← Home ← Back to /tv/

Thread 213895765

163 posts 50 images /tv/
Anonymous No.213895765 >>213896444 >>213896801 >>213899039 >>213900862 >>213905264 >>213907790 >>213908348 >>213908780 >>213911995 >>213913060
this kills the plinkettchud
Anonymous No.213896444
>>213895765 (OP)
NICE THREAD
Anonymous No.213896801 >>213901022 >>213908478 >>213908835
>>213895765 (OP)
Um actually, no characters in the Prequels have any discernible personality traits, the sample group made up of Mike's friends said so
Anonymous No.213896850 >>213896872 >>213896897 >>213906036 >>213906911
Not sure how this image is supposed to work when ROTJ was a total mockery of the American soldiers who died in Vietnam whereas Mike was on internet forums going "my country right or wrong" over the invasion of Iraq
Anonymous No.213896867 >>213896932 >>213898894 >>213901043
am i retarded? what am i looking at
Anonymous No.213896872
>>213896850
>comparing the Viet Cong to tiny cuddly teddy bears
DAS RACIST AS FUCK YO
Anonymous No.213896897 >>213896916 >>213907790
>>213896850
>george is based
>mike is a retard
that's what the image is saying, yes
Anonymous No.213896916 >>213904206
>>213896897
So you fundamentally misunderstand the meme bullseye chart then
Anonymous No.213896932 >>213896936 >>213898894
>>213896867
No clue, but it just feels right.
Anonymous No.213896936
>>213896932
alright respect
Anonymous No.213897956 >>213902613
>YOU CANT NITPICK MY 5 HOUR LONG NITPICKINGS OF STAR WARS MOVIES YOU FUCKING CHUDS!!
>FUCK DISNEY, ALSO HERE'S ALL THE DISNEY TOYS I ********IRONICALLY******* BOUGHT
Anonymous No.213898578
report eceleb threads as off-topic
Anonymous No.213898894 >>213899008 >>213901932 >>213904234 >>213905970 >>213907840 >>213908348 >>213908787
>>213896867
>>213896932
The image you're looking at are "empathy circles"
Each concentric ring, starting from the center, abstracts further and further out.
So we start at the center representing the self, then immediate family, then extended, and friends, and so on and so forth until we get to mammals, animals, insects, all life, inanimate objects like rocks, and further

The study in question happened to notice that those with more conservative leaning tendencies had empathy circles that trended on the left. Whereas those with more liberal leaning tendencies trended towards the figure on the right.
Anonymous No.213898942
the prequels sucked dick, anakin was only a likable character with the added context of the clone wars series
Anonymous No.213899008 >>213899066 >>213899399 >>213901190 >>213905305 >>213905396 >>213907951 >>213912342
>>213898894
so libtards are out there empathizing with rocks while conservatives are providing for their families, that tracks
Anonymous No.213899039
>>213895765 (OP)
Keep seething prequelfags! Plinkett forever!
Anonymous No.213899066 >>213899399
>>213899008
yes exactly
Anonymous No.213899399 >>213900497 >>213900824 >>213901716 >>213901932 >>213905324 >>213905410 >>213906979 >>213907835 >>213908864 >>213911947
>>213899008
>>213899066
The image is lightly misleading, however. It should be noted that wherever you end on the empathy circle, you inherently empathize with all those circles within.
So it's more about where your empathy stops. Those that tend to be more conservative seem to have their empathy end around the friend level. Whereas those that trend liberal seem to have their empathy extend all the way out, but still including all those levels within.

However, one could make the argument that a person only has so much capacity. And that dedicating your energy tightly you are able to benefit more. And if everyone focused on tighter empathy circles, we'd have a better society with more love -- despite those circles only ending at the friend level.
You could also say the opposite, however.
Anonymous No.213899467
the prequels are more fun to watch and thats the whole point of movies
Anonymous No.213900497 >>213900824 >>213905396
>>213899399
This, rightoids getting oneshotted by a study they completely misunderstood is so on brand
Anonymous No.213900824 >>213903133
>>213899399
>>213900497
Okay, rocklover.
Anonymous No.213900862 >>213900949 >>213906157 >>213907146 >>213908093 >>213914475 >>213915619
>>213895765 (OP)
that chart was always misunderstood by chuds and i don't understand how

