← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 213890242

71 posts 12 images /tv/
Anonymous No.213890242 >>213890306 >>213890653 >>213891134 >>213891193 >>213891216 >>213892293 >>213892351 >>213892890 >>213892953 >>213894144 >>213895537 >>213895666 >>213895680 >>213896620 >>213897612 >>213899268 >>213899401 >>213899491 >>213900902 >>213904204 >>213904499 >>213904837 >>213904926
Uhm, so why was this scene in the film?
Anonymous No.213890306 >>213891424 >>213904175 >>213904683
>>213890242 (OP)
Wasn't this about a real thing?
Like some guy dresses as a dog and gives blowjob to the other dude?
Or that was just a dream?
Anonymous No.213890653 >>213891094 >>213891168 >>213891215
>>213890242 (OP)
Because this film is hacky and overrated. You could just as easily point to the room with all the spoopy scary skeletons and ask "what's the deal with that?" There is no deal, because by the end of the film, The Shining is really just another haunted house film. Man in bear suit giving a blowjob is weird, so let's put it in. No underlying meaning, let's just throw in some weird shit to get retards to spend years looking for the significance when there never was any.
Anonymous No.213890863 >>213893022 >>213893074 >>213895932
It's a reference to a more fleshed out scene in the book where they guy in the dog costume is basically the other guy's gay sub who does whatever he's told but basically its just supposed to show the sordid history of the hotel bleeding though into the present
Anonymous No.213890961 >>213891065 >>213903532
>A scary image in a scary movie.. what could this possibly mean?
Anonymous No.213891065
>>213890961
Is he okay? What's wrong with his eyes?
Anonymous No.213891094 >>213891197 >>213891245 >>213893027
>>213890653
Stanley Kubrick was autistic and obsessive. There's photos of him walking around the set for that movie turning cans and moving chairs and shit until the background satisfied his autism. You can still call it bad, but Kubrick absolutely didn't do anything arbitrary. Part of what made me fall out of love with his movies is the fact that he was all intellect and no intuition. His movies are very sterile.
Anonymous No.213891105
do you think the actor on the right is embarrassed about his role in this scene, it seems like a shameful role to take
Anonymous No.213891134 >>213891253
>>213890242 (OP)
a lot of evil things happened in that hotel over the years, including homosexuality
Anonymous No.213891168 >>213891212
>>213890653
it seems like youโ€™ve confused stanley kubrick for david lynch. kubrick deliberately put stuff like this into his movies because they have subtextual meaning. lynch was the guy who did le epic random โ€œitโ€™s a dream bro it doesnโ€™t need to make senseโ€.
Anonymous No.213891193
>>213890242 (OP)
I hate when people who never read the book bring this up
Anonymous No.213891197 >>213891770 >>213892016 >>213895382
>>213891094
>all intellect no intuition

Very sterile critique. Just because his intuitions are not your intuitions doesn't mean they aren't there.
Anonymous No.213891212 >>213891345
>>213891168
>my slop is better than your slop
Anonymous No.213891215
>>213890653
Actually, it's a masterpiece.
Anonymous No.213891216
>>213890242 (OP)
It's a metaphor for infra-familial sexual abuse
Anonymous No.213891245 >>213892016
>>213891094
His movies are unlike any others. His autism had no limits. 2001 still looks fantastic
Anonymous No.213891253 >>213893881
>>213891134
Not just homosexuality, but pedophilia as well
Anonymous No.213891345
>>213891212
>my buzzword le buzzword le heckin weckin buzzworderino
go outside
get better taste
take a shower
and dial 8
Anonymous No.213891424
>>213890306
>dresses as a dog
he's clearly a bear though
Anonymous No.213891770
>>213891197
Wrong.
Anonymous No.213891844
Itโ€™s a reference to historical faggot Jay Dilks. He was a professional golfer and a diddler extreme.
Anonymous No.213892016 >>213892805 >>213896254 >>213898913
>>213891197
Intuition is unconscious. Kubrick was all intellect. Somebody like Lynch or Tarkovsky would put stuff in their movies that just "felt right" without having a detailed explanation of why of, but Kubrick was extremely conscious on all fronts in a way that made his works purely intellectual. They're good movies, but it's a different approach and one that, as I age, I'm not as interested in as the opposite.

