>>213526987
>>213527865
Guess it is time for the FAQ
>Isn't this a show about incels?
No, chud. The topic of incels is brought up twice, only to be dismissed each time, as the kid (1) is 13 years old and therefore clearly not an incel, and (2) does not agree with incel ideology or Andrew Tate.
>Isn't this show based on a black killer who Netflix then whitewashed?
No, chud. The show's creators have made it clear that Adolescence is not based on a single case, though it takes inspiration from a variety of such cases, one of which happens to involve a black killer (and black victim).
>Doesn't this show say that incels are the number one problem facing the UK?
No, chud, nothing of the sort is ever suggested in the show.
>Doesn't this show state that all white men are incels?
No, chud, this too is a chud delusion that has nothing to do with this show.
>Isn't this show literally state-funded propaganda?
No, chud, and it wasn't figuratively funded by the state either.
>Isn't the 4th episode a PSA about incels where the actors break the fourth wall and directly address the viewers?
No, chud, this is another lie spread by chuds that is easily disproven by just watching the show.
>Aren't the creators of this show jewish and trans?
No, chud, they are not.
>If this isn't a show about incels, then why does the media say it is?
Because the media tends to sensationalize and lie in order to attract more clicks, especially from people who easily fall for ragebait (such as incels)