it doesn't mean liberals care more about rocks than about their family, it means they care about their family but they also care about rocks - it's a range not intensity
Anonymous No.213900949 >>213901216 >>213903133
>>213900862
>he said as abdul and pooshit made him a second class citizen in his own country
Anonymous No.213901022 >>213901269 >>213907097
>>213896801
Sheev has more personality than the entire cast of the original trilogy.
Anonymous No.213901043
>>213896867
It represents their dicks
Anonymous No.213901190
>>213899008
But what if you have very strong empathy for your family and animals and plants, but not for any of the brown people in between, or bugs.
Anonymous No.213901216
>>213900949
that's totally irrelevant to the point at hand though
Anonymous No.213901269
>>213901022
In memes, not in the movies.
Anonymous No.213901716
>>213899399
>You could also say the opposite, however.
nah
Anonymous No.213901932 >>213903105
>>213898894
>>213899399

naw brother youre schizo
Anonymous No.213902613 >>213903008
>>213897956
they're detached irony-poisoned hypocrites and contrarians
you can't trust them to be sincere or consistent
Anonymous No.213903008 >>213903034
>>213902613
They've always been sincere and consistent. What has actually changed?
Anonymous No.213903034
>>213903008
mike has never made a serious film, mike hides behind plinkett to avoid being a video essayist, mike loves tim & eric
Anonymous No.213903105
>>213901932
you have the iq of a rock
Anonymous No.213903106
RLM bent the knee to this btw
Anonymous No.213903133 >>213905164
>>213900949
>>213900824
>t. Empathy starts and stops with Israel
Anonymous No.213903251
woefully inaccurate. Fat Mike doesn't care about anyone.
Anonymous No.213904206 >>213906190
>>213896916
No one understands that retarded pic.
Anonymous No.213904234
>>213898894
But Lucas is a borderline communist
Anonymous No.213905164 >>213905236 >>213905423 >>213912385
>>213903133
>do you want to vote for unlimited money for Israel (red)? Or infonote money for Israel (blue plus open borders and drag queen story hour)
Anonymous No.213905236 >>213905528
>>213905164
Nobody ever gave "unlimited money" to Israel. If you combine their countries the Arabs arguably got more military aid from the US actually.

This whole obsession with jews is fucking retarded.
Anonymous No.213905264 >>213905329
>>213895765 (OP)
We need to make more graph memes of that graph because it's so poignant.
Anonymous No.213905305
>>213899008
That is the entire breakdown of the graph and the memes from a couple of months ago, yes. I have a reaction on my computer where it's the libtard graph and it says "OPINION DISCARDED" in big Dark Souls "YOU DIED" font, lol.
Anonymous No.213905324
>>213899399
It's a weight, idiot. Libtards are weighted "out there" by nature of the question and the graph. You're speaking nonsense.
Anonymous No.213905329
>>213905264
Anonymous No.213905396 >>213905410 >>213906008 >>213906108 >>213907021
>>213899008
>>213900497
>you inherently empathize with all those circles within
No you don't, that's not what the study is saying. The study is about prioritization, and that liberals prioritize the out group over their own group. Thats the entire point of using a heat map, to show where each groups empathy is centralized (who the prioritize the most).

This isn't even a new concept. Charles Dickens was criticizing the same phenomenon of telescopic philanthropy in the 19th century.
Anonymous No.213905410
>>213905396
meant to also reply to >>213899399
Anonymous No.213905423
>>213905164
Bold of you to assume i'm a filthy muttoid
Anonymous No.213905528
>>213905236
>hurr durr they haven't been given a million billion dollars all at once!!
You don't understand how finance institutions and their machinations actually works.
Anonymous No.213905970 >>213907924 >>213908855 >>213912069
>>213898894
Lefties will put the life of a brown person 3000 miles aways over their own child
Anonymous No.213906008 >>213906960
>>213905396
It's not, though.
Anonymous No.213906036 >>213907025
>>213896850
Prequelfags and Snyderfags share the same DNA, that's why both falsely attribute right wing beliefs to the creators of the movies they love despite both being outspoken liberals.
Anonymous No.213906108 >>213906960
>>213905396
That's actually exactly what the study says, lol.

From the supplementary material
>Supplementary Note 4.
>Note that in this scale, the number you select includes the numbers below it as well. So, if you select 10 (all mammals), you are also including numbers 1-9 (up to 'all people on all continents') in your moral circle.

