Thread 213552029

I like the idea of Good Boy, a new horror film about a dog witnessing its owners being haunted by supernatural forces, but I can’t help feeling that like with Weapons, it’s going to be underwhelming, and most of the effort has gone into hyping up the concept so casual viewers will go see it because everyone has the atention span of a goldfish now.

It could be decent horror slop, I like to watch that every once in a while

I will watch it because apparently it used a real dog and not some unholy CG abomination

>>213552029 (OP)
If the dog dies I won't watch. Simple as. I love me doggos

>>213552118
All dogs dies

Is the dog the monster or the protagonist?

>>213552155
Protagonist

>>213552029 (OP)
SHLOP SHLOP SHLOP

>>213552138
:(

We all do anon, we all do....shitty life

>>213552155
he's the top dog

>>213552138
me in the back doing a poo

>>213552170
good poster, treat

It probably won’t waste time with dialogue and just gets to the point. Needed in more movies

>>213552241
>won’t waste time with dialogue
There's nothing wrong with dialogue if its well-written and has intention. Joss Whedon sent the idnustry to a dark place.

>>213552187
based pooer

>>213552304
Show, don’t tell

>>213552138
Bit not all dogs truly live.
>>213552029 (OP)
Should have named the movie "Scare Bud".

>>213552029 (OP)
>everything has to be some clever gimmick now
Art thou implying a dog seeing their owners being haunted is a novel concept?

damn a dog centered horror movie? what a novel concept

>>213552506
>Tries to be clever
>Reveals himself to be a retard
The novel concept is the movie is told from the POV of the dog not a horror film with a dog

>>213552029 (OP)
oh yeah, that is a real problem OP. might as well kill yourselfs I guess

>>213552763
Okay, the real worst thing about the internet is how humanity is being collectively manipulated by a few psychopathic oligarchs designing algorithms to keep us passive while they buy up all the land and natural resources.

Is there a trailer for this yet or just ai jeet slop?

>>213552029 (OP)
They are just Reddit concept movies with nothing else going on. Like Death of a Unicorn, absolutely nothing beyond killer unicorns.

>>213552849
When did this site become so passively liberal? You are ineffectual and passive because most people are ineffectual and passive, and you’re not any better than most people.

I LIKE having endless access to free porn and cheap entertainment bc im not indescribably gay. Maybe cope about oligarchs more bc you’re too busy gooning to anime games to write your screenplay.

>>213554413
In b4 im not liberal bc im scared of black people

>>213552029 (OP)
It's not a gimmick, its just a ripoff of Courage the Cowardly Dog

>>213552029 (OP)
>it’s going to be underwhelming, and most of the effort has gone into hyping up the concept

Isn't that what horror is in general? Overwhelming majority of them stand on premise instead of execution, because filmmakers see the as entry level popcorn genre?
When was the last time horror movie was created with craft and filmmaking skill? 80s?

>>213552099
And with that I am sold.

>>213552138
I miss my friend.

>>213552304
>Joss Whedon sent the idnustry to a dark place.
Wrong, it was Gunn trying to emulate Whedon.

>>213552506
>what a novel concept
>posts 50 years old movie where dog is just a monster

>>213554413
What about that statement is liberal, most of those oligarchs are fucking jews(Zuckerberg, Altman, Ellison)

>>213552118
He doesn't die, he's been dead all the time

>>213554593
>What about that statement is liberal
Seething about hecking being genocided by billionairinos out of fucking nowhere in a horror movie thread on television board.

>>213554634
It was a flippant response to a guy who said that it wasn't a real problem when I was complaining about a trend in the film industry. The joke was that he had escalated it to much higher stakes

>>213554629
He was Zoltan Hound of Dracula all along and the ghost was haunting HIM because it was one of his many victims.
Shalamalongdingdong TWEEST!!!

>>213552187
perro caca

>>213552138
>Hey, what if we did this for people and attached microtransactions to it?

>>213552099
poor dog has to work for the tribe

>>213554413
Yeah enjoy your empty hedonism when you could be paying taxes to Israel.

>>213555182
Yeah I enjoy paying taxes to bomb palestine to make you shriek in impotent anger.

>>213554593
Simply means i should have said in b4 afraid of jew instead of afraid of black people

Also the central conceit of OP is wrong, if anything we get a smaller proportion of ‘gimmick’ movies being made because big blockbusters are almost never gimmick movies, they’re capeshit

Also oligarchs don’t make you do anything you don’t want to, besides Altman making you obsolete which was always literally inevitable (or the alternative is necessarily equally dystopian) so pls just get over that tbqh

>gimmick movies are new
You must have missed the trend in the 90s where everyone went to New York or the 80s when everything had THE MOVIE

>>213552029 (OP)
Weird that it isn't a pitbull.

>HURR DURR WHY DON'T THEY MAKE ORIGINAL MOVIES? EVERYTHING HAS BEEN DONE ALREADY

*they make something original*

>HURR DURR WHY DID THEY MAKE SOMETHING ORIGINAL??????

>>213552138
>NO YOU DONT UNDERSTAND THE PUPPERINO LOVES ME LIKE A PERSON.. NO, BETTER THAN ANY HUMAN COULD LOVE ME
dogkeks, when will they learn

>>213552029 (OP)
Will be a better horror movie than "Mans best friend"?

That concept is fun. Fuck you, OP.

>>213557511
Nobody loves you so how can you know?

>>213557617
unholy projection kek

>>213557563
I don't disagree, I just worry they won't properly execute on it and will instead focus more on trailer-worthy moments to sell the movie e.g. like Weapons

should I watch that bear movie? it was called cocaine bear or something

>>213558850
Cocaine bear was retarded

>>213552029 (OP)
I just like duck tolling retrievers

>>213558850
It sounded good, it wasn’t good. Made by a woman who made Wonder Woman 1984 and now her career is completely done.

>>213559038
They've got soft as fuck coats. Based choice of breed

>>213552029 (OP)
what was underwhelming about weapons for you? I liked how it was about processing grief, that the pain never really goes away.

>>213559123
>what was underwhelming about weapons for you? I liked how it was about processing grief, that the pain never really goes away
In all seriousness I just thing it didn't really go that deep on any thing and was mostly entertainment. Tons of red herringabthat went nowhere

>>213554413
It's not, 4chan was always a meeting place from all sides of the political spectrum. The left is just super vocal now because the shill campaigns specifically target this place to disrupt proper discussion and sharing of info + ideas. Go to a good thread on /pol/ (if they even still have any) and you know it's a good topic when it's 2-3 decent posts with 20 jeets/bots/liberals interrupting with memephrases between them. A small example would be that Anastasia thread on /tv/ the other day, random people interrupting discussion of the movie and history to try to sway sentiment.