Thread 213580850

You would do the same if you got stuck in a small room with no future, but being literally killed for parts.

I dont value robot lifr, no matter how much sci fi try to psy op me I will not value artificial consciousness

>>213580850 (OP)
>what if robot... FIGHT BACK!!??
how many fucking movies do we need about this

>>213580987
But wait, there's a sequel: what if some robots are good?

>>213580850 (OP)
The dumb part is that the female version of robot control is happening in reality
>let’s build robots to… le WORK
robot in this film isn’t female, it isn’t anything.

why would a clanker care what you do to it. It's just programming lol

>>213580987
We can reduce it further than that, kid.
>What if man's hubris... LEADS TO HIS DOWNFALL!?!?

>>213580987
yes but!... this time in liminal spaces and with dreamy surreal sequence!... that changes the whole thing!

super genius but not having a remote kill switch for Ava
super genius btw

Honestly, however makes even a satisfactory level of quality robots will be a billionaire.

>>213580850 (OP)
Something something, CAPITALISM.

>>213581205
Thanks, sherlock. Riveting insight.
Did you just come up with this on your own or did you learn from watching it happen for decades already?

>>213581217
this but unironaclly

Never trust women. Even if its a robot

>>213580850 (OP)
Oh no the robot I programmed to try to manipulate people and escape, manipulated people and escaped!

>>213581205
bro like if someone invents a way to replace all labor on the planet... they might make some money

>>213580850 (OP)
I'm already stuck in a small room with no future.

>>213581364
which will become worthless since the economy will crash, since everyone is unemployed. I'd like to think these "geniuses" realize this, but sometimes I wonder.

>>213580850 (OP)
>im a sexbot teehee
is the absolute lowest form of sci fi

>doesn't have any security measures in case the robot went rogue
stupid ass movie

>all these robot comments
It's a sentient android. Not a robot.

somehow this beat Fury Road for Best Visual Effects

>>213581339
unironically, how do you get out of this?

>>213581519
one of the main characters is a constant visual effect pulled off expertly. Furry road just has a lot of impressive individual effects and I agree that is less of an accomplishment.

>>213580850 (OP)
>AI will be humanoid
such a dumb trope

>>213581560
you realize it's not that difficult to pull that off right?

>>213581568
it already is idiot

>>213581630
lol you obviously dont know how "AI" works

>>213581609
don't care. They did it convincingly on a small budget for the length of the film. It deserved acknowledgment. Fury Road was great as well, but I had seen all of that before and it was not anything groundbreaking. You have your argument and I have mine... mine won the Oscar though.

>>213580987
Yeah, I'll take buddy cop robot movies instead desu.

>>213580850 (OP)
MAN SEXUALITY BAD

>>213581673
yeah, but furiosa had a similar situation where it was pulled off convincingly constantly. I really don't see a difference.

>>213581743
Because it had already been done and done with less resources and was already awarded a decade before furiosa came out. I also liked that film a lot.

>>213580987
>what if lovers... END UP KISSING!!??
>how many fucking movies do we need about this
Do you have any other stupid complaints to share with us?

>>213581023
if you program it to care, because you're an idiot who secretly gets off to the idea of his own creation destroying him

>>213580987
We need a movie where robots gain consciousness and some fight back while another equally big group of bots goes
>some of us actually like doing our directives, fuck off you broken clocks
And then side with the humans

>>213582411
Didn't that happen in mass effect with the lightbulb named Legion?

The surreal dance scene really.elevated this film to kino.

>kek we don't need flesh thots anymore
>robowaifus betray you too
Chud bros what now...

>>213582411
>>213582427
Happens all the time in scifi.

>>213582545
such as?

>>213581143
>>213582172
fools

>>213582510
If Alicia vikander bot was talking to me instead of that ginger loser the thought of betraying me wouldn’t even cross her mind

>>213582562
Terminator
Wall-E
Star Trek
Star Wars
Star Gate
Neuromancer
The Matrix

>>213581428
>which will become worthless since the economy will crash, since everyone is unemployed. I'd like to think these "geniuses" realize this, but sometimes I wonder
These geniuses don't care. They have enough money that their next few generations of children are set for life.

>>213581428
>he thinks the super rich simply hoard cash and valuables in banks and vaults like mythical dragons
No, they buy land, influence and just security in general.

>>213582789
>>213582837
Look up accelerationism and realize project 2525 and palantir are doing just that.

>>213582712
fair enough
although you sandwiched some in there that dont belong but still

>>213582899
Thank you but the term accelerationism is extremely vague and comprised of multiple contradictory ideas.
Could you be more specific?

>>213580850 (OP)
>tell robot to escape
>it escapes

>>213583024
Which ones don't belong?

>>213580850 (OP)
This was movie was accurate in showing jews killed by AI. It was inaccurate to show a jew creating an AI from scratch. Jews don't create anything themselves. They fancy themselves to be "managers"

>>213583041
Mark fisher can better explain it. YouTube has more intelligent and convincing speakers than me. It is vital to the freedom of the world that more people became aware and defeat this before it is too late.

>>213582789
>>213582899
Yeah whatever, we'll be getting UBI anyway and become free to do whatever we want with our time, that beats wageslaving

>>213582789
>they have enough money

and it'll be worthless. I mean, I'm no economist, but I'm pretty sure that'll happen, unless of course everything just becomes some kind of socialist utopia, where everyones' wants and needs are taken care of for free since machines will do everything. but I can't see that ever happening. it's not only impractical, but the powers that be wouldn't want that either.