The study where these circles come from is called Ideological Differences in the Expanse of the Moral Circle .
Anonymous No.213906157
>>213900862
>it means they care more
It means they signal irreciprocal fealty when the cost of doing so is 0
This kind of research is especially prone to the observer effect.
Anonymous No.213906190
>>213904206
Selfish vs selfless.
Anonymous No.213906911
>>213896850
>Mike was on internet forums going "my country right or wrong" over the invasion of Iraq
Yeah, I'm sure the opinions he held at 25 are the same ones he swears by today, anon. That's totally how people work.
Anonymous No.213906960 >>213907868 >>213909082
>>213906108
>>213906008
>Heatmaps indicating highest moral allocation by ideology
>One caveat to Study 3a is that we constrained the number of units that participants could assign to each group, forcing participants to distribute moral concern in a zero-sum fashion (i.e., the more concern they allocate to one circle, the less they can allocate to another circle).
Yes it is. Its zero sum. Again, that's the point of the heat map. To show who they (don't) prioritize. Its saying that liberals (at best) don't care about their family more than random strangers or animals.

>Although research suggests that people indeed do distribute empathy and moral concern in a zero-sum fashion24,25,26, this feature of Study 3a imposes an artificial constraint. Therefore, to examine whether a similar pattern would emerge without this constraint, we conducted Study 3b to test whether the effect would replicate using unlimited units.
>Study 3b is a conceptual replication of Study 3a, allowing participants unlimited moral units to distribute to various circles... Again, these findings demonstrate that liberals and conservatives differ not in the total amount of moral regard per se but rather they differ in their patterns of how they distribute their moral regard.

Literally just read the study.
Anonymous No.213906979 >>213907063
>>213899399

Empathy is entirely zero sum. You can't "love everyone." You have to frequently choose between this or that person, thing.

Regardless, no, leftists don't "equally love" their neighbors, family, native countrymen, they positively revile them. The love for other things is more a strange reflection of their seething hatred for their ingroup and traditions.
Anonymous No.213907021 >>213907072 >>213907080
>>213905396
But conservatives slash even more aid for those at home than those abroad. They kick their kids out of the house at 18 and burn through all the money/property that could have been passed down on cruises and golf.
Anonymous No.213907025
>>213906036
>Prequelfags and Snyderfags share the same DNA
Yes
Anonymous No.213907063 >>213907109 >>213907126
>>213906979
>Source: I made it up
Anonymous No.213907072
>>213907021
My parents are far left and did the exact same thing. It's a western boomer thing, not a left-right attribute.
Anonymous No.213907080
>>213907021

No they don't. Over taxation in order to fund various welfare/grift groups in DC isn't "ingroup empathy." Wanting to keep what you earn so you can keep it in family and pass it down is. Forced charity isn't empathetic. This isn't even an argument dipshit you aren't going to sit here and pretend like the emphasis on family/nation is similar for lefties and righties, it's pretty much the defining schism for white people.
Anonymous No.213907097
>>213901022
checked. after spending more hours than I'm willing to admit reading (((non-canon))) Star Wars books I finally understand the prequel politics, which all hinge on Palpatine and his motives.

Palpatine and his Master Darth Plagueis are attempting to dominate the galaxy by means of political manipulation. Plagueis is tied to the banks and uses his wealth to fund groups that will benefit him. As a political figure, and eventual Senator of Naboo, Palpatine focuses on manipulating the Trade Federation. On one side, he pressed Supreme Chancellor Valorum to impose taxes on the Trade Federation - this will strengthen the Republic by bringing in more credits. At the same time, this will offend the Trade Federation, who see this taxation as theft. During this time, Palpatine also secretly works with pirate factions (e.g. the Nebula Front) to have them attack the Trade Federation - forcing the Trade Federation to bolster their defenses, namely by getting a Droid Army. Palpatine, now as Darth Sidious, tells the Trade Federation to enact a blockade on Naboo, which eventually a) erodes confidence in Supreme Chancellor Valorum and subsequently gets Palaptine elected in his place and b) further creates schisms between the worlds of the Republic - who continue to see the Republic as a large, slow, bureaucratic mess. This eventually leads into Separatist movement which is explored in Episode II.
Anonymous No.213907109
>>213907063

Nope. Look at how little they care about foreigners invading their country and marauding their fellow nationals. They're quicker to cry and scream when those same invaders are rounded up and detained or sent back. It's zero sum. You either prioritize your own, others, or no one. There's functionally no such thing as "loving everyone", that means it's useless. If someone assaults your child but you're too scared to hurt the assaulter because you "love him too", that's useless.
Anonymous No.213907126
>>213907063
The post above the one you replied to is quoting a source saying exactly that.
Anonymous No.213907146 >>213907732 >>213907998 >>213908213
>>213900862
It's deranged to care about rocks anywhere near as much as your family.
People throw rocks into the sea for a laugh. Not babies.
Anonymous No.213907732 >>213907755
>>213907146
again, you are misreading the graph

it's not about intensity of care, and it's not about how much you care about one thing compared to another

if someone loved their family more than anything in the world, and also felt slightly bad when someone crushed a pretty rock, they would be placed on the outer part of the circle
Anonymous No.213907755 >>213907794 >>213907998
>>213907732

