10 years when TFA came out and everyone went to see it. The longer it’s been since people have went to see a Star Wars movie in the theater the more one will make when it releases. Casual audiences don’t give a shit about the disney plus slop so for them it’s been years since they last saw any Star Wars.

>>213430151 (OP)
>In theaters May 28, 2027
Yeah, sure it will be.

>>213430638
You are objectively wrong. The Thrawn trillogy is the proper sequel.

>>213430709
At this time there was no star wars fatigue and disappointment.

>>213430745
>muh blue sherlock star trek alien!
>le art lets me know their entire military strategy!
>muh force blocking lizards!
>luuke
Kill yourself, shit eating slop consoomer.

>>213430767
Sure there was, watch the Plinkett reviews. There was massive levels of disappointment in those movies including RotS which failed to make NYT top 100 films of 21st century. Cope and seethe all you want, but don't pretend those movies were broadly popular. They were fucking jokes which is why when a random Plinkett appeared to make fun of them he was hailed as a genius film critic. Deny it all you want. Cope and seethe all you want. But that's reality. The little bubble you exist in where you believe the prequels were popular and successful among general audiences and not tired and disappointing compared to the OT is NOT a majority opinion.

>>213430709
Because it was a change in ownership. Disney has changed nothing since the the force awakens. They are an awful, creatively bankrupt company. Everything they make is bad. Star wars is dead and has been dead and hated by fans since sequels and awful rogue one/solo films.

>>213430811
You can cherrypick and ridicule the movies in the same fashion.

>>213430151 (OP)
Smith is really leaning into bad guy roles lately.

>>213430638
Heh. Fucking crazy amounts of cope in this post. Lemme guess you think RotS was a cinematic masterpiece and the NYT was wrong not to include it on their top 100 films of the 21st century?

>>213430882
The only reason people gave disney a chance is because the prequels were bad and they hoped they could save the franchise, disney made star wars worse. Including dogshit like Andor consumed by faggots like you.

>>213430767
Most of it is just online, same as with the prequels. We’ll have to wait and see if it translates to normalfags.

>>213430151 (OP)
>star wars is dea...

>>213430910
TFA made gobs of money, thougheverbeit. It was popular among general audiences and the only people who seethe about it are gigantic nerds. What killed the franchise was TLJ and ROS but I don't believe it's really a dead franchise. Nothing dies anymore. No one's ever REALLY gone. Die hard fans are basically delusional nutjobs who cherry pick the stuff they like and say the rest doesn't exist.

>>213430910
OT>ST>PT Disney kept Star Wars at basement levels except for the critically acclaimed series Andor. But it was shit before that as well. Only fucking fat retard incels took those prequels seriously. Star Wars ended with RotJ for most people. Lucas attempted to murder the franchise, Disney attempted to murder the franchise, but it's still a zombie franchise. It'll be back. It'll make money again, I guarantee it.

>>213430977
TLJ only killed it for internet fans. It still made a fuckload of money and didn’t put audiences off going to see the next one. That Pedro and Baby Sneed flick is going to make another billion and no amount of youtube video essays about *ahem* THE MESSAGE will stop it. The thing about making goyslop is that everyone eats it up.

>>213430977
TFA was worth defending when it was the only film. After the sequels came out it spoils it completely. Normal audiences hate star wars. Only trannies like you defend it.

>>213431023
If you think that the sequels are on par with anything Lucas did you are an absolute retard and your opinion doesn't matter. You probably put they/them in your social media profiles.

>>213431070
Prequelfags btfo TFA made big bucks. RotS not on NYT best movies list of 21st century. Lucas is a retarded fish frog who looks and acts like Boss Nass in private.

>>213431101
Underage detected.