>>213891245
I read about the boxes he had made once. He paid out the ass and commissioned an extremely specific custom design from a factory down to the exact cardboard, dimensions, the way the lids fit on, everything, just because the lack of uniformity in his document storage was triggering him. That's how he made movies. I wonder sometimes how many men cut from that kind of cloth have been totally smothered by the state of the world today. If he was actually born in 2001, Kubrick would be on Discord right now erotic RPing as Tails the Fox and having meltdowns about board rules.
Anonymous No.213892293
>>213890242 (OP)

Watched it for the first time when I was like 13/14 and it was easily the most disturbing thing in the film, the thing that stuck with me. But I hadn't registered what they were actually doing, what they were really up to. When I re-watched around 19 or so I did a headslap.
Anonymous No.213892351
>>213890242 (OP)
In the book, the dog-guy says he wants to eat the kid's cock. Literally.
Anonymous No.213892432
Uhm, so why was this scene in the show?
Anonymous No.213892805
>>213892016

I understand what you're saying, but in some interview materials he does speak of a certain intuition that he can't fully explain, "like liking a certain girl". For him there was a little mystery as to why he liked a certain shot or presentation. But yes, his method was laborious, painstaking, slow, and autistic. It's why the Napoleon project got shelved: someone else just released a movie around the same period and beat him to the punch because he was too slow in development (it's very common for two movies with virtually the same subject matter to be in development and/or released right around the same time, he was on the winning side of this one with Dr. Strangelove by suing the competition and forcing his film to get released first).