Read the study, it is quite literally specified as zero sum, you have to apportion a set amount of units and prioritize. You are talking out of your ass, wishfully. It is exactly as bad as it sounds, leftists hate their family and their country.
Anonymous No.213907790
>>213896897
You got it right
>>213895765 (OP)
I'm embarrassed I listened to that whole video
>shits on Prequels for the millionth time
>oh actually I LIKED The Acolyte
>and it's so similar to the prequels
>?????
Every time I think RLM cannot possibly have a shittier Star Wars take, the surpass it.
Anonymous No.213907794 >>213907815 >>213907849
>>213907755
i read the study, and you are factually incorrect
Anonymous No.213907815 >>213907843 >>213907874 >>213907998
>>213907794

>NOOOOOOOOOO THE DEMOGRAPHIC THAT HAS NEVER BOTHERED TO HIDE HOW MUCH THEY AVIDLY HATE THEIR NATION, TRADITIONS, FATHERS, AND WILL NEVER MISS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT A FOREIGNER OR NIGGER FIRST IS ACTUALLY JUST AS INGROUP EMPATHETIC

do you hear yourself?
Anonymous No.213907835
>>213899399
Based, it's hilarious that every conservative who posts this doesn't understand it at all
Anonymous No.213907840
>>213898894
Cool but what does any of that have to do with fucking Star Wars lol
Anonymous No.213907843 >>213907873 >>213907961
>>213907815
you legitimately need to go talk to people irl
Anonymous No.213907849 >>213907874 >>213907998
>>213907794
>refusal to admit when they're wrong
yeah, you're a lefty aren't ya?
Anonymous No.213907860 >>213907870 >>213907998
itt: deranged leftists coping
haha
>bro they care just as much about their friends and community as they do the poor people living 500 miles away and the trees 15000 miles away
okay
Anonymous No.213907868 >>213908213
>>213906960
Yeah, read the study.
>Its saying that liberals (at best) don't care about their family more than random strangers or animals.
It doesn't.
>>Note that in this scale, the number you select includes the numbers below it as well. So, if you select 10 (all mammals), you are also including numbers 1-9 (up to 'all people on all continents') in your moral circle.
You realize this is from the same study? This is the instruction to Study 3a. So no, it means that liberals overall care about more than their family, but they absolutely also care about their own family.
Anonymous No.213907870 >>213907965
>>213907860
reddit post
Anonymous No.213907873 >>213907910 >>213907998
>>213907843
everyone I talk to IRL say they hate leftists, even leftists as long as you frame the discussion outside the normal political memes. imagine living in a world where something as pure fucking evil as MAID exists and defending it unironically.
Anonymous No.213907874
>>213907849
>>213907815
I think you guys are getting trolled.
Anonymous No.213907910
>>213907873
MAID is a capitalist invention and supporting it is a politically right position
Anonymous No.213907924 >>213912011 >>213912016 >>213912069
>>213905970
Rightoids love children just a little bit too much tho
Anonymous No.213907951 >>213909027
>>213899008
Conservicucks are not very smart, are they
Anonymous No.213907961 >>213907998
>>213907843

>he thinks my disdain from leftists is due to unfamiliarity

I'm basically a Cuban refugee
Anonymous No.213907965 >>213907973 >>213907998 >>213908012
>>213907870
no one cares what leftards "think" if you can call it thinking
Anonymous No.213907973
>>213907965
go back to /r/conservative
Anonymous No.213907998 >>213908122 >>213908183
>>213907965
>>213907961
>>213907873
>>213907860
>>213907849
>>213907815
>>213907755
>>213907146
https://test.mensa.no/home/test/en
do not reply to this post if you score less than 130
Anonymous No.213907999 >>213908088 >>213908249
The paper is here

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336076674_Ideological_differences_in_the_expanse_of_the_moral_circle

>ll participants completed a moral allocation task, in which partici-pants allocated 100 “moral units”among the following 16 categories, pictured asincreasingly large concentric circles (see full depiction of task in SupplementaryNote 4): all of your immediate family; all of your extended family; all of your closestfriends; all friends including more distant friends; all acquaintances; all peopleyou have ever met; all people in your country; all people on your continent;all people on all continents; all mammals on all continents; allamphibians, reptiles, mammals, fish, and birds; all animals on earth includingparamecia and amoebae; all animals in the universe, including alien lifeforms; allliving things in the universe including plants and trees; all natural things in theuniverse including inert entities such as rocks; all things in existence.

