Thread 213488227

Is it actually neutral or biased?

>>213488227 (OP)
Whatever your political leanings, the film offers a look at a scientist who has made sacrifices fighting for the public good.

>What does it mean, 'ecstatic truth?' And what constitutes as mere fact, which is the truth of accountance. We shouldn't dismiss the power of facts, because–as one of the lessons says–facts create norms, including ethical norms. When you see, for example: footage shot in concentration camps, right after they were liberated. It is 'fact, fact, fact,' and nothing but that. And it has such an immense power, that it creates norms of moral behavior. So we should not dismiss that; it's not the end of it. It's not what can be reached in cinema. There are deeper strata of truth. And you have to be inventive, and you have to fabricate, and you have to stylize. And you have to try to catch this elusive magic, of images. And, if we don't have these images–if we don't develop an adequate language of images–our civilization will die out, like the dinosaurs.
>Werner Herzog
TL;DR - neither

Remember how fucking crazy this period was?

>>213488243
Jennifer Connelly was the one that sacrificed, but I appreciate his enthusiasm.

>>213488307
It was real life kino and we’ll never get it back.

>>213488307
I miss that window of time where it felt like every retarded conspiracy about Bill Gates and the Clintons was actually true and we'd all have to unite to shoot down the UNATCO black helicopters

>>213488227 (OP)
Imagine if trump won 2020. The vaccine discourse would be bizarro world.

>>213488243
The movie should be entitled, FRAUD.

>>213489840
Trump turned against Fauci in midterm >>>/pol/lefty

>>213488409
>we’ll never get it back.
Oh, buddy...