Anonymous
8/17/2025, 9:09:26 PM
No.213767241
>>213767322
>>213767853
>>213767922
>>213768016
>>213768055
>>213768092
>>213768151
>>213768153
>>213768619
>>213768659
>>213768771
Waterworld retarded edit that that broke the story
In *Waterworld*, Enola's tattoo contains Chinese coordinates (27Β°59'N, 86Β°56'E) pointing to Mount Everest. Director Kevin Reynolds planned the film to end with the discovery of a survey plaque revealing that "Dryland" was actually the peak of Mount Everest; the world's highest point and last refuge from rising seas.
Kevin Costner fired Reynolds and re-edited the film, cutting this crucial 10-second scene entirely.
Without the reveal, the story's central mystery goes unanswered. For Chinese-speaking audiences, it was even worse... they could read the coordinates from the beginning and spent the entire film waiting for a payoff that never came.
Why would Costner destroy his own story? Removing this scene was like cutting the Statue of Liberty reveal from "Planet of the Apes" ... it eliminated the moment that gives the entire plot meaning.
Was this pure ego? Did firing the director and dismantling his vision matter more than making a coherent film?
Did no one in post-production speak up? How did such obvious narrative vandalism make it to theaters?
Keeping the scene would have cost nothing. Costner actively chose to break his movie for reasons that remain inexplicable 3 decades later.
Kevin Costner fired Reynolds and re-edited the film, cutting this crucial 10-second scene entirely.
Without the reveal, the story's central mystery goes unanswered. For Chinese-speaking audiences, it was even worse... they could read the coordinates from the beginning and spent the entire film waiting for a payoff that never came.
Why would Costner destroy his own story? Removing this scene was like cutting the Statue of Liberty reveal from "Planet of the Apes" ... it eliminated the moment that gives the entire plot meaning.
Was this pure ego? Did firing the director and dismantling his vision matter more than making a coherent film?
Did no one in post-production speak up? How did such obvious narrative vandalism make it to theaters?
Keeping the scene would have cost nothing. Costner actively chose to break his movie for reasons that remain inexplicable 3 decades later.