It is zero sum, and leftists did allocate the majority of their "moral units" to non familial, non parochial entities. Is it shocking to anyone that they're universalists? They don't hide it. It's actually a very interesting paper that shows how human behavior can naturally fray and decompose as society becomes too secure and prosperous. They have literally forgotten the value of family/community because they rely on a faceless, universalist "state" and "global family."
Anonymous No.213908012
>>213907965
Anonymous No.213908029
It's hard to believe that so many people here used to hate on the prequels because of them. It's genuinely hard and yet funny to think about.
Anonymous No.213908088
>>213907999
A natural byproduct of Liberalism.
>be me
>grow up close to all your extended family
>age 9, dad moves for work, now you hardly see yout extended family anymore
>decades later
>reconnect through fucking funerals of all things with your family, and find you are more comfortable and at ease with them than anyone else
>i literally 'forgot' how important and good family was, because my dad needed a better job
>many such cases, hence leftists being leftists
Anonymous No.213908093
>>213900862
Are you retarded?
Let me explain to you how the graph works:
Red = care more
Green = care less

So yes, they care more about random lieforms they never met (tropical bugs, aliens, palestinians...etc) than about their own family
Anonymous No.213908122 >>213908629
>>213907998
>do not reply to this post if you score less than 130
I'll happily post my score just after you do :)
Anonymous No.213908183 >>213908629
>>213907998
I've taken real standardized tests and was offered a scholarship to graduate school, you brown troon supporter. Your IQ is def not 130 lmao
Anonymous No.213908213 >>213908263 >>213908272
>>213907868
>number you select includes the numbers below it as well
which is exactly what
>Its saying that liberals (at best) don't care about their family more than random strangers or animals.
means, that liberals treat family and their strangers pet equally. This guy >>213907146 summed it up succinctly. What the fuck do you think "zero sum" means? reread what I quoted very slowly.

You are purposefully ignoring everything the study says about
>"distribute moral concern in a zero-sum fashion"
and
>"these findings demonstrate that liberals and conservatives differ not in the total amount of moral regard per se but rather they differ in their patterns of how they distribute their moral regard."
Because you know it contradicts your argument completely.
Anonymous No.213908249 >>213908299
>>213907999
No, you're confused. That's not what the heatmaps are based on. That's Fig 4 and Fig 6.

Heatmap is based on this:
>Finally, we assessed the heatmaps generated by participants’ clicks on the rung they felt best represented the extent of their moral circle. These qualitative results also demonstrated that liberals (individuals who selected 1, 2, or 3 on the ideology measure) selected more outer rungs, whereas conservatives (individuals who selected 5, 6, or 7 on the ideology measure) selected more inner rungs (see Fig. 5).
>. In addition, participants also completed a more qualitative measure of the extent of their moral circle by clicking on rungs extending outward and representing the same categories as in the moral allocation task (see Supplementary Note 4). This measure allowed us to create heatmaps to visualize the relative sizes of liberals’ and conservatives’ moral circles.

And from the supplementary note:
>Please click on a number that depicts the extent of your moral circle. Note that in this scale, the number you select includes the numbers below it as well. So, if you select 10 (all mammals), you are also including numbers 1-9 (up to 'all people on all continents') in your moral circle.
Anonymous No.213908263 >>213908437
>>213908213

The rocks thing is kind of distracting to the larger argument. The more pertinent phenomenon is that their locus of care centers around "the universe of living things." This highlights a disregard for the notion of family or neighbor. To them it's simply unimportant.
Anonymous No.213908272 >>213908437
>>213908213
>means, that liberals treat family and their strangers pet equally.
It doesn't. That's a different graph, it's not the heat map.
Anonymous No.213908299 >>213908753 >>213909082
>>213908249

It is literally talking about Fig 3a and that study, please kill yourself. Is there a single leftist on earth with a working brain at this point? Also why are you so ashamed of what you are? Why not just stop being that?
Anonymous No.213908325
If you're the kind of person that resorts to hair splitting and obfuscation when confronted with uncomfortable but obvious facts you need to be chopped into pieces and fed to dogs, you're basically a demon
Anonymous No.213908348 >>213908494 >>213908604
>>213898894
>>213895765 (OP)
In many ways it's wrong because ultimately Anakin feels very strongly about others.

