"It would be extreamly painful... for you"
That's what he meant.
Anonymous
8/19/2025, 11:40:08 PM
No.213829697
Then why the rising inflection? You're not considering the tone of his delivery. It's not "FOR you", as if he had simply been interrupted. It's "for YOU". In your interpretation he's making a statement, not a question. Therefore it can only be that he's replying to Shansha with a completely separate clause.
Anonymous
8/19/2025, 11:41:33 PM
No.213829727
>>213830090
>>213829523 (OP)
that's what the writer meant, yes. but that's not what bane wound up saying.
Anonymous
8/19/2025, 11:56:26 PM
No.213830066
He clearly said "for you" in response to the statement "you're a big guy"
Anonymous
8/19/2025, 11:57:22 PM
No.213830090
>>213829727
I'm a big guy ....for you is a much better and wittier line. We j oke about it but it's a damn good line.
Anonymous
8/19/2025, 11:58:38 PM
No.213830119
>>213829523 (OP)
"extreamly" is not a real word.
Anonymous
8/20/2025, 12:05:45 AM
No.213830294
>>213830373
>>213829523 (OP)
the most media-literate scholars have studied this scene and come to the conclusion that, in fact, bane was a big guy for him
Anonymous
8/20/2025, 12:08:39 AM
No.213830373
>>213830294
you literally cannot argue with the most media literate scholars
Anonymous
8/20/2025, 12:10:38 AM
No.213830431
>>213829523 (OP)
For WHO?
LEX TOOK THE COOKIES FROM THE COOKIE JAR
