>>213512500 (OP)I've never seen Waterworld, is this true?
Waterworld (1995) got panned for a mix of behind-the-scenes baggage, storytelling issues, and audience expectations gone wrong, not because itโs truly one of the worst movies ever (it actually has a cult following now), but because of the context around its release.
Hereโs the breakdown:
1. The โMost Expensive Movie Ever Madeโ Curse
At the time, Waterworld had a budget reported around $175 million (huge for the mid-90s) and earned a reputation in the press as a โproduction disaster.โ
Hurricane damage, sinking sets, cast injuries, and constant rewrites all became public knowledge before the film came out.
By the time audiences saw it, they were primed to expect a bloated flop.
2. Weak Script and Thin Characters
Critics said the plot was basically Mad Max on water without the same tight pacing or compelling characters.
Kevin Costnerโs Mariner was called too stoic and uncharismatic, and the emotional stakes often felt flat.
Dialogue was often clunky, with exposition-heavy lines that didnโt match the movieโs gritty tone.
3. Tonally Uneven
It tried to be both a gritty post-apocalyptic action movie and a lighthearted, almost swashbuckling adventure.
Dennis Hopperโs over-the-top villain performance clashed with the otherwise serious, dour tone.
4. Pacing & Editing
The middle act was criticized for dragging, with long stretches of wandering before getting back to action.
Some critics felt the payoff wasnโt worth the build-up.
5. Overhype vs. Delivery
The marketing leaned heavily on spectacle, giant floating sets, stunts, massive action scenes, but the final film while visually impressive, didnโt feel groundbreaking in story or emotion.
Coming off Dances with Wolves and Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, audiences expected Costnerโs next big film to be another classic, not a mixed-bag sci-fi experiment.