To a much greater extent than Obiwan. He cares about justice, he cares about clones, he cares about droids.
He is talking about "universal love"
And truly believes this to be a core jedi tenet, while also being essentially the only Jedi to follow it.

Its just that he ALSO cares about his immediate family to a gargantuan degree. He would sacrifice the world for his wife. And he gives his life for his son.

Obiwans
Light in that graphic should be very dim.
Almost
Non existant.
Anonymous No.213908349
>most liberals include "all mammals" (and even "all animals") in their moral circle
>only something like 10% of said liberals are vegan

In reality that's more of a hypocrisy map than anything...
Anonymous No.213908437
>>213908272
>It doesn't
It does, I omitted the word "again" from the beginning of the quote. It's indicating they are saying the other graph is showing the same trend of moral distribution.

Also again, you are purposefully ignoring everything it says about zero sum distribution.

>>213908263
The rock quote just highlights the absurdity of it, but you are right. "Telescope Philanthropy" the name of the phenomenon which I mentioned in my first post.
Anonymous No.213908478
>>213896801
Anonymous No.213908494
>>213908348
Anakin is just overall a much more emotional person, which is antithetical to what the Jedi ideal.
Anonymous No.213908604 >>213908813
>>213908348

Ani is ingroup coded, the Jedi are outgroup coded. Ani cares and worries about his mother, Padme, Obi-Wan. He takes a special care to "his droids" C3P0 and R2. He has disdain for the generic universalist republic and would rather foster "his empire." He is parochial. He's driven insane by the constant willing apathy of the Jedi, their universalist complacency, their disregard for natural humanity, which includes emotion, attachment, care (remember they forbid attachment entirely).

The funny thing is, Lucas is probably more in the universalist group, and writes the Jedi tenets as righteous, characterizing Anakin as out of control and wayward. He characterizes care, attachment, ingroup priorities as "pathways to the dark side" and attack vectors for sith manipulation. But the movies clearly show a more balanced sense of care for one's own is necessary in order to protect them and foster cohesion and mutual love and respect. Or maybe Lucas does know this and he just hides his power level, who knows.
Anonymous No.213908629 >>213908849
>>213908122
here you go, done in 5 minutes
>>213908183
the only probable thing you were "offered" was a restraining order from every other woman in your life
Anonymous No.213908734 >>213908749 >>213908778
213908629
you're literally retarded if you think posting a pic indicating you made a good score on an ***online test*** has any relevance at all to any discussion.
I know that's a bit of a long sentence for a person who cares about online "iq tests", so maybe try reading it a few times slowly, brownoid.
Anonymous No.213908749
>>213908734
thanks for confirming you are a low iq gibbering monkey, and probably brown too. i accept your concession
Anonymous No.213908753 >>213908783 >>213908815
>>213908299
Do you think I make it up? What do you think this means?
>Please click on a number that depicts the extent of your moral circle. Note that in this scale, the number you select includes the numbers below it as well. So, if you select 10 (all mammals), you are also including numbers 1-9 (up to 'all people on all continents') in your moral circle.
It's what the heatmap is based on. The heatmap shows the extent of moral circles, not preferences.
For preferences you have other Figures.

This is not hard to comprehend.
Anonymous No.213908778
>>213908734
>"take this test, if you're not afraid!"
>"ok, done"
>"uhhhh you think that proves anything other than that you're retarded for taking the test LOL?"
Anonymous No.213908780
>>213895765 (OP)
>RLM are subversive redditor faggots
True.
15 years too late, but I am glad people are figuring it out.
Anonymous No.213908783 >>213908825 >>213909641
>>213908753

100 moral units. 100. Set number. You allocate and weight based off of your priorities. It's zero sum. They had the full freedom to weight family/nation higher just like parochialists and they did not. Because they literally don't. Kill yourself.
Anonymous No.213908787
>>213898894
It's a misleading graphic because it's highlighting the rings as if that's where the most focus is, when it's really as far as your empathy possibly stretches and then no word on how you rank what's inside that. So if your empathy stretches to dead rocks it could just mean that you're against blowing up the grand canyon for no reason, but you still prioritize your family and humans.
Anonymous No.213908813 >>213908879
>>213908604
Well, I'd argue that anakin strives towards empire due to feelings of wanting to help people. Like genuinely belong, and he feels Padme is the best shot towards that.

