← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 213665476

24 posts 14 images /tv/
Anonymous No.213665476 >>213665709 >>213665772 >>213665967 >>213666067 >>213666070 >>213667332 >>213667372 >>213667690
Ron Howard Says ‘Solo’ Creative Clash Is ‘Still Just a Shame’
>Ron Howard opened up to Vulture in more detail than ever before about taking over the helm of the “Star Wars” prequel movie “Solo” after Lucasfilm and original directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller had creative differences. Howard said it all came down to the movie’s tone. Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy asked him to a lunch meeting, where they were joined by “Solo” co-writer Jonathan Kasdan.

>“They basically said, ‘We’ve reached a creative impasse with Lord and Miller. Would you ever consider coming in?'” Howard remembered. “I looked at some edited footage, and I saw what was bothering them. There was a studio that liked the script the way it was and wanted a ‘Star Wars’ movie, but there was a disconnect early on tonally, and they weren’t convinced that what Phil and Chris were doing was working effectively.”

>“I couldn’t judge that because I didn’t see enough of it to know. But they were sure,” Howard continued. “Once I said, ‘Okay, I think I can do this script, and I think I understand what you want of this script,’ they said, ‘We’d want to reshoot a lot.’ I looked at the whole movie and then pointed out some things that I thought were great. And Phil and Chris were incredibly gracious throughout that process. They were just seeing two different movies. So I came in, I had a blast, but there’s nothing personal about that film whatsoever. It’s still just a shame. I can’t wait for Phil and Chris’s next movie.”

>Howard even got the chance to consult with “Star Wars” creator George Lucas, who was not involved in the development or filming of “Solo.” Before Howard committed to taking over as “Solo” director, he got advice from Lucas. The creator told him, “Just don’t forget — it’s for 12-year-old boys.”
Anonymous No.213665709 >>213665957
>>213665476 (OP)
i thought this movie came out like 5-10 years ago already
Anonymous No.213665772 >>213665853 >>213665992 >>213666278
>>213665476 (OP)
>>It's for 12 year old boys
Anonymous No.213665793 >>213665821
Emilia was hot in it. That was all I needed.
Anonymous No.213665821
>>213665793
This. Solo was peak Star Wars. Much better that Communist One.
Anonymous No.213665853 >>213666002
>>213665772
Yes? This looks like power rangers
Anonymous No.213665957
>>213665709
I'm afraid it's been... 7 years.
Anonymous No.213665967 >>213666009 >>213666300
>>213665476 (OP)
I WONT HAVE THIS, YOU JANNIE FAGGOTS ARENT GONNA TRY AND TELL ME WE SECRETLY LIKED THIS OR SOME GROUP DID IT FAILED FOR A REASON

FUCK OFF AND FUCK YOUR ARTICLES
Anonymous No.213665992
>>213665772
>bloodless, clean, blink and you miss it fast, don't even see the actual human head - just a helmet flying off
Yep, it's for 12 years olds. It's cartoon violence. This isn't an ISIS video.
Anonymous No.213666002
>>213665853
Yes, I remember death and dismemberment in my Power Rangers shows.
Anonymous No.213666009
>>213665967
Anonymous No.213666041
solo movie should've copied more from the han solo books, i do like the idea of woody harelson being han's mentor and a total asshole criminal, i kinda like how they did his "shoot first" moments
Anonymous No.213666067
>>213665476 (OP)
>“Just don’t forget — it’s for 12-year-old boys.”

Well George should have taken his own advice before he made Phantom Menace, a film for 5-year-olds.
Anonymous No.213666070
>>213665476 (OP)
I honestly thought he did a good job with Solo. At the very least I enjoyed it more than TLJ or RoS, or maybe it would be better to just say I enjoyed it instead of hated it.
Anonymous No.213666278 >>213667749
>>213665772
Wait, are you implying 12 year old boys wouldn't think that was the coolest shit ever?
Anonymous No.213666300
>>213665967
It was an okay movie. It didn't deserve most of it's hate. It just came out at a bad time where star wars was getting a lot of negative attention.
Anonymous No.213666697
HAN WHAT
Anonymous No.213667332 >>213667403
>>213665476 (OP)
I enjoy this movie for what it is, and so should you.
The only bad part was
>Who are your people?
Anonymous No.213667363
I'm almost done playing fallen order and I've come to the same conclusion that I did in the '00s. Star Wars is a great video game series with okay film adaptations.
Anonymous No.213667372
>>213665476 (OP)
Havent watched it and never will. Dont care.
Anonymous No.213667403 >>213667589
>>213667332
It was also too dark, couldn't see shit, looked like ass. Not as bad as something like AvP Requiem, but it's up there.
Anonymous No.213667589
>>213667403
Any special part that made you feel that way? The only part that was dark or hard to see for me was when they were in an imperial battle, on the frontline, and I guess that was intentional.
Anonymous No.213667690
>>213665476 (OP)
It's actually amazing how Star Wars is firmly and thoroughly in the ground now. And it's been what? A little over a decade since Lucas signed that contract with begging eyes. You used to see children with Star Wars shirts and toys and now the biggest film franchise in American history gives you a bad taste in your mouth.
Anonymous No.213667749
>>213666278
I am not implying but directly stating that.
when I was 12 I was watching Predator not this shit.