>>213431051
Normal audiences have no strong emotions towards Star Wars whatsoever. They don't even think about it. Therefore it's not a dead franchise and any potentially non-slop film has a chance of being successful. Just keep Rian Johnson and JJ Abrams away and try to write a compelling story and you'll do fine. From what I can tell the fags on this board when it came out even liked that Jude Law show well enough. Face it, prequelfags, you are the vocal minority. The silent majority knows Luke Han and Leia. They don't give a fuck about some faggot crying little bitch named Anakin or his dumb groomer wife Padme. SEARCH YOUR FEELINGS YOU KNOW IT TO BE TRUE

>>213430882
>watch the Plinkett reviews
I don't give a shit what your favorite friend simulator has to say.

>>213431168
I wish. Then I'd have more life left to shit post in Star Wars threads. And for the record I'd rather rewatch Rise of Skywalker than anything about that fucking crying fag Anakin. So yes. OT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ST>PT.

>>213431101
You are a retard though. You brain is broken by bipartisan politics so you don't believe that sequels can be criticized on their own merit. Instead you deflect and point at prequels as if that's an argument (it's not).

>>213430882
I remember some portion of the "hardcore" SW fans being mad about PT. Some of them later praised disney for throwing out the EU. Ironic because disney replaced is with far worse slop.

Also the late 2000s-early 2010s were filled with sw content like TCW, vidiya etc. All of it was generally well liked and popular. Some people were actually waiting for disney movies with hope.

Now disney shits out 10 pointless tv shows and most of them flop. People just stoped caring. The 2 and 3 sequel episodes were absolute shitshow.
The tv shows raised some hope initially but turned out to be disappointing.

>>213431169
Still better than sequels and that's saying a lot. Nobody thought Disney could do a worse job but they did. And it's only gotten worse with each year they have owned the franchise. Retard.

>>213431180
This was long before they were a friend simulator, fuckwad. It was a deranged old man nitpicking objectively AWFUL movies. Nobody knew anything about Mike or Rich or Jay or Jack or Jack or Macauley or Josh or Josh or Jessie or Colin or Jim or Freddy or Len. Kek. Plinkett made actual waves on the Internet. And his reviews still shred those movies to pieces. God it's fun fucking with you prequelfags.

>Shawn Levy directing
They really dont care about quality

>>213431249
My man you think a YouTuber has a valid opinion

>>213431197
bait used to be believable

>>213431270
Agreed. I mean, he probably doesn't have a degree in film critique. And I very much doubt his review was peer reviewed. I only trust trusted critics.

Y'all just regurgitate with ZERO arguments. WHY are the prequels better than the sequels? Is it the shitty cgi? The constant usage of ugly CGI creatures? The creepy cgi stormtroopers? The masturbatory fight sequences? It's truly amazing arguing with all of you at once because it's just,
"Disney managed to make it even worser than the Prequels." Nah, they didn't. That's a fucking fact. You're being disingenuous faggot prequelfags when you pretend you don't fucking love the prequel films for the sake of argument. I know your ranking is
PT>>>OT>>>>>>ST. You don't even like Luke Han or Leia. You just like it when lightsabers go bwoosh bwoosh crash. Zwiiiinggg oh shit I'm a lightsaber now. Fucking retards. Kek. I'm literally lmao at how shitty your arguments are.

>>213431315
Reddit letter media got demoted culturally when Camile Puglia praised Episode III

>>213431329
Story. Very simple. Disney writers can't make a compelling or original story. Lucas made all his movies unique and he didn't over do things. He didn't produce dozens of slop TV shows.

>>213431334
She's my hero :)

>>213431209
You prequelfags refuse to even discuss the POSSIBILITY that they're STILL the worst Star Wars movies. It's genuinely embarrassing watching you all trip all over yourselves day after day to suck Georges dick. You don't even grant the possibility. The prequels are THAT BAD that even Disney couldn't do worse. Let that sink the fuck in.

>>213431345
Yeah the super great story of watching a little boy get warped into an intergalactic warlord. WOW I LOVE IT SO MUCH. Rey's story is more interesting because resisting the dark side takes actual courage.

