Thread 213634807

Why do most WW2 movies inaccurately portray german soldiers are not immediately surrendering?

>>213634807 (OP)
Nazis were cowardly trannies

>>213634807 (OP)
>action is over after the first 5 minutes of the movie
Riveting.

>How Israel Created the European Refugee Crisis

https://michaelpeinovich.substack.com/p/how-israel-created-the-european-refugee

its funny, ive read so much neo nazi discourse on this website, and you see them talk bout all this grand existential stuff, but the moment you ask "ok so what you doing about it? why arent your organizing? why arent you doing anything" the answer is always "well that would be dangerous, i could get in trouble with the law."

like these nazi niggas talk so ahrd bu in the end of the day they no deep down that their "cause" aint shit, they wouldnt dream of sticking their necks out for their billions must die nazi larm. its all preformative, or an expression of their repressed feelings

the only concrete truth is that none of it is real, none of it is actually worth fighting for IRL, its all talk, and nazis are nothing but a punch of impotent cucks living out their power fantasies online

why do WW2 movies portray jews as innocent darlings, and not blood drinking lunatics that ruin any nation they infest?

How'd that soul-selling thing work out for you, america and britain? You having fun watching your nations turn majority brown while your masters can freely genocide their enemies in front of the entire world without backlash?

>>213635296
Most neo-Nazis are kind of dumb.
>>213635280
This guys falls for cheap propaganda and cherrypicked news. They are all like this. They hate actual data and statistics.

>>213634807 (OP)
Morning, jew.

>>213635343
Then you should be able to refute his article easily and publish said refutation. Bet you won't.

>>213635372
What article? What is there to refute? A bunch of news that Israel and Israeli organizations take care of refugees?
Are there no refugees in Israel? Do they send all of them to Europe? Is there any evidence that Israel is responsible for the influx of refugees to Europe?

>>213634807 (OP)
Americans still need to pretend WW2 was hard and they actually needed to bomb all those kids in Dresden.

>>213635463
>What article?
The article at the address posted.
>What is there to refute?
The evidence presented by the article, that you call "cheap propaganda" and "cherrypicked news."
>Are there no refugees in Israel?
No, there aren't. The jewish state does not accept refugees.
>Do they send all of them to Europe?
Yes.
>Is there any evidence that Israel is responsible for the influx of refugees to Europe?
Yes. In the article.

>>213635463
>take care of refugees
Yeah, help them settle in europes social wellfare systems so they can act as an anchor for more

>>213635463
>https://michaelpeinovich.substack.com/p/how-israel-created-the-european-refugee
Or this one making a giant conspiracy of Israel planning to sent their Arabs to Germany when Germany actually needed a work force? Gastarbeiters not even mentioned?

>>213634807 (OP)
The nazis spent world war 2 kicking the shit out of everyone else before simply running out of petroleum - I’m not sure the schlock nose Hollywood producers are too interested in depicting that accurately for you

>>213635532
The Gastarbeiter program (which jews were also responsible for) has nothing to do with the 2015 refugee crisis.

>>213635508
>>Do they send all of them to Europe?
>Yes.

>In Israel, the number of illegal migrants is estimated to be around 30,000, primarily from Eritrea and Sudan. These individuals entered the country illegally, mainly through the Sinai Peninsula, and many claim asylum. However, Israeli authorities often view them as economic migrants.
Other websites show even a higher number. Also, 200,000 foreign workers.

>16,250 refugees - deal with UN
>Netanyahu said on his Facebook page that the deal would be re-examined. He had come under heavy criticism for the agreement by members of his coalition and citizens of a south Tel Aviv community where a large migrant community lives.
Apparently they weren't resettled.

>In 2018, Israel planned to resettle 16,250 refugees in Western countries, but this agreement was later canceled. The plan involved relocating African migrants to nations like Germany, Italy, and Canada. For each migrant resettled, Israel would grant temporary residence to another migrant within Israel. The plan faced significant public and political opposition, leading to its eventual cancellation.

>>213635667
Illegal migrants are not the same as refugees.

>>213635532
>Arab workers

Fuck of you lying piece of shit, we had Italian and Turkish "gastarbeiter" during the 60s and 70s, ever since we didn't have the economy to enhance the workforce, over 70% of the arab migrants end up on wellfare. They are a massive strain on our social systems, not even mentioning legal system where they are absurdly overrepresented in violent crimes.

>>213635594
That's great, but the link you posted talks about Israeli's plan to resettle their own Arabs in the 1960s. I couldn't be bothered to read further.