It's why he had card catalogues full of sources, text and pictures relating to whatever project he was working on, he wanted to have lots of material to sift through until he got the one he felt was right. Drove his actors nuts with this, of course, especially poor Scatman in that one god-damn conversation with Danny at the end of Act I where they were made to do 148 takes, the most of any one scene. Spent a lot of time listening to previously-existing, already-performed classical music while doing this stuff (i.e. not original scores or soundtracks) and the juxtaposition in 2001 was successful, to put it mildly. "Yes, that will work well with the spaceplane".
Anonymous No.213892890
>>213890242 (OP)
it's a pedo allegory
Anonymous No.213892953
>>213890242 (OP)
Holy fuck that labubu is hughe haha
Anonymous No.213893022
>>213890863
Read the book recently, the part where he shows up in a corridor and barks and raves at Danny is pretty creepy. Got very strong BioShock vibes, this could easily have been a scene from the Cohen level (they were probably inspired by this in no small measure).
Anonymous No.213893027
>>213891094
lmao Dunning-Kruger post at full display
Anonymous No.213893074
>>213890863
>guy's gay sub
Is this a Jared Fogle reference?
Anonymous No.213893881
>>213891253
this anon gets it. jack forced danny to perform oral pleasure on him. Jack was always a pederast.
Anonymous No.213894144 >>213896287 >>213899198
>>213890242 (OP)
its implied through visual imagery that the dad was raping the kid, every time theres bears in the movie its related to sexual stuff being discussed or shown. So this is the most literal version of that, but it doesnt exactly explain why hes blowing a butler dude so idk really.
Anonymous No.213894494
bumping
Anonymous No.213895382
>>213891197
>Very sterile critique
you are sterile
Anonymous No.213895537
>>213890242 (OP)
Because it was in the book but had a lot of build up to whom they were and what it meant, and Stanley cut all that, and jammed in this one bizarre clip of a notorious bootlegger that owned the hotel getting blown by a sycophant faggot that the bootlegger kills later. The ghost menaces Danny for a while in the book threatening to bite his cock off.
Anonymous No.213895666
>>213890242 (OP)
Wilfred promo
Anonymous No.213895680 >>213895740
>>213890242 (OP)
To show that being a furry is fucking gay.
Anonymous No.213895740
>>213895680
six seven
Anonymous No.213895857 >>213895949
Symbol for how Jack was sexually abusing Danny
Anonymous No.213895932 >>213895978 >>213896009 >>213896052 >>213896218
>>213890863
Is he dog or a man in a costume. The other thread said he was a dog in book
Anonymous No.213895949
>>213895857
six seven
Anonymous No.213895978
>>213895932
six seven
Anonymous No.213896009 >>213896045
>>213895932
in the movie he was a dog in a man costume
Anonymous No.213896045
>>213896009
No I'm pretty sure he was a man in a dog costume in the movie. Or bear but everyone is saying dog so
Anonymous No.213896052 >>213896083
>>213895932
he comes from a masquerade scene, he's a man in a dog suit.
Anonymous No.213896083 >>213896266
>>213896052
In the book aswell? I know in the movie it's a man
Anonymous No.213896218
>>213895932
He is a man in a dog costume, an inversion of an animal wearing a man costume that is coming apart at the seams and, if you will, reverting to his most primal state, that is to say Jack.
This signifies Jack being fucked in the ass.
Anonymous No.213896254
>>213892016
It doesn't matter why he did something, it's about whether it makes you feel something and if it says something. His movies did both, same or better as someone who just did what felt right.
Anonymous No.213896266
>>213896083
in the book, yes
Anonymous No.213896287 >>213896310
>>213894144
Jack is the butler, he's been there forever.
Anonymous No.213896310
>>213896287
oh...ok
Anonymous No.213896620
>>213890242 (OP)
>dogs lick your face
>they give you head
>STUFFED animal with cock
Anonymous No.213897612
>>213890242 (OP)
Entire movie was Kubrick telling the audience what they already knew or suspected-King is a pedo and peddles softcore pedophilia to his audience. This is why King hated the film and Kubrick.
Anonymous No.213898913
>>213892016
where did you read about the box stuff? I am feeling quite inspired by it.
Anonymous No.213899198 >>213904775
>>213894144
what's the connection between the bears and sexual abuse stuff? like why that particular symbol? does it relate to something else?
Anonymous No.213899268
>>213890242 (OP)
you know exactly what this scene is about
Anonymous No.213899401
>>213890242 (OP)
that kubrick is based
Anonymous No.213899491
>>213890242 (OP)
Something something the elites have kinks impossible for plebs to grasp, therefore scarier because we're making a horror movie, don't forget it!
Anonymous No.213900902
>>213890242 (OP)
HOW IS THE BLOWJOB HAPPENING ?????
I have never seen anyone ask this. The pers9n on their knees is wearing a mask that fully covers their face... is it even supposed to be a BJ
Anonymous No.213902922
the film really is nothing without this shot. it brings everything together, somehow.
Anonymous No.213903532
>>213890961
what's scary about the average white women's pass time
Anonymous No.213904175
>>213890306
King wrote a prequel for The Shining that also featured that guy. It was pretty depressing desu
Anonymous No.213904204
>>213890242 (OP)
Showing off the degenerate nature of white '''people'''
Anonymous No.213904499 >>213904798 >>213904910
>>213890242 (OP)
you tell me
Anonymous No.213904683
>>213890306
It's called furries. They are real and if only theye stopped at that.
Anonymous No.213904775
>>213899198
bear/bare skin, teddy bears are a common child's toy. the people here saying you need to read the book are retarded. as for the butler. who knows, butler, butt, buttsex lmao. stanley put a lot of double entendres with characters names in his films, along with suggestive dialogue.
Anonymous No.213904798
>>213904499
there is also a bare, bear ass in this clip, with the butt-ler.
Anonymous No.213904837
>>213890242 (OP)
It's deleted page from the book that Kubris insisted on adapting (partially).
Basically, this was sort of Smithens and Burns situation. Where the fur guy wanted to suck off his boss, and his friend convinced him to come into a ball in hotel wearing a fur outfit (supposedly there was a costume party). But they lied and everyone made fun of him in the party. And even his boss lost respect for him.
So, the next day, having been deprived of all dignity, he killed his boss and himself.
Anonymous No.213904910
>>213904499
>watching videos of people watching movies
What the fuck is wrong with zoomers
Anonymous No.213904926
>>213890242 (OP)
Because it's a horrific scene of abnormal behavior. It fits perfectly in a horror film.