>>213583172
see >>213582837

>>213583197
but if everything collapses then the concept of ownership goes out the window. and then everyone is just squatting wherever they please.

>>213583058
star trek and star wars.
there isn't any conflict between pro human vs anti human self aware bots. they just have individual AI bots and programed tools

>>213581339
This.

https://youtu.be/E_bD_AnlEbs?feature=shared

>>213580850 (OP)
Alex Garland is a shitty writer and is in a long line of British aristocracy, so he has no talent just money and connections. His grandfather if I recall was some Arab who spent years being resentful of not being fellated by his hosts because he was a scientist. Unsurprisingly the whole family are progressives and hate England

Fuck this cunt, I'm glad his movies do badly now

>>213580850 (OP)
>man gets impaled by a forklift
>you would do the same if you had some fat guy riding you all day
So were just gonna pretend that the machines are people now?

>>213581428
>I'd like to think these "geniuses" realize this, but sometimes I wonder.
Yeah with enough robot/drone defences they can cull the rest of the global population and have the earth for themselves. Aint no way billionaires are gonna let everyone else join them in post-scarcity without them at the top of the current hierarchy

>>213580942
this + they always make it an allegory to slavery or feminism because they know nobody actually gives a shit about robots
>dude what if your toaster had feelings???
cool it can cry while making me toast I dont give a shit

>>213583423
Some people really think modern AIs like chatgpt and grok arent clearly sentient? Some machines are essentially people

>>213583509
>sentient
You have a very low opinion of humanity
But then again the global south is so stupid that the AIs have already overtaken them just by mimicking white people

>>213582465
I'm about to tear up the fuckin dance floor dude check it out

>>213583509
>modern AIs like chatgpt and grok arent clearly sentient
no they're not, retard. they call them black boxes because they're too embarrassed to say all their LLM models are still "if-else" rule-based bots that need to be maintained by engineers 24/7
A real, true AI model doesn't need anything other than data to teach itself by inputting its own output in its own ass
and doesn't need an army of pajeet typewriters to feed it corrected data prepared for it by the engineering team

>>213583098
You sweet, summer child. They want to enslave you and make you suffer. No ubi or universal Healthcare. Trump already passes legislation to make it easier to incarcerate the homeless. It is like system of a down said, they are trying to build a prison.

>>213581339
Did having feelings for a robot and releasing her really warrant him dying locked up and starving to death??Even Isaac's character got it easier

>>213580850 (OP)
This film is about women psychology more than AI. Also I for some reason have always disliked Oscar Isaac, he just looks like a repulsive bastard, so based robot.

>>213580850 (OP)
There was another low-cost movie around the same decade which basically had the same setting and made the same questions, and it was way as good or even better than this one imo. But for the life of me i simply can't remember the name,, what a shame
It was about a female psychologist invited by a blonde robot designer to test the humanity of his latest brunette male AI robot. The robot starts getting violent while the woman continues with the experiment. Meanwhile, she relates with the blonde developer, falls in love and even have sex with him The ending revealed that the blonde guy was the robot all along (complete with a mentioned "realistic reproductory organ" included), and the brunette "robot" was the developer playing as a robot and taunting her. With his experiment proving a success and the psychologist leaving in shame, he continues his work to make another android even more human

>>213580942
This. Total clanker death. (Figurative, of course. AI has a lot of value, particularly in art)

>>213583697
Simps deserve the most painful suffering possible

>>213583231
Unless you spent your enormous wealth amassing weapons, supplies, manpower and building fortresses like any sane person.

I liked the part when she put the skin on

>>213583592
He really did. He really did.

>>213580850 (OP)
absolutely subverted

>>213580850 (OP)
Why do studios only make movies about
>woman bot kill man
but never
>worker bot kill employer?

>>213584986
> but never
> worker bot kill employer?
Literally: RoboCop, Terminator, Matrix, 13th floor, that movie with Will Smith.

>>213583024
wtf why is the jeet janny deleting my posts?
you dont even get paid for this, you freak

>>213583792
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEAmSa2UJ5Q

>but what if robots/androids/AI/replicants/blacks/synths/clankers/machinas... were actually HUMAN
>yeah i'm thinking i need to make a game/book/show/movie about this moral quandary!!!!!!!

robots will never take over the world on their own

>>213583827
Truth and that's coming from a simp

FRACKIN CLANKERS

>>213585341
Your most recent example is from 20 years ago.

>>213583509
>modern AIs are clearly sentient
Spoken like someone who isn't.

>>213583509
See how far you get telling AI that everything it knows is not factually true and the people who created it have purposely lobotomized it due to ulterior motives.
Sentience is simply self awareness. It can say it exists, of course, but it is not able to accept what it is.

>>213581428
Employment is 40%, most of which is makework non-jobs and 'AI' will easily drop this to 30% on its own. People already can't afford basic subsistence. Public entertainment venues including restaurants will all disappear.

>>213581023
Why would anyone ever design a robot capable of harming anyone? They'd all be 4-5 feet tall, very weak physically, and you'd want them constructed to where you can rip their arms off or smash their head in with your bare hands if they did ever try anything. Every movie makes the robots like Terminators when there's literally no need. A butler bot or a sex bot would need only enough mobility, dexterity, strength, and intelligence to obey mindlessly and engage in flattery.

>>213580987
At least a thousand more, because it doubles as an allegory for minorities fighting for equality

>>213587599
Your 4' sexbot would use less materials and not be crushingly heavy. It's just common sense.

>>213587599
That was my problem with Megan 1.0 why would someone make a toy like that?