His methods are focused on the in group, but he has genuine love for broader society.
Anonymous No.213908815
>>213908753
Look at this sputtering brainbroken dork that literally can't read or admit anything. You can cite and screenshot the exact portion that describes the procedure and he's still faggotly going on about how that simply can't be it. Somebody get him a straightjacket
Anonymous No.213908825 >>213908894 >>213908941
>>213908783
>Please click on a number that depicts the extent of your moral circle. Note that in this scale, the number you select includes the numbers below it as well. So, if you select 10 (all mammals), you are also including numbers 1-9 (up to 'all people on all continents') in your moral circle.

>the extent of your moral circle
>the extent of your moral circle
>the extent of your moral circle
>the extent of your moral circle
Anonymous No.213908832
I hate 4chan now

Now all you need to do to "sway board opinion" is just ban evade and spam the same shitty post/opinion every hour and eventually thew retarded shit-eating masses will just go along with it for some reason
Anonymous No.213908835
>>213896801
they also break the rules when discussing ot characters
Anonymous No.213908849
>>213908629
fake as the day is long. You likely got that from an image search. nothing you have said indicates you have any real intelligence.
Anonymous No.213908855 >>213912016
>>213905970
More of a foid problem than a leftoid problem, though there is plenty of overlap.
Anonymous No.213908864 >>213908956
>>213899399
>zero people calling out this post for AI slop
>all ragebait replies talking about le owning the chuds
You fags gotta stop falling for it.
Anonymous No.213908879
>>213908813

I'm going to really blow your mind: you can only really "help people" in your direct radius of care. This is why, naturally, we have instincts to put those in our radius first. We get to know them and tend to them. As I mentioned, universalism is a non starter. It encourages general apathy and disconnection by definition, you can't truly "care" about everything all at once, it's nothing. Sending taxes and bags of cash out into the ether isn't care. Investing time and money into your wife, kids, community, town, is.

You don't hate the outgroup due to putting the ingroup first, that's a misconception. You, as a small individual, can only do so much, and your efforts are best felt closely.
Anonymous No.213908894 >>213908932
>>213908825
What the fuck to you think the study is talking about when it says "zero sum"?
Anonymous No.213908932 >>213908967 >>213909082
>>213908894
another part of the study you braindead chattering chuddie
Anonymous No.213908941 >>213911704
>>213908825

K I L L
Y O U R S E L F
Anonymous No.213908956 >>213908974
>>213908864
Except multiple keeps replying trying to defend this AI slop. Anon used AI to try and summarize the study because he's too retarded to read and understand it himself.
Anonymous No.213908967
>>213908932

It's literally study 3a you window licking little dick turd
Anonymous No.213908974
>>213908956
he's likely indian.
Anonymous No.213909027 >>213909066 >>213909108
>>213907951
libtards are generally more intelligent but attract some retards who want to appear intelligent by association and conservicucks are generally less intelligent but attract some intelligent people who feel the need to herd the cattle
Anonymous No.213909066 >>213909194
>>213909027

They're not intelligent, they just exclude their mass of black and brown retard loyalist voters every time they cobble together some kind of fanciful "libtard intelligence study." This is fallacious, the demographics are objectively coupled.
Anonymous No.213909082 >>213909641
>>213908932
Read the first sentense of the final paragraph from this image >>213908299
>"We also explained to participants that these categories were non-overlapping such that giving to one category (e.g extended family) would not include an inclusive category (e.g, immediate family).
>Non-overlapping
>not inclusive

Also this post >>213906960
>"distribute moral concern in a zero-sum fashion"
is about study 3a, the graph this entire discussion is about.

Either you haven't read shit, have shit for brains, or are purposefully talking shit.
Anonymous No.213909108 >>213909230
>>213909027
>more intelligent
more midwits, maybe. who, strangely, are the demographic with the dumbest ideas. if you ask someone if it's okay to fuck their own daughter, low-IQs and high-IQs both will say that's deranged, while midwits will say "sure, if you use a condom!"
this goes for basically any position you can imagine. you can always convince a midwit that whatever you're doing is actually OK as long as you use arguments that make sense to them. because they can't think for themselves. low-IQs can't think for themselves either, but at least they go with their gut rather than trusting their retarded consciousness for answers.
Anonymous No.213909194 >>213909459
>>213909066
ok retard
Anonymous No.213909230
>>213909108
ok dumbnut
Anonymous No.213909444 >>213909471
Lucas is a classical liberal. Not a neo libtard.
Anonymous No.213909459 >>213911982
>>213909194

