>>213876536
>>213876601
Most of these episodes suck, by the way.
Please don't listen to the "early TNG is good and like TOS anon", he's woefully incorrect. While it's true that early TNG retains the camp and costume sensibilities of 1960s Star Trek in part, it also leaves its most important quality behind: great writing.
There is not a single great episode in Season 1 and Season 2 only has Measure of a Man (which is filled with plot holes and logical fallacies but if you squint a little, it's a worthy successor to TOS).
Compare that to Season 1 of TOS which is just banger after banger after banger of incredibly snappy, well-written episodes, each with something to say. And it carries right on in through the first half of Season 2.
TNG S1-S2 is far, far worse than TOS S1-S2 which might be the best Trek run ever.
You should still watch early TNG. You MUST watch early TNG for the introduction of the characters, etc, but you should lower those expectations mightily from your TOS experience.