>>213431329
Cant say if trolling or just very stupid

>>213431345
This, the sequels are just badly written.

>>213430151 (OP)
>still trying to pretend mouseshit is canon
DOA

>>213431334
She isn't going to have sex with you you know. Also dinosaur media is dead and Redlettermedia killed it. They were YouTubers before there was even any money in it. They even used to upload most of their videos to their own website because monetization wasn't even a thing yet and videos had 10 minute time limits on YouTube. Know your facts you retarded nigger.

>>213431395
I wish that I could just WISH away my feelings about the prequels. No wait. I don't. I love how much I hate them. Thanks for refilling my dark side fuel you stupid Lucas simps. You'll never be able o unsee George as Boss Nass anymore.

>>213431362
You mouse shills are something else. Nobody believes you, you realize this right? You are a tranny or they/them freak that defends the sequel trilogy because you are a leftist. It's very simple. You think that liking those movies is morally right or something. You eat literal shit to own the chuds. Including believing that dogshit like the force awakens stands on it's own feet next to anything that Lucas has done.

>>213431390
>resisting the dark side takes courage
Ray was never tested or given a single trial the whole trilogy. She was a mary sue from the start until finish. Never a single hardship that obi-wan or luke skywalker faced when confronted by temptation of the dark side.

>>213431475
Thanks for the peek inside your own deranged mind. I'm just obsessed with movies which is why I'm on this board and the prequels are WITHOUT A DOUBT some of the WORST movies I've ever seen. They shit upon some of the greatest movies I've ever seen, the OT, in a way that makes me think Lucas actively hated those movies and wanted to ruin them as much as possible.
>LUCAS LUCAS LUCAS LUCAS LUCAS LUCAS LUCAS LUCAS LUCAS
This is you

>>213431395
The sequel movies make an impression that they were written in a series of corporate meetings where they brainstormed stuff to get creative decisions like "wait but what if we have a death star but now its an entire planet and it shoots even harder?", "wait but what if she rams the ship in hyperdpace?", this may work for superhero marvel slop but it does not for star wars.
>>213431415
Cringe, you overplay it.

>>213431532
That's fine you can believe prequels are bad but the sequels are still objectively worse. But I realize you probably failed your English class so you wouldn't know what a good story is if it hit you in the face.

Disney:
>This franchise has people who like it, let's try to make some movies that they'll like. Oh shucks sorry we messed up.
Lucas:
>Those bastard fans didn't like my Special Editions, I'm going to drag their favorite characters through the mud and make them all look like retards

And yet somehow the vitriolic hatred you have is directed towards Disney. It's truly mystifying.

>>213430151 (OP)
I moved in with my gf last week
I had to leave my ps5 behind because she does not like it when I game and now I can't watch the shows I like
She does not like Star Wars Dexter Foundation Superman etc
I don't know what to do if I break up I'm basically homeless because I moved out my old apprtment to live with her
But not beeing able to watch and do the things I like is terrible and time moves very slow
We are now living together for one week and I already hate it
We been dating for 2.5 years and felt we were ready to take it to the next level but fuck this
This is not how I want to spend my life
I have not watched tv shows and movies that I wanted to watch since moving in
I made a terrible mistake moving in with her I should have never left my own place

Why do people keep responding to low quality bait?

>>213430332
it's more like they use him to salvage trash and it rarely works

>>213431567
TFA objectively made more money than any of the prequels. Objectively objectively objectively. You faggots on here LOVE that word when describing art, which is subjective. It's truly astounding to witness.

>>213431606
Money and box office doesn't mean good. Get that through your brain. Because something sold tickets doesn't mean it's good.

>>213431575
> let's try to make some movies that they'll like. Oh shucks sorry we messed up.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
i remember online shilling blaming the flops for toxic masculinity and saying that's a good thing anyway

Matt Smith should be cast as The Maker for Marvel.
He's got the tall and lanky look that Reed Richards needs to have and has the presence to play a good villain, Pascal is shorter than all of his costars in the new movie and played Reed like a pussy the whole movie.

>>213431606
If i meet you in person i would have beaten you

>>213430332
>undercover operator they bring in to kill a franchise
Can't kill what's already dead.

>>213431575
All of Lucas' movies are good and all of Disney's movies are bad. It's very simple. Lucas' movies are so good they keep releasing them again and again in the movie theaters. No other movies get this kind of treatment. Nobody will ever watch the sequels again in the movies. LMAO you are such a loser.

>>213431630
Tell it to the prequelfags who went apeshit because ROTS made the MOST MONEYZ EVER as a rereleased film. They are so embarrassing. They make me embarrassed to be a human being.

Just for shits and giggles I decided to look up the tomatometer despite hating Rotten Tomatoes, and TFA still has a higher score than all of the prequels. It has a higher fan score as well. So let's see, it made more money, was more popular with both critics and fans.

But I guess it didn't have the STORY of a BOY BECOMING A CHILD MURDERER so that makes it bad. Story story story Lucas Lucas Lucas objective objective objective. By every objective metric TFA was better objectively than ROTS, the highest rated of the prequels. Disney OBJECTIVELY made a better Star Wars film than Lucas did. Objectively. Now kindly shut the fuck up and quit responding to my bait you stupid Lucas faggot.

>>213431666
Good morning SAAR

>>213430202
HOLY BASED

>>213431728
There is nothing lower than a lifeform shilling for disney like yourself. You are so pathetic.

>>213430709
>They hadn’t made a movie in 10 years when TFA came out and everyone went to see it.

That's because there wasn't 10 years filled with girl boss garbage, beta male cancer, and the destruction of the original characters that everybody loved before the sequel slop was made.

>>213431683
See for reference:
>>213431728

You are wrong on every possible level. Your own delusional Lucas loving brain might allow you to SUBJECTIVELY PREFER the prequels but you can't claim they are objectively better. Not according to any known metric.

>>213430332
Ironically he would save Doctor Who.

>>213431762
I'd argue that Darth Vader got raped harder in the prequels than Chef did on South Park.

>>213431760
Ah now let's resort to calling me a shill after you got BTFO. TFA was more successful AND more popular, OBJECTIVELY, so I assume on average audiences LIKED the story as well. So we can't say it didn't have a story. What's left. Oh, anyone arguing basic facts must be a tranny leftist Disney shill. I am none of those things. I am based and have a bigger dick than you. I have gotten laid more than you. I have never voted for a Democrat in my life. I think trannies are disgusting.

>>213431771
Disney movies are objectively bad because they are just regurgitated imitations, like Chinese product knock offs. On top of that they are woke. By every single literary metric they are bad. You just have shit subjective opinions.

Thanks for the laughs, chumps. Prequels eternally worst Star Wars possible. Objectively. I could take a shit and call it a star wars movie and it would still be better than the prequels. Later faggots.

>>213431825
You sound like a trannie and you don't have an ounce of testosterone or warm blood din your veins if you enjoy Disney star wars, I'm sorry. But that's the most faggot thing you could like. Even Trump would agree star wars has gone to shit.

>>213431825
Are you ready to fight irl one on one for you wrlng opinion? you a weak cunt or woman, i would beat you

>>213431846
Chicken

>>213431846
go dilate your asshole faggot

>>213430151 (OP)
he is evil because he has no eyebrows

>>213430151 (OP)
shid, sounds kino. too bad about the ‘protecting le kid’ story

>>213430193
it's pretty obviously RYAN GOSLING:STAR STARFIGHTER WARS shit for brains

looking at bogsling gives me extreme angst

Mouse shills are pathetic

>>213430151 (OP)
>The film is set 5 years after the events of Star Wars: Episode IX — The Rise of Skywalker
Would it make any difference if you just said "25 years" or whatever after Return of the Jedi? Did any event of note happen in the sequels?