Ok, throw me some numbers.

>ITWAS CHOO??
i dont understand, who is this strangely named character?

>>213874942 (OP)
*makes a spreadsheet in your path*

what the fuck were they thinking

>>213874942 (OP)
lmao which studio exec thought this would be a good concept for a full-length film? I bet whoever thought this up is getting relentlessly mocked behind their back by every single person they work with.

Then again, toxic positivity is a huge problem in Hollywood. There's an equally good chance that everyone who worked on the film is an idiot yes-man and they're all patting themselves on the back and refusing to admit this is one of the worst movies ever made.

did anyone watch it

>>213876643
Movies are for nerds.

>>213875817
It's a common korean name you bitch bastard

>>213876643
all i have seen so far are webms and the honest trailer on youtube but i still do want to watch this stinky pile of shit lol

Ever since watching this movie, i've been looking at data in a whole new way

>>213876643
Yeah, I watched it because the film review podcast I listen to was doing an episode about it, it's as bad or worse than you've heard. The only thing that stops it being completely unwatchable is that it's so bad it's actually hilarious.

>>213877078
Me too kek
I love the internet because I can ID garbage like this immediately and have fun hatewatching it with the lads

>>213874942 (OP)
>Ok, throw me some numbers.
check these

https://youtu.be/3lgJNBps0EY?si=0zA9mfkVx4Fchufh

this is so fucking funny

>>213874942 (OP)
Kino of the decade.

>>213874942 (OP)
Oral cumshot? Yeah that figures

>*some alien shit happens on a screen*
>"GOD DAMN!!!"

>>213879227
Is this the hacker known as 4chan?

>>213876643
Yes. I went into it expecting to laugh at how bad it is, but it's actually not that bad. It's pretty fun. Definitely better than the other two "at a computer the whole time" movies (missing, searching)

>>213875898
>trace the signal

>>213874942 (OP)
Does he need money or something?
Why would anyone "star" in this.

>>213876643
I was doomscrolling amazon video and it popped up. I just wanted to see if there would be anything interesting to put on in the background and maybe catch my interest. After 5 minutes I realize the whole screenshare/webcam thing wasn't just an opening scene and it was the whole fucking movie so I turned it off.

>>213879435
>Definitely better than the other two "at a computer the whole time" movies (missing, searching)
Nobody could possibly believe this

NUMBERS
NUMBERS
NUMBERS NUMBERS

>>213876643
I don’t watch movies

Six million
1488
69
420
1337
9001

>>213879621
80085

>>213876643
Yeah. It's definitely bad, but somehow not nearly as bad as I was expecting from the hype. The clips you've seen are pretty much the funniest parts, with long stretches of nothing interesting between them.
I wouldn't really recommend watching it for entertainment, but I do have to admit the time I spent watching it flew by, so I must have enjoyed it more than I realize. It just wasn't as "so bad it's good" as I was led to believe.

>>213879484
I'm sure the pitch sounded revolutionary in a misguided way that only people outside of the industry could have gleaned. "The whole thing takes place on a computer screen!" is something only an ideas guy could think sounds good, and not what any sane audience would ask for. I'm also reasonably sure this wasn't originally going to be a War of the Worlds movie, but that they tacked the name on at the end to try and salvage what was clearly a mess at the end of the day. This wouldn't have even registered with the population without the name.

however deep my racism gets over time I will never bring myself to hate Cube or any of the trash he makes

It's (mostly) unintentionally very funny and a fun watch with friends. I can see it being a cult film in time.

>people get obliterated by alien spaceships
>"Damn..."

>>213876643
I work remote so I’m on MS teams all day. I had to turn it off after 15 minutes because it just reminded me of being at work. I unironically think this was made to launder money.

>>213875898
that isn't what metadata is