Ok nigger
Anonymous No.213909471
>>213909444

"Libertarians" and lefties are getting exposed as largely one and the same. Their core tenet is cosmopolitan globalism, they're willing to compromise on the economic minutiae to achieve this and band together to oppose others. The question of our time is nationalism vs globalism.
Anonymous No.213909534
>leftists can't even read a study written in English
haha
Anonymous No.213909614
>"Why yes, I respect all life forms equally"
>*eats animals and plants but refuses to eat humans*
Anonymous No.213909641
>>213908783
Fig. 4 is based on this part, not the heatmap. Both liberals and conservatives allocated more units to humans, so it's not true that they care more about plants.

>In addition, participants also completed a more qualitative measure of the extent of their moral circle by clicking on rungs extending outward and representing the same categories as in the moral allocation task (see Supplementary Note 4). This measure allowed us to create heatmaps to visualize the relative sizes of liberals’ and conservatives’ moral circles.
This is what the heatmap is based on.

>>213909082
This is Fig. 4.
>Personal moral allocation to humans and nonhumans by political ideology, Study 3a.
Anonymous No.213911704
>>213908941
this is for another part of the study you animal
Anonymous No.213911947 >>213911982
>>213899399
Classic chud L
Anonymous No.213911982
>>213911947
see >>213909459
Anonymous No.213911995
>>213895765 (OP)
This fag likes the prequels lol
Anonymous No.213912011
>>213907924
now show the democrat one
Anonymous No.213912016 >>213912069 >>213912286
>>213907924
>>213908855
leftoids are prey animals, plain and simple
Anonymous No.213912063
Star wars is gay
George Lucas is a leftist nigger lover
Ecelebs are dumber than fuck and you have to be a real big faggot to watch them
Is there anything else we should know about you to call you even gayer you little bitch?
Anonymous No.213912069
>>213905970
>>213907924
>>213912016
>yes goy argue back and forth just don't look up!
Kill yourselves.
Anonymous No.213912285 >>213912463
Meesa...meesa getting kind of pissed of.
Anonymous No.213912286
>>213912016
>white hag dragged to death
My racism is fading
Anonymous No.213912342 >>213912405 >>213912462 >>213912892
>>213899008
Funny how sociology isn't a real science but when it fits your views fake 200 sample size sensationalist trash is suddenly valid.
Anonymous No.213912385
>>213905164
You forgot where the first group also pardons pedophiles and sends them to Israel as well
Anonymous No.213912405
>>213912342
It appears true on its face. There are people that care more about random animals than their own family members. That exists.
Anonymous No.213912462 >>213912570
>>213912342
Funny how you're a faggot
Anonymous No.213912463
>>213912285
>Meesa...meesa getting kind of pissed of.
I fucking love those voicemails just because the lucas voice they use sounds pissed but so inebriated he's about to pass out.
Anonymous No.213912570 >>213912726
>>213912462
That would be the face of modern conservatism Peter Thiel and his mascara boyfriend the vice president.
Anonymous No.213912726
>>213912570
True.
I don't like gay kikes if that's what you were implying
Anonymous No.213912892
>>213912342
>Sociology is a real science except when it fits your views!
You're basically admitting you're guilty of same kind of hypocrisy.
Anonymous No.213913060
>>213895765 (OP)
You’re now realizing Mike is a woke liberal retard
Anonymous No.213914475
>>213900862
Loving your own family is the most right-wing thing you can do.
Think about it; you divide mankind into two groups: in-group that gets preferential treatment and out-group which doesn't and the ONLY thing that decides to which group you belong to is the circumstance of your birth.
It's the exact same logic that describes aristocracy, racism and nationalism.
That's why leftist policies inherently weaken the family unit and left-wing media love tha 'found-family' themes.
Anonymous No.213915619
>>213900862
Care is a limited resource, chemically in the brain and also practically in terms of where you can distribute your efforts, resources, and attentions. Caring about everything is functionally indistinguishable from caring about nothing. You WILL draw a line, either through action or inaction, and things will fall to the side and through the cracks as your own limitations prevent you from omnipresent omnipotent caretaking. To me, the graph shows a leftist need to have their cake and eat it too, while the right is more able to focus on their priorities and obligations, which requires being able to set things outside of the set of things one "cares about". Leftists seem to have no filter about what they latch onto emotionally, which absolutely tracks with the kind of histrionics endemic to them.