>>213822404
We're working with different definitions for all these terms it seems, and/or you are getting too hung up in semantics to understand the actual underlying belief. Which if correct, is the only thing stupid here.
So putting aside these specific terms and labels, my position is that at the present moment I don't see any evidence for the existence of god and therefore I live in accordance with that, meaning that there is likely no such thing as god. But I don't know for certain, therefore I concede that god might exist. It doesn't mean that I'm conceding that god DOES exist, it means that it COULD, and it also could NOT. It's just that there is no strong enough reasoning or evidence for either that I've come across. So what is the term for this? Agnosticism? The only two choices given in the original post I replied to only mentioned agnostic theist and agnostic atheist, so I chose the one that most closely represented what I thought. I looked up the definition for both. According to wikipedia: 'An agnostic theist is someone who believes in the existence of one or more gods but considers the basis for this belief to be unknown or unknowable'. So going by this definition, I don't believe in any god, therefore I'm not agnostic theist. For the definition for the other term, according to wikipedia - 'An agnostic atheist is someone who does not believe in the existence of any deity (atheism) but also claims that the existence of a divine entity is either unknowable or currently unknown (agnosticism)'. This does match up to my position.
Agnostic atheist, as oxymoronic that term might be, does more closely represent the actual underlying position I hold.