>In the first half of the 1960s, the Foreign Ministry continued to examine plans to encourage the emigration of Arab refugees from the Middle East to Europe, particularly to France and Germany. One option that was considered was to find them jobs in Germany, which was then in dire need of working hands. During 1962, Israeli officials examined the possibility of finding employment for Palestinian refugee laborers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The initial checks done for this plan, known as “Operation Worker,” and the correspondence involved, were kept completely under wraps.
What a conspiracy. Western countries need workers, Israeli wanted to get rid of Arabs. Truly a white genocide.

>>213635667
>SNIFF SNIFF SNIFF SNIFF SNIFF
>RUB RUB RUB RUB RUB

>>213635694
In Europe they pretty much are yes. Barely any of them got rights to seek asylum and they are legally required to go back.
Which of course gets sabotaged by NGOs, often financed by guys like George Soros.

>>213635696
>we had
Well, in the 60s you didn't have them yet. Israeli wanted to make a deal with you to give you their Arabs, you picked Turks instead and imported 800,000 of them in the next 10 years.

>>213634807 (OP)
Oh gee i sure do love me another thinly vieled nazi/jew/race thread.

>>213635710
I like how you just ignore the implications for the populations involved.

>>213635710
>I couldn't be bothered to read further.
Then I will do the same for your posts. If you think you can refute the article, go ahead and publish your refutation. You can even go on the author's podcast and debate him if you're brave enough.
>>213635719
>guys like George Soros.
i.e. jews.

>>213635734
Yes we didn't want to support your ethnic cleansing. Not to mention that smelly turks are still preferable to raping Arabs.

>common criminals stick their necks out for their money and power and regularly get killed for their organizations
>leftists stick their necks out organizing and engaging in activism/terrorism and even carry out revolutions and regularly got killed, imprisoned, or sent to gulags for their causes
>nazis when facing white genocide and complete domination by jews: naah i wont do any of that stuff, I could get in serious trouble!

what explains this mentality? is the white race just not worth risking your own comforts for?

>>213635751
If this guy manipulates already at the very start of his article then what's the point of reading further? He clearly has an anti-semitic agenda.

>>213635750
What implications?

>>213634807 (OP)
Look at all these fine aryan gentlemen lmao

Master race my ass

>>213635781
>But it demonstrates that foisting the Arabs on Europe as a form of racial revenge was on the minds of the Jews in Israel from the very beginning.
Why do you think I should take this guy seriously? Why are you people so gullible, lol?

>>213635778
>what explains this mentality?
Being underage

>>213635781
Oh I dunno, the implication of losing their land on one side and overall safety for the others? I can see how just deporting your ethnic conflict into the society of someone else seems like a fine idea, especially if you frame it right but you are still a piece of shit.

>>213635827
>Oh I dunno, the implication of losing their land on one side and overall safety for the others?
It was the 60s, why would anyone even think this? Again, Germans imported nearly a million Turks in the next 10 years anyway. And there were obviously also other gastarbeiters.

>>213635925
>It was the 60s, why would anyone even think this?
What are you actually trying to say here? Which part would be unthinkable in the 60s? They're both things that are clearly self-evident.

>>213635925
Do you even know what "Gast" means? In the 60s and 70s the German population was overall pretty critical of that program anyways but they were being promised that this was a temporary thing (which it generally was as far as the Greeks and Italians were concerned).
How on earth do you think you could have convinced them of just taking in palestinian Arabs ESPECIALLY in the 60s?
And yeah it would just have been ethnic displacement, something the Germans had experienced themselves just recently and would have never supported since it's a horrible thing to do to people.

>>213635995
He's just doing bad faith. He's already admitted to not reading the article, so there's no point in engaging him. He's just trying to waste your time because that's how these freaks get their kicks.

c'mon guys, let's just discuss movies. Has anyone watched pic related? It was made in 1940 but it's strikingly relevant in today's day and age

>>213635995
I'm asking how is this different from importing Turks?
Also, from the cited article:
>But both Foreign Minister Meir and her director general, Yahil, objected to these ideas. Meir was concerned that Germany would be flooded with Arab refugees, and, in any event, the whole scheme proved fruitless.

vs:

>This plan was eventually tabled since then Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier feared it could generate a huge backlash from the German people.
Doesn't mean the same. Also obviously their plan had nothing to do with some imagined racial revenge on Europeans as they also tried a similar deal with Iraq, which is mentioned in the same article.
It's pure pragmatism, meanwhile you present it as a conspiracy to destroy Europe. It's ridiculous.

Also, German backlash against Palestinians and Jews, but not Turks? Why exactly? Both are Middle Easterners, both are Muslims.

>>213636034
>Jud Sus