← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 213474778

15 posts 2 images /tv/
Anonymous No.213474778 >>213474820 >>213474858 >>213474905
The Lord of the Rings trilogy is over 20 years old, can it be considered vintage?
Anonymous No.213474810
Please let Jackson die soon so we can have a faithful remaster for the 25th anniversary
Anonymous No.213474820
>>213474778 (OP)
Two towers is the best one
Anonymous No.213474858 >>213474927 >>213477230
>>213474778 (OP)
Is a 20 year old person considered vintage?
Anonymous No.213474905 >>213475547
>>213474778 (OP)
Movies from early 2000s to today are pretty uniform stylistically so no.
Anonymous No.213474927
>>213474858
Yes, unc. Time to hang up your sneakers and start dressing your age.
Anonymous No.213475547
>>213474905
except 2000s movies were whiter and had prettier girls
Anonymous No.213475590 >>213475636 >>213475816
it honestly isn't that good after the first movie
Anonymous No.213475636 >>213475652
>>213475590
they're all good but each movie is noticeably worse than the last
FOTR - 10/10
TT - 8/10
ROTK - 6/10
Anonymous No.213475652
>>213475636
swap your scores for TT and RotK and you're on track
Anonymous No.213475737 >>213476441
>zoomers think the 2000s are retro now
Anonymous No.213475816
>>213475590
Could say the same about the first movie. First 30 minutes is kino
Anonymous No.213475864
>dude time moves forward!!
Anonymous No.213476441
>>213475737
the 80s were retro in the 2000s and the 90s were retro in the 2010s
the 2000s should be retro by now
Anonymous No.213477230
>>213474858
A 20 year old person wasn't interesting or fun to hang out with